New Footage: This Bigfoot Sighting From Washington Looks Legit
Here's a new footage, and this one is supposedly from Washington State. The video shows a person frantically chasing down a shadowy figure, and it becomes obvious that the creature he's chasing is bipedal. It's pretty awesome. A breakdown by ThinkThunker is also included below:
Breakdown by ThinkThunker:
Great stuff Shawn!!!
ReplyDeleteMore dumbass comments from dumbass people in this dumbass society that you f'king dumbasses live in.
DeleteDumbasses.
It's like a mirror of your personal view, eh?
DeleteAnd so - we remain 'Anonymous' ....
WAY TOO MUCH OFF HERE....tell tale is the vocal range of the "whoop and growl"....plus a Bigfoot only flanks when stalking....not after it runs to seek shelter
DeleteAnd where did you get your bigfoot phd?
DeleteSo many "experts" without a physical specimen to examine.
Bigfoots only flank when stalking? Its hilarious the things people state with such authority about Bigfoot as if anything about them is known for sure. If they even exist.
DeleteGood mornin VIET KONG
ReplyDeleteBandini!
DeleteMornin Arry, an to u as well Joe. I am faced with a choice of Advil and coffee or Perhaps hair of the Dogman that bit me. :)
DeleteDogman every time!!
DeleteFirst one is a guy in the woods, second one is a porcupine in a tree. Dumb asses
ReplyDeleteWe werent REALLY talking about the porcupine it was the first part that piqued everyones interest based on the breakdown in the second video. We were hoping that the intellect of the readers would have them ignore the 2nd part of the first video.
DeleteDid you know your handle is misspelled?
DeleteThat's why no one calls him Exceptional Joe.
DeleteShawn misspells ThinkerThunker every time.
DeleteI misspell hatertole.
Delete1st video was staged," get in the house! Get in the house! "
ReplyDelete2nd video was one of those rotten ewoks.
The Sith returns.
DeleteMy Lord, surely mere humans warning each other in the presence of real danger or danger perceived is insufficient to rule this staged. Why you yourself with your frightening visage might engender said similar response. As to whether the creature in the second video is from the forest moon of Endor or simply a porcupine from the forest floor. I'll leave that for you to discern. Obi Wan has taught me well.
DeleteIsn't this another re-run?
ReplyDeleteIt appears so.
DeleteOld and BS.
DeleteIt was posted here a while ago, I was talking about this vid with someone recently and went back to the old thread to see if I could find anything out, over a hundred comments not one mentioning the video
DeleteI'm going to say its legit because who has time in the day to fake this shit!
ReplyDeleteHe didn't get paid cause who pays for this stuff...
It's mostly ridiculed so he sucker a lot of people except me and I do think its real.
I agree because if you look at the breakdown you will see that hands are huge and the arms are long. Technically that would have been a better hoax than P&G. PLUS look at the feet, who would have or could have thought of all that? AND the piece de resistance is if you look close in the break down, you can see a LONG beard. A BEARD!!! Who would have put this hoax together? The only one who could lie this big would be Obama! "If you LIKE your doctor you can KEEP your doctor!"
DeleteI have to agree with SMALLFOOT AND AVEREGE JOE.
DeleteWhen I first saw this some months ago because of the fast pace, not so good video and of course get back to the house I figured hoax. That was until Thinker Thunker put his touch to it, and details came out which he clearly points out into something much different. Also the guy filming is breathing in what is a panic mode.
As a side note Thinker Thunker put out his video ( short one ) over two years ago maybe titled 21 degrees of separation between bigfoot and you. It explained some differences in the walk of a bigfoot and human. I tried to walk like a bigfoot and it is extremely difficult to achieve and look normal. You can also use the analysis when judging purported bigfoot videos.
Chuck
Agree, Chuck. Thinker's good work has made me reconsider this one. Nice!
DeleteI'm in with you guys. Missed it the first round time out. Without the great breakdown I wouldn't have liked it much. But the freeze frame of the high leg angle, large sloping back, and forward hanging head smacked of Patty. Liked it lots.
DeleteShould read "Missed it the first time it made the rounds." Still waking up here I guess :)
DeleteAgreed all round!
DeleteYou are one chick with discernible abilities and tastes CHICK. But you know that.
DeleteChuck
;)
DeleteI'm going to put out my own hoax video, wait for all the idiots to eat it up and tell each other how good it is, then release the behind the scene video to show you all how easy it is.
DeleteAll I need is a baggy suit like this one, hell even dark clothes and a hoody would work, stoop forward to make my arms hang below my waist, walk is semi rough terrain to give my legs the 'magic angle" and some one to film it super blurry and with fast panning. All too easy.
Bro, who you kidding? You can't even make your own hot pockets, forget an elaborate hoax video.
DeleteEET GUD, GUD GUD, YOO NOOW BUTT MEE NUT SAEZ
DeleteVA GINA GUD, MEE SAEZ, NUTT BLOCC MEE PLEEZ
DeleteHa ha ha!!!
DeleteI'd love to see your hoax video cause I work in TV and have tried...
DeleteLooks nothing like many of these video's cause YOU CAN CLEARLY TELL!!!
So good luck, I'll be watching.
In fact, I think all the skeptic's should cause nothing worse than an expert at nothing....
All my Hot Pocket references are finally started to take hold. I love when a plan comes to fruition!
Delete^-^^ no comprende.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMy pants have been removed by the author.
DeleteNope there is no bigfoot, no yeti, no orang pendik, no yeren, Soon there will be no more finding bigfoot. Aliens thats where the action is. Look at all of the shows dealing with that subject.
ReplyDeleteWho? the Border patrol?
DeleteI think you'll find an eery similarity between both topics; this and UFO's...
DeleteThe same level of cover up.
The same odd, strange phenomena.
The same disappearences.
... The two topics really aren't that different at all. There are also more and more considering a major UFO connection to this subject all the time.
To claim that there is nothing to this subject and consider another topic that has far less physical evidence as credible, is what it is.
(And this coming from a major UFO enthusiast.)
Correct JOE. The Science channel now is putting out several UFO series and they are pretty good. Saw one last night of a Saskatchewan farmer in the early 70s who witnessed five then six upside down bowl like discs, 11 feet wide from extremely close in broad daylight. They were spinning then lifted away all with no noise just emitting a maybe gas plume. What was left were possibly the first crop circles reported all perfect circles with swirling wheat stalks rotating clockwise and matted down. It was investigated by the RCMP who could not attribute human actions to the incident. Before they formed the circles he saw one at a swamp drop down a tube and it appeared to suck up water before it joined the other five discs. Series is Close Encounters.
DeleteChuck
Amazing stuff.
DeleteHave you seen UFO Files/Deep Sea UFO's? There's an interesting photograph that appears to be a Disc shaped craft sucking up water in a swirl... Fascinating stuff. Absolutely love USO's Chuck.
JOE. I think I have I know I have seen the photo. Amazing indeed. These craft, or maybe some of them, can operate in both air and water in ways the military can only dream about. When I was a youth there was a show on Sunday nights called Voyage to the bottom of the Sea. 1964-68. Main actors were British born Richard Basehart, and then David Hedison ( played Felix in several Bond Films ) about a futuristic American nuclear sub called the Seaview. It had a craft called the Flying Sub that was launched under water and was adept in water and air. Pretty neat although it did not have the USO capabilities. Series was created by Irwin Allen who was in the mold of a Gene Rodenberry or Rod Serling.
DeleteChuck
5.01 - Why are you here then?
DeleteChuck, you're my encyclopaedia!
DeleteI don't get why the same deniers come in here day in and day out with the same comments. If folks don't believe why the obsessions?
DeleteAnd now I see this is being discussed below.
DeleteHello Ernie!!
DeleteHey man.
DeleteThinker Thunker only does breakdowns on obvious hoaxes. I know I know "they're all hoaxes" but this dude really scrapes the bottom of the barrel. He's a typical footer desperately looking for something to bleev in.
ReplyDeleteCould not be further from the truth.
DeleteChuck
5:17 is phil poling
DeleteAnd still after all these years this is the standard. It's nothing. There is no bigfoot, just idiots who believe in it.
ReplyDeleteIf you don't believe, why visit this site day after day?!
Delete+1
DeleteRichard! Your reasons are as follows;
Delete*Dependance of community to make up lack of belonging
*Chronic denialism
*A missunderstanding of skepticism
*Fear
*Anxiety of the unknown
*Requirement of reassurance
*Closure desperation
... Also, some are just too afraid to admit they're visiting this blog out of pure interest, and have to leave comments like that to convince people around them they're here to scoff.
Summed it up nicely JOE. I will add a pathetic way to live a life. Hope the rest of their day is productive.
DeleteChuck
Hey, anyone who reads our posts is welcome
DeleteBang on Joe. Bang on.
DeleteGot rid of cable 2 years ago so this place is entertaining as heck. Believed in bigfoot when I was a youngster then grew up.
DeleteThis place is like watching a mental hospital and Joe is the guy who rips his pants off and runs around the room screaming "look at muh pee pee!!! It dances!"
^^^^
Delete*Dependance of community to make up lack of belonging
*Chronic denialism
*A missunderstanding of skepticism
*Fear
*Anxiety of the unknown
*Requirement of reassurance
*Closure desperation
... No need to be concerned with people around him or any form of intimate relationship for that matter.
Good day joe!
ReplyDeleteTtl!
I like both of these videos and I like thinker thunker
Hello TTL!
DeleteThinker Thunker's really cool!!
The question of the year should be ? What made mr David paulites stop looking for bf??? To spend 5 plus years and then never give a opinion about bf agian?? What did he see? Who talked to him, why doesn't he share the truth about why bf will not be released to the knowing public? 1 question what changed him to no longer looking for bf??? There is a real good story here and only a select number of people know about what happen and what the conversation was about!
DeleteTtl!!
OK, then why don't you fill us in old sport?
DeleteI think Paulides was spun up in the Ketchum fray and came out scratched. He left feeling badly about her on some level and he was attacked by angry skeptics and a few footers as well. The bf flower people accused him of tarnishing the name of their forest friend He said he was convinced that bigfoot exists and that was enough for him.
DeleteYou cannot put together a compendium of legitimate missing persons books with real people and real families and attribute the cause to "Bigfoot". David Paulides has a rich collaboration history with Scott Carperntar. He hasn't given up looking for anything. But he absolutely has to leave the results or conclusions open ended to be taken seriously by the public. And more importantly to not offend the people he must interview and research to write about said serious topics.
DeleteOn to the matter at hand. Looking past the blood soaked hung over retinas of my eyes from the Spurs victory party last night I see what appears to be a Sasquatch. Thinker Thunker just gets better with each breakdown and he brings a certain fresh perspective to a tired typically jaundiced view of these movies. Calling your attention briefly to the semi conical head and it's placement on the Subjects' shoulders there Simply aren't many stage actors classically trained to change the location of their skull placement on their spine. So when you get any video at all that shows this in some detail you almost have to take it seriously.
DeleteMIKE. Well said my friend. I could not agree more. There are things that happen in real time we overlook, but his methodical and analytical approach is a breath of fresh air. The semi conical as you call it and the placement of the head on the shoulder grabbed me and I paused the frame and looked. Also the still frame which I think showed huge muscles in the upper back, and trap area is impressive. The arms are longer, the feet large and the step at the start is exaggerated yet natural.Then there is the 73 to 90 degree back leg angle that humans just do not do when only walking. The front foot is firmly planted while the back on is in the air at close to 90 degrees.
DeleteImpressive piece of analysis.
Thinker Thunker as doe a pretty good Arnold.
Chuck
Amazing thread of comments there, and spot on... The only thing I will add is that it is my feeling that Paulides was still very much behind Ketchum by the end.
DeleteMike, I'm so pleased you highlighted this, I feel like I'm treading on eggshells sometimes discussing 411.
Amazing stuff TTL, Chick, Chuck and the Texan!
Yes. It's hard to talk about. I can't tell you how many people get ridiculed for being even curious about this subject. And that brings me to a very important topic. These guys going around right now attacking anyone who has advocated the taking of a specimen need id lighten up. You are subject to ridicule the moment you get associated with this topic.
DeleteSo why throw fuel on the fire calling people murderers. Who is mass killing these sunjects? We are debating their existence. The topic of their protection is not RIPE.
DeleteSo. In a fringe topic where you will likely be margianilized by virtue of your curiosity, why not leave the subject of their protection to learned minds once their existence is proven to science. Let's not get the cart before the horse. And I'm not calling for a fresh round of clips. But I am asking for the pro lifers to police themselves a bit more with their rampant dogma and bitter attacks. It's just gotten way out of hand and run me out of groups I enjoyed participating in. We here hit loud and clear. But if you want to protect the pileated red headed woodpecker why don't you guys show me a fu,."'ng feather first.
DeleteThey're pretty damn big, need a big caliber and even then just grab the head and get
DeleteThe woodpecker or the wood ape? Cause Rummie. I want mine pileated!! ;)
Deleteits a toss up, fun to watch the woodpecker evaporate and more grubs for Mr. Bigfoot
DeleteSee Rummie. We don't have to drink to see things disappear. Bigfoot cloaks like a Klingon Warship. And my wallet is a few bills lighter this am. Not to mention. Jethros tolerance.
DeleteProfound, dear Texan... Profound!!
DeleteJoe it's part profound and part profane. I wish they'd spend half as much time discovering the species as they do droning on about protection issues. Hey. They remind me of the radical PETA personnel who once screwed up and threw their protest blood in a faux fur show. Did you kids not read the pamphlet? In order to advocate the protection of any Subject there must first be a subject to protect. And don't go telling me you have seen enough to satisfy your curiosity. Because the scientific taxon for your curiosity is Beastie Imaginary. Not sufficient. Not even by a longshot.
DeleteTime to get off my soap box and treat this hangover with the degree of respect it deserves. Good day.
DeleteGod bless you Texan! Really enjoyed that.
DeleteNo one chases down BF when he hits the woods. #1 he's too fast....supposedly. #2 if it was a real Bigfoot the camera guy would have crapped his pants and run away, not towards the beast. This is fake . Or else that is a really old and slow BF and an unusually brave camera guy. I doubt either is the case. No body, no BF.
ReplyDeleteDSA gets one point for Clever Quip. Evidentiary value of his assessment yields, sadly, a 0.
DeleteAlot of people are braver than you 5:25. Unless you did a mind meld with this BF you have no idea what this BF was thinking when he cleared the road. He might have known that was the home owner or resident and didnt expect him to come across. PLUS no one has seen this, but I believe there is BF #2 that makes the 2nd growl at the end. BF#2 is there were BF#1 is shaking the brush before going in, and they are having a communication. He MAY be reacting to BF#2 and not even notice camera man. There is SO much going on here that not even Thinker Thunker covered it all. I think the reason the camera man runs off is because of BF#2 growls and is much closer to the camera, not because of the other one he was originally filming.
DeleteDon't annoy us further, we have our work to do, just think about the average,what use have they for you? Another toy that helped destroy the elder race of FB/FB, forget about your silly whims,it doesn't fit the plan
DeleteThis is supposed to be in Washington state. There's nothing but hippies and panty waistes in Washington so you know they are not brave enough to run after it and the hippies would just assume to let the gentle forest people be. So ya, this is fake.
DeleteUh, morons...the growl is also faked. Duh
DeleteThat may have been the most profound comment of all AVERAGE JOE. I saw the same thing you did. When the first one moved while shaking the bush another huge one was there also. You know what JOE. You are not so averege but then you know that.
DeleteChuck
This isn't new at all matter of fact this is several years old...
ReplyDeleteFFS!
It is fairly "old". Disappointed that Shawn (or whoever) is unaware - particularly as this is a bigfoot sight. You'd think he'd have seen it all thrice over by now.
DeleteStill curious video nevertheless.
I think the purpose of reposting it is ThinkerThunker's latest contribution.
DeletePersonally I really don't mind looking at old videos.
Well, we need some backstory on this. Dude saw it multiple times, almost unheard of. Plus he must have huge cojones. Maybe it was a young one.
DeleteBut then, I thought that second part was shown a porcupine, so I dunno.
Maybe Joe. (8:08). He does state "new".
DeleteAnyway - I do enjoy "breakdowns" as they often point out things I did not notice.
Thinker Thunker is the new FB/FB
ReplyDeleteMike, does Jethro chew your shoes? He's got that look
ReplyDeleteHe has problems. Man. He's got an illness. He's carved up my hands. Destroyed my home. Well my ex wife's home. It was my home. ;)
ReplyDeleteHA, the kids love him, thats why Spot the rotten jack russell is in my house
ReplyDeleteDogs are acting worse than pro lifers. I believe Danny McBride said it best. " thug life".
ReplyDeleteMy hindu friend says he wants to come back as an American dog
ReplyDeleteI cannot blame him is do I. Snoop Dogg in point of fact.
ReplyDeleteI like ThinkThunk's work over on YouTube. He pretty much only deals with what appears to me anyway to be REAL sightings of real sasquatch
ReplyDeleteI'll say it now and say it agian if I get a somewhat clear shot it's going into the arm, back leg, or stomach and theres only going to be a shot if the camera is running on my scope! Cheers everyone!
ReplyDeleteTtl
Please don't shoot em Ttl, I beg you.
DeleteI really didn't want to but now for my safety and my kids safety were I hunt it's going to have to happen! Kids come first and I'm not ever moving out of my hinting area or going to put my kids threw a possible incounter in the future.! Sorry if I'm coming off as some blood thirsty hunter type person, have a good day everyone.
DeleteTTL!
That is clearly M.K. Davis, who is surprisingly fast.
ReplyDeleteit looks very promising. If it is a hoax it is better than the average ones.
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone else see a face behind the tree at the :47 second mark? To me it looks like a face but it's hard to tell because of the pixelation and the shaky camera. Too bad the video wasn't clearer or we'd be able to see even more detail.
Luckily you have started circling the bigfoot in the pictures. THERE IS STILL NOTHING THERE
ReplyDeleteAnother ignorant comment.
ReplyDeleteNow that Ive seen the break down it looks like the first subject could be different than the second one (in the woods) if it was real maybe there were two creatures. As far as the arms being unusually long in second part, when he runs into the woods, it just looks to be bent over, or leaning forword and just gives the impression they are unusually long. Its really just to blurred in the first part (across the road) to tell how big it really is, once its blown up and slowed down it loses so much resolution its probably making it look bigger than it really is but hey I guess anythings possible. I can say this for sure though, it sure is fun playing Sherlock, I could be doing worse things with my time.
ReplyDeleteRidiculous. First, ask yourself why someone is standing in the middle of the road, in the middle of nowhere, filming with his camera phone -- and just happens to catch the mother of all cryptids right at the perfect moment. Second, if this was filmed in Washington in the US, why does the uploaders writing and grammar sound like they are from China? Who talks like that? It's quite obvious this is just another hoax. Grow up people -- Bigfoot DOES NOT EXIST.
ReplyDeleteI see two staged movies showcasing classic techniques. Both start off abruptly with no background as to why each person is there with a video camera or type of camera. The first relies on distant shots of the figure moving and shaky camera while running, to create excitement. The figure is just far enough away to make out what it's supposed to be, but too far away for details. The roar could have been edited in post-production. The second relies on the figure being a great distance away at a ridiculous height up a tree. What, is the person with the camera's feet encased in a block of concrete and can't move any closer? The second one relies on the astonishment factor of the figure to explain why the camera man wouldn't advance closer and full zoom resulting in you guessed it - pixelation and indistinction! The movie makers of these masterpieces are getting their fun by seeing how many views they get, hoping they will reach a certain number at which point they receive monetary gain. These videos are a dime a dozen and a social experiment on how many people are curious enough to check it out. Money talks and as the first video exemplifies, bullshit walks!
ReplyDeleteFAKE
ReplyDelete"get in the house" whilst I single handily chase done the 8ft 800pd muscle bound ape man
ReplyDeletecool
I used to think bigfoot was a myth. dreamt up by wacked out Indians who believed in all kinds of crZY SHIT
then u see the quality of the video evidence and realise ,these are not idots doing lame hoaxes, there are indeed thousands of 8/9ft 800pd creatures in American national Parks
PS
this joe fitz[verified] wanker is pretty annoying,i can see why he airritates people
a lonely guy who is interested in haory men in the woods
whats the bet hes 40year old virgin who lives at home with mom