Melba Ketchum Tells Dean Cain She's Dissapointed In His Decision To Host Bigfoot Bounty
Oh, wow. Earlier today, there was a battle between Bigfoot Bounty contestant, Rictor Riolo and Dr. Melba Ketchum on Facebook. The show hasn't even started yet and the battle lines have already been drawn! In a recent statement, Bigfoot DNA expert, Dr. Ketchum says the $10 Million Bigfoot bounty is really about harassing the Big Guy and it's impossible to win the show:
Riolo responded accordingly but his message was later removed by Ketchum! Perhaps this is why the scientific community did not take her hard work seriously if she can't even engage in civil debate on the subject of Bigfoot -- even in the realm of television programming.
i guess i'll take the honors. first.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Deletegood pic. that is what you do if you are a yes man. laugh at the bosses jokes.
ReplyDeleteReagan could spin a good yarn...nevertheless!
DeleteWish I knew what the joke was?
Just like BE to use a laughing picture of the criminal organisation running, not only the US, but the whole world. Says it all really, which side they're on; the cover-up.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete..Thanks Don, but even if I agreed with their politics I simply do not have enough time to join the KKK....
DeleteBIG GINGER STRIKES!!!
DeleteThere is no hiding place Don!
MMG
Ha ha ha ha!!
DeleteNow then MMG and Joe our resident butthurt footers. Please return to your homes everything will be OK. Big Jim Rennie is taking charge. We wont have any of this bigfoot nonsense on my watch. All I can suggest for you two is to do a bit of studying of the subject of Science. Start at the basics.
DeleteBig Jim Rennie over and out.
Big Jim, didn't you get Big Beat Up last time you were I town?
DeleteThe last time I checked, you were on a Bigfoot blog... You must be Big Time Confused.
Yeah Big Jim Rennie has got this.
DeleteWhere you been Jim?
Last time I saw you your taterhole was flappin' in the wind like a sail on a pirate ship.
MMG
Hey Joe I shut down this place last time and left you footers in a pile of smouldering ashes. And I Big Jim Rennie heard rumours of Joe getting a bit big for his boots so its time once again for the nonsense to stop.
DeleteSimply put you have no bigfoot. That's the bottom line. You can copy and paste endless paragraphs of drivel but there is still no actual bigfoot to point to, not even a shred of dna evidence that you can point to which can be examined resulting in a "yep that's a bigfoot".
You have nothing. As usual. The same with all you footers. Any other animal you can give some evidence for its existence and guess what you actually have proof of the animal, because the animal actually exists. SHAME that doesn't work for animals that don't exist like your super human mind speaking knuckle dragging coned head night visioned 9 foot tall magic wood ape.
Get yourself to a library, read some books about science... hell even read Wikipedia entries about REAL animals, at least they reference real sources. You come across so fucking deluded that I am almost 100% sure you are a troll pretending to be a footer and if that is true (I hope for the sake of humanity it is) then 10/10 bro good game. Sadly I think there are people that delusion in this world and that is a scary thought.
And I am not even going to start on MMG.
Now back to business. Everyone stay in your homes, if we all pull together we can get through these hard times.
Big Jim Rennie over and out.
Sup dork.
DeleteWhew! Thanks Big JIm. We're going to give this sience thing a shot.
DeleteI'm really nervous about it. I mean...communicating with the dead? Do e need a medium or something? I have a 32 waist.
Hey Fat Boy... Here's a cut and paste just for you...
DeleteYou have ten thousand years (the natives say 50) of acknowledgment of this creature. You have a transition from this into settlar's diaries that had no link to one another geographically that told of the same consistencies. You have 150 years worth of archeological and anthropological studies that have documented giant skeletal remains in libraries up and down your great country. You have a transition into that of modern accounts that tally the tens of thousands (that is of course just skimming the surface of those accounts), much of which are multiple person. You then have tracks with dermals that show scare tissue and toe bending, consistent with species traits from different States years apart, that are also found 50 miles into wilderness interiors. You have a transcribed language that was recorded from a similar description of the country. You have film footage that you cannot explain and you have science, in all the time it has had to debunk this subject and hasn't; asking the questions.
When you have the frequency of sightings that are in complete conjunction with what one would expect to see from a highly intelligent nocturnal creature that buries it's dead and evades in social groups, it is down to either the individual looking at that information to either express denial, or be a true skeptic and promote the requirement to at least investigate.
You have never had anything shut down except for probably your pizza business where you ate all your profit; probably why you give yourself the kinder name of 'Big', when you're probably just fat.
No, no... The pleasure's all mine.
Eh, and Fat Boy... Pop along to those libraries you claim to know a but about and read some stuff like this...
Delete"A skeleton which is reported to have been of enormous dimensions" was found
in a clay coffin, with a sandstone slab containing hieroglyphics, during
mound explorations by a Dr Everhart near Zanesville, Ohio. (American
Antiquarian, v3, 1880, pg61).
Ten skeletons "of both sexes and of gigantic size" were taken from a mound
at Warren, Minnesota, 1883. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, May 23, 1883)
A skeleton 7 feet 6 inches long was found in a massive stone structure that
was likened to a temple chamber within a mound in Kanawha County, West
Virginia, in 1884. (American Antiquarian, v6, 1884 133f. Cyrus Thomas,
Report on Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology, 12th Annual Report,
Smithsonian Bureau of Ethnology, 1890-91).
Didn't bother reading any of that nonsense as I already know you did not provide an actual location where this evidence can be physically seen (i.e. a museum) or a link to an actual published peer reviewed paper. Hope that makes you mad. It should. You know full well you have no evidence.
DeleteBig Jim Rennie over and out.
The Fat Jim Rennie is a card.
DeleteDid he say something about BF not existing yadda yadda yadda?
I struggled to keep awake reading that diatribe...
Come on Jim show some balls... ;)
MMG
most people skip joe's bs and go right to the next post where he gets smoked
DeleteYes Fat Boy... Those archeological and anthropologal studies would be found in those museums you claim to visit too.
DeleteNow run along Fat Boy... You're on a Bigfoot blog.
Yes, I jump straight to the smokings as well. Saves time and keeps it simple.
DeleteAparently Joe thinks he knows better than the millions of combined years of experience that scientists have had... LOL
DeleteThird here jumping straight to the smokings. Joe, time for making questions to yourself
DeleteClassic pwnage of Joe and cheerleader MMG by Big Jim. Nice.
DeleteThanks for dropping by BJ Rennie.
DeleteSee you in another 6 months... Boom.
MMG
Big Jim Rennie with the Runnies exposes self as JREFing skeptard extraordinaire via use of standard talking points:
Delete"shred of evidence"
"delusion"
"delusional"
"deluded"
"magic monkey ape"
You know, the usual claptrap they teach at the Randi Big Prayer Meetings where faith, mucho faith, is required to rise to their bleefs.
The many hair samples returning DNA results of unknown hominid are evidence. Footprints with dermal ridges are evidence. Some fillm footage and video offers some evidence. The hair and dermal ridges are hard science evidence.
Wrong again that there "is not a shred of evidence."
Skeptard of the Day, congratulations.
Big Jim had to go Big comfort eat.
DeleteRennie the Rectum-Ravaged Skeptard yet again.
DeleteBJ Rennie has a tattered tater.
DeleteAgain.
MMG
Well well well, looks like I cant leave you town people alone for 1 minute without it turning into a "bigfoot is real" circle jerk.
DeleteI see lots of personal attacks but no bigfoot. If you had any evidence you could present it and it would be accepted, but that doesn't happen, simply because there is none.
MMG, where do we start with you my friend. Your obsession with "taterholes" is a little alarming.
"Rennie Has The Runnies" - ALMOST funny, 10/10 for effort though. You sound exactly like that butt hurt footer I dealt with all those months ago, and looks like your stubbornness is still holding you back from seeing the truth. Your fear of this Randi guy is quite troubling.
Point me to a paper verifying any of this evidence? Your "unknown hominid hair" was tested by Sykes and is of known animals. Do you really think Sykes would miss that? Moron.
Point me to the published peer reviewed paper that substantiates any of that evidence. You cant. Not my problem.
Now run along people, if we all stick together we can get through these troubling times and build a better tomorrow.
Big Jim Rennie over and out.
Fat Boy...
DeleteDo us a favour and start by debunking the long list of things you avoided up top, and stop requesting a peer review when science hasn't investigated, that's the cop out of a silly Fat boy of ever I've seen it!
When you can debunk something after it's been presented as evidence, then you can claim there is no evidence. Put the pizza down and get thinking like Pooh Bear.
Lil' jim poonies butt plug went haywire in his size 12 taterhole.
DeleteHis Queen Randi saved his life by stitching his taint together.
Lil jim poonie,how's the taterhole holding up?
No offence but I think I will take Sykes' findings over your opinions.
DeleteBig Jim over and out
Who, Bryan Sykes of the Collateral Homind Project? Dr Sykes who is still attaining samples, anyone would think he had something to replicate? Bryan Sykes, an active member of Bigfootology? Bryan Sykes who has research currently in peer review that has two samples that are gonna change the world and have nothing to do with bears, apes or humans?
DeleteNot that I'm claiming to know what those two samples are of course.
We'll see how his long term study unfolds and see if you're so ready to take his findings so well should he bring you some bad news.
JOE GOT SMOKED AGAIN!
DeleteAlmost half a century later you still don't have anything decent to show us.
You're really starting to sound deranged. Have you been seen by a mental health professional?
It's late in the UK, I'm signing off... But I'll be along in the morning to respond to you 'Big Boy'. Make no mistake about that.
Delete4:51...
DeleteYou are so boring. Do you know that?
(Sigh, head shake, yawn...)
Easy joe on the fat guy. ! I think I'm stuck in my chair as we speak < B-(
Deletew'sup mmg ?
Joe, have you ever kissed a girl? What do they think of your Leaping Russian Yeti bullshit?
DeleteYou ain't played with me yet, "Big Jim Rennie".. So explain to me how science works exactly and I will give you countless examples of how it does not practice what it preaches.
Deletegreat- another bigfoot fag
DeleteYea with a name like "Big Jim".^
Delete"AnonymousFriday, December 6, 2013 at 5:35:00 PM PST
Deletegreat- another bigfoot fag"
Great-Another anonymous coward taking cheap-shots at people.
Most people actually know Joe's right, were Bigfoot some ape (that doesn't exist) all these trolls wouldn't even be here so it's fair to say the species not only is real but something important that must be mocked and hidden. Question is what and why.
DeleteWho needs DNA proof and/or a body and/or photographic evidence when you have the excellent study done by Ketchum? (/sarcasm)
ReplyDeleteInteresting how Ketchum, Disotell, and Sykes all agree now on certain points. (No sarcasm.0
Deletelies. footers always resort to lies.
Delete^ Closet footer still in denial.
DeleteIf I got owned like that by Rictor not only would I delete the comment I would probably leave the internet forever.
ReplyDeleteDid I own her? I tried to be decent and not the bitchy gay man I am known to be. I wanted a discussion on the subject matter and she ignored me. I feel sad. This show is a win win for everyone.
DeleteBig Jim Rennie approves of Rictors pwnage
DeleteShut up boy.And take that damn vibrating butt plug out of your taterhole son.I can't hear the TV.
DeleteHahaha.I can imagine that really happening. Now that's some funny stuff right there.
DeleteButthurt footer is really buttmad tonight. Good job Rennie.
DeleteLil Jim Poonie.Good one.lol.
DeleteVibrators hurt my pink hairy hole. But your warm goodness will make me squeal like a school girl!
DeleteInteresting definition on "getting owned". If someone had a history of badmouthing me, I would delete any comment they made on my facebook even if they were blowing smoke up my ass.
DeleteBut I will answer your claim Rictor... #1 since when is photographic evidence solid? #2 IF Bigfoot is being covered up (And there are many reasons why it would be.) then NO DNA evidence is going to be accepted. Ketchum did her own work, but most people send their samples off to various labs that already have a biased take.
Though I hear this or that geneticist saying that her results are faulty or they are this or that animal mixed with human contamination, I also notice that they seem to be unable to agree on what the "animal" is nor do I see them showing any examples to back up their claims. I did however see Sykes make a fool of himself coming up with theories far more ridiculous than Ketchum's theory. (Sub-Saharan Africans running around in Ice-Age Russia and Hybrid Extinct bears.) So Hybrid Extinct bears with modern bears is okay, but Hybrid Hominids are not?
I find Ketchum way more credible than Sykes.
Thats what I.m talking about Tz.
Deleteno one cares you long winded buffoon,tzieth.
Deletejoe's blog is about having fun at the expense of footers. so just deal with it.
Tzieth, out of the samples she did actually provide, the results were states which animals they belonged too.
DeleteProblem is she doesn't provide most of her actual work and data for people to test.
What good would it do anyway it'll be ignored because there's a cover-up in academia going on. Government, science (and CIA wing set-up blog BE) all in bed together on this.
DeleteRictor your the man agian! Hope she comes on the show, keep up the good work! Canadian guy!!!
ReplyDeleteThanks. Calm, rational debate does not seem to interest this woman. Only flame throwing seems to be her method. Which is too bad. Me and Dr. Disotell have offered the olive branch. Why is she giving Dean Cain a hard time? He's not a Bigfoot researcher, he's an entertainment personality. An actor. Dean liked my defense of him. So he knows whats going on.
DeleteShe does not and probably can not answer the questions you would ask of her Rictor. IMO what she has done is criminal fraud. If she goes on uncontrolled interviews she could risk financial loss.
DeleteThink she's shutting up, think again.
DeleteRICTOR, YOUR AN iDIOT!
DeleteShe was attacked over and over and over, before the Study was even completed.
Why the hell would she subject herself from questions from a FRUIT cake such as yourself. Most normal people don't even want to occupy the same air space as you.
If I run into a gay bigfoot, maybe you'll have relivence in this world. Otherwise, not so much!!!!!!!!!
Ps, I think you have to be gay to be a flame thrower ---------------- right. Idiot!
DeleteI support Dr. Ketchum. No! Wait! I support Rictor. I think. Damnit! Why is life so hard?
ReplyDeleteRictor did you actually change your middle name to 'Bigfootbounty'?
ReplyDeleteTalk about being 'All in'!!
MMG
MMG do you really believe a con man who said he was going to film a bigfoot managed to film one first try. A feat that has not been match since? Talk about being 'All in'.
DeleteMoron.
You have to hand it to Roger don't you?
Delete50 years on and his footage still stands. The more technology we throw at it the more legit it looks.
It's why you concentrate on the personalities and avoid the footage itself.
MMG
Does it still stand though? REALLY?
DeleteI don't see science accepting the footage? LET alone the fact that there is still no bigfoot to be found to match the footage to. Also no evidence that even points to the possibility of an undiscovered biped in north America. Its ludicrous.
All I see is a couple of crackheads on the BFF thinking its a real bigfoot. And that really is it. No mainstream acceptance. Hell even the scientists in the 60s laughed it off as a bad monkey suit. These are the facts.
YouTube; leaping Russian yeti (MK Davis version)... Matching specimen.
DeleteGlad I could help... Now, got monkey suit?
Also, check out my post up top for the evidence you claim isn't there.
DeleteYou have to provide a monkey suit, because if you can't, then Patty is real and therefore Bigfoot is real.
See how it works?
Not even footers would put up "Russian leaping yeti" as an argument. I am pretty sure that is mostly brushed aside as it really is laughable.
DeleteMonkey suits exists. Proven.
Bigfoots don't. Proven by the lack of expected evidence and proof of what is causing the phenomenon ie hoaxers/bears/idiots.
If you think its more likely that a bigfoot can exist than a suit that looks like what we see in the pgf then not even medical professionals can help you.
The plain and simple truth is; you see what you want to see in the two pieces of footage.
DeleteIn Patty; you see either a creature with dimensions & proportions, gate, muscle tone & skin folds that are organic... Or you see a man in a suit without offering an explanation how the 'suit' was manufactured.
In Leaping Russian Yeti; you either see a creature jumping from bipedal to quadrupedal motion in very tricky terrain, leaping feet into the air in transitioning those motions, muscle tone in the back and arss, limb length and gerth matchable to patty... Or you see a man in a suit without offering an explanation how that stealth would be accomplished; even in a bulky, no-neck outfit.
Now... These are just two pieces of footage and are one of many sources of accumulative evidence that you struggle to cope with at the best of times. It is simply not the scientific method to deny something is there when you struggle to attain answers for it.
And back to Russian Yeti; you are a liar or just unobservant. The creature in it's last moments switches from bipedal motion to quadrupedal motion. It is there in front of your eyes... I have shown this part of the video to skeptical thinkers and they are in agreement. I am actually bored of you because of your inability to present anything other than denying that something is there. How do you intelligently debate with a child? You can't.
DeleteThe creature jumps from bipedal motion to quadrupedal motion and that is something you have to deal with I'm afraid... I reference this footage for a reason, and the way you are avoiding it's obstacles is exactly what I intended on drawing you out on.
Joe, this guy does have a point about that clip from Russia: It is not given much attention at all by advocates...Any ideas why? I think MK is not very well regarded and his name is attached to it..Also, it is from Russia(a place where local governments encourage hoaxing), and finally its just to damn far away.....
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTddczieNdQ
Delete... At 1.47 mins, you see it pull itself along with it's arms in that terrain.
I am sure that a requirement of reassurance follows you in teenage life the same way it was a necessity in your childhood to be a reassured of the bogey man so much. Unfortunately the wild world out there has many unanswered questions, and simply denying something that is there, when it is in front of your eyes is the saddest cop out anyone can stoop to.
Also it is invisible to dogs. Another sure sign of it's magical properties.
DeleteYou have in the Russian Yeti a much younger specimen than Patty, probably a juvenile; this would account for the possible extra stealth displayed, as it would also explain the reason why the witnesses dog does not react in fear. A reference to dogs not being as afraid of younger Sasquatch as opposed to older specimens is the recent 'Listen to Squachers Lounge Podcast Tonight at 7PM PST With Special Guest Damian Bravo (Archived)' blog page... If you skip to 19mins, there is a reference to this regarding the Georgia house 'Visitors in the Twilight' location that has been stalked by Sasquatch.
DeleteYou must remember that Sasquatch are not dumb animals, have different tempraments and different agendas. A confused intimidated female with a gun pointed at it, would act differently to an anxious, younger male confronted by a man and his kid.
If you look at MK Davis' screen shots of the Yeti, you will notice that it's a matching specimen... And even harder to claim 'man in suit'.
Oh, and to suggest that 'there are no Bigfoot's so it has to be a man in suit' requires a little more backing because we at least have an expert, ironically a costume expert of 30 years that should be in your corner, but strangely enough... Isn't??
Peace.
3:31 et al raging dipshit skeptard twerktard dumbest comments of the century congratulations.
DeleteYou have proven bigfeet do not exist have you?
Congrats, you are the first person in recorded history to have proven a negative.
You must be an astounding genius.
My God, we are quaking in awe.
It's an extreme stretch to claim that Patty is a bloke in any kind of suit, jumpsuit business suit wetsuit you name it.
Patterson went where the footprints and reports were hottest.
He took an expert guide, Gimlin.
He took guns, a camera.
He drove pack animals in as far as possible.
He then went into the back country with pack animals.
You can point to almost no researcher who uses pack animals in the back country to search for bigfoot.
Those are your differences.
A bigfoot might be interested in, curious about, or less fearful, of horses, than people charging in on 4x4s.
Most researchers car camp, shoot video from the car camp or hike in a short distance.
Patterson and Gimlin did something much different.
You asked, there is your reply.
Shameless.
DeleteSo you are saying bigfoot must be real because a con man used a pack horse and no one else has ever done that before or since?
WOW.
Yes Joe, I know you think its good..But I asked why it hasn't caught on...I don't expect it to get the attention the PGF garners, but if its as good as you think it is I would expect more advocates would point to it...I think most people agree its too far away...
DeleteHmm.. And yet you believe that he was a con-man based on word of mouth, yet you do not believe bigfoot eye-witness testimony... Being a little hypocritical aren't you?
DeleteFact is that Roger Patterson had no criminal record and the only charge he had was not returning the camera he rented. (Same camera he filmed the creature with.)Those charges were dropped after he returned it..
So while we are to "prove" bigfoot is real, try proving Patterson was a conman. At least Bigfoot has evidence to back it.. there is NO evidence that Patterson was a con-man.
Yeah, and Rick Dyer filmed his Bigfoot on the first try. And went where the sightings were hottest, nuff said.
DeleteNo, not nearly enough said... 1st of all, Dyre's creature was so pathetically fake, that he had to film it from inside of a tent through a small hole with a cameraphone to give it the illusion of being a better blob-squatch. Sasquatch are not active in the day.
DeletePatty was filmed after a flood and heading for higher ground. But get it right, Patterson did not set out to film an actual Sasquatch. He was making a documentary.
He did have an actual suit and no one addresses this anymore. The suit was for recreations for his documentary and looked nothing like what he filmed.(Looked more like the Boggy Creek one.) The fact is that there was no suit that complex back then. (For that matter there still isn't one today.. Just look at any Bigfoot movie.) You can't even replicate Patty with todays technology and you think they could do that back then? The muscles moved and flexed as it walked. That still can't be replicated even with stretch fur. The breasts even swayed and bounced as it walked. (If you want to know how impossible that alone is, then go to your local nudy-bar and see how fake breasts behave.
Tzieth, you're post contradicts what people like John Jones and Mike Brookreson talk about.
DeleteThey both seem to get high activity during the daylight hours, as well as these darn turkey hunters whom see the creature...
You don't turkey hunt in the dark...that's more like Snipe (bigfoot) hunting.
Tzieth and Joe, you guys do see this is a conspiracy to make Roger look bad and badmouth thousands of witnesses, right? I'd be interested in hearing your opinions, why they're so hung up on this suit craziness when even they know it's none. Why the cover-up, what's really going on here, is Bigfoot an ET lab-made species dropped here to spy ideally constructed to stand wind and weather. That cover-up would make a lot of sense if the trolls were just timber guys protecting their acres from a species of ape, or primitive human - that couldn't go undetected forever - it'd make less sense, so we're possibly dealing with an alien species/interdimensional and this would fall under both national security and science. So for now, they've chosen to okay the ridicule of fellow Americans.
DeleteI guess I will address this mainly for the sheer happiness I feel when I see trolls and skeptics get pissed off by my "long winded walls of text." lol Because this will be LONG!!!! :D
DeleteI think there are multiple cover-ups for multiple reasons, but they cannot be related.
#1 Academic Science cover-up: You know how these Nay-sayers try to get scientific and start championing "The Scientific Method"? Well while they do this, they forget that huge Elephant sitting in the living room... Macro-Evolution! It has never been proven, never been successfully tested, and never been replicated, but that goes without saying. However you have all of these fields with all of these "Experts" depending on it to be real. Now there was an experiment involving fruitflies that they deem a "success". Basically they accelerated the life cycles of a group of fruit-flies and watched them change into various different species until they went sterile. However in the end, they were still fruit-flies.. This is Micro-Evolution, not macro. We see Micro working all the time. It's the way Wolves became Dogs, Dogs became Dingo's and Domestic European Pigs became Razorbacks. Everything in a genus already shares the same genes though in one species the genes might be active and dominant where in another species they may not be used at all, but they are still being carried.. <---Remember this, it will come into play later.
IF Sasquatch genetics are doing something that would offset Darwinian Macro Evolution (Such as if they truly are some or all archaic species from the past.) Then jobs would be on the line. It would make entire fields obsolete and years of "education" would be for nothing.
#2 Government Infrastructure Cover-up: Logging here in the Pacific North West came to a halt and many jobs were lost all because of this stupid little Owl a while back. Though I saw a White Spotted Owl the other day while hiking on one of our local Bike trails, they say it can only live in old growth forests. Meanwhile, Oil Drilling in Alaska came to a halt due to it "possibly" disrupting the mating habits of the Alaskan Caribou.
Okay now imagine that Sasquatch are confirmed and look at where they live. It would be bad enough if they were just apes, but if they do turn out human??? In this age of high speed media, it's not as if our government could quietly exterminate them or relocate them like they did our Native American population. World Media tends to notice shit like that... Our Economy is hanging on by a thread as it is, now you have something that will threaten logging, mining, drilling, game hunting and agriculture. To admit that there is another type of human living in areas that your economy is dependent on is like signing your country's own death warrant. Of course we will not stop mining, drilling, logging or farming so this could lead to war.
It would be best to simply deny they exist at all from your Governments standpoint. U.S. Canada and Russia would be faced with this problem.
Delete#3 Academic cover-up II: There is another possibility to Ketchum's results. She thinks they are hybrids as they have sapiens-sapiens mtDNA and "Other" nuDNA. This goes back to Micro-Evolution. If they evolved directly from us, then they would show sapiens-sapiens mtDNA. Everything that makes a sasquatch standout is in us already. We have the genes inside us and every now and then they activate. When this happens it is called a "genetic defect." Being born with flat feet (Such as my self), Gigantisism, dwarfisim, hypertrichosis etc.. Now if you are a follower of Macro-Evolution and believe in survival of the fittest, then you must concede one of two things. Sapiens-sapiens are obsolete and headed for extinction or that we are devolving. Either way that throws a huge monkey wrench into Darwinist macro evolution. But it fully supports Micro-evolution (Adapting to your environment.) Ketchum said that this "hybridization" happened 15,000 years ago. Though I have no idea how the hell she came up with that time frame, 15K years is more than enough time for Micro-Evolution to occur. 400 years ago Dingo's and Razorbacks did not exist. 20 years ago the Brown Widow and Red Widow spider did not exist. (Soon there may even be a White Widow as Brown Window's are slowly becoming white.)
#4 Military Experiment gone wrong cover-up: Back to Micro-Evolution. We now have the technology to manipulate certain genes. We can change or determine eye-color, hair color and sex of a child. While this is still being debated as to the ethics of it, we are doing it with animals. If we know what genes to manipulate and what the genes do, then what else can we do with genes we are fully aware of? The U.S. military is not beyond using humans as test subjects. Hell I found out that I was given vaccines that according to the civilian world, do not exist when I tried to donate blood. They tried to tell me that there was no vaccine for Bubonic Plague, Hepatitis-C or Anthrax yet there they were on my military shot record. You can also thank the Military for 90% of these trolls on here who never seem to sleep. The Military is responsible for Meth as well.. And PCP and though they did not create it, they were also responsible for the spread of LSD as a street drug. Almost all designer drugs tha are now on our streets were fully exploited by the U.S. military as either part of the Super Soldier program or the Star Gate program. LSD was once even used by the military as a truth serum. (Wish I could have seen how that worked.. "Who is running your operation!!!" "The big Pink Talking-Sandwich is!!!!")
The military clearly is not beyond using narcotics and non-existent vaccines on soldiers, why stop at genetics?<--Though I must point out that if this is the case, then we would have two different types of HB's running around as sightings were happening way before we even knew what genes were, much less DNA. Longer if you count Native American and early settler stories.
However out of all of these reasons for a cover up, I think #2 is the most likely.
The US government would not have been spreading LSD, they were concerned about the effect the drug was having in the counter culture movement, and how it was undermining their authority. As for a truth syrum, if you take them out of their comfort zone, mess with their heads a bit, some will surely crack.
Deletemelba got a rise out of the show because she wished she got in on some of that 10 mil action since she did prove bigfoot with dns. *cough* ok now i see why the dudes are laughing...
ReplyDeleteTrue dat. (Not the true dat guy put standing in)
DeleteJust like Sykes, Cain is now being falsely informed by the Rictor brigade that include the BFRO, etc. Hope he's smart enough not to bite, if he has any sense he'd know he's actually being set up those ex-Presidents are laughing at him too!
DeleteI have yet to see anyone do a repeat analysis of her genome extraction and come up with a proper scientific debate. So until that is done I suggest that her detractors are just assuming her work is wrong. I am waiting to see someone, anyone, do what science demands which is to repeat the work. I am not talking about the mtDNA but the nDNA. Until the amateurs here and the supposedly proper scientists do that they are being what they accuse her off - hypocrites. Either test her results properly or zip the lips. The shameful comments that I see here say more about the authors than they say about her and that is not a compliment in case you didn't understand.
ReplyDeleteaccording smeja, melba wanted him to pour bleach on his(bear) evidence. that pretty much puts in question the integrity of the entire shame that it became.
Delete2:53...
DeleteYou are right sir, her research should be replicated and we would have definitive answers.
Peace.
joe the results were already looked at by plenty of real scientists and she had known animals contimated by human
Deleteher nephilim hypothesis just isn't science I am afraid
I'm thinking that she did some things that were pretty naughty and it tarnished any real bit of decent work she did.
Deletethe results are the results. she didn't even do most the work, other labs did. when scientists have looked at those results theres no bigfoot there just bears and such
DeleteOnce again more crap written by those who do not understand the science, have not actually read her work, confuse what she did with what others have done or still prefer to get their facts secondhand or just listen to rumours and rubbish. REPEAT the analysis and either prove it RIGHT or WRONG. It will stand or fall on the science, not "some" persons half baked interpretation of what they want to see.
DeleteI find the previous commen to be truthful.
DeleteI think you'll find that it merely proves the samples submitted weren't what they were thought to be. The amount of samples sequenced probably just covers one per State, so to try and debunk ten thousand years with just that frequency... Is pretty desperate for closure I think.
Delete3:52...
DeleteI like your posts.
2:58 Sorry but any point that starts with "According to Smeja..." makes me LAUGH!!!! :)
Deletep.s. I think big K should be considered a little sketchy also.
Anon 2:53 ... You fail to understand that she has not and will not share her complete data for anyone to test against it. And why? Because she knows she's wrong. As long as she does not share the data, she can continue to play victim.
Delete..And you never will: There is nothing to respond to. It is self published on the web like this comment...If she had credibility in the field like Krantz had in his it wouldn't matter so much it wasn't peer reviewed. People responded to his books and theories because he had a track record in a mainstream subject...In her case it matters that her work didn't appear in a real journal because she is just another crack pot coming out of nowhere pushing a fringe subject...
Delete"AnonymousFriday, December 6, 2013 at 6:06:00 PM PST
DeleteAnon 2:53 ... You fail to understand that she has not and will not share her complete data for anyone to test against it. And why? Because she knows she's wrong. As long as she does not share the data, she can continue to play victim. "
If that is indeed the case, then people like Disotell shouldn't be saying she is wrong should they?
I will tell you what I do know.. Her samples came from all over but a-lot came out of Texas. I have heard various animals mentioned in regards to her NtDNA but mostly bears. Finding bears in Texas is right up there with finding Sasquatch.
She could not even attempt to have even tried to publish her findings unless she found something uniform.
"AnonymousFriday, December 6, 2013 at 7:27:00 PM PST
Delete..And you never will: There is nothing to respond to. It is self published on the web like this comment...If she had credibility in the field like Krantz had in his it wouldn't matter so much it wasn't peer reviewed. People responded to his books and theories because he had a track record in a mainstream subject...In her case it matters that her work didn't appear in a real journal because she is just another crack pot coming out of nowhere pushing a fringe subject..."
Was that supposed to be funny?.. Fringe subject like Macro Evolution? Never a working model and never even tested much less replicated.. Yet whole scientific fields are based on it. Look at both Denisova and Neanderthal genomes. They were rushed into peer review and readily accepted that fast. Now there is reason to believe that they are wrong. The same guys who were not first to get these sequenced are now saying that cave microbes chemically change DNA over and over again. The very same microbes that preserve long dead specimens are doing it because they are changing the whole chemistry of the dead organism. Unlike Decomposer microbes that thrive on photosynthesis and are dependent on organic matter, cave microbes are feeding off of inorganic matter and then on each other causing chemical change after chemical change. The very acids found in DNA are fed on and then replaced by byproducts. Yet these two genomes were readily accepted by top scientific journals.. So now tell me what is fringe here.
(clive squashy)
Delete"Finding bears in Texas is right up there with finding Sasquatch.
Haw !
Krantz, like Meldrum's role now, was merely being a puppet for science. His theories have been proven wrong, most crucially the fact this is no animal.
DeleteLong first contacted Mrs. Patterson in Dec. 1998 requesting an interview which was repeatedly refused. Three years later Long again called her and when he informed her that there was a man named Bob Heironimus claiming to have been in the suit, she simply went silent and hung up on him. Long then sent three letters asking for an interview and her comment regarding Heironimus' involvement with her husband during 2001 while the book was being written, one which was returned stamped REFUSED.
ReplyDeleteThe poor dear doesn't want to talk. She's old and probably deserves to be left in peace with a little respect.
DeleteSmackdown that you silly boy.
Uh oh...Joe's mad....MEAN mad...
DeleteIt amazes me the level of shit sucking the JREFers do...
DeleteForget explaining the single biggest obvious obstacle; the footage... And scrape up the same level of hearsay and lies that they claim Footery is based upon... Or just pick on an old widow that deserves to get every little penny for one of the greatest pieces of footage ever.
Pretty hyserical.
she talked to munns though didn't she? she gave that "pgf is real" guy full access to the film itself... footers double standards every single time
Deletebloke in a suit theres nothing more too it
Deleteanything else in the film is just wild inventions of believers
And the 'JREF Smackdown' (or should I say Brian Dunning) concludes that a old lady's reluctance to deal with another moronic tard solves the mystery.
Delete50 years on. Still they don't want to talk about the film itself.
Roger still pwns from the grave.
MMG
Indeed he pwns all the footers who still bleeve and for keeping the funds coming in to his wife. WHAT a gift he gave her, what a truelly respectable man, a gift for life. Wonderful.
DeleteYes lets talk about the film. What do you want? Diaper Butts? Bulges? Gun turret turning? Loose fabric? Ridiculous feet? Rectangular cut out on the face fur for the eyes? What you want to talk about bro?
Let's talk about magic monkey suits that can be made by broke, amateur film makers that appear to trump all efforts of technology and special effects for the past 46 years... And talk further of magic miraculous weird proportioned people to fit I to the magic monkey suit?
DeleteIt schools you every time and I will smile typing it to the end...
Got monkey suit?
Why would I or anyone have the suit that was used in the PGF? That is an absurd request.
DeleteMissing the point... In 46 years there's been nothing to match it, and people HAVE tried.
DeleteQuite an accomplishment for a broke rookie film maker to make a suit with materials that weren't even available in the late 60's?
But Joe, an old lady wouldn't speak to a skeptic scumbag so it has to be a hoax.
DeletePatterson didn't like to pay his bills and Bob enjoyed the company of hookers so it has to be a hoax.
It would be funny if it wasn't so so so tragic.
MMG
Oh, I manage to get a chuckle out of it my friend.
Delete; )
You got to hand it Joe. He has completely failed to convince one person with his arguments. Talk about consistent.
DeleteSays the boy trying to convince himself Bigfoot ain't real by trolling my every comment... Your actions speak louder than words; and words you ain't got old boy.
DeleteSchooled.
Greg Longshot you mean?
DeleteAh yes. Looooooongshot.
Interesting that Bob Hilarious and Longshot REFUSED to supply Christopher Murphy with a simple photograph of Bob Hilarious for comparison work to the image of Patty.
Oh yeah JREF Smackdown, great job, you just got Struckdown.
Honestly, a bunch of self-proclaimed skeptards who have nothing, just nothing at all, and make it up as they go along.
Absurd request 3:38?
DeleteJust today we have the report that Kitakrazy has found "the suit" at a pawn shop.
Oh yeah, these JREFers are serious.
She talked to Munns because she knew her late husband knew it was a real creature, no suit. This has convinced her it's real so why would she pay any attention to the liars trying to bring her husband down. Nobody would. Picture this Rictor dude ringing her doorbell, he'd get a kick down the stairs on his ass.
DeleteI'VE BEEN TRACKING SASQUATCHES FOR 25 YEARS.
ReplyDeleteFROM BEHIND MY DESK.
ON THE INTERNET.
IN WALES.
you mean joe?
Deletedelusional likes to answer himself^
DeleteYou surely seen'em.
DeleteThey're here.
THERE'S SOMETHING ON MY SCREEN!
DeleteTHESE 100% HUMAN SAPIENS SAPIENS IN FACT ARE REAL.
DeleteI'VE SEEN'EM. THEY'RE HERE.
I really had a difficult time finding an explanation for Joe's stupidity
DeleteI do think theres a moron on this blog
DeleteActually two, one is here ^^
DeleteOk say it in Moneymakers voice: Theres morons on the hill!
DeleteMelba Ketchum probably thought Dean Cain was actually Superman too.....
ReplyDeleteUmm.. he just might really be superman. Sigh. :)
DeleteChick
OMG that made me snicker! I wish I had thought of that!!!!!!!!!
DeleteHey Token. ^^^
DeleteBigfoot Evidence, What happen to good old bigfoot news instead of this bullshit E! News like gossip appearing on this site. I enjoyed this site when it was more about talking about bigfoot sightings and reports not gossip and the he said she said shit.. Please go back to your old ways..
ReplyDeleteever since it became popular thanks to tht damn show, all it attracts now are hoaxers and bottom feeders. Have you seen that cut and paste guy?
Delete"News" about an imaginary creature would be pretty hard to come by I would have thought......
Delete"News" is "News" Fake or Real.. fucktard..
DeleteInterdimensional, not imaginary...
DeleteFlash DNA update Zana is more closely related to Harlem Africans than sub saharan. This explains her propensity for getting drunk and slutty and shitting out babies like a machine gun.
ReplyDeleteSecure that sh*t Hudson.
DeleteMMG
No bigfoots will be harmed during the filming of this show, nor any other show.
ReplyDeleteOf course I don't believe in bigfeet but really enjoyed this Rictor fella dropping the bomb on Melba. Too funny! And isn't this a case of the pot calling the kettle black? Didn't she charge joe public a monetary fee to view her "court worthy" DNA papers? I wish bigfeet was real just so he would kidnap her froot loop ass and take her away forever.
ReplyDelete^^^Crankshaft the pot calling the kettle black.
DeleteAs per usual.
Smoked.
Bigfeet? You mean Bigfoots? Of course they're real, what do you think this whole charade of endless trolling and covering up is for...just for fun, perhaps ? Think again.
DeleteSo is Melba going to be on the Rictor show or not?
ReplyDeletehttp://youtu.be/-4P_APbquiM
DeleteMore South Park.
Of course she's not. She might talk to conspirator Disotell though, but not on that show.
DeleteThree jars of poop for the first person to shoot santa claus.
ReplyDelete;-)
DeleteDamn it! What do I get for Heat Miser? I shot the fat fuck.
DeleteIs Spike TV here yet? Is that what all this commotion is about?
ReplyDeleteMelba trying to get a little attention because she's jealous that they won't take her and her DNA evidence onto the show and give her 10 mil for it.
DeleteOh, really... Prove it, and try not to get science to fake it once more.
DeleteMelba is more of a batman type gal
ReplyDeleteMelba is an extortionist who tried to swindle more money out of Wally Hersom. FACT.
ReplyDeleteProof? Thought not.
DeleteLOL - common knowledge and often discussed, 10:17 - where have you been?
ReplyDeleteMelba will never subject to an interview with a real scientist who can expose her sciency double-talk and smoke and mirrors.
ReplyDeleteWally ... please file charges or sue her. Do you really want her shit to be your legacy? Look at the people still defending her who have fallen for her shit.