Is Bigfoot Gigantopithecus, and Does the Government Know About It?


Is it possible that Gigantopithecus survived extinction? Are there members of our government covering it up? Some of this very concept is in the premise of author Eric Penz's novel Cryptid: The Lost Legacy of Lewis and Clark.

"Years later I had a strong impression to write a story that gave readers that same sensation. And so I set out to write a story about a creature that haunted the backwoods of the Pacific Northwest. Only my creature couldn’t be fantastic if I were to make the experience authentic for the reader, nor could I use a creature that one might see in a zoo. I had a loose understanding of the bigfoot mythology so prevalent in the Pacific Northwest and thought such a creature would be perfect. To be honest, though, I had no prior exposure to cryptozoology, or really any substantive knowledge of bigfoot. I threw myself into a year long research endeavor to fill the knowledge gap. As a result I have a new perspective on bigfoot and other cryptids. First, I can’t say I have a sure knowledge of bigfoot’s existence, but I do know that there is plenty of evidence to suggest it does exist whereas is there is no evidence to suggest it doesn’t. Second, I am an adventure seeker at heart, which is why I read and write thriller novels. Story is the one realm left to humanity that is yet unexplored and will forever remain so. However, in this over-documented and exploited world, the field of cryptozoology may offer one last field of exploration to those with the patience and courage to venture into the unknown."



You want more? Of course you do. For the entire interview, and more videos, click here.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. I don't think Sasquatch are Giganto, but I did enjoy reading this guy's thoughts.

      Great stuff Matt! Nice to catch you in my time zone for once!!

      Delete
    2. "First, I can’t say I have a sure knowledge of bigfoot’s existence, but I do know that there is plenty of evidence to suggest it does exist whereas is there is no evidence to suggest it doesn’t."

      Quote of the day!

      Delete
    3. Joe I do believe you that they are not giganto but I do believe they evolved from giganto and are not as big as giganto

      Delete
    4. Would there be enough time for them to evolve in such a way from the fossil remains of giganto we have though?

      Delete
  2. That's right. The government is covering it up. Just like they're coming to take your guns. BENGAZI, BENGAZI.
    Grow up, you ignorant dirt-monkeys. You embarrass this country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 150 years of giant skeletons missing - check.

      A eugenics regime hell bent on taking land from indegenous people's - check

      Protection of long lasting religious ideals and educational systems - check

      Logging industry to protect - check

      All is left to the general public to maintain is ridiculous due to there conditioned ignorance - check

      Delete
    2. No actual bigfoot anywhere, ever - check

      Delete
    3. No actual intelligence able to withstand chronic denial of the truth - check.

      Delete
    4. BENGAZI Hillary said all is known,
      its a right wing conspiracy,
      koch brothers fingerprints all over it!!!!

      Delete
  3. Sykes study found no bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This was dealt with here yesterday;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/watch-this-bigfoot-sighting-at-macon.html?m=0

      ... And here;

      http://youtu.be/foOjH0nJpPA

      ... You will learn of three projects in one; the Zana study, what Sasquatch is, and living Sasquatch hybrids.

      Glad I could help!

      Delete
    2. Meldrum says the paper is about the bear. His credibility trumps yours and whatever his name is.

      Therefore Sykes no have no bigfoot.

      Delete
    3. A contributing researcher to study and close associate of the founder, who has been aloud to speak on the study's behalf, states the study is still being conducted.

      "The results aired on the television shows do not compromise Bryan’s paper in peer review. The show is purely entertainment and as I said before, we had no control over it. So the concerns of some people who think that results revealed in the show are leaks from the paper are unfounded. We kept things quiet for so long, why would we suddenly “leak” anything? We are a professional organization and adhere to the proper scientific process."

      I know this is really hard for you to grasp... After all, that celebrating born out of chronic closure desperation felt so good at the time, didn't it?

      Delete
    4. BZZZZZTT! Wrong Answer

      The Sykes TV documentary took maybe a dozen samples from a specific area, and then only addressed 4 or so of them as being known DNA. The documentary deliberately did not address the other 8 or so samples because those are part of the peer reviewed Bigfoot proof DNA paper, now going through the gauntlet of closed minded scientists. Go back and watch it again if you recorded it. You'll see.

      Delete
  4. Just do not know enough about the giganto to say yes or no.
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Forgot the latter. There are segments in the employ of the government that do know, probably rouge and they keep it close to the vest.
      Chuck

      Delete
  5. The government is covering it up to protect probably the most endangered species on the planet.
    How many idiots would be hunting it for cash and trophy and how many people would be mistakenly shot!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're giving the government way to much credit in it ability to keep a secret. They couldn't even keep the fact that Clinton got a BJ in the White House under wraps and there was only TWO people involved for crying out loud.

      Delete
    2. How about this question for the top researchers? What Ten researchers friend or not given the time they have put into bf would they invite to see a sasqwatch body if only ten could go see the body????? TTl the results r interesting! Ttl

      Delete
    3. It is more like they don't talk about Bigfoot because they don't want to get fired from their jobs that have a pension.

      Delete
  6. William j
    Bobo F
    Todd S
    Bindernagle
    Matt M
    Now there's a lot of time between these guys who else would u pic to see the body and no cameras allowed!
    TTL !!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. except Matt a bigfoot guru : )

      Delete
    2. It's funny you add hoaxers to the list!! I would add the top 10 skeptics and proof to them they exist!! You can show Standing a video of an animatronic BF blinking or even a video of a BF that doesn't move one muscle for 3 hrs and he'll believe its real and no one outside the BF community would believe them anyways!!

      Delete
    3. Might as well add Rick Dyer and the 7 bozos over at FB/FB along with Musky Allen etc. etc.

      Delete
    4. BIG JOHN KLOFNOSKI,,,RULES!!!

      Delete
  7. Remember one other thing as well! When they go into the room to view the body they can't wear any clothes so there arnt any pictures taken!!!! Who would be first to strip down to nothing to get in the body room first??????????????!!!!!!?????????????????!?!??????? Bobo???????? Bindernagle??????????lol your thoughts people?????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They would put MORE clothes on Bobo

      Delete
    2. BIG JOHN(10in)KLOFNOSKI, DONT CARE AS HE IS VERY "PROUD"& THICK!!!

      Delete
  8. all not lost its MAY DAY comrades : )

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?