Bigfoot Ethics 101
Editor’s Note: Dr. Matthew A. Johnson is one of the most credible people in the Bigfoot world. In July 1, 2000, Dr. Johnson had a "Class A" Bigfoot encounter with his family while hiking near the Oregon Caves. After his life changing sighting, he went to the public and described one of the most intense encounters ever. You can join him on Facebook at Team Squatchin USA.1. Thou shalt not go behind a fellow Bigfooter's back to find out the location of their Research/Habituation area(s). If they tell you "No!" or "I want to get to KNOW you better first", then "No means No" or simply take the time to get to really KNOW them better first.
2. If a Bigfooter behaves in such an UNETHICAL manner (i.e., If they choose to go behind a Bigfooter's back to obtain the location information of their Research/Habituation areas), they shall be publicly called out and brought to the attention of other Bigfooters because if they attempt to do it to one person, the odds are that they just might do it to other Bigfooters too.
3. If a Bigfooter is called out for UNETHICAL behaviors, thou shalt not "Shoot the Messenger." Instead, thou shalt confront the Bigfooter who tried to go behind a fellow Bigfooter's back in order to find out the locations of his/her Habituation/Research area.
4. Those who defend the offender (i.e., Take the side of the individual who attempted to obtain the locations of someone else's Research/Habituation areas in an UNETHICAL manner), they're merely shedding the light on their own UNETHICAL tendencies (i.e., One does not stand up for a friend when the friend engages in UNETHICAL behaviors. Rather, one confronts one's own friend when they misbehave). Bigfooters don't let Bigfooters engage in unethical behaviors.
5. Finally, if a "Public Apology" is to be made, it will be made by the offender who tried to go behind another Bigfooter's back to unethically obtain the location information of their Research/Habituation areas. The individual who was offended is NOT responsible for issuing a "Public Apology." Rather, they're responsible for publicly calling out the unethical offender and to warn others about their unethical conduct.
Doris first
ReplyDelete"Sorry, that's completely false. First of all, scientific evidence is defined by being biological and not anecdotal. There has to be organic evidence to be scientifically analyzed. This is why anecdotal evidence is worthless unless compounded by raw physical data.
DeleteIn this sense, all submitted biological evidence in conjunction with bigfoot has returned as known animal. Usually bear, canine, deer, raccoon, and bovine."
The assertion that there is absolutely no physical evidence is absolutely false. There is more physical evidence than most people realize or in this case; willing to acknowledge. Physical evidence is found every month in various areas across the country. Distinct tracks with dermals that have species traits, that do not match other animal tracks, hairs that match each other but no known wild animals, and large scats that could not be made any known species, are all "physical evidence."
The reason why tracks are 'not good enough' for example? Because we have examples of them being falsified. This is a major, major fallacy... Because nearly all evidence can be falsified and is more evidence of scientific method being twisted to suit an early conclusion, even in the court of law and is cognitive bias. Cognitive Biases are systematic errors that predispose one's thinking in favor of a certain viewpoint over other viewpoints. The scientific method developed, among other reasons, to counteract these biases in order to derive objective knowledge.
"'Normal' science, in Kuhn's sense, exists. It is the activity of the non-revolutionary, or more precisely, the not-too-critical professional: of the science student who accepts the ruling dogma of the day... in my view the 'normal' scientist, as Kuhn describes him, is a person one ought to be sorry for... He has been taught in a dogmatic spirit: he is a victim of indoctrination... I can only say that I see a very great danger in it and in the possibility of its becoming normal... a danger to science and, indeed, to our civilization. And this shows why I regard Kuhn's emphasis on the existence of this kind of science as so important."
— Karl Raimund Popper
Peace.
I hope you listen to the woman above big doris.
DeleteHey joe hope all is well. B
DeleteD.
Joe bigfoot retard 101
DeleteHello 2:28! Much respect!
DeleteGood morning Joe furthermore dr j that's craziness
DeleteHey Harry!!
DeleteApologies Bigdad! Just worked out who you are!! Ha!
DeleteMORNING, JOE!!
DeleteALL CAPS
KUDOS FOR DORIS!! TWO IN A ROW!!
DeleteALL CAPS
Doris you are indeed kicking some arss! HEY ALL CAPS!!
DeleteJOE, I LOOKED UP COMMUNION LIKE YOU SAID, BUT, GOT NOWHERE.. THEY NEVER MENTIONED
DeleteTHE RED EYES! :/
ALL CAPS
i looked it up, and there is no such creature known as bigfoot.
DeleteSorry ALL CAPS, I think I may have confused you! JP Smith and Freeman Young talk about eye shine in the following link;
Deletehttp://youtu.be/mjr7YNviNuo
... I must warn you that this stuff is pretty far out; the stuff I must say I like very much!!
As for red eyes, I'll do some homework for you but the best you're likely to come across are the eyewitness accounts. It appears to me that the longer armed, more apish featured type are the ones that seem to have the glowing red eyes.
Hope that's some help to you bro.
Ridiculous. There is no scientific proof of bigfoot at all. Nothing. Nada.
DeleteAs for credible bigfoot researcher--why? What has the guy found? Nothing. All there is are his stories. Nothing concrete at all.
Also who is he to tell people where they can and cannot go? Does he own the land?
What trash.
Bigfooting is all about EGO EGO EGO and a bunch of idiots getting their 15 minutes of fame.
DeleteHabituation my ass.
You are welcome to our opinion when it comes to Johnson, but it is the single most ignorant thing in the world to such there is no evidence in the face of so much.
DeleteIf you deny the existence of evidence, I suppose it avoids coming up stuck and looking silly when you are presented with examples that of cannot slither put of.
Don't make me list the sources, I'm sure you are pretty familiar with them by now.
I have a long Johnson.Want to fight about it?
DeleteIf you are in a state park,as SOHA obviously is,then people are free to come and go as they please,no one owns anything,including bigfoots.I'll feed the ducks in the park with my son but I don't own the damn ducks.This guy is becoming a real headcase and plenty paranoid to boot.Look here Johnson,I'm putting my name today because you know me and got all pissy and paranoid about answering a few questions.
DeleteToo Much PJ
DeleteIf this man's "research" area is on public land he has no say. He thinks he is a god of bigfooting that's why he is posting like it's in a bible.
DeleteThis man is mentally ill with a severe Napoleon syndrome. Avoid him at all costs. No matter what he says people say when he "allows" them near his delusion.
Warning, warning, warning.
I can't stand this Johnson character.
ReplyDeleteThat's more craziness than I care to hear the man is a psychiatrist or psychologist that's the scary part
DeleteWHEN THAT BIG S.O.B. STARTED CRYING I WAS DONE WITH HIS ASS..LOL
DeleteALL CAPS
Lol oh nooooes I gotta keep people away from the spot where all my bigfeets come cause then people might realize they aren't there
DeletePlease sign this NDA so you can't tell anyone I'm full of shit
DeleteQUESTION, HARRY, ARE THERE 2 TYPES OF BIGFOOTS, THE ONES WITH RED EYES AND THE AMBER COLORED ONES?
DeleteI WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE SOME SCHOOLING
FROM SOMEONE ON THE MATTER, BEING THAT I'M
A NEWBIE..
ALL CAPS
Good morning every one,how's your knee ALL CAPS? xx
DeleteI'm not the one to school anyone AC I'm a city boy I really don't know I'm just incapable of seeing that an animal as elusive as Bigfoot is continually visiting anyone it just goes completely against common sense if it was the case why aren't all the tree huggers with no cameras and all good intentions not constantly seeing Bigfoot
DeleteEVA!!!!!!!! I MISS YOU, FRIEND!
DeleteTHE KNEE IS HEALING, NOT READY TO WALK
ON IT TOO MUCH..
ALL CAPS
I DON'T THINK WE'LL "EVER" SOLVE THIS MYSTERY
DeleteIN OUR LIFETIME..
ALL CAPS
So I'm honestly beginning to believe the hibituation stories are a gameplan to some end what the end is is beyond me but I can almost guarantee it's to fuck someone either literally or out of money something because it just doesn't make sense unless you really are just that starved for attention
DeleteLMFAO, HARRY!!
DeleteALL CAPS
Good morning Eva
DeleteAC I think eye shine the same as in cats just has to do with the color of light being reflected or the angle of reflection because there's times our cats eyes will shine one color or another so I don't think it has anything to do with subspecies type
NAHH, HARRY, THESE RED EYED ONES EMIT LIGHT OR GLOW FROM WHAT I HEAR..
DeleteALL CAPS
Hmmm that's interesting I'll have to look into that than I've never heard of an animal that actually emits light from it's eyes or what it would even take to do that
DeleteSTRANGE....
DeleteALL CAPS
This is the only plausible theory of light shining from the eyes of people or animals
DeleteIn computer graphics, the concept of eye beams is fruitfully resurrected in ray tracing (in which the bouncing of eye beams around a scene is simulated computationally)
I'm not in that camp thought I strictly believe the eyes take in information not send out anything to receive information and the computation is only a line of sight math not an emission of light of sight math so I really like I said don't even know what it'd take to physically make the eyes emit light they already digest the most information of any body part let alone what extra neuro connections it would take to emit a light it just doesn't seem reasonable to me
Deletec'mon chimps- eyes work because light ENTERS the eye and is focused on the retina. If an organism emits light it cannot be from it's eyes, unless, once again, bigfoot is immune to physical reality.
DeleteWho are you callin chimps chump
DeleteHa ha ha!
Deletesorry macaques- eyes may reflect light, but they do not emit light. There goes like 50% of your sightings on the rubbish heap.
DeleteI heard somewhere that 90% of all made up on the spot statistics are totally wrong.
Delete; )
Oh... And though some very much stand by omitted light, there is no concrete school of thought that suggests Bigfoot omit light anyway; so you can throw that on the rubbish heap too.
'It was very dark, and I saw a bigfoot with glowing red eyes'. Garbage. The animal would be blinded by it's own 'glowing eyes', and be incapable negotiating anything other than a large parking lot.
DeleteI think you are mistaking this beast for the common North American Snipe.
There's a whole bunch of known animals that have bioluminescent properties but there's no scientifically described animal that has bioluminescent eyes, at least within the spectrum of light visible to humans. If an animal produced light out of its eyes it would vastly REDUCE their vision, not enhance it in any way.
DeleteTo put it another way, here's a list of creatures that are said to have eyes that emit light:
- vampires
- spectral hounds/black shuck/barghest
- mothman
- the Dover Demon
- bigfoot
- cartoon robots
- evil Disney villains
And here's a list of creatures that do NOT have glowing eyes:
- animals known to science
Pretty simple... Maybe Bigfoot don't have bioluminescent eyes.
DeleteSimple as. There are people who suggest Bigfoot can cloak too...
Amazing. That this site's most prolific (and irritating) bigfoot proponent is completely ignorant of how this world actually works from a scientific standpoint.
DeleteMan, jumping the fun much? Ha ha ha!!!
DeleteHave of ever heard me support such claims? Answer me this simple question...
You people make me laugh... So much anger directed as a result of so many instances of logic fallacies being identified.
DeleteIt's ok... Baiting maybe all of what you have left, but never forget there are as many enthusiasts that call out what you have proposed, than anyone else.
; )
There's a significant percentage of Bigfoot sightings where glowing eyes were described so I'm pretty sure that we can chalk those up to people's imaginations getting the best of them. If anecdotal evidence includes any mention of glowing eyes that's a good indicator that the story shouldn't be taken too seriously by anyone.
DeleteI wouldn't be too quick to chalk anything off... 'Glowing red eyes' could quite easily be the result of eye shine, easy as that.
DeletePeace.
'As for red eyes, I'll do some homework for you but the best you're likely to come across are the eyewitness accounts. It appears to me that the longer armed, more apish featured type are the ones that seem to have the glowing red eyes.'
Deletejoe posted this upthread, so apparently he had no idea until today that 'glowing red eyes' was a glowing red flag. Really intelligent guy.
Or, like most 'footers' he encourages anything and everything that will lend support to his rice paper thin hypothesis of giant unknown primates.
JOE-SMOKED
DeleteJOE-PWNED
JOE-SCHOOLED
JOE-STOOPID
Oh dear... Someone been upset a few more times than he would like?
DeleteAgain, baiting... And in your attempts the only one who looks silly is you as I point out to you a very basic point that you have missed; either from stupidity or at an attempt to bait... I can't decide yet.
'Glowing red eyes' meaning eye shine... This was presented to you at 6:02... I would learn to either read properly or reference from those who have a little more intelligence other than baiting, before suggesting anyone else isn't clever... Old boy.
; )
For example; I could quite easily suggest that your belief of any number of recognised creatures' habits (that are from a minority pocket of people and widely disregarded) to indeed be the case, but that wouldn't be a true reflection, would it? Sure... It does well to vent a little aggression into an imaginary scenario, but only lasts as long as it takes to point out such a fallacy.
DeleteYou also conveniently ignored my point; that there are so much more enthusiasts that condemn omitted eye shine. Glowing red eyes could purely be eye shine.
Baiting don't work too well when you're with the big boys.
blah blah blah
Deletejoe has to parse words now because he looks stupid
glowing red eyes were your words ya assjack
My words... Your interpretation... As convenient as it was until I showed you how to read properly.
DeleteAgain.
(Sigh)
haha joe-- dance fucker dance
Deleteyou're like a fuckin marionette
"'Glowing red eyes' could quite easily be the result of eye shine"
DeleteA lot of the reports that mention glowing eyes annoyingly don't record details such as whether the witness had a light source with them. Some of the reports of glowing red eyes are clearly eyeshine from a light source pointed at the creature, eg:
http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=2347
However, there's a bunch more reports of Bigfoots with glowing eyes that clearly aren't reflected eyeshine:
http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=945
http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_report.asp?id=1664
http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=8435
http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_report.asp?ID=1228
http://www.bfro.net/gdb/show_article.asp?id=54
... and so on and so forth.
Thank you for those.
DeletePeace.
Even the reports that could be 'eyeshine' once again point out that this is a creature that frequently brings itself into such proximity to man that it's eyeshine is observed. Yet you cannot show us a picture of one that was taken in our lifetime (under 47). Or a body, etc.
Delete'Pretty simple... Maybe Bigfoot don't have bioluminescent eyes.'
Deletejoe fitzgerald today
Maybe?
you're unschoolable
Many of the reports that mention eyeshine don't mention any other details, just a tall creature with glowing eyes. Some of those reports mention a hairy silhouette and some only mention that the eyes were high off the ground. The animals could possibly have been standing bears, or moose/elk seen front on, or an owl in a tree. Eyeshine on its own isn't proof of much at all.
DeleteAnd who's to say that out of all of the video and photographs taken, that not a good few of them are actually what is being suggested thy are?
DeleteIf you have a creature that buries it's dead... Has the evasive attributes of a highly intelligent human, with the heightened sensory attributes of animals... Then the frequency of sightings are exactly as to what is expected. I don't have to remind you of the frequency in which recognised animal remains are found from natural courses. When you also have 70% of the country covered in wilderness then you can understand (or maybe not) why this creature is doing what it's doing so successfully.
Peace.
Don't go changing the topic Joe, we're talking about eyeshine/eyeglow here and why it's a bad indicator for Bigfoot anecdotes.
Delete7:19... Spot on.
DeletePeace.
7:23... I'm addressing the gentleman up the thread... That's manners.
DeleteListen, my concern is to draw attention to the excistimg facts. There are loads of things we don't know about these creature, like infrasound for example, and I'm open to a lot of it... But the truth is I really don't know enough about the facts of eye shine/shine omitting Bigfoot; so I can't really lay claim to be certain about any of it.
My mind is open however.
Special pleading for bigfeet. Because we all know that bigfoot possesses whatever traits that are necessary to keep your childish dream alive.
Deletebigfeets are a primate with a super duper sense of smell, not because we have seen this in any other primate, but because saying so allows me to say it smells human on trail cams, etc.
what a maroon
'But the truth is I really don't know enough about Bigfoot; so I can't really lay claim to be certain about any of it.'
Deletejoe fitzgerald 01-12-14
Special pleading? Just because you struggle to find any counter argument for what is being presented off the back of many, many years' worth of research, doesn't mean anyone is special pleading... Laughably.
DeleteSmells human on trail cams? Are you sober??
And with the post at 8:31, I know I'm baby sitting... See ya later.
I love how Joe will start screaming SCHOOLED at people if he thinks he's winning an argument but when someone takes the time to show that his position is actually wrong (Eg, statements like "'Glowing red eyes' could quite easily be the result of eye shine") he goes really quiet and tries to change the topic. LOL
DeleteHey Joe, man up and admit you were wrong this time.
Seriously, are you trolling? Either that, or you are just plain dumb, man.
DeleteThere's other ways in the world of getting attention... The type in a reclusive cyber world ain't the healthiest.
People reporting 'glowing red eyes' could quite easily be that of eye shine or missunderstanding. That is me being skeptical, but practicing proper skepticism in that I'm pretty open to other viewpoints, because I don't know the facts.
Stupid little insignificant, you'd have enough to bitch about if I said I thought Bigfoot omitted red lasers from their eyes.
Now that was a schooling.
Nope, the reports that I quoted clearly had glowing eyes that weren't eyeshine or anything else. They were glowing like a ghost train monster's eyes.
DeleteYou were wrong, you hadn't done your research and you were talking out of your ass and now you're trying to weasel out of admitting you didn't know what you were talking about.
That's sad, man. Stop being a coward and just admit you were wrong.
"There's other ways in the world of getting attention... The type in a reclusive cyber world ain't the healthiest."
DeleteAh ha ha ha ha, that's pretty rich coming from a guy who writes thousand word essays over and over on this blog.
You're not just a coward, you're also a hypocrite.
Maybe those reports are wrong... Maybe Bigfoot do have the ability that we can't explain yet?
DeleteWhat exactly haven't I done my research about? That I'm not willing to jump in with two feet about glowing eyes reports? Do you even know what you're talking about??
Tell me Einstein... How can I be wrong about something I've been openly skeptical about?
Man... You making yourself look silly, I might just stick around to make you look even more silly.
9:32...
DeleteAnd that's the issue here isn't it... You have to focus on irrelevances because you can't and never have countered my comments, cause you too dumb.
Moma never show you any attention.
Ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
"Maybe those reports are wrong... "
DeleteHa, you've been so insistent in the past the the anecdotal evidence should be allowable and now you're saying that they can't be trusted after all. So which is it? Is anecdotal evidence reliable or not?
I think you'll find that I've always maintained that 90% of all accounts are inaccurate... An outlook that's in review; but that is what I've maintained.
DeleteRunning out of angles to fabricate yet?
Poor dumb numpty...
Oh wow, Joe is really squirming on the hook today. Wrigglw wriggle wriggle
DeleteMan... The truth is pretty much like this.
DeleteYou have nothing, you never have, you never will and you are left to tactics like this thread; pretty pathetic and it warms me to see you resorted to it.
I'd be embarassed... Troll.
You got schooled, now run along.
You know that Joe is in difficulties and with no more arguments when he start to repeat obsessively "schooled" like a 5 yr old baby
DeleteNo come on you are busting his balls he's clearly stated for as long as I have read that at the very least 80% are wrong dont say he's back tracking because he's not
DeleteHey Harry bro!! These kids are just yanking my chain! Left you an email bro!
DeleteHope you are well buddy.
Hey Harry, Joe, AC if your around. Just so you know, I know someone that had a Bigfoot step out from behind a tree and tower over them. Looked down, growled in his face, all while the man said RED LIGHT was beeming out of his eyes. It was pissed! The guy was so close he could have touched its belly-button. 4 in the afternoon on a trail in Yosemite. This guy thought bigfoot was a joke, he did not believe in them. Glowing red eyes baby!
Deleteyeah sure, now share your 'maria
DeleteHmmmmmm, fascinating. Man, I'm reading some of the BFRO accounts pasted up top... Pretty cool stuff!
DeletePeace.
What's goin on TBP
Delete"I think you'll find that I've always maintained that 90% of all accounts are inaccurate... "
DeleteOh jeez. You only have 10% confidence in the dataset? That's ... something else.
For a start, Sturgeon's Law is only an adage and shouldn't be applied to real world statistics. It's not a scientific or mathematical law. You can't just apply random confidence levels to datasets, you have to actually examine and measure the data. If you're making guesses like that then you're not in any position to accurately assess the data or draw conclusions from it.
Secondly, if we accept the assumption that the data is 90% worthless then congratulations, your hits are statistically insignificant and you can't reject the null hypothesis. In fact you can't perform any worthwhile statistical inference at all and the alternate hypothesis is completely unsupported. Therefore on the basis of the anecdotal data failing to maintain statistical significance we can reject the hypothesis that Bigfoot exists. That's not to say that the null hypothesis (Bigfoot does not exist) is proven, just that the alternate hypothesis is not supported at all by the data.
The short version: if the data is 90% inaccurate then the entire dataset is junk and can't be used to support the hypothesis that Bigfoot is a real creature.
Hello ALL CAPS,i'm glad it's getting better,hopefully it will be as good as new soon xx
ReplyDeleteTHANKS, EVA!
DeleteALL CAPS
DWA, Joe, Mike, MMG(sparklecake) and Travis have a show coming up called Dick Dynasty where they sit around and pat each other on the back because bigfoot has already been proven
ReplyDeleteA radio personality bubba the love sponge in fl has already trade marked it they better change their name lol
Deletehi
Deleteball boy
Good morning bb
DeleteWay to have fun with it Harry. No hard feelings, i was
Deletejust busting your balls!
BB
None taken man
DeleteOh man I watched that show suddenly smeja is a dick he is now the only authority on Bigfoot because he shot two. Well without proof sorry you may as well be the rednecks with repeated visits by anal probing aliens it's a great story but that's it
DeleteThen Todd broke him down feral human DNA rough
DeleteEditor’s Note:Dr. Matthew Ahole. Johnson is one of the most credible people in the Looney Toon world. In July 1, 2000, Dr. Johnson had a "Class A" Erection for his family while hiking near the Oregon Caves. After his life changing erection, he went to the public and described one of the most intense erections ever. You can join him on Facebook at Team Erectile Dysfunction USA.
ReplyDelete1. Thou shalt not go from behind a fellow masturbaters backside. If they tell you "No!" or "I want to get to KNOW you better first", then "No means No" or simply take the time to get to really KNOW them better first.
2. If a masturbater behaves in such an UNETHICAL manner (i.e., If they choose to come from behind a masturbaters backside), they shall be publicly called out and brought to the attention of other Masturbators, because if they attempt to do it to one person, the odds are that they just might do it to other Masturbaters in the circle jerk too.
3. If a Masturbater is called out for UNETHICAL behaviors, thou shalt not "Shoot/ejaculate on the Messenger." Instead, thou shalt confront the masturbater who tried to take them from behind.
4. Those who defend the offender (i.e., Take the backside of the individual who attempted to enter the initial backside), they're merely shedding the light on their own UNETHICAL tendencies (i.e., One does not get an erection for a friend when the friend engages in UNETHICAL behaviors. Rather, one confronts one's own friend when they misbehave). Masturbaters don't let masurbators engage in unethical behaviors.
5. Finally, if a "Public Masturbation" is to be made, it will be made by the offender who tried to cum inside another masturbaters backside. The individual who was offended is NOT responsible for issuing a "Public Masturbation." Rather, they're responsible for publicly calling out the unethical offender and to warn others about their unethical conduct.
We are men and don't stand for taking someone from behind! We jerk each other off, its the manly thing to do in our masturbation area!
Lol
DeleteThats just crazy,that dude needs help,LOL
DeleteHey rum did you see the message I wrote you about the funny shirt
DeleteI'm willing to bet that even though he thinks he does, Mr. Johnson doesn't actually own "his" "habituation" property. If it is in fact public land, it would be pretty UNETHICAL to tell people what they can and can't do with regards to locating it.
ReplyDeleteHEY! He does too own it. He owns the whole entire area. Millions of acres and his name is on every tree now too. So take it back.
DeleteHis tears have littered every inch of that pristine land.
He has pissed against nearly every tree. Isn't that enough to own the land?
No one else may ever go there. Not ever. Take that mr meany.
Now leave the world's greatest most credible bigfoot hunter alone. He alone has the key to Bigfoot. Only he has the method to finally photograph and film a real live living bigfoot in its natural habitat which Matthew owns.
Bigfoot owns nothing as per their religious belief that no one can own land.
Squatchin USA fever has gripped the nation
Delete^^Woody Guthrie?
DeleteI first had an encounter with bigfoot in the big woods of Wisconson and later with the same bigfoot in the forests of Washington.
ReplyDeleteI was lying on my camp cot and was jumped from behind by a huge bigfoot named Jack. He said his name clearly though gutterally as he wrestled me to the ground.
I managed to give him two big black eyes and loosened several of his stinky discolored teeth. I bit his toe off and spit it in the face of his gorilla-like teenage son who waited nearby as the hulky bigfoot tried to have his way with me.
I won both rounds and managed also to hypnotize a baby bigfoot in my habituation area in Alexandria Virginia. I made them act like chickens and squawk around peeking the barnyard.
Later I became a professor of psychiatry at Leonard Poolishness University in Toronto and had to keep my bigfoot encounters to myself.
I feel for Matthew. It isnt easy to see things that arent there and then convince people of it.
Bill Harrigan
Awesome- thanks for sharing. Can I send you lots of money or something?
Delete^^The scary thing is I don't know if he's joking (I hope) or serious.
DeleteI'm super serial.
DeleteJoe's eyes reflect the light in the bedroom at night as the moonlight streams in. Makes me all shivery inside.
ReplyDeleteIt all goes back to Maurice Sendak's 'Where The Wild Things Are, a childhood favorite of his. Joe sees himself as Max, and wishes to cross the ocean to become king of the wild things (bigfeets)
Delete"Dr. Matthew A. Johnson is one of the most credible people in the Bigfoot world" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
ReplyDeleteHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*breath*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
He saw a bear and embellished the story to draw more attention to himself. Before the sighting he was just another man-boobed doofus. Now he sells tee shirts proclaiming that he's a man-boobed doofus.
DeleteHey,jump up my ass and tell me what I ate last night.
DeleteJoe's cock.
DeleteThis johnson guy sounds like a total fake. Total fake.
Deleteethic in bigfoot? o please.
ReplyDeleteWhy is anyone giving this wacko a public forum?
ReplyDeleteHow long did it take for researchers to 'discover' gorillas after they started to look for them? It certainly did not take some 60+ years to get some definitive photographic proof and a body, etc.
Habitat has been shrinking continuously and more and more people are out in the woods, yet NO solid evidence. I'm crying foul.
the bff has an excellent thread about all of the REAL biologists and conservationists that have a huge network of cameras throughout the pacific nw. Scores of cameras in place for years right where all of the bigfeets are supposed to be and not one of these people has ever seen or recorded anything that could even be misidentified as bigfeets
Deletethis is the death knell of bigfoot
This guy must be new around here...
Deletewho the.. what the .. i must be on the wrong site. i thought this was bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteeveryone who comes here believes in bigfoot. only the clinically insane leave still believing in an 800 pound primate that roams all over North America
Deleteso says the guy with a Patty tattoo on his chest
DeleteWhen was this nutbar made head hocho of the bigfoot world?
ReplyDeleteif the doc believes in bigfoot don't that make him a quack doc.
ReplyDeleteThe Doctor failed to define the entire basis for his diatribe. Namely, "going behind one's back". There are a number of ways to find out where his SOHA is. Of those, I only see one way as going behind his back.
ReplyDeleteWays to Find OSHA
1, The doctor published pictures on the internet which has a picture of particular Lake in Southern Oregon in the background. Based on his own descriptions of which town his site his near and the orientation of that lake, it is pretty easy to figure out on topo maps, which lake that is and where that picture was taken from. He then post pictures of his vehicle on presumably a dead end road because you can't do Bigfoot research on a thru road very well. Based on the same topo maps, you then look for dead end roads. Voila. You know where SOHA is because the Doctor gave you enough clues to find it.
2. Using the gps/On Star capability in his late model Chevrolet SUV that always is on whether he paid for it or not, the government, sophisticated criminals and private detectives can use satelite information to pinpoint where he parks his car on weekends.
3. Using his cell phone gps that he inadvertantly left on, you use triangulation from cell towers and/or the actual gps info that his cell phone sends out.
4. By talking to someone that he actually took along, you get the location from him.
Of these 4 ways, I only see Way #4 as going behind the Doctor's back. No way you say! Yes way.
Why bother,the bigfoots he sees are in his head
DeleteMy unseeing eye glows red in the dark.
ReplyDelete