Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
What about an actual bigfoot? Just the one should do it.
ReplyDeleteI'm just gonna walk rich in and take that first
DeleteHold your applause.
*right
DeleteRemember don't interact with Josephine today. Not even once.
DeleteHey Joe! How are you? I need to clear up a few questions I have. Contact me here, Daniel Campbell.
DeleteP.S. I miss you! WE ALL MISS YOU!
How's that TRolls!
Bigfoots don't get tattoos.....stupid!
ReplyDeleteI wanna f--k autumn williams bad,
DeleteSimmer down, Enoch
DeleteFox?
DeleteThe only tattoo I would have would be of Hula Hoop Girl. Or Sharon H. Or Sharon H. as Hula Hoop Girl.
DeleteI want to get a tatoo of HENRY MAY on my chest !!
ReplyDeleteMe, too!!! I fuckin' luuuuuv Henry May's fat funky ass!
DeleteMMG
^better have a damn big chest...
DeleteClearly not MMG
DeleteMMG
Addition to the HENRY MAY tatoo I could get flaming triple jointed Bigfoot penises on my arms !!
ReplyDeleteBigfoot penises are only double jointed. The mid penile break in well known in cryptozooligical circles.
DeleteAhahaha
DeleteIt's really about the locomotion in the native habitat, for gripping and thrusting itself forward.
Nah, they have retractable peni, like their distant cousins, the dolphins. They sneak up on their women and then flip that shit out.
DeleteYou would know Daniel!
DeleteThe tat should be blurry. That would be more realistic
ReplyDeleteAnd the funnir than hell award goes to...3:45!!
Deletehw much of a half wit would you be to get a tatt like this
ReplyDeleteOr to believe in bigfoot
Delete^How much of a half- wit? A half-half-wit? :)
DeleteMr. President. The team remains on standby. We are good to go, sir--just give the order.
;-)
DeleteKit found the suit. Its over.
ReplyDeleteTrue dat. Although the suit is not important. The pgf is a hoax regardless of a suit being found. The lack of an actual bigfoot is the smoking gun.
DeleteHa!
DeleteYou see... The suit is desperately important, because if there isn't one, there is your Bigfoot you suggesting is lacking.
Your logic is the smoking gun old boy.
Wrong^
DeleteThe suit is right there on film.
No bigfoot is a big problem here.
Where is the suit then dumb ass? Where is the person with the craziest proportions in the world to fit into the monkey suit?
DeleteYou people get denser by the week, I'm telling you.
The suit is on the film. Where it is now how the hell would I know. What a ridiculous request.
DeleteWhat proportions exactly? That is just nonsense fabricated by pgf bleevers.
A bloke wearing a suit can have the same proportions as patty.
Have you actually stopped to take a look at your posts? Honestly??
DeleteYour burden is to prove that the creature is not organic and therefore a suit. We have our expert sources, what so you have? You have the same issue with us backing up our claims, why are you excluded from that?
The arm proportions, the leg proportions, the toe bending the finger bending, the 'masks' proportions... None of this is not there because you have a hard time explaining it, numpty.
No, a suit won't make those proportions and no... You clearly don't know what you're taking about, do you?
A bloke wearing some shoulder pads and some diaper butt padding covered in fur is what it is
DeleteEthos, pathos, logos...
DeleteStill no shred of the feetbig.
Don't interact with Josephine.
Show us a suit and your claim will take hold. The reason why our claim can take hold is because we have a costume expert of 30 years, and the coultless other sources of evidence that accumulate... That is how scientific debate works. Scientific debate doesn't work in the way that if you cannot back up your claims, that the primary reason we have legitimacy as a result, doesn't exist. That's stupidity.
DeleteDon't interact with Josephine. Not even once.
DeleteHey Joe! How are you? I need to clear up a few questions I have. Contact me here, Daniel Campbell.
DeleteP.S. I miss you! WE ALL MISS YOU!
How's that TRolls!
PGF = Hoax
ReplyDeleteIs Leon colored?
ReplyDelete^yes rainbow colored...
DeleteMy theory is that Leon is terrified of his own latent homosexuality, thus the homophobia. On the racist stuff, well, he's just an idiot.
DeleteWhat ever happened with ketchum proving bigfoot? Im not seeing any scientific acceptance of the creature so what happened there then?
ReplyDeleteshe committed criminal fraud and no one will touch her "paper".
DeleteOK I'm back. Found the suit, the cable guy Skyped it to me, didn't record it (doh!), really did plan to sneak in myself for a "routine signal check" but Brent's uniform was too big, then I just went for it but the dobermans got me, been recovering in an undisclosed rehab center translating Japanese, and by the way, the film will be proven a hoax as soon as the heirs die off. But now I just want to move on, OK?
ReplyDeleteKite pwns footers. Bff were at full damage limitation after just a few posts. Sweaty had to try to divert attention to some foot angle nonsense.
DeleteSounds like a real soap opera over there.
DeleteAs The Foot Turns.
DeleteHis casual comment that the film's authenticity will only last until no one can make money from it anymore is extremely provocative and should be challenged more aggressively. It's one thing to just show back up, but to drop a bomb like that and refuse to explain it, especially when you're claiming exceptional access, just makes you a troll to believers and skeptics alike.
Delete"Because like I said about Patricia and cashing in on a tell-all, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. More specifically because life presented more realistic and positive opportunities than getting embroiled in a battle I wasn't equipped to fight. Someone else can jump into that snake pit. Life's too short and one way or another, the PGF's claim to being real has a shelf-life only as long as the lives of those who continue to profit from it, and profit from it on their own terms that don't include disgracing themselves.."
DeleteThat statement reeks of self-serving BS. He is stating those things as facts of which he has special knowledge, but letting them hang out there without providing proof because it's too much trouble for him.
So, Patricia would tell all if she knew it would make her more money than continuing the hoax, but better to stick with something that you know works. Also, she's making as much money as she can without admitting it is a hoax, which could make her more, but it would disgrace her.
Ban his ass, BFF.
"I believe she is hoaxing" is an opinion.
Delete"I know she is hoaxing because, duh" is an opinion.
"I know she is hoaxing because I have special knowledge" is slander, or lying, or any other no-class descriptive you want to give it.
Oh dear...
DeleteIf a widow was to make money as one of her only means of income, from one if the greatest pieces of footage in history... Then how does that make the footage a hoax?
I hear the same sad logic in people condemning the footage purely on the basis that Roger Patterson was successful in setting out and getting a Bigfoot on camera.
(Sigh)
Anything except provide a monkey suit... ANYTHING!
Why has noone else done anything similar since?
DeleteSome what? Capture a Bigfoot??
DeleteWho are skeptics to say that they haven't, that out of all the footage that are supposedly of Bigfoot, that loads of them aren't?
You have to remember that out of the tens of thousands of eye witness accounts, it takes one of them to be legitimate for Bigfoot to be real... Just because you have Patty in an exceptionally rare state of motion... Doesn't make it fake purely because of that. Especially when you have the accumulation of other sources, matching specimens in other pieces of footage, and Tards stumbling over their own sad logic in that all this time, the 'suit' cannot be replicated... And people have tried.
Patty looks like a bloke in a suit to me.
DeleteAnd that's completely cool bro, I respect that. Just please try the other way of looking at it, that is important.
DeleteTake a look at a Bill Munns presentation when you get two minutes and see what you think.
Peace bro.
I looked at his presentation and his entire argument seems to be "I can't replicate it therefore its real". Well that is just poor science I am afraid. All that proves is that he can't replicate it and nothing more.
DeleteTo prove the film all that needs to be done is find an actual creature that can be seen and studied in the flesh that matches what is seen in the footage.
That is precisely how scientific debate works I'm afraid... You see, if you claim it is a suit, and then a suit expert of 30 years says it's not possible, then you still have your claim to verify. That is how scientific debate works, and in scientific debate, you require back up sources; such as tracks, etc. footage and tracks were good enough for the Bili Ape (after the locals maintained it was there for decades and were ignored) and is western science actually investigated, then you may have had your matching flesh and blood specimen a long time ago.
DeleteWrong^
DeleteBurden of proof.
Don't interact with Josephine. Not even once.
DeleteScientific debate doesn't work in the way that if you cannot back up your claims, that the primary reason we have legitimacy as a result, doesn't exist. That's stupidity. The burden of prove is with anyone who makes a claim, his subject does not get any special reference otherwise that would be against she scientific method. Your burden get's heavier as the years role by and it is more apparent that a suit cannot be manufactured to look anywhere as near as good. Our burden get' lighter as a result and as the accumulation of evidence keeps rolling in and science begins to actually ask questions as opposed to ignoring it... You'll have more than a magic monkey suit to tackle.
DeleteDon't interact with Josephine. Not even once.
Deletesome of those are well made but the rest just look plain awful. I could do a better job with crayola .
ReplyDeleteI want to get a tattoo of joe fitzgerald , on the head of my dick!! just putting him where he belongs........... eat up joe!!!
ReplyDeleteyou would love to blow Joe wouldn't ya ?
DeleteAnd just as I was about to have lunch... Bang goes my appetite.
Deletesounds like a man with experience, and references too,,
DeleteQuiet today without Joe
ReplyDeleteHey bro!
DeleteI think what speaks volumes about the pgf is the response that occurs when the subject of royalties is brought up. When it was brought up on the bff, bill munns immediately tried to change it from royalties to "licence fees" to try to divert the attention from anyone making any real profit from it. Disingenuous at best. The truth is profit is made. 10k a showing in fact and then more for image stills etc. Bigfoot is a lucrative business (4 seasons of finding bigfoot anyone?). The gravy train keeps rolling and at the heart of it is the pgf. If the pgf were to fall it would all come crashing down like a house of cards. This is why there is a huge resistance by footers when anyone says a bad word about their holy film.
ReplyDeleteFor footers it is a win win. The suit was likely destroyed after filming and as no such creature exists the film will always be there to keep the "belief" instilled on believers.
Oh dear...
DeleteIf a widow was to make money as one of her only means of income, from one if the greatest pieces of footage in history... Then how does that make the footage a hoax? Bigfoot is now part of popular culture, that does not make the subject any less credible, but quite the opposite... Are you stupid or something? Either that, of you haven't thought this out too well.
I bet you were the same type of Tard who thought ET's were BS prior to the popular culture boom of the 90's.
I hear the same sad logic in people condemning the footage purely on the basis that Roger Patterson was successful in setting out and getting a Bigfoot on camera.
(Sigh)
Anything except provide a monkey suit... ANYTHING!
The smoking gun is your logic... You now feel it is not important to explain how a suit could be made by materials that weren't available in the 60's, by a broke cowboy, that has in turn defied 46 years of technological achievements. That isn't important anymore, what is, is every other little avenue of slimey accusations, hearsay, rumors, lies... The same thing that you people claim Footers do. Anything that will deflect from the main issue you have.
Pretty pathetic and it is no more evident in the manner in which you are grasping at straws.
I am a skeptic on PGF but have no problem with Mrs. P making money off it. Real or not it's her footage.
DeleteWhat Kit is doing though is totally uncool. Saying he "knows" it's a hoax but offering no more than provocative comments. Same as a Footer not showing a body or pics they say they have.
I do think there's too much analysis of what is a film after all. What's a fold, what's a shadow, where does the arm really start, etc. That kind of evidence is just too open to interpretation.
Wasn't Kit caught out lying as well?
DeleteTrue dat.True dat.
DeleteWhat is important about what kit has achieved is nothing do to with suits or the film itself. What he revealed is the true nature of the cult of footery and that is far more of a smoking gun than any suit could ever be.
DeleteNo... What he has done is highlight the desperate requirement of lying to have to bat the skeptical corner... Because tacking the obstacle honestly seems to end up with a face palm.
DeleteIf Footery was nothing but a cult, them Kit wouldn't have to stoop so low... This is the lengths people will go when the world they can't explain around them presents them with such a headache. As a human race, we need answers... Even if it means bending the truth and moulding ideas to suit some and that is a cult; one that is more dangerous than any anthropological question the Bigfoot community asks.
Don't interact with Josephine. Not even once.
DeleteHere's Daniel Campbell, a grown man, talking like a 2 year old again. DIAPERFOOT! Dan, is there anything MATURE you can say?
DeleteDJ Kitakaze in the house!
DeleteWhooooo Whooooo!
Lock your cupboards folks he's looking for a furry suit!
MMG
If there is a suit, and some one finds this suit, I want to crawl into it with Eva and zip it up.
ReplyDeleteIf only you knew bro....
DeleteThere's nothing wrong with me don't be so horrible 8;51,.......Hello 8;47,if you can't find the suit just grab a sleeping bag it will be just as cosy xx
DeleteExcept for that giant Adam's apple you sport.
DeleteI don't have one sweet cheeks xx
ReplyDeleteDyer on WLAV tonight...Paranormal and Beyond. Closest thing to a real media he's done. Should be interesting. 11 p.m. PST, 2 a.m. EST
ReplyDeleteWho gives a rats ass.
Delete