Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Why Are The Palms and Feet of The Patterson Bigfoot White? M.K. Davis Answers That Question


Here's a closer look at the Patterson Bigfoot film where M.K. Davis reveals some answers to some long wondered questions about the Bigfoot in the film -- its feet and hands!



72 comments:

  1. First,
    What does every one think of Claudia Winklemans fringe ? xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry,forgot to post link xx
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2307215/Claudia-Winklemans-HUGE-fringe-The-irritating-haircut-TV.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

      Eva, your comments are off-topic which makes you a troll and a psychopathic sadist according to Joe.

      Delete
    2. That's what used to be the definition of "troll". Now it's a catch all phrase used against any one who says something a particular person disagrees with or doesn't want to hear or read. Go to the Huffington Post or Salon.com and you can see the word "troll" thrown around like a hand grenade at any detectable dissent. They take their group thought seriously and god help any sheep that strays from the flock. Wiping out independent thought is 24/7 job for those fascist tools.

      Delete
    3. Sorry,but it's Patty again,we already know she's real,also there's bad trolls and good trolls xx

      Delete
    4. sadly enough your right it is patty again. if u believe or you dont when is enough enough?

      Delete
  3. bigfoots eats U fer shure tham be captullism

    ReplyDelete
  4. They are white because it's a suit. And it's what believers want to see.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So he put the suite on out at the road. Makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Its just too easy.

    Bloke in a suit.

    Show us the verified evidence of bigfoot? We can do it no problem for every other species. Why not bigfoot? Too easy. Cos it don't exist.

    Royally smoked.

    The funniest thing is the footers will attempt to shoehorn anything they can to be "evidence" of bigfoot. None of it is scientificly acceptable of course but it sure does give us a hilarious circus show to watch. No complaints here. 

    Let's go back to the packham bigfoot suit that joe and the resident butthurt footer and poster boy for footer stupidity were talking about earlier. Do you really look at that and think that was a recreation of the pgf? Of course it wasn't. If it was an actual recreation attempt you'd think they would at least get the colour right. The bbc just got a costume company to make them a bigfoot suit and that is what they got. This is a classic example of one of many failed arguments put forth by the footers. If we want to look at a patty recreation how about we actually look at one rather than using one that clearly wasnt meant to be a patty recreation.We have 2 examples of these. We have the dfoot recreation and the blevins recreation. Both excellent examples. Blevins recreated the arm proportions perfectly but his budget was too low to get a similar style fur. Dfoots recreation showed identical "muscle" and bulk, quite excellent really. This is the same guy that made patty bleevers on the bff look like fools when he photoshopped patty onto a different background and all the bleevers said it was an obvious suit. He embarrassed them so bad they banned him and swept the whole thing under the giant footers rug of ignorance. Also lets not forget that side by side shot of a gemora butt with the patty butt. Identical.

    And anyway the whole notion of requiring an identical replication is nonsense anyway. The footers know this which is why they use it, instead of doing something like, oh I dont know, find a real life specimen that matches patty.

    Its just too easy.

    Fish in a barrel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's no way a costume of that detailed could have been created back then, let alone by a couple of cowpokes.

      Delete
    2. how cute I am being both unverified and verified? who I am? am I the real Joe then? who is joe?

      Delete
    3. am I a verified unverified or an unverified verified?

      Delete
    4. Thank you Jesus, thank you. Hes back. Make one for Ernie too

      Delete
    5. ^^^^ MMC or Kent Obsessed with Joe obsessors

      Delete
  7. Im part native american...my palms and bottoms of my feet are the whitest part of me. Also african americans have the same...white soles..white palms....Doesnt surprize me Bigfoot has the same...i noticed that before on the patty film...so....makes perfect sense to me. Riddle me this skeptics...whats the deal with that..?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. you'll no more have white feet if you costantly walk on the dirt soil, you idiot, they'll get dirty and brownish

      Delete
    2. LOL...Idiot...huh! Me thinks your mentally challenged...so sad..for you...........yawn. Can you say...critical thinking...didnt think so. ..you dont get out much..do ya..!

      Delete
    3. Isn't she walking on sand or light coloured ground? xx

      Delete
    4. Using MK's logic, then you must sprinkle lime in the carpet of your living room, in order to maintain that white skin tone. Which of course, is completely ridiculous.

      Delete
  8. Not to mention Ostman described light colored feet long before all this hoopla started.
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Patterson studied Ostman's accounts, that's where his original Patty drawing (you know, the one that looks just like her in mid turn with big breasts) comes from. He was drawing an Ostman account.

      Maybe you should learn before opening up your donk licking mouth.

      Delete
    2. ^^ MMC or Kent Obsessed with Joe obsessors

      Delete
    3. Scrambling and looking for answers, worked up in a froth.^

      Delete
    4. Patterson studied Ostman's accounts, that's where his original Patty drawing (you know, the one that looks just like her in mid turn with big breasts) comes from. He was drawing an Ostman account.

      Maybe you should learn before opening up your donk licking mouth.

      Delete
    5. ^^ MMC or Kent Obsessed with Joe obsessors

      Delete
  9. GW knows wheres da bigfoots goes.....

    ReplyDelete
  10. thankin sometimez bigfoots alookin lack bears, becawz ifn U seein tham, U thankin bear not bigfeets

    ReplyDelete
  11. Joe it's Harry strain !! How's the Bigfoot world these days !!???

    ReplyDelete
  12. The bottoms of Pattys feet should be almost black with white cracks in them?????? TTL ????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 野人在这里我们用不了多久,最好独自离开

      Delete
  13. What I find weird is the awkward hunch while walking. That's hard to do especially in a fluid motion. Explain that one to me. I've even tried to duplicate a walk like that and it hurts. Whoever or whatever it was had to have good endurance

    ReplyDelete
  14. Another Complete BS Presentation Brought To You By M.K. Davis
    1. Neither the USFS nor the BLM spends money on lime to stabilize roads in California. Gravel and river rock is used because it is often free. A lime borrow pile would never ever in a thousand years, be placed in a stream bed. Only a lunatic or someone who has spent his life with his head buried in the sand and consequently is not aware that stream bed water levels fluctuate wildly from season to season, thus making it completely ridiculous to consider storing any kind of loose product in a stream bed and expect to have it there at a future date. It's absurd. Furthermore, there were no roads to the Patterson Gimlin film site, and MK Davis knows that. Improved roads are required for dump trucks with 10 yards of material to access a halucinated storage site in a stream bed. Where are the guys with the straight jackets when you need them? Lastly, there is no hand print on the log as Davis maintains here. Bark sheds off of a tree progressively. The sooner the bark sheds, the longer it is exposed to the sunlight. When finally, all of the bark has shed, the areas where the bark was shed earliest, will have a lighter sun bleached tone to them.

    In conclusion, M.K. Davis continues to test the boundaries for how stupid a video a person can put on the internet, and not yet be carted away to the funny farm, in a fairly snug straight jacket.

    ReplyDelete