More Photoshopping of Todd Standing's "Sasquatch" Images?


Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Kevin Buresh, a sasquatch enthusiast.

Well, here we go again, folks...

Back in April, on the Bigfootforum....(under the username 'SweatyYeti')....I created/posted an animation which shows twigs disappearing from in front of the face of one of Todd's "Sasquatches" . Todd came up with a plausible sounding reason for how the branches disappeared...he claimed a fan of his, Alex Putney, removed the small branches using Photoshop. Personally, I have been a bit suspicious of this "fan" of Todd's...regarding his relationship to Todd.

But since then, I have been looking-over all of Todd's videos and 'still images', that I could find on-line....looking for any additional signs of Photoshopped images. And, I have found a few more.

Here is one new animation, of the subject Todd filmed in 2011...in which small branches once again appear/disappear from in front of the subject's face...(either within the very same image, or in two images taken very close in time to each other)...


One of those images must have been Photoshopped...since there is no possible way, physically, for the vertical twig to disappear from view...(by either the cameraman moving, or the camera being 'zoomed-in')....while the blurred green twigs (near the subject's left eye) remain within view of the camera, and in precisely the same alignment with the camera/subject. During the time those two pictures were taken....nothing could have moved.

Here is another pair of images of the same "Sasquatch"...in which ALL of the foreground and background objects have changed, while the subject's head maintains the same 'angle-of-view' relative to the camera...(it doesn't rotate, or tilt in any direction)...


In this instance, it would be physically possible for the subject and Todd to have moved laterally...enough so that the background/foreground objects could have changed...but it really isn't possible, or probable in a practical sense. The subject's head does not move... in any respect.

If this was a real, live creature in the wild....what are the odds of it moving to it's side a significant distance...(with Todd moving along with it)....and it never changing it's facial expression, or moving/rotating it's head in any direction??

One more definite example of Photoshopping....the top image has had 'white eye detail' added to the eyes...



The lower image is the higher-quality version of the same image...yet it shows none of the white eye detail that is clearly visible in the lower-quality version. How can that be?? Hint: Photoshop. It works wonders.

And last, but not least....here is one example of a physical change to the subject's face....the hair beside the mouth has moved, from one image to the other...


The only way that that could have happened, under the 'real Bigfoot' scenario...is for the creature to have brushed it's arm, or hand, across it's face. So, does Todd have footage of the subject raising it's arm up, and doing exactly that?? I kinda doubt that he does.

At least two...and probably three...of these images have been manipulated via Photoshop. I think Todd has some explaining to do.

Thanks for reading,
Kevin Buresh.

Comments

  1. The desire for permanent hair removal in both men and women has created a laser hair removal in gurgaon

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are you trying to say bigfoot don't exist? Yea, we already knew that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And to think. The footers you champion support this guy. What a blunder.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Its quite funny that sweati yeti will happily say this is a hoax but not the pgf. The reason is this is unambiguous enough that it is obviously a hoax so BFF damage control comes along to sort things out.

    This is killing 2 birds with one stone. Firstly it creates the illusion that there is a standard of acceptance of evidence. And secondly it boosts the perception that the pgf is real. Both complete and utter failures of course to any onlookers with even a single brain cell, but sure nice try.

    Protect the ambiguous pgf at all costs. The fundamental concept of the bigfoot religion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing more fundemental like than the expressive t**ds that can't cope with the opinions of an anthropologist, primatologist, wildlife biologist and costume expert... Yet they swallow the claims of an ex DJ that lies about a suit?

      The core of all fears of any 'skeptic' is the PGF. They cannot provide a suficient means of testing it, therefore better to deny it and the scientists that endorse it.

      Remember, the 'sketpics' want science to endorse the subject for legitimacy, yet label every scientist as a 'bigfooter' when they do.

      Rhetorical at best and the actions of chronic denialists. All praise the church of hearistics.

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    2. Obliterated footer meltdown^

      Delete
    3. Meltdown? This coming from the person who uses others' cut an pastes because I've bullied him around for too long?

      Self obliterated ever apparent.

      Delete
    4. Cut and pastes obliterate you with zero effort its great.

      Delete
    5. If those cut and pastes proved your point, it would be the case.

      Delete
    6. There is nothing for skeptics to prove. You are the ones that have something to prove. So in the meantime we like to show you how wrong you are.

      Keep trying though... I'm sure that evidence is "just round the corner"

      Delete
    7. You have nothing to prove, but still have to test the evidence that you require. In this case, it would be to show that the suggestion that the PGF is not organic, by demonstrate how that can be achieved.

      When this isn't archived and we have scientists presenting a case for legitimacy... And we have more footage, physical evidence and anecdotes accumilating ever since the footage was captured, is it any wonder why we have the best genticist in the world conducting a hominid study?

      Delete
    8. If there is this accumulation of footage, why are none even remotely close to the "quality" of the PGF?

      The only clear pictures of BF are known hoaxes or tampered images as well.

      And in conclusion, Joe told the skeptics best "you have nothing to prove."

      Delete
    9. There are more very rare examples of legitimate footage. It's as simple as that. The Freeman footage shows a creature with less detail acting more or less the same way as the PGF. We have other sources that show amazing stealth in terrain
      unachievable by normal humans, yet this is dismissed as mere hoaxing... It can always be a 'man in a suit' and you want more footage?

      Rhetorical.

      You have nothing to prove, that's a very obvious statement and one you've perpetuated for a long time, now you want to twist that because you deflect from having to test said evidence?

      Rhetorical.

      Delete
    10. How dare you use the Freeman footage as an example of footage in the same vein as PGF.

      Just because someone says it's unacheiveable doesn't make it so. And just because a normal senditary human can't doesn't mean no one can. A normal human can't throw a baseball 95+ but there are still some humans that can do it exceedingly well.

      Delete
    11. Are you saying Randy Johnson was "abnormal"?Start using "most" Daniel. It'll make you sound less foolish. "Mostly"

      Delete
    12. Firstly, I just did.

      Secondly, for an old guy and a small kid to put together a hoax where the subject leaps feet in the air, to then transition into bipedal motion... Doesn't fit. That's without going into the details of the subject's apparent physicality.

      If these subjects existed (which they do) then it is natural that every now and then people will manage to film them. Some come out as blobs, some come out with detail and others come out in motion.

      Delete
    13. As for "sedentary". Every player rides the bench between innings have a seat for a moment. I'm here now.

      Delete
    14. Daniel,a 'normal' person CANNOT throw 95mph.An abnormal person can but not a normal person.

      Delete
    15. Thank you that. Yes. Tall athletes are as normal as the next person. They just have more or unique ability.

      Delete
    16. If I could have thrown 95 at Texas A&M I would of made it to the pros.
      Mike H.

      Delete
    17. I could have been your catcher Mike. Like Wainright and Yadi.

      Delete
    18. Or maybe hit .300 for avg.
      Mike H.

      Delete
    19. Dan. I've got just a few clear pictures that are of a Bigfoot. I think we can all agree I'm not qualified to operate a Polaroid. So you think I'm hoaxing? With as many Blobsquatches as I've taken. Stop making broad sweeping Conclusory statements. You are not bringing your A game.

      Delete
    20. Bigdad. We coulda been contenders. We can still go Footin and have a blast.

      Delete
    21. If only I had the time.
      So many irons in the fire and not enough water to cool them.
      Maybe in the fall or winter.
      Things seem to slow down about then for me.
      Definitely want to do it.
      Mike H.

      Delete
    22. I would say he is an outlier for sure. 6'10", 100+ fastball, crazy slider, WSC, MVP, multiple CY and all stars. Definitely not normal.

      Since you provide nothing to me in terms of verified conclusive results, Mike, I can only assume you are either chasing the wind, fabricating a world of make believe, or being hoaxed.

      I've seen your google + pictures and they are hardly clear.

      Joe, the biggest red flag is staring you in the face and you are oblivious to it; an old man and a small boy, huh? Where's the middle person that would be father/brother/son, and the size of a full grown man, conveniently being filmed perhaps?

      Delete
    23. Is that your idea of debunking that video Danny? Is it really?? I used to go for walks with my grandfather quite often, and 'old man' was loosely used, he gentleman might not be that old at all. We don't know because we don't see him on camera. The motion and speed attained by he subject is your biggest obstacle.

      Mike works very hard, and when he's done doing that, he's in the field following genuine Sasquatch activity. Verifiying his work are some of the very best researchers and outdoorsmen in the country, people who have a million years on you Danny. Outside of that there is very little to verify woodknocks, tree structures whoops and gifting occurances... What can verify these things is trust and a basic understanding that where Mike is, nobody else goes.

      You may request a more scientific means of verification, but lucky nobody cares what you require.

      Delete
    24. I have people working with me on that. Thanks Joe. Every word true. And Joe knows who they are. Dan. If you knew the offers I have turned down you might begin to understand I'm not out to prove the existence of anything. When I got but memorial weekend I was staring at a 22" track filled with rain water I'm just biding my time and passing my research onto better brains. And yes Dan You've heard of them. Everyone has. But I'm no Bob Garett. My Subjects are raising babies here safely and protected. His are wild clans who can and are dangerous and aggressive. And be knows it. Bobs warnings are heard loud and clear and because of him I now protect myself. No jokes. I'm trying to be very serious here.

      Delete
    25. Jeez. It's not "debunking" it. I see no reason to debunk it. It's a non-factor to me, most people, and so on.

      I'm sure you enjoy long walks with old man, I never said you didn't.

      Defensive about Mike though. You shouldn't be. Again, it really doesn't play into my day to day life. It's simple, don't expect to be taken seriously by anyone outside of the footer crowd, until scientific evidence is conclusive and available. Even then without a type specimen you will still have a bunch of doubters.

      Delete
    26. Johnnie Chochran once told me, if it doesn't fit, ram it till it fits.

      Delete
    27. Non-factor's and day-to-day plays... Danny it means more to you than anything. Every contributing scientist, however impartial; would be another Footer. However legitimate the science used; type specimen is needed. It's how people like you worm out of the science applied so far.

      Rhetorical.

      Delete
    28. Dan. I agree. I'm no serious researcher. But I can put you next to one. It's just that simple. Sorry. Still trying to recover from the idiot above. No. Not defensive. But often shocked by stupidity. Look Dan. Keep being skeptical. It's a good thing. Just don't being the anonymous fool above who was gonna " do me one better" before he knew anything about the Subject Matter. Chick did. Y'all might want to listen to her. Girl knows her stuff. Have a great day. Even you Daniel.

      Delete
    29. Thanks for what you shared Mike. Because of the video, it is really effecting me more than just a story. Sickening, just sickening. You are right, Bob is brave to bring this out.

      Delete
    30. Yes. And what he's sharing is the tip of the iceberg. Those are real people Chick. That was real skin by that tent. That was real blood by that toilet paper roll. The urine everywhere were the Subjects. They tore the forest to bits. Their prints were everywhere. I'm going to stop the whole marking thing I do to their trees. Sometimes they tear them out. I'm backing off all aggressive technique for now.

      Delete
    31. Joe, it matters to me for the duration of my bowel movement, occasional lunch breaks, and right after I get stoned before I fall asleep.

      Categorically on my list of subjects spent concentrating or caring about, bigfoot in general is low on that list, not considering individual elements of that subject.

      Delete
    32. Yes, yes Daniel... Yes, yes... We believe you.

      (Sigh)

      Delete
    33. For the best Mike. Hope you never have a passer by with a bad attitude.

      The cover up is pissing me off. People have the right to know.

      Delete
    34. Great news people,I just stumbled upon a used colostomy bag I found in the dumpster behind the hospital.Winner winner chicken dinner!Now I can eat.No more begging for food for a week!

      PS.Anyone have any seeds or stems from their stash I can have?I'm tired of working the glory hole at the adult bookstore for my dimebag.

      D Campbell.

      Delete
  5. I seriously don't believe most normal people on this planet believes big foot is a real live creature roaming in the woods. It's like : Professional wrestling (often shortened pro wrestling, or simply wrestling) is a mode of spectacle which combines athletic and theatrical performance.

    It's entertainment!! Over the years it's become very profitable ..lol!! Duh!!

    Enjoy the fun..but remember that's all it is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder if wrestling blogs attract the same level of fear ridden skeptical acrobats trying to claw back the remotest piece child like reassurance?

      Delete
    2. Haha. Absolute meltdown.

      Delete
    3. The only meltdown is from someone reverting to others' comments cause I've bullied them around too long.

      ; )

      Delete
  6. And to think how much you blunder around facts. Meldrum and Bindenagle don't endorse these photographs and are having them analysed. It's the experiences they've had where Todd has tracked for the last fifteen years, places where you wouldn't have your mother at such quick access, that have resulted in their support.

    Doesn't stop morons burping on a Bigfoot blog though.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Are having them analysed" that says everything you need to know right there. Anyone with any credibility would dismiss them outright.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well as long as they 'could' be real, it's worth attaining a better opinion. Remember err was a SFX expert on with Rev Jef the other day that couldn't categorically dismiss the images.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Could" be real? Wow just wow.

    ReplyDelete
  10. No footer has ever addressed the turtle shell butt and thigh subduction of the pgf.

    Remember it only takes 1 visible suit flaw to prove its a suit and we have it right there.

    Game set and match.

    See ya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is in fact something that has been knocked out the park time and time again, here's your 'diaper butt';

      http://youtu.be/wQr922oWdgY

      Smell ya later!

      Delete
  11. Yes, could be real... Meaning it's worth investigating and proving either way.

    When you have the same person delivering on genuine experiences, even more important to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Genuine" experiences? Wow just wow. Genuine by what standard? That you believe someone's story that they heard or saw something? Mental.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Genuine as in an anthropologist and wildlife biologist being there and reporting them.

    Meltdown?

    ReplyDelete
  14. When your anthropologist and wildlife biologists are bigfooters it doesn't count.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Precisely my point down below. You are a rhetorical mess my friend. Sykes will be a 'footer' should be bring you Bigfoot DNA too.

    Do you think Bundenagle's methods were a problem when he was an advisor to the UN?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Sykes will never be a footer simply because he is a scientist and he can only prove things exist if they actually exist in the first place which of course bigfoot doesn't.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The last 15 years? Didn't he steal the bigfoot "claim" off the backs of other people here within the last year or three?

    Regardless, Todd keeps netting goals for the Manitoba Hoaxers while the Alberta Authentic fall further behind.

    Sorry, Rushfer, but your boy is in line with fabricators everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 3:28... So let me ask you a question; should Sykes deliver a result that would be attributed to living hominid DNA, would you believe it?

    Danny... I dont really care what he did, this field is full of rumours, competition and back stabbing. It's soap opera and means nothing to me. The truth is Les Stroud took a leaf out of his book, gotta mean he knows his outdoors.

    Even though there is plenty to be suspicious of these photographs, we still do not have a conclusive means to dismiss them, neither the experiences of those professionals that have had legitimate experiences with said researcher.

    When all the chips are down, I could join your cynicism for him, but I'm waiting for those chips.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Much more compelling "evidence" exists for UFO's. Look at all of the new tv shows about that subject. Very little new progamming about bigfoot.Finding bigfoot is on it's last legs and they are just riding the last vestige of momentum before it is canceled. You can only rehash a dirty diaper butt so many times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A TV crew that will never find anything remotely Bigfoot and is not the flag ship for this field.

      The only people rehashing anything to do with a diaper butt are those with nothing else as an argument who refuse to look at a piece of analysis that proved they are talking BS. The giant butt on Sasquatch are one of the widely reported physical traits.

      Delete
    2. As usual JOE is spot on correct again. Large butt has been discussed at length and mentioned many times by witnesses. These rears house the glute muscle groups that enable these creatures to run at tremendous speeds, same as human sprinters who train these muscles extensively. Take a look at olympian female sprinters and you will see the same thing minus the hair which will also adds to the size on is seeing.

      Chuck

      Delete
    3. As per usual, Chuck gobbling on that European knob.

      Delete
    4. As per usual, a mindless child is allowed ok the desktop too long.

      Delete
  20. JOE. Yesterday Finding Bigfoot had reruns of some episodes from last season. I watched part of the WV episode with a witness who had a clear sighting through his rifle scope. One statement grabbed me. He said the creature blinked once but it was a very slow and methodical blink almost like it really did not want to blink. Where have we seen this before?

    In the new Kentucky Finding Bigfoot the Turtle man gives a heck of an interview with more details of his encounter as a nine year old than his original interview with Charlie Raymond. First off the bigfoot screams at him with a scream which was like the high pitched scream I have heard actually heard. This scream knocked him off his feet with the power it had. He stood back up and yelled at the creature and then took a shot at it with his 22 and may have hit it in the shin or foot before he turned and ran back to his home. Absolutely fantastic.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yep I would believe it and so would the scientific community because it would be backed up by evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Chuck, I recall that exact account when I think of that blink, thank tou so much for referencing it. Peoole need to realize that there are eyewitnesses that have expressed an exact likeness to their experiences of the photographs up top.

    The Turtle Man makes me laugh and it's no suprise to me someone with the much experience of the outdoors should have an explerience like that.

    4:09... We'll see.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Big Jon. That is right you are. One I saw in early 70s was to far away to see facial detail, just a huge hairy giant crossing a swamp no man would and with great ease. Did you actually see an eye blink as these are quite rare for someone to remember. I imagine a lot of folks have seen an eye blink but are so caught up in their fear it is a detail overlooked.

    More on the Turtle Man. Before the creature screamed at him it was pulling up saplings roots and all and tossing them at the young boy age 9 then. Ernie said they were thick enough a human could not pull one out. Chuck

    ReplyDelete
  24. So many Hoaxes, Hoaxers, liars, incompetent researchers that I at 16 years old, will be, 90years old, or Dead, by the time any Physical Evidence is found!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you, at 16 years old, are spending time here, you'll be 90 before you get laid.

      Delete
    2. i'm getting laid right now!

      Delete
    3. Young one, you write in a very unusual fashion similar to our dear departed John W. Jones. It is reassuring to know that JW, with his quirky grammar and charming tall tales. will live on in the lives of the nation's youth. Some tips to help you in your journey:

      1. Bigfoot--they're in the trees!

      2. You can only find Bigfoot by taking pack horses deep into the Catskills with your imaginary friends. And with imaginary pack horses.

      3. Anyone who hunts bigfoot at night is an idiot.

      4. Anyone who tree-knocks to attract Bigfoot is an idiot.

      5. Everyone else is an idiot.

      6. Give your imaginary friends names like Hawkeye and Tina Running Bear. It makes your story more believable.

      There is more, so much more, but I don't want to overburden your young shoulders. Come back when you have mastered the above tips and we will continue your training.

      Delete
    4. Someone must have been burned seriously by good old John.

      Delete
    5. 6:21 your hand doesn't count

      Delete
    6. Never even a shred of evidence for it.

      Delete
    7. Not a shred of evidenced that such a person ever existed either.

      Delete
  25. The big bummer here is this will set the record straight...
    This is only about the money, nothing more nothing less. FFS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No Money & Fame that's what most big foot researchers grave for!

      Delete
    2. Yep. The checks and endorsement deals are piling up. Just did a shoot for a pilot TV show about an Adderall crazed Sasquatch who kills people. It's called "Wigfoot". Every creature needs his sleep

      Delete
    3. Wigfoot.
      Now that's funny Mike.
      Mike H.

      Delete
  26. Geeez,,, this is fake already, give it up. There more attention it's given the longer it sticks around. Let it go and fade away.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Joe, you don't join "cynicism" when all the chips are down. No, that's defeat.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Joe, honestly I wish you wouldn't talk so much it's hard to find anything original here.

    ReplyDelete
  29. bigfoot does exist
    Todd standing on the other hand is a hoax

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. no, I mean there is no proof that a person named Todd Standing actually exists. The person who has been playing the part of Todd is really an actor named Jack Doyle. He has us all fooled for a bit there

      Delete
  30. There is no defeat on Standing. Period. Our position on Standing remains the same. If he's able to put people In a position to have real Bigfoot encounters, as I am, today...ummm right now if I chose, why crucify him for doing whatever he could to get funding to allow him to do this? I hate hoaxing. But it doesn't mean you can't grow Into a real Footer. Not everyone has a huge tract of private land or a pack of researchers willing to support them out of the gate. Bob Garrett's been out in the Big Thicket for 25 years down here. Now. Go Watch the Torn Up Camp video. Bob will show you what happens when humans encroach on an overly crowded Sasquatch travel corridor. They disappear into he midst of a missing person/crime scene investigation. These are real flesh and blood creatures. And they aren't they cuddly forest guardians some think.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Excuse me??????

    There are plenty of things I'm skeptical of, you silly, silly boy.

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Absolutely beautiful comment, dear Texan.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Thanks Joe. I guess we can't say "Paul Freeman" now. Wow. How's this. Paul Freeman, like Todd Standing was accused of hoaxing. May have done it a time or two. And yet was a real Footer who turned Jeff Meldrum into some excellent tracks and caught a piece of some of the best footage ever captured. Yes Dan, I dared to say it. Now do what you do best and start the Anonymous attacks. I'll get my coffee and swat the flies and eventually we can cue the other insects together.

    ReplyDelete
  34. "Onto" if he'd have turned him into tracks we'd have no Bigfoot North.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Hey joe fits!!!!!
    TTL!

    What's up ? I've been real busy!, so what's new in bf world these days??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TTL,shoot me an email me.
      If you can't just send up some smoke signals.
      Mike H.

      Delete
  36. Ok. Big Jon and Chuck. Love your truth. Here's a sighting reported to me this weekend by Texas Biologist John Morley. A teenage girl drives home at night in East Texas to her family Farm and sees something as her car pulls in the driveway. She hits her hi beams. Standing In a crouched position in the field is an upright bi pedal hair covered " thing" as she described it. She was so scared she called her Dad on the cell phone and waited in her car in her driveway until he got home to escort her inside. She kept saying it wasn't human and it looked at her the entire time it walked out of view. Her Dad knew she saw something. He walked down in the field and saw clear impressions and found a couple of clear tracks. He called Morley. Morley told him, I know now, how to use hairspray to firm up the substrate in the track and preserve its integrity and how to mix his casts. They now have some great track casts with dermal impressions. Morley is showing the guy how to work trail cams now for his property.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Well still haven't set up joes trail cameras and do feel bad about that but it will get done and I'm really looking forward to sending him the SD card in the late fall I think he's really going to enjoy the pics etc even if the pics ended up being pic of just wildlife it wil be awsome! Long distance research for joe

    Ttl!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey TTL!!

      Listen buddy, I really appreciate you doing this for me, but please don't worry about getting it done any time soon. I'm not going anywhere and I'd rather you see to more important matters. No news this end, great new audio from the Browns, the link is here, let me know what you think!

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/these-bigfoot-calls-from-brown-family.html?m=0

      Delete
  38. Mike B.-

    Listened to the new episode from last night. Bob goes into greater detail about that night. Sas. Chron. 34: Charged by a sasquatch!

    I felt physically sick listening to what Bob had to say, I believe him. He says 2 people are missing from that camp site. Last night he released a video he had been forced to remove by the authorities. Here it is: http://youtu.be/zE5ewH3W_24

    I have a bad feeling about these creatures now. Paulides said he would never do a 411 Texas. Disappointing.

    Do you have any missing people out by your area Mike?

    ReplyDelete
  39. In the interview he talks about someone being drug out of the camp. In the video I see- to me my eyes see- deep finger drag marks of two hands where someone is trying to resist being drug towards the forest.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Joe I understand what u mean but I'm just a man of my word and besides that your going to have fun with the trail cam pics, locations etc Also like I said I'll send u video of tree breaks etc

    ReplyDelete
  41. Joe I could even answer lots of your questions in the feild on video and give u live answers to your questions explaining why some things people say r bf related and there not etc

    TTl

    ReplyDelete
  42. And the names and police report on this incident are where exactly?

    ReplyDelete
  43. traps none better built by WILD BILL and Willy,

    ReplyDelete
  44. I don't know, I haven't listened to it yet. But if it were given... All the victims, police and all concerned would be just Bigfooters and not trustworthy.

    ReplyDelete
  45. 9:33- You would have to listen to the show(s) for his explanation. He was interrogated at length along with members of his family. I don't know the rules or even if the police have to release anything at all with no body. The forest service came in right away and did a serious clean up, obviously not treating it as a crime scene.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Let me correct- it was apparently not the police

    ReplyDelete
  47. Of course. The Forest Service. Again, some people are REALLY overestimating their capabilities. And legal authority. And interest in Bigfoot. If two people disappeared, I can guarantee you the police were/are involved. If a Park Ranger attempted to interfere with a cop he would be tazered and cuffed before his Smokey the Bear hat hit the ground. In the hierarchy of police, they are near landscapers and loggers.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Listen to the show. I knew about this months ago. All Texas researchers did. Kept our mouth shut out of respect. Here's the deal. Bob and both his kids were questioned by the authorities. Do your research Anon. Then I'll answer your questions. Chuck. You are into something. And no. David woukdnt. Because East Texas authorities have covered up 2 incidents this year.

    ReplyDelete
  49. It is. Look. Encroachment is causing aggressive and even deadly encounters. The East Texas coverup is the worst kept secret in the State. And now. With the truth coming out on Sasquatch Chronicles. People are learning the truth about Torn Up Camp. Bob Garett is a brave man. Big Thicket researchers. Please be careful. M

    ReplyDelete
  50. Horrible and fascinating. Keep a close eye on your children all.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Look. Bob was followed. His kids were questioned and harassed. Chick. No joke. We might want to just drop this. It's out there. Listen to the last 3 Sasquatch Chronicles. Then watch Torn Up Camp and the after video. Then you'll know what Chick and I aren't discussing.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Listen to the show? Fuck that I'll do you one better. Tell me the county where this happened and the names of the missing people and I'll call the suckers. You kept your mouth shut out of respect for who? If you had any respect you would have called the State Police and State Attorneys office immediately. As a lawyer, shouldn't you have thought of that?

    ReplyDelete
  53. You are the biggest idiot I've ever met. Read and listen Dip S-/t. The entire incident is an open investigation. Who do you think questioned Bob? Reverand Jeff? Jesus. I'm outta here. Idiot alert.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Bob contact the authorities immediately and they questioned him and his family as suspects. I've been on this blog for years and you are the biggest idiot I've ever met. Dan. If this is you remember my old offer. Tennessee is not that far. Now yawl have a great day.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Mike don't leg a dude who posted a pic of his nads chase you away.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Dan knows it all. Except how to act like a decent person. Right?

    ReplyDelete
  57. It isn't nads chasing him away. It's his inability to answer a question. WHO'S MISSING AND FROM WHERE?

    ReplyDelete
  58. I would love to have a serious discussion with all of you about this. But stupidity really does piss me off. Il come back when I calm down.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Hey Mike, without me, there would be no Bigfoot North. Fact.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Agreed. You are my hero and that's a fact !

    ReplyDelete
  61. Much much respect for you Mike. I wish you the most awesome success in your research. If you ever want to collaborate with our group, let's do it. Team work gets things done.

    ReplyDelete
  62. You're all crazy. Go to Tennessee all you want, all you'll find is an empty house I once called home.

    This comment train is a perfect microcosm of the bigfoot community as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Agreed. I may get back there Jed. But first. Dan. If that was you above. Or even if let's say you're a curious skeptic. Take the time to listen to the last 2 Sasquatch Chronicles and then view Bob Garett's blogs that relate to The Torn Up Camp. You'll discover that there's a real missing persons/homicide investigation stemming out of a very real Bigfoot Attack in East Texas. I want you to do this so you can tell me they were vengeance filled Beavers or Angry Coyotes that committed this horrific act.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I'm sure Harry Henderson's slow cousin Fred sure put a working on those people.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Joke if you choose. I often do. But this is no laughing matter. Ah well. Good day to you nonetheless

    ReplyDelete
  66. Dan Campbell on the money.

    Never thought I'd say such a thing.

    The 'tracking for 15 years' is BS. When you start repeating the lies of a hoaxer it's time to pack up and move on to UFO's.

    MMG

    ReplyDelete
  67. For petes sake!!! how many times are WE going to be subjected to this darn obvious fake photo(s) let it fade away like ALL the other fakes......

    ReplyDelete
  68. 781 985 9398

    Your BF Hotline all the Time :)

    ReplyDelete
  69. Here is the issue . I truly believe this . I am a firm believer in bigfoot and I am part of a very credible research team using alternate methods of research. The fact is there's a reason there aren't any lose up clear photos like Todd's. Because they dont allow you to do that. These creatures are not gigantipithicus or any other ape or ancient man. Although I admit it sounds crazy but there are paranormal abilities of these creatures ! I have witnessed it. Think before you chastise me . You believe in bigfoot but not anything else outside of the norm. Now to Todd.i truly believe Todd has seen and interacted with bigfoot. I believe he is so obsessed with bigfoot and convincing others including the scientific community that he has in fact fabricated these pictures we are seeing . The one looks incredibly fake like an Ewok from one of the Star Wars movie. The others are clearly photoshopped. The devil well that is a man in heavy makeup. No browridge. The other evidence that the scientist have seen are real. The bigfoot leave plenty behind. They just don't allow close uppics. We have had anomalies like fully charged batteries draining completely in minutes , all of our trail cams being shut off with NO IMAGES on them ! You could here them right by my tent heavy footsteps within feet just for me to cut on my flaslight and see NOTHING only to cut it off and again here footsteps. We in the community HAVE to come together and not condemn each other because our experiences are hard to conceive but share our data and experiences. We cannot hoax a single minute aspect of anything because every time that happens we ALL lose ! It is a huge setback each time. Todd will be proven s I believe he has to be heading on the pictures which causes him to lose all credibility ! Which is sad because I believe he is an outstanding woodsmen sho truly has seen and experienced the bigfoot. He has resulted to trickery to be taken seriously by science thus the world. My opinion . Maintain the vision my friends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I apologize for all the gramerical errors. I have fat fingers and was posting from a smart phone.

      Delete
  70. Great posting! Thanks for sharing.
    Anyone who has undesired, coarse, black hair is an excellent candidate for laser hair removal treatment. All skin types and skin tones can benefit from hair removal. After speaking with and receiving medical advice from the dermatologist, females with excessive facial hair growth and underlying hormone abnormalities can also undergo laser hair removal and the treatment of hormonal disorders. Anyone who experiences folliculitis and ingrown hair issues is an excellent candidate for permanent hair removal. White or grey haired people lack enough melanin in their hair roots to act as laser light targets. They must therefore look into other hair removal solutions as they are not qualified candidates.
    Click here Laser Hair Removal in East Delhi
    for more.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?