Sunday, January 12, 2014

See Why Finding Bigfoot Rejected This Footage


We've videos from this YouTube user before. Here's why Finding Bigfoot rejected it:



127 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Hey guys

      Great docu on one of my favorite filme. The top video is the one to watch

      http://www.bigfootbuzz.net/could-one-of-the-best-bigfoot-films-all-time-new-analysis/

      MMC

      Delete
    2. Not the real MMC^^^^^^^

      You will know its the real me soon. So i guess i have multiple dopples, as now there is even someone with a pretty cool avatar pretending to be the one and only MMC. Very flattering actually. But i assure all you guys that when i make the change that will set me apart, you will know it.

      Peace.....

      MMC

      Delete
    3. ^^^^^ your an idiot kid

      Delete
    4. You truly are an idiot kid. The more you impersonate me, the more flattered i get. But you wont be able too soon, b/c im making a big change, and getting involved with some expeditions. I have actually been exchanging emails with Matt Moneymaker and we are considering working together.

      You kids are just funny, go run along now and play. The grown ups have come to talk, and MMC always leads the discussions.

      Peace....
      And i bet you still dont know my favorite band. You like being me so much, whats my favorite band?? Huh?? You cant tell me?? Cmon tell me my favorite band, right now?? You cant, HA!!!

      MMC

      Delete
  2. Watch out guys, tonight episode in Kansas will be mindblowing!

    I'VE BEEN TRACKING SASQUATCHES FOR 25 YEARS

    ReplyDelete
  3. Replies
    1. He's a bonafide resident of Narnia, that's for sure. He cried himself to sleep the night Bigfoot Files episode 1 aired and Sykes taterholed him deep.

      He has zero accountability, trivial understanding of science, and zero credibility to boot.

      If breathing wasn't an involuntary action then he would have died by age 12.

      Delete
    2. ^ Got tuned on the Johnson thread and is understandably cranky.

      Poor little fella.

      Delete
    3. Hey Joe where should I report my personal account? I saw Bigfoot in north rock county in western Montana and I was scared to death

      Delete
    4. Joe spends every day of his life arguing about a fictitious beast on a blog.

      Delete
    5. 1:28...

      Get on over to the BFRO and get your account on there... You can also make a start at spilling the beans here bro, very interested!!

      Peace.

      Delete
    6. tell them the bigfoot had glowing red eyes. they eat that shit up

      Delete
    7. LOL Joe do you know that North Rock county doesn't exist? That's how you verify your sources?

      That anon is probably just joking you, moron!

      Delete
    8. Anon 1:46 spends every day of his life arguing about what he believes to be a fictitious beast on a blog.

      MMG

      Delete
    9. Nuttcracker Man is the most credible voice in the Bigfoot community and he will fart in your general direction.

      Delete
    10. "He has zero accountability, trivial understanding of science, and zero credibility to boot."

      That's an accurate description.


      *gets ready for the gnats to swarm*

      Delete
    11. Gnats are gaining some serious credibility in the Sasquatch community.

      WA

      Delete
    12. Danny Boy... Didn't you run off crying last time you were in town?

      Oh, and this WA clown smells of poo worse than you... You been talking shit WA?

      Plop!

      Delete
    13. Oh look, another line PJ commandeers from me. Some people just lack creativity I guess.

      Delete
    14. You taking shit again Danny?

      Plop!

      Remember to wipe your mouth.

      Delete
    15. Joe's getting smoked downpage and is looking for something that won't tax his brain quite so hard.

      Delete
    16. I'd actually go and have a read of those threads... Sorry to disappoint.

      Not.

      Delete
    17. These Videos come from a Website called Beacon Bigfoot. Steve Kulls of Squatch Detective put this Website on his Hall of Shame Listing as soon as it came out last year.

      Johnnie Jones warned about this Video a while ago. He even knew the Midget used in the suit His name is Bob Fester of Cold Spring, N.Y. This little guy is locally well known, and actually went to school with Johnnie.. .

      Delete
    18. And I thought to mention, I'm a close friend of Johnnie. I'm on his computer right now, with a bunch of his friends laughing in the background.

      Oh wait, Big Red you know our African American ex pro football player he says FUCK OBAMA!

      Johnnie, is in the Hospital recovering from an arm injury. He was training/breaking in my new Mustang which nearing pulled his arm off!
      Hes doing Okay but more angrier than ever! He's pissed because the Wolf pack came back and killed a calf that was just born.
      I'll be the one watching this site and keep him abreast of any Vile comments against him, his wife
      Whoever the Anon was that wrote those vile comments about his wife better pray he never finds you

      My name Tina Walking Bear!
      Isn't that Ironic you trash trolls

      Delete
    19. Hello Tina Walking Bear!

      Give John my love... Can't stop; got some clowns that need a proper tuning!!

      Peace.

      Delete
    20. My name is Daniel Hanging Sack and only two people care about John, Stories, the terrible state of New York and your laws, as well as your big "Afro American" [as John loved to say] ex-football player buddy.

      My high school basketball coach was a teammate of Michael Jordan when he played for the Wizards and he says f**k your black friend. He said he's much blacker and has youth on his side.

      PS - the names of those two people are Sparklecake and PJ.

      Delete
    21. Hey Mr. Daniel Campbell, Johnnie warned me about you, but I will not let myself sink to your level.
      With In our African community that number around 400 residents, most (not all) distrust and do not like other African Americans because all these people work, most are self-employed, and live off the land. No Obama Welfare sheep here.
      They also see the hatred from the "White Race" against Native Americans, to this day.
      I read the Hatred you have for everybody, and your disgusting remarks!
      Come to Tannersville, N.Y. and see how long you will last!

      Tina Walking Bear

      Delete
    22. Been to New York half a dozen times, it sucks, no thanks.

      You take the Internet way to seriously.

      You're black friends are guilty of the same 'hatred' as everyone else.

      Delete
    23. Hey fuck face Daniel, This is Cory, Johnnies Grandson, You better be careful, we do take this shit to heart. We're not the kind of people you want to fuck with! I'm not the nice one! Johnnie is the nice guy! I ain't! if you say any more shit about my grandmother, I'll find you, tear off your head, and shit down your neck.
      You can fuck with other here, but don't fuck with us!
      Hey,Tina Walking Bear, this is how you handle these white people!

      Delete
  4. There's nothing on the hill

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. me spent shell casings that say different

      Delete
  5. The legend of bigfoot is dead. Killed by Kitakaze.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kitakaze - "I know where the suit is."

      Anon - "Really? That's good enough for me."

      ... Closure desperation is a curious thing.

      Delete
    2. check out the CCP thread. The complete absence of bigfeets in the areas where bf sightings are most prevalent is a HUGE problem for you.
      This has nothing to do with the suit. Your misdirection has failed, along with your other lousy arguments.

      Delete
    3. If you guys want to see a 'suit' check this one out.

      Courtesy of my good buddy TT.

      So what do you think guys?

      Water Baloons or Robot Musculature? :)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbcC5xGPb6Y

      Enjoy.

      MMG

      Delete
    4. the suits mean nothing. why are ZERO bigfoots ever recorded by hundreds of cameras over years and years in the squatchiest places on earth?
      think logically...you can do it...

      Delete
    5. 1:36, 1:48... You must be new around here. Your argument has been knocked out of the ball park too many times.

      There have been experiments with infared trail cams that have proved that these appear to omit what looks like a flashlight beam when on (According to the trail cam manufacturers, the game will not spook because of the lack of flash). Any creature with nocturnal vision would be able to see this and merely stay out of it's way. Whilst there is not a trail cam being manufactured today that doesn't omit an audio frequency that isn't audible to us... But maybe audible to a creature with heightened senses.

      Bigfoot ain't a dumb animal.

      MMG... Man, I haven't got Internet to watch that link you posted, any good?!!

      Peace.

      Delete
    6. So although even the rarest and most elusive animals on earth, including basically every primate on the planet, is being photographed, you rmagical bigfoot isn't?
      More special pleading for bigfoot. It obviously has qualities that can only be described as 'magical' as far as our understanding of life on earth goes.
      With the newer generations of trailcams you argument will become even less convincing, if possible. Keep in mind that the researchers conservationists and biologists involved with all of these programs report ZERO evidence of bigfoot period. No sightings, no tracks, no clacks knocks or howls. Some of them studying the squatchiest places on earth for over a decade.
      It is also very telling that nobody involved in the business of bigfoot evidence has ever reported on these groups or their findings.

      Delete
    7. Game. Set. Match.

      Of course sparklecake will come shuffling along in a few hours to get the final word on the matter.

      buc buc bacaw

      Delete
    8. Joe check out that link ASAP.

      Pretty controversial given the source but i'll let TT take you through it.

      Excellent vid as usual. A must see for all footers and skeptics.

      MMG

      Delete
    9. what part of patterson was a conman don't you understand?

      Delete
    10. "There is no BF"

      "But I'm more than happy to believe the word of a known liar and bullshitter known as Kitakaze!!"

      So what is it guys truth or BS?

      You cannot slate Patterson without proof and then exalt Kitekaze who was caught lying and had to 'leave' the scene for a few years...

      For Kit see Dyer.

      MMG

      Delete
    11. Kitakaze did not conduct these studies. He has provided linked information to all of their sites, and all of their procedures.

      Shoot the messenger much?

      Delete
    12. WHAT PART OF IT DOESNT MATTER IF KIT HAS THE SUIT OR NOT DONT YOU UNDERSTAND

      IRELEVENT

      Delete
    13. sparkles should quit while he's ahead. come back in a few hours when everybody's gone and you can spout off like you normally do

      Delete
    14. Sometimes Sparklecakes gets them menstrual cramps real hard.

      Delete
    15. Kitakrazy self-demolished with the "exact match" claim of Hilarious and Patty, then along came Hilarious with arm extensions doing a hairy jerk dance, blowing up in Kitakrazy's face, as Hilarious then claimed he used arm extensions in the PGF.

      There is all kinds of krazy on the JREF boards, which is where this information is, public, for all to read. Kitakrazy's "exact match" post is there on offer. The thread still exists.

      Delete
    16. 2:33...

      It's pretty simple numpty... You lie! Not every primate on the planet has been trail cammed.

      Schooled.

      Secondly... Do you know how many wildlife biologists are involved in Bigfoot research?

      Schooled again.

      Man... You made stuff up all day; your creative child's mind must be seriously tired by now. When you're not making stuff up about what people have said (cause you haven't the intelligence to debate anything), then you're making up facts.

      You just too dumb numpty... And it makes me smile soooooooooooooo much, ha ha ha ha!!!!

      : )

      Delete
    17. Uh-oh. Joe's in meltdown mode.

      Go to the thread where you can get the names of the projects, links to their websites and and the methods they use to conduct their wildlife surveys.

      Do NOT take my word for it. These are serious people doing serious research; not a bunch of footers.

      Hypothesis: Joe resorts to name calling and saying Schooled repeatedly when he's getting destroyed in an argument.

      Delete
    18. Sykes is coming and you are scared. Vrrrooom Vrrrrroooooooooom!

      PJ stand-in guy

      Delete
    19. Dude I'm always ahead.

      Why quit huh? :)

      MMG

      Delete
    20. 3:57...

      It's pretty simple, I'm tired of you... You've been making hilarious lies up all day and now that you got exposed for lying about all primates being caught on trail cams, and threatened with a long list of wildlife biologists and anthropologists that research this subject, you crying like a baby.

      Tell me something; why would people like Jane Goodall and Sir David Attenborough have an openings about this subject?

      (Duh?)

      Bigfoot ain't a dumb animal boy... You've been told once. You on the other hand are one dumb animal, and that's being pretty kind to you.

      Oh no... I resort to name calling when I'm talking to the most hilarious of people who have to make up stuff to even attempt to mix it with the big boys.

      ; )

      4:00...

      "Dr Sykes is quite happy to discuss the negative findings of the research so far, but the groundbreaking results from two samples means that Oxford University require him to peer review these in a paper properly. This has not stopped British based newspapers running with the assumption that 'Bigfoot' has been proven to not exist via proven bear samples."

      - Fringe News

      "Sykes has publicly stated on the BBC that his main objective was and still is; to find other species' of human on this planet. If he has found a new species of bear in that process, that is pretty amazing... But you have to be of a very high level of needing closure on something to over-see the fact that a bear in Asia does not disprove a Bigfoot in America.

      (Sigh)

      For Sykes to still have the fundemental stance and still be associating with Bigfooters, doesn't mean that the long term results of his study are already certain... It merely means that we have to wait a little longer... Because Sykes' obvious agenda has not been fulfilled yet."

      - Joe Fitzgerald


      "For the most part the samples he has tracked down for analysis have turned out to be known species such as humans, bears or apes; however two samples taken towards the end of his quest will "change our understanding of human history. Professor Sykes is a world authority on genetics and what he has to say about Yetis will shock the world".

      - Taken from a very recent book review on http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/10/first-hint-of-sykes-yeti-book/

      You were welcome.

      Delete
    21. So you're going to seize on that one insignificant fact- that perhaps not all primates have been caught on trail cams? What a lame thing. These species are all fully recognized by international zoological societies and therefore have been proven with type specimens. They have probably all been photographed, just not by trail cams. Maybe there are one or two that are small and incredibly remote that haven't. But an 800 pound North American primate?

      Pull the other one.

      You are losing this one badly.

      And even a skimming of the above thread will reveal to anybody familiar with the English language that it is you, dear chap, that is behaving like petulant child.

      Hundreds of cameras for years and years in areas where YOUR side claims to have repeatedly seen massive primates. Zilch. If there is a rational; explanation, besides the obvious, I have yet to hear it.

      Delete
    22. Hang on here... Can you believe this?

      Firstly, YOU use a false argument, a lie... That all primates have been caught on trail can. Then... When exposed for a little liar (I'm suspecting now this is Muir) the argument that not all primates on the planet have been caught on trail cam; is 'insignificant'?

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!

      Man, I can't believe you can suggest anyone is petulant when this is your idea of 'debate'... Are you being serious? Are you really that dense?

      Man... They've been putting trail cams up for far longer than this project has, and it's an old argument & old news; especially when you have the mounds of evidence roll in as the months go by. For every month that this project has gone on, there are seriously outnumbering months where evidence has rolled in, in comparison... Again headed by wildlife biologists and a anthropologists.

      Oh dear.

      Delete
    23. What primates haven't been caught on trail cams Joe? And are there any primates that we do not have clear and convincing photographs of?

      Delete
    24. And what evidence of bigfoot's existence are you talking about? Mounds of what? Where? Can you give us a link?

      Delete
    25. keep Googling Joe. We can wait. And we'll be here tomorrow. And the next day. And the next.

      Delete
    26. oops- I just reread the thread and I said 'basically every primate'. So I did qualify it. I guess you've been spinning your wheels, thinking you had found an easy way out.
      I'll follow you around and remind you of all of this tomorrow. And the next day. And the day after that. I want to hear about these mounds of evidence? How exciting!

      Delete
    27. 'Easy way out' and you post that?! Ha ha ha ha!!!

      Man, you've been tuned all day... Exposed for stretching and twisting comments, exposed for making exaggerations and now you've been exposed for telling lies. Do I really need to post all the evidence that you fail to counter here 'day after day after day'... Man, please, please, please stick around... You are why I'm here, you are why I love coming here very day, you are why I have this ego, because you are too stupid and you make it so easy for me to bully you about like the cyber insignificant you are.

      It is important to me that you know this, because I love what I do to you... And you in particular.

      ; )

      Delete
    28. You didn't answer a single question Joe.

      What primates haven't been caught on trail cam? You seemed so knowledgable before.

      Is there new evidence of bigfoot's material existence?

      Will you provide a link?

      Delete
    29. PJ, are you a midget? It would make everything even better if you were.

      Delete
    30. I tell you what... Go and look for yourself and stop relying on me to spoon feed you your education. I don't avoid questions as much as I avoid stupidity. Not all types of gorilla have been captured on trail cams for example, plus the Bili ape has not been caught on trail cam.

      Get Danny Boy to link his balls again... You can't counter the most basic of sources of evidence, and you want more?

      Delete
    31. it's as bad as i thought. we have photos of the Bili ape old sod. Perhaps not by a trail cam, but if you can stand there and photograph them, you don't need a trail cam.
      I find it very disingenuous of you to use that argument.

      What on earth makes you think that the person taking the photos of the Bili ape could not just as easily get the creatures on a trail cam?

      That is just a crazy train of thought, IMO.

      Delete
    32. Nope... That wasn't your argument, so stop moving the goal posts. We have clear footage of Bigfoot, why do you want photographs? Your point was that "every primate in the world has been caught on trail cam" meaning that Bigfoot isn't real because trail cams haven't found one in the PNW. Well it's BS... They have erected trail cams to find chimps and not found Bili's and have erected the same to find gorilla's and only have the very precious small amount with none of various other types of the same species. You avoid the fact that there are possibly higher numbers of chimps than Bigfoot, which would account for the amount of trail cam pictures there are of them in comparison... Which I must stress... Is such a small amount still. That isn't a crazy thought, that's the truth... It takes researchers weeks to track Bili Apes, same as gorillas.

      Facts.

      Delete
    33. When we were discussing 'primates' being accessed by trail cams, I assumed you were using the primate label to denote some intelligence or behavior associated with the species.
      If you are talking about simply the numbers of any given animal, then I should think that the fact they were able to pick up the lone wolverine in the state should at least give you some pause.
      And they are not using JUST trail cameras Joe. Several people much more knowledgeable then I have commented and stated that some (not all) of the projects are extremely well done using the best available research methods.
      I think if you read up on these projects you might learn a great deal about how they can estimate animal populations using these methods.

      Delete
    34. It's pretty simple... It's nothing mainstream science hasn't done for years. It is completely rational for someone to only believe in something that they have seen... Particularly something like this subject... But because they have photographed a wolverine, that has been before I might add; doesn't extinguish the possibility of other creatures being existent. It's back to the bear DNA example. Especially when at the very same time this project has been going on, there has been a steady flow of research accumulation from parts of the same region, not to mention the rest of the country. You cannot close the world out for the sake of one area, however big it is and the PNW is big.

      I am not for one second challenging these researchers; I in fact celebrate these great minds for what they are doing and what they've achieved... But it is nothing new and even as this project is in full swing; more and more Bigfoot researchers are turning away from trail cams... Because they have never been the bearer of any fruit. A lack of one source of evidence doesn't cancel out another two or three... That goes against all rules of evidence accumilation.

      I'd be a complete liar if I said this didn't frustrate me, I can however step back from my own point of view and understand what a lack of trail cam pictures could seem like to someone who doesn't entertain the idea of how this creature has been so successful for this long, but the truth is there are more Bigfoot researchers that have gone down this road with cams and turned from it for a reason and had better results for it.

      Delete
    35. It's 2:30 in the morning in the UK so I'm off... If you want to continue this tomorrow, call me out but remember one thing...

      You want a war; you got one... You want an exchange with a little respect; show some and you've got that back without question. Don't forget my former proposition however.

      Delete
  6. wow . that footage with the baby bigfoot sucking his thumb should have been on the show just for audacity of the guy... lmmfao

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wouldn't it be great to see a hollow point 220 swift evaporate that things face?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Early settlers diaries spoke of the joy of witnessing head shots on baby bigfeets.

      Delete
  8. EVERBODY RELAX

    Big Jim Rennie is here to sort out this mess.

    First up Joe I thought I told you to stay indoors, this is no place for someone like you. Special pleading for your favourite cryptid just wont cut it I am afraid. Science says no bigfoot. Listen to science and deal with it. Science gave you the very computer that you use to preach your monkey man religion. Oh the fucking irony of it all.

    Yes, the Cascades Carnivore Project is the death knell for footery. Well not that it even needed it, but yea, you are done. Crys from the likes of DWA and the BFF muppets complaining scientists are not looking and right here we have a 10 year study recording the wildlife in an area that is supposedly "prime" bigfoot habitat. Guess what. No stinking apes, not one, not a trace of one, no sign of one, nothing. Yet miraculously they manage to capture the most elusive mammals on the continent. That is fucking pwned and there is no two ways about it. Seeing you morons jump through hoops trying to give your magic monkey man magical abilities is frankly a fucking embarrassment to the human race.

    To all those skeptics out there, keep up the good fight. I know you can not reason with a moron, but it is our duty to try. If we do not try to pass on our knowledge then we are no better than those who lack the knowledge.

    Now calm down people and stay in your homes, if we all stick together we can get through these troubled times.

    Big Jim Rennie over and out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. get 'em jimmy - hardtimes for bigfoot

      Delete
    2. Forget Dyer and Smeja.

      Kitakaze killed bigfoot.

      Delete
    3. Little Jim Rennie, people wonder why you are invested in such a creature not existing. Yours and others emphatic-ness in the matter is strange, since you claim to casually dismiss the entire subject as nothing but a crumb on your ample sleeve.

      If the latter is true, why are you hyperventilating?

      Please just rip open the can of truth and finally tell the truth, for once, just once, why are you emotionally invested in this creature NOT existing? Don't make anything up, no excuses, just tear the truth out of your heart and write it down.

      After that, please sign Over and out, and when you go out this time, stay out.

      Delete
    4. As soon as PJ's mom puts an internet feed in the new basement, he'll be here to copy/paste the hell out of your ass.

      Delete
    5. I can watch a telelvision program and not believe it's true. Why can't I visit a web page about something I don't believe is true?

      This site is funnier than hell and it's interactive. You butthurt footers can deal with it. I'm sure there are dozens of heavily moderated sites where you can go and thump your chest with other 'knowers'.

      Delete
    6. Nuttcracker Man is the nuttiest bastard this side of the nuthouse.

      Delete
    7. Hey Fat boy!!! I wondered when you were gonna put that pizza down and join us for another schooling.

      It's basically like this... People like you are too stupid to counter sources of evidence when presented with them. So what you do, is quite simple; you claim there is no evidence, it's way, way easier than looking stupid if you were to acknowledge and try and counter like an adult. Special pleading is hilarious when you have a living fat boy example of cognitive bias like you, actually, that's being a little polite, you just plain dumb boy.

      Every single one of your points regarding this project that's given you the first rush of blood in years, has been addressed up top in one of my comments to an equally fat numpty.

      But tell me this Fat Boy... Tell me how someone like Jane Goodall and Sir David Attennorough go on the record to state this creature is a possibility? Surely you don't know more than them from behind your religious car sales desk?!

      And you wanna talk about 'science'?

      What a fat joke you are... Now run along before this another comment get's your heart racing a little too much.

      Schooled fat boy, schooled.

      Delete
    8. Tiger nuts. They're GreeeeeaaaAAAT!

      Delete
    9. Joe: check out the Cascades Carnivore Project over at the BFF. You better get over there and set them straight. They got links and everything, though, so be prepared. You're usual bullshit prolly ain't gonna fly!

      Delete
    10. Kita-blase comes back to bore everyone with the trail cam debate.

      Yawn.

      We've done it to death. Yawn.

      Skeptards says no pics cos no BF.

      Footer says no pics due to IR and Freq.

      Nothing changes. Next.

      MMG

      Delete
    11. BJ Rennie.

      I thought we had destroyed that fat old sob.

      Very Christian of you to pop by. I'm in the market to buy a used car from a crazy but honest internet troll like yourself.

      MMG

      Delete
    12. Man, I'm just fine upsetting you people here about it, thanks.

      The plain and simple truth is that not even all the cameras these people can put up can account for a region as big as the PNW... Anybody avoiding that is either very naive or conveniently avoiding the fact, it's as easy as that. Sure they've seen some rare animals the size of wolverines & shit, with the ocassional grizzly... What's so different about the other examples of trail cams that have easy counter arguments for?

      Also... Bigfoot ain't no dumb animal, and isn't gonna do the tango in front of technology that it has probably not only seen be erected, but has the ability to evade through sensory attributes.

      They've been putting trail cams up for far longer than this project has, and it's an old argument & old news; especially when you have the mounds of evidence roll in as the months go by.

      Pop over to the BFF and tell what I said... And sorry to ruin your day.

      Delete
    13. Wrong MMG. No pics, no tracks, no sightings, no vocalizations, no grabbing peanut butter and raspberry jam sammiches out of Dr. J's hands.

      By people who have been searching the very areas the footers tell us are thick with for years and years and years and are taking wildlife surveys.

      What don't you understand? It's pretty simple.

      Delete
    14. Jesus Christ, do you maroons not understand Stephen King, Under The Dome, and the character Big Jim Rennie?

      It was only a month ago that it was explained over and over again.

      Your religious used car salesman that you think is real is fictitious just like your mythical man beast.

      Delete
    15. Explain what?

      Wriggling out of pwning so embarrassing it made your testicle meltdown display almost seem like nothing?

      MMG

      Delete
    16. Easy DC, the bleebers are gettin restless. Let them have this one.

      Delete
    17. They act like cornered rats.

      Delete
    18. Ok, let's look at it like this how many cameras have these researchers erected?

      Let's compare that number to the size of the PNW.

      Then, let's compare the number of months this study has gone on for, to that of the evidence accumulation during the same length of time... Let's also look at the significant people who have made comments regarding their open mindedness of this subject during that time.

      It's an old argument and there have been trail cams erected all over the country for many years... Bigfoot ain't a wolverine, a wolf, a grizzly, a lynx... It's a type of human that has evaded people and in particular; technology for this long. Why? Because it is a a big pink flag in a see of green... It is an intrusion in a home where they know the slightest bit of detail to stay one step ahead of all other apex predators and us to survive.

      It's as old an argument to say that Bigfoot is avoiding this study as it is to say technology should have found this creature by now... And laughably it seems to be giving you people a cause to get excited about.

      I wonder if people like Stacy Brown would be concerned about this Carnivore Project? I know Sykes is still looking for samples; so he sure as hell isn't.

      The reality of this is; you people have very little to go on of late... And digging up old arguments isn't gonna help that... Cause trail cams have so many counter arguments and I'm happy to post them as long as if takes to expose you silly people like I have done for quite a while now.

      Pow!

      Delete
    19. Man...all those words and not a smidgen of original thought. Makes the weak delivery even more ludicrous.

      I'll give you this -- you're the undisputed King of pseudologic. Even DWA isn't as deep down the rabbit hole as you.

      Why do you take such offense over people asking you to post on BFF or Sasquatch Proboard too? Ever hear of diversification?

      That's why you're guilty of 'Big Jim Rennie' attitude and philosophy. It seems you know you are small potatoes in a big garden and can't handle it.

      Delete
    20. It's not just trail cams Joe. They have no evidence of bigfoot whatsoever. No sightings. No tracks. No vocalizations. And some of them have been there for 10 years Joe, surveying an area that is covered with dots on the BFRO site map.

      Delete
    21. We're not upset Joe. We're just trying to help you understand how this works. Would you like us to go to the CCP thread and copy the links over here for you? Would that help?

      Delete
    22. 5:09... 'Original thought' and you're suggesting there is no Bigfoot because of trail cams?

      Ha ha ha ha ha!!!

      Man, do you know how long this has been dribbled over by you people, and you want to suggest I have no original thought? Jesus, you people make me laugh. You'd love for me to leave and go to the BFF because it would mean you could get away with your little hate campaign here. You are why I am here, you are why I love coming here and it will be your lies and agenda driven crap that keeps me here. Remember you are the one pleading for me to leave, sad for you that it should be off the back off your arguments being countered so regularly and successfully.

      5:09... Man, how old is this argument... Again! Ten years eh? I know people who have been in the woods 30 and not seem anything. The fact is, that I know people who have spent 40-50 and have.

      Easy as that.

      Delete
    23. Your anecdotal evidence does not really apply now does it?
      Every other creature seems to be accounted for. Even the states' solitary wolverine.
      Your argument seems to be that the area is too large for them to see one. Yet everybody sees them, all of the thousands of eye witness reports you guys cite as evidence proves that.
      You yourself were debating the eyeshine issue, something that again brings them into close proximity. There are 'mountains' of reports of bigfoot up close and personal and everywhere you want to be.
      I'm glad Kit pointed out the existence of all of these studies. It certainly disproves the existence of bigfoot in those particular areas.

      Delete
    24. Oh yes, of course people see them, but these people aren't confined to the same spot, same tree for weeks on end, giving out infared and electronic humming are they? What a stupid argument that is.

      Furthermore, how many of these accounts are missidentifications? Take 90% of those sightings away, and you still have what one would expect from a highly intelligent, highly evasive, largely nocturnal creature.

      Like I said up top which was conveniently dodged; let's compare the number of months this study has gone on for, to that of the evidence accumulation during the same length of time... Let's also look at the significant people who have made comments regarding their open mindedness of this subject during that time.

      You ignore physical evidence accumulation and then bang on about trail cams that pick up wolverines?

      Delete
    25. "I know people who have been in the woods 30 and not seem anything. " Joe

      Gee, that makes a compelling case for bigfoot. Talk about YGNALI

      Delete
    26. you keep saying evidence accumulation and never specify what that evidence is or where it's from.

      we're not mind readers Joe. what are you talking about? And is there a link we can follow?

      Delete
    27. Nobody here said leave and don't post here. They question why you become enraged when people ask you to also post on BFF and proboards where conversations go hundreds of pages in depth on specific topics.

      You can post on another forum or two (especially the biggest and most frequented, as well as moderated ones on the net) without ceasing your postin here.

      Talk about seeing what you want to see.

      Geez.

      Delete
    28. I also know people who have spent a matter of an accumulation of a couple of years in the woods and seen Bigfoot; the purpose of the comment above was to draw irrelevance to what he was drawing on.

      YGSANLI

      Delete
    29. BTW- i you'd accessed any of the sites, they are not relying SOLELY on trail cams. That would be idiotic.

      Would you like me to give you the link so you won't look quite so uninformed?

      Delete
    30. For every little angle you have, I can show you how irrelevant it is... It's as easy as that.

      Old news for naive heads.

      Delete
    31. Nobody here said leave and don't post here. They question why you become enraged when people ask you to also post on BFF and proboards where conversations go hundreds of pages in depth on specific topics.

      You can post on another forum or two (especially the biggest and most frequented, as well as moderated ones on the net) without ceasing your postin here.

      Talk about seeing what you want to see.

      Geez.

      Delete
    32. Hey Big Jim,

      Shouldnt you be scouring the beaches of Elbe looking for more fake tracks??? LOL.. I remember fondly the days you spent claiming the Elbe trackway was the real thing and couldnt be faked. Yet in reality, it was one of the easiest trackways to see was fake. The evidence and beyond suspicious circumstances of the find were enough for even kids to know it was fake.

      Yet not Big Jim, he was for sure it was real!!!

      Big Jim is credible, you can tell form the Elbe Trackway, lol!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
  9. WHERE'S THAT GRUMPY LITTLE SPARKLECAKE? WE NEED TO TURN THAT PARANOID FROWN UPSIDE DOWN!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see your pee pee Mr Campbell.

      I told you if you get them out again I'll snap em off.

      MMG

      Delete
    2. You kids should really stop using the term sparklecake. Its extremely homoerotic and very stupid. I dont know who started, but you can bet they are a big homo, just like all the other homos who keep using it.

      Pwned!!!!!

      MMC

      Delete
    3. Anon 6:29

      Your an idiot kid

      Delete
    4. ^^^ You tell em dude,

      At first it was kinda funny and flattering, now its getting old. Im sick of this dude impersonating me. Im glad others can see through it too. But dont worry all, i will be making a big change soon.

      Keep tryin fags!!

      MMC

      Delete
  10. Has Mr. Jones been around today to yell at everybody yet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Early settlers diaries spoke of a man named John W. Jones who would wet his pants if someone even said the word 'bear'.

      Delete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anybody can come along and claim to have seen anything.

    We need something, anything to prove the material existence of this creature.

    Joe thinks tracks prove it, but that is the same argument Krantz used in the 70s. It didn't work then, and it won't work now that Joe has adopted it.

    ReplyDelete
  13. So lets get this straight,

    A gay producer from the finding bigfoot picks out which pieces of evidence to investigate????????? And at the same time, remember that Moneymaker claims that this show isnt scripted for TV in any way. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    So a gay hollywood producer who probably has never even set foot in the woods, somehow is knowledgeable enough to know which pieces of evidence should be investigated. These clips probably are fakes, but the real joke here is that anyone from finding bigfoot, let alone some gay producer, should ever be telling anyone what is fake or not.

    Finding Bigfoot is a scripted TV show where no one is trying to find bigfoot. They are trying to find money. There are no good guys on that show, not Bobo, not Cliff, not the gay producer, no one. They all are there for money and they play there roles appropriately.

    What a joke!!
    Fetusman

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hey Joe: Is every woman is Wales like Catherine Zeta-Jones?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If she is wearing white fur head to toe and says "baaahhhhh" a lot.

      Delete
  15. Hey Joe,

    You know its a crime to sit in your astrovan outside the local YMCA with binoculars all day and night, while surfing bigfootevidence, dont you???

    I am beginning to think that either Joe is in reality Robert Lindsay, or at the very least has exchanged salt samples with Robert Lindsay in the past.

    Joe "Oh Wee Robert" Fitz........a true bigfootevidence blog hero........translation.....i live in my parents basement and scope out people form my astrovan for "research".

    FetusMan

    ReplyDelete
  16. I try not to be homophobic but I am. this guy is everything that's irritating about homosexuals ie personality of a brick and irritating as fuck

    ReplyDelete