1,000 Bitcoins if You Can Spot The Sasquatch In This Video


The uploader says there's a Bigfoot at the beginning of the video. They believe the Bigfoot may have felt threatened and blended in with with the trees -- looking like a stump. Watch the video and see if you agree:


"My son going to check out stump when Sasquatch is standing still by stump in beginning of video."


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. There's a bigfoot in every YouTube upload, you just have to believe!

      Delete
    2. CONGRATS, DANIEL!!



      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    3. Thank you 1:41 and ALL CAPS.

      Just a peasant amongst first ong royalty though!

      Delete
    4. 146 Comments can only mean one thing....

      MMG

      Delete
    5. That Joe went off the deep end? I haven't posted since about 7 or 8 this morning.

      Good day to you too, MMG.

      Delete
    6. What a pathetic kiss arss you've become Danny Boy.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. What bigfoot related clip isn't?

      I see nothing in this clip that looks like a bigfoot. Where is this bigfoot supposed to be in the beginning of the clip? At what time in the clip?

      Delete
  3. Why cant people just stay still when filming stuff like this? Also why do people filming the alleged bigfoot sound as tho they are really bored? Oh...im gonna... take a picture.... of the forest, god yaaaaaawn!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The guys voice just drones on and on and onnnnn!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If these guys are representative of footers, then there still is hope Bigfoot do really exist, because they will surely never ever find them.

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your evaluation, you are clearly a very special voice in the skeptical community, well done, good for you.

      Delete
    3. Their odds are better than the resident serious researcher hailing from Wales, UK, named Buzz 'Fitz' Killington.

      Delete
    4. If I hail from Wales then I'm hardly resident, am I?

      You're doing your theory group proud guys, keep up the good Tardisms.

      Delete
    5. Resident of this blog, which you proclaim as yours, even though you fail to branch out and diversify your portfolio.

      Way to use your brain...

      Delete
    6. Would investing such content for someone who promotes discussion on a blog that certain people such as yourself use as the main means of a social life... Be branching out and using your brain?

      Delete
    7. Dude. Joe was a part of a group that shot unprecedented footage and you have the gall to mock him. Give him some time. Ill let him release it to your smarmy ass

      Delete
  5. In need of a new festive sweater?

    Checkout the Sasquatch Zip Cardigan from Fossil:

    http://m.fossil.com/controller/View?page=PDP&store=Fossil&productId=22479745&imagePath=MC2655134&category_id=331238

    For the low price of $168.00 + tax & shipping and handling, you too can be the owner of a taterbrown and cream colored ugly cardigan!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mrs. Patterson's base rate fee for televised use is $10,000. This is only for use that casts the film in a positive or hmmmm-what-is-it? light. Anything examining the film critically and skeptically and the film can not be used. Anything dealing directly with Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin's friend at the time and cast member of Patterson's South Fork Bigfoot film, Bob Heironimus, and no fee can be paid nor can the film be used in any way. Mrs. Patterson never has and never will do any recorded interviews regarding the film. For proponents of the film to suggest that Mrs. Patterson not doing an expose of the film for a large return shows authenticity is to ignore the most basic human and psychological factors of the situation. Mrs. Patterson is a widow of many decades living in a small community in Yakima, WA. She can continue as always with the situation that her husband and brother-in-law intended for her, that the film be a tertiary source of income beyond the massive amount of money that Roger and Al made with it in its original barnstorming phase and live a quiet content life with her dog, or she can invite media hounding and public scorn for her and her family in return for some amorphous one shot bid for riches. What riches did the Wallace family meet when they came forward with Ray Wallace's role in creating the modern Bigfoot phenomenon? Not only that, for Patricia to take a dive and do a tell-all while living means for her to throw away the entire point and meaning of what her husband did for her. It's a complete abandonment of the memory of him.  A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, particularly when the bush is poison ivy that will make life very difficult whether actually get any of the birds in it. And why would Roger continue to look for Bigfoot or not make another film? No matter Roger's cunning or lack thereof, or total absence of business acumen, he was handled during that period by a man who possessed both in excess, his brother-in-law Al DeAtley. Were Mrs. Patterson to now after all these decades decide to unilaterally tank her husband's memory, she would be made to consider the potential repercussion for Roger's brother-in-law, who engineered the foundations of his current fortune and the takeover of his father's failing paving company with the capital he made from his promotion of the film, and a man who is no stranger to legal problems. Whether you believe that film to be real or not, that the film was a financial endeavour from its inception. Yes, Roger did really look for Bigfoot for the rest of his brief life. Hoaxing the film he did does not somehow mean he did not actually believe in Bigfoot and want more than anything to find it. Indeed, the film was a means to an end in that regard, something you could call a necessary evil from his viewpoint, and giving fools what they want from DeAtley's. $10K, no skepticism and absolutely none of that man who was involved with my husband and whose brother I once lived with, please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. More monkey suits than you can shake a stick at...any actual evidence of bigfoot yet? No?

      Go away.

      Delete
    3. No, just giant hairy people suits

      Delete
    4. You just have the magic, miraculous, sensational, technology topping for the last 46 years, monkey suit then?

      You must also have the super human crazy proportioned individual to fit into the magic, miraculous monkey suit?

      It seems to me that some people have an issue with a widow of the man who captured one of the greatest pieces of footage ever, calling the shots on what happens to the footage, in light of her late husbands hard work?

      Deal with it... And please, please, please show me your magic monkey suit!

      Schooled.

      Delete
    5. Patty 100% modern human, yeah...

      Delete
    6. ... Oh and for those who think that 'hoaxed tracks in the 50's & 60's started off the 'Bigfoot myth'...

      "In 1932, Ellis Wright found human tracks in the gypsum rock at White Sands, New Mexico. His discovery was later backed up by Fred Arthur, Supervisor of the Lincoln National Park and others who reported that each footprint was 22 inches long and from 8 to 10 inches wide. They were certain the prints were human in origin due to the outline of the perfect prints coupled with a readily apparent instep."

      "During World War II, author Ivan T. Sanderson tells of how his crew was bulldozing through sedimentary rock when it stumbled upon what appeared to be a graveyard. In it were crania that measured from 22 to 24 inches from base to crown nearly three times as large as an adult human skull. Had the creatures to whom these skulls belonged been properly proportioned, they undoubtedly would have been at least 12 feet tall or taller."

      You were welcome.

      Delete
    7. Fat woman with hypertrichosis.

      Skewled.

      Delete
    8. Patty a human... For sure. Check out Harvey Pratt and Steindforf's versions with no hair;

      http://bf-field-journal.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-human-side-of-bigfoot-comparing.html?m=1

      Glad I could help.

      Delete
    9. That fat woman with that skin disease you prefer to cite makes you look idiotic. Which isn't a far stretch.

      Delete
    10. In fact. The most realistic argument you have left is that the subject is real. But now extinct. Something the Browh Thernal strongly disputes. Furthermore I spent 11 hours capturing rough hi def footage yesterday and we shall see what it yields. But of its got what I think it's got, this year may go out with a bang.

      Delete
    11. Only a fool hangs themselves up on a grainy film of a man in a bigfoot suit.

      50 years and the best evidence gathered is a grainy film, blurry pictures, old stories that have absolutely zero hard evidence, failed genetic testing, and easily hoaxed footprint casts.

      In the real world we call that no evidence.

      Delete
    12. As for the diatribe above. A carefully crafted half truth which assigns personal motivations to parties that couldn't be further from the truth. I suggest you sit down and listen to MK Davis. You might learn something.

      Delete
    13. Mike, I can't wait to see that stuff! If you could get that to me ASAP I can put it all together and get it uploaded.

      Also... 3:51...

      Wouldn't hypertricosis fit into the human theory? Add gigantism and hey! You have examples of early hominids having morphological differences within the same species, who's to say what will be unlocked in the near future with regards to the understanding of biological evolutionary differences in our species?

      Delete
    14. Did you hear what I just said nimrod. I shot clear footage yesterday. I don't hang my very nice svelt hat on those foolish pegs. Stop reciting years. It may be that long since you've had an original thought.

      Delete
    15. Joe. It's all on mini disks at 30 minutes a pop. And it's gonna fucking blow your mind.

      Delete
    16. Okay Joe. You've got a thing for fat, hairy women. We get it you moron.

      Delete
    17. I'm gonna thread it to my monitor. Watch it all in ho def. mark the key points. Download and transfer. I can tell you I stood stock still for hours forgetting to eat and drink and even take a piss. It was wild. M

      Delete
    18. Did you learn anything yesterday, Joe? Something about pseudo logic and A,B,C,D...you're going back off the rails...

      Delete
    19. 3:49...

      You have ten thousand years (the natives say 50) of acknowledgment of this creature. You have a transition from this into settlar's diaries that had no link to one another geographically that told of the same consistencies. You have 150 years worth of archeological and anthropological studies that have documented giant skeletal remains in libraries up and down your great country. You have a transition into that of modern accounts that tally the tens of thousands (that is of course just skimming the surface of those accounts), much of which are multiple person. You then have tracks with dermals that show scare tissue and toe bending, consistent with species traits from different States years apart, that are also found 50 miles into wilderness interiors. You have a transcribed language that was recorded from a similar description of the country. You have film footage that you cannot explain and you have science, in all the time it has had to debunk this subject and hasn't; asking the questions.

      When you have the frequency of sightings that are in complete conjunction with what one would expect to see from a highly intelligent nocturnal creature that buries it's dead and evades in social groups, it is down to either the individual looking at that information to either express denial, or be a true skeptic and promote the requirement to at least investigate.

      No, no... The pleasure's all mine.

      Delete
    20. 3:58...

      Pseudo logic would articulate perfectly the thought processes expressed after looking at all the sources I have presented you in my prior post, and maintaining there is nothing to the subject.

      Also, as was highlighted yesterday, you can't apply scientific conclusions based on A, B, C steps when science hasn't investigated in the first place. That is pseudo logic old boy.

      Delete
    21. Love to see what you have Mr. Mike, and maybe your patience paid off. Sounds like a good approach used yesterday. It amazes me that these guys are still hanging around. Why do you think this is? You are in a very very special situation presently and cultivation is the key.

      For Joe. I heard on the news yesterday that Wales was getting hammered by tremendous winds up to 100 MPH. Any truth to this?

      Chuck

      Delete
    22. Mike, with that type of equipment and that much duration of footage, you are on to such a winner pal!! Exciting times ahead!!!

      Delete
    23. Chuck. As we moved to the new thousand acres. All the dogs were barking. All the horses running. All the deer facing one way in the field. I went into an old potting shed at the base of a mountain and watched the whole clan for 11 hours of video. I forgot to eat. Drink. Piss. I just watched them watch me pack. Chuck. They do such weird shit to each other. They play hide and seek. The do dominate and submissive roles. They throw rocks at each other. They sneak up on each other. If it recorded. It's unprecedented.

      Delete
    24. Hey Chuck!

      I think that's on the West Coast my friend! I'm more South. The Irish Sea is one of the roughest in the world, it can be a piece of work getting over there and maintaining your pint in one piece on the ferry.

      Delete
    25. I was using a Sony Handycam with a Carl Zeiss. 40x vario Tessar optical zoom hybrid with night shot dcr-DVD 610

      Delete
    26. Mike... My word... Such exciting times...

      Delete
    27. Mike, I would have cried my eyes out watching that...

      Delete
    28. Every race of humans on this planet have different morphological and anatomical features, go google search the skulls of different Caucasians, Africans, and Asians. People trained in observing these details can tell you just by looking at a skull what race and sex the subject was.

      As for hypertrichosis, the congenital version of the disease only has ~ 100 recognized cases world wide and most times is not passed along with all offspring. Simply having hypertrichosis therefore doesn't guarantee your child will be born with the same disease...yet Squatch after Squatch is hairy including juveniles.

      Acromegaly also doesn't affect offspring in that way. Just because you have acromegaly doesn't mean your child will have it. It means he will carry the gene but it doesn't mean it will be active, everyone carries inactive hereditary genes.

      Delete
    29. You will. I gotta go. Some true dipshits on here. You and chuck email me. You too Dan. It's never too late. M

      Delete
    30. I have hypertrichosis of the crotch.

      Delete
    31. If it recorded? Here's a tip- most devices have a little LED light that shines when the device is recording. Look for a small LED that says RECORD under it.

      Delete
    32. Crampz...

      "Every race of humans on this planet have different anatomical and morpological features."

      ... You are agreeing with me then?

      Delete
    33. Modern 'Wolfmen' May Have Inherited Ancient Gene
      By NATALIE ANGIER
      Published: May 31, 1995, The New York Times;

      CASTING a slender ray of light on the mysteries of both hair growth and the legend of the werewolf, scientists have discovered a gene that in its mutant form causes hair to sprout thickly and thoroughly across the face and upper body, covering the cheeks, forehead, nose, even the eyelids.
      The rare hereditary condition, called congenital generalized hypertrichosis, results in such a furry appearance from birth that scientists propose it could be an example of an atavistic mutation -- the re-emergence of an evolutionarily ancient trait that is normally kept suppressed. In this case, the mutation harks back to the prototypically mammalian state of near-total hirsutism, the possession of a protective fur coat that modern humans for some reason lost at an unknown point in the past.
      In fact, those with generalized hypertrichosis -- hyper meaning excess, and trichosis, hair -- are even hairier than chimpanzees or gorillas, which lack fur around the cheeks, nose and eyes. The only parts of the patients' bodies without hair are the palms of the hands and the soles of the feet. This suggests that the atavism could recall something earlier than the emergence of hominoid apes about 25 million years ago.

      Delete
    34. In what context?

      I don't even believe bigfoot exists, if that's what you are implying, let alone that they are of modern homo sapien sapien descent.

      Even Ketchum doesn't claim that her studies showed mTDNA of modern human 100% as she led all the footers to originally believe. Now it's only a small amount of human mTDNA in her samples.

      Delete
    35. "Hypertrichosis can be hereditary. It can be generalized (all over the body) or localized (just in certain areas). There are two forms of the generalized congenital condition. One is congenital hypertrichosis lanuganosa and the other is universal congenital hypertrichosis. The first is much rarer than the second. There are four different versions of the congenital localized condition. They are melanocytic nevi, Becker's nevus, lumbrosacral hypertrichosis, and porphyria with each condition having a different area of appearance or age when it occurs."

      http://www.sharecare.com/health/hair-diseases-disorders/does-hypertrichosis-run-in-families

      Delete
    36. You can find better sources for that than a 1995 article in the New York Times. There are dozens of articles on the subject from medical and scientific journals.

      Delete
    37. If morphological and amatomical differences in different races are quite normal, why can't there be the same in a particular race with hereditary gigantism and hypertricosis?

      Delete
    38. What do you want? This is why people don't want to interact with you.

      All looking down from your pedestal on high with the mighty right click copy and paste.

      No amount of Indian stories and bad theories will ever make an independent thinker believe in bigfoot.

      Should have continued to ignore you, woulda been better off.

      Goodbye Your Royal Highness.

      Delete
    39. Dan already said just because a gene is hereditary doesn't mean it's going to be an active gene.

      Midgets wouldn't be able to spawn a normal size child, but they do, etc.

      Gigantism and acromegaly (better look up the difference!) isn't really genetic anyway, it's main cause is tumors causing the pituitary gland to overproduce GH

      Delete
    40. Beckwith-Weidemann syndrome means enlargement of adrenal glands and gigantism. Bigfoot might be of a human that has large adrenal glands and their size might be perfectly natural for someone with large adrenal glands in their anatomy?

      Delete
    41. http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/42772-possibility-of-large-bones-being-found-in-north-america/page-4#entry791885

      There you go, FitzJoe, have all the serious giant human bigfoot talks you want with all sorts of people interested in talking about it.

      Delete
    42. Beckwith-Weidemann is usually characterized by low blood sugar, diabetes, separated abdominal muscles, prevelance of seizures, swollen or enlarged tongue, enlarged kidneys, livers, and spleens...

      Safe to say that shouldn't top your list of healthy primates...

      Delete
    43. Pork Chop my friend. We can get a weed eater. Or we can just live in the Ron Jeremy era. You are far too cool to let the creeping vines spoil the grapes. :)

      Delete
    44. 5:43...

      Forget the other symptoms, you have an example right there of something like an adrenal gland causing gigantism other than tumors.

      Schooled.

      5:34...

      It's way too much fun getting to you guys around here, plead all you like... You pathetic cries only make me contended in knowing I'm doing something right.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    45. I guess I can always use Nair Mike.But I read on here that it burns like hell.

      Delete
    46. You'll notice in this series of "comments" that a skeptard used hearsay in a pot shot debunk attempt at the PGF.

      It's hysterical that these droopy assed strutters pontificating about logic and reason wouldn't know either if they tripped over them and made love to them.

      Any low brow idiot can see that the film provides more evidence than hearsay and rumor. You could write a book on rumor and hearsay about the PGF; you are still left with the PGF and the evidence it contains.

      THE FILM TRUMPS THE HEARSAY.

      It doesn't matter how many rumors you report and repeat, the evidence in the films trumps all. No matter how many pieces of hearsay you regurgitate, you are left with the flim, still playing, still with evidence in it.

      No amount of hearsay can explain certain pieces of evidence in the film.

      Using hearsay and rumor as attempted debunking tools is the antithesis of the scientific method.

      Literally skeptards say something is debunked if a rumor or hearsay says it is, that's all it takes.

      TAKE A LOOK AT HOW SCIENTIFIC HEARSAY AND RUMOR ARE.

      My God, are they that dense?

      "Hey, I heard Patterson's second cousin said it was Patterson's 400 lb aunt in "the suit" so yep that settles it, that's HARD SCIENCE baby, yep, it's a hoax. For I am a skeptard."

      It's also remarkable that a skeptard above insists that hypertrichosis equates to hyper speed--running faster than a horse.

      It's interesting how they always "forget" that point. Zana was fast as hell, according to the descriptions. As at least some of the description is borne out by Sykes' findings, we can at least operate on the hypothesis that Zana was capable of extreme speed. Her size alone wouldn't account for this, nor any known human deformity or condition. Faster than a horse, would be roughly twice as fast as the current steroid-fed Olympic champion sprinter.

      Yeah, that thar hyper-tri-what's-it sure as hell explains that speed, phewee!!!

      Delete
  7. The Guy That Threw Away 25 YearsFriday, December 6, 2013 at 3:05:00 AM PST

    I'VE BEEN TRACKING SASQUATCHES FOR 25 YEARS AND THIS IS THE BEST EVIDENCE I'VE EVER SEEN

    ReplyDelete
  8. get the movie that has everybody cutting and pasting!

    Dude Bigfeet- a story $3.99 (residents of Wales add $500 shipping and handling)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Get off Joe. If you can't do it as funny as I did and I was just trolling give it a rest dear sweet Anon. Ill talk to ya. I have something to say.....

      Delete
  9. You saw a lot of evidence then

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And what I'll say is this. Yes. I holed up in a shed in 22 degree temp in the Texas Hillcountry and I got the swizzle. The real deal. Hi Def with movement. And it wasn't me. It was my research team. They deserve all the credit for convincing me to quit making silly cell phone vids. Get a real camera and stick it out. I also wanna go on record stating I respect Sasquatch Ontario. And others who take risks by not hiding their research for for fear of ridicule. I like Ro and Shawn. And I've made peace with Stacy for my part. I'm gonna reasses my footage. Then with the help of some of the best on the world. Ill find this critter for ya. And I don't need no stinkin 10 mil. Just my buddies. Most of you from BFE. And a little more time. M

      Delete
    2. Mike, you're a legend mate... And let me tell you all, he has the best in the world on board.

      Delete
    3. You filmed your research team pretending to be bigfoot?

      Go forth, and suck the life out of this thread o more.

      Delete
    4. Hey Mike. Happy you finally got a real camera and hopefully it pans out. How about a night thermal one? Keep at it.

      Chuck

      Delete
    5. 4:16. I am going now. Your sheer idiocy just sent me packing. The rest of the field has expressly you to thank for that. If I could express your ignorance in mere words id love to. But there is no insult in the English language which encompasses the brevity or mundane nature of your thoughts. It's cerebral cortex not cereal cortex. M

      Delete
    6. No no no. Scratch That. Make that super serial vortex!!

      Delete
    7. We shall no longer tolerate your pathetic lies Mike Braggadocio.
      And what happened to your self-induced exile?
      Do you ever say anything that doesn't completely unravel and make you look foolish?


      Delete
    8. I love when dipshits like you exclaim we. Like you honestly think I say in a potting shed and froze my ass of for you Or that you speak for some vast silent majority that clings to your every malaprop. Listen up fool. I will publish with total transparency every minute of footage that potentially shows a subject. Now. We regret to inform you that Elvis has left the building and your fly is unzipped.

      Delete
    9. When? ohthatsrightNEVER

      lies make the drunken baby joe cry

      Delete
    10. Mike doesn't tell lies... And we shall no longer tolerate your hate campaign.

      Delete
    11. 4:54...

      I think that what get's you so bad about Mike is that he's been totally transparent about his research. There is very little angle for you to attack his work and you can't keep up with his wit, so the only other angle you have is to troll. How many people would like you to leave this blog in comparison? The foolish one is the anonymous hater that side steps the subject matter for a moment's worth of tough guy brovado, your self esteem must have 'unraveled' a long time ago that you should try and claw back some on a blog you know nothing about.

      Now that's pretty 'pathetic'.

      Delete
    12. Hey Mike. Hopefully you are still looking on. Loved what you did with the potting shed. I will give some suggestions on what could make this shed even more beneficial because I have seen it, but I am sure you are getting advise from all over the place.

      Do a lot of activities around the shed and let these guys watch you. Only stay around this area and do not invade their cover. Use the kids, Christmas vacation is coming soon. Play catch with a baseball with the boys, and hit some baseballs with a bat. Let them see what else a piece of wood ( use a wood bat ) can do. Toss a friesbe with them. Also a basketball and football. Kick a soccer ball back and forth. Get a leaf rake out and rake or shovel, etc. In essence do anything that these guys would be capable of and peak their curiosity. Now when done put all the stuff in the shed and leave the door open. Note where everything is put take a picture and leave the area. In the AM go back take a picture and see if anything was taken or moved. Could also leave some food goodies for them.

      Their is a very nice gentleman researcher named Bob Daigle who lives in the Detroit suburb of Warren, MI. I met him in 2010 at the Comins MI Bigfoot Bash. He is a kindly elderly gentleman who has been at this for many years. He gave a lecture and showed us his VHS film of a shed incident from I believe 1991. This was taken at a very rural property in Coshocton County, OH. This county has long been known as a true hotbed in Ohio since its founding, and hundreds of encounters have occured to residents of this county. The owners had ongoing activity like you have and invited Bob come and look. On this property they had an old shed with the rear of it that faced the woods. The rear was open At night a creature(s) would sometimes enter it. During the daytime Bob placed a few items that were quite heavy. One was a foundation cinder block and one was a large Tractor/Semi tire still on its rim, and these things are very heavy, probably 200 pounds or more. During one night Bob was in hiding and filmed activity of the Bigfoot moving about in the shed. It was dark, however because the shed window was out you could see movement going on and tell it was large and hairy.. All of a sudden the cinder block comes flying out of the shed open front door a long distance. A few seconds later the tractor tire comes flying out and sailed out of view, but you could tell it was an effortless effort. It was truly amazing. Unfortunately the property owners were so scared of the Bigfoots they soon moved and the new owners would not let anyone back.

      In time you might find a way to film them at night, best done with a thermal. Let them feel safe to enter the shed at night.

      Thought I would just put this out there for you. Best of Luck my friend.

      Chuck

      Delete
    13. here's the angle to attack his work:

      what are the results to date? where can I see them?

      i reserve the right to express my opinion. and if i think you're both full of shit i will say so. deal with it.

      Delete
    14. You can see the results on Texas Hillcountry Cryptozoological Society channel on YouTube.

      If you were at least constructive you'd be appreciated, but you just preach hate and therefore attract negativity.

      Deal with that.

      Delete
    15. Oh and Chuck!

      Great input pal, you're a wealth of knowledge bro!!

      Delete
    16. poor Yoe. Perhaps a tampon will be of cheering you ups. or maybe your homosex friends cock? Even the homosexes call yous faget.

      Delete
    17. It seems the only one upset is the numpty that is so angry he can't spell.

      I'm having the time of my life actually.

      Delete
    18. You must have a very silly life then

      Delete
    19. Can you imagine if defending yourself from people calling you gay, full of shit, etc., was having the time of your life?

      Delete
    20. Schooling you dense people... Would be the time of my life. No wonder I have a pedestal.

      Delete
    21. Still pretty silly if these are the best satistactions you get from your life

      Delete
    22. I do all this schooling whilst holding down a job with several circles of friends.

      What is said about me on a blog isn't important...What is; is me helping you as often as possible.

      Delete
  10. You saw a lot of evidence then!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Replies
    1. Sanderson and Hauvekmans saw things we will only dream of. Including that real ice man!!!

      Delete
    2. But I saw a hairy Texas Hominid doing all sorts of human oriented monkey business.

      Delete
    3. Or we aren't prepared enough? Can we handle this?

      Delete
    4. But to those that have asked please be patient. I have. 30 tapes with 30 minutes. Each tint an item was moved from shed or the cd ran out I had to re adjust. I came here where I started with this. Bit I couldn't have gotten it without the help of a team. Some idiot and one or two constantly harangue me. I sincerely hope the time it takes to get these images and streams downloaded and edited is respected. Because I didn't pan away. I didn't run straight at the subjects. I just rolled film. I hope you get out if it what I did experiencing it. I come here with humor and good will send self depracating jokes that really harm noone. I frequently apologize. I humbly ask Joe to promote the images I have gotten and they kind of mark the stages of development I've experienced. I do ask this thorough. And it's all I ask. If a skeptic or Big Red or Babe the Blue Ox come on here and bash me until I can get this content to you Then please defend me. I simply cannot provide you with the content you seek and continue to fend off the attacks that seem to be led by a despatate, vitriolic and wellhidden few. My deepest regards. Michael K Brookreson. Four Forks Ranch. Hill Country. Texas.

      Delete
    5. As Spock said to Kirk I say to most all of you now, " I am now and will always be, your friend .."

      Delete
    6. Mike, like I said... I'm not a religious man, but in praying those images were captured. These trolls wouldn't know what hit them and I'd take a week off work to see them try and explain such things away.

      Fingers crossed.

      Delete
    7. who do you pray to? bigfoot?

      Delete
    8. It is clear you pray to Randi and follow his religion militantly.

      Delete
    9. Wrong again. I did however once subscribe to a publication from that ultra-sinister hide-the-truth-at-all-costs hideously heinous institution the Smithsonian.

      Delete
    10. With that description, you are learning something at least.

      Peace.

      Delete
    11. now i lay me down to sleep
      i pray the Lord has got big feet

      Delete
  12. this must be another research video from the Olympic project

    ReplyDelete
  13. My favorite part was when spock died. That was hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "I simply cannot provide you with the content you seek and continue to fend off the attacks that seem to be led by a despatate, vitriolic and wellhidden few."

    This is the same guy who holed up in a shed all day when it was 22 degrees?

    Is Mike parodying Footers as drama queens? Or is that for real?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You see Tard... This is what it takes to try and attain the information you so desperately seek from behind the safety of your laptop.

      Delete
  15. it's confimred. kitakaze did purchase the patty suit at washington pawn shop. it was filmed and a documentary of the find is being negotiated. this is turning out to be the final straw for many footers. first it was melba, smeja, sykes and chewbacca.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kitakaze was caught telling lies.

      Next?

      Delete
    2. joe- somebody made a comment you didn't respond to like 2 pages up. they might be feeling left out. could you maybe say something stupid for him?

      Delete
    3. They can scroll down to the 7:55's comment for help with that.

      Delete
    4. Kitakrazy is trolling pawn shops for the Patty "suit"?

      Oh yes, that is the first place a Scientifically Minded Person would look, them pawn shops, yep sir ree.

      Maybe the JREF had a short bus field trip and did a pawn shop crawl, with Kitakrazy on board.

      Kitakrazy has one BIG PROBLEM:

      He insists that Bob Hilarious, via a cherry picked photo, is an "exact match" for Patty's proportions.

      The BIG PROBLEM rears its head when Bob Hilarious used arm extensions in his Patty Redux Twerk Dance Stop Motion Attempt Colossal Fail.

      This is typical of the science-claming skeptards; they are utterly devoid and incapable of using the scientific method.

      Theory: Bob H in cherry picked photo "exact" match for Patty (hahahah). This of course means No Arm Extensions.

      Then along comes Bob H doing a Twerk Dance stop motion series of crazy moves in a suit with . . . yes, arm extensions. This of course means Bob H now claims he used arm extensions in the PGF.

      It's a tough one when your own theory subject disagrees with your theory.

      For they are the skeptards, riddled with hypocrisy, devoid of logic and reason.

      Delete
  16. Replies
    1. The only 'nothing' is between your ears; cheerleader.

      Delete
    2. Joe, do you think nothing looks better in HD?

      Delete
    3. Nothing this...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTddczieNdQ

      Schooled again.

      Delete
    4. Don's cheerleader? Sorry I upset you...

      Delete
    5. These are some spooky fellas Joe. You ok ?

      Delete
    6. Hey Mikey still waiting for the video.

      God only knows why everytime it takes so much to see the clearest HD video ever

      Delete
    7. Clearly it confused them that I had to hide a camera and have a wind break. These atomic sub particles that are attacking you today might be the dumbest bunch of gap toothed yokels since Harry Met Lloyd. Of course I parody the Bigfoot world with its colossal egos, ridiculous skeptics and chronic whiners. But that doesn't mean I can't do research when required concerning a subject I believe in, so Fitzie. Don't let them get you down. I'm going to hunker down and go through all the video on a large monitor screen taking only breaks for the Mizzou game and then God willing we may have some interesting things to enhance. I'm sure the comments and support you've gotten from the field have left you as inspired as me to post them here among the warm bosom of our friendly Anons. I wouldn't waste another second on it Joe. Plenty to do. Besides being chided by children. Yours truly. M

      Delete
    8. So we passed from "Clearest HD video ever" to "We may have some interesting things to enhance" ---> Typical of Bigfoot YGNALI great announcements

      Delete
    9. 10:12. You ever shot video ? Reviewed it. Motion captured or looped or enhanced it. It does take time. Quite a bit. It's not one piece of footage. So. Ill do my best. That's all I can do. Why don't you guys lighten up. And by guys I mean the ones harping on Joe for me trying to be positive and forthright. And if you can't. If you can't say nice things or funny things. If you can just be hateful and ugly. Then truly. Fuck off. I've been on here long enough for folks to know that I will get it to you. But not on common like some step and fetch servant. Savvy?

      Delete
    10. Joe, how many leaping Russian Yetis do you think will be in Mikes video?

      Delete
    11. Now if that's not good enough for you let's hear from that one dickhead now that ruins it for everyone.

      Delete
    12. Joe, what kind of gifting buckets do leaping Russian Yetis prefer?

      Delete
    13. Not you Don. I said dickead. Not dumbass

      Delete
    14. Mike, will there be plenty of bent branches in your super HD video? There are few things as Bigfooty as a bent branch. This is very exciting.

      Delete
    15. COME ON MIKEY, STOP WRITING HERE AND WORK FOR LET US SEE THAT MIGHTY VIDEO!

      Delete
    16. Joe. I'm going to work very hard to get this submitted to our film guy by the end of the weekend. If it turns into another nasty soccer scrum you let me know about it. Because you and I both know the reasons I do this. And you bring ridiculed for my work won't lead to a reward for one of the miscreants today that removed a cock from his mouth to run it. Lemme know. No more pithy quotes. M

      Delete
    17. Yeah Mike, the fact that you passed your day here instead of working to your mighty video smells a bit like POOP

      Delete
    18. It's about time the Bigfoot world got some HD footage of Mikes backyard.

      Delete
    19. Just like you to deflect from explaining the footage, eh Don? Mike, you're being kind there my friend.

      Schooled son.

      Delete
    20. Don...

      Let's have a laugh then yeah? How about you explain the leaping Russina yeti for us?

      This'll be good...

      Delete
    21. Hm, how can I explain... A BLOKE IN A SUIT AS ALWAYS MAYBE?

      Delete
    22. Wait, wait... I wanna hear Don's poetry...

      Delete
    23. "Will do?"

      OH COME ON IF THIS WAS THE CLEAREST VIDEO OF BIGFOOT YOU'D BE DOING IT NOW, YOU BUTTHURT CLOWN!

      Delete
    24. And don. Besides a leaf designating yourself Canadisn. What have you offered the community. Your precious commentary. What have you written invented researched or accomplished that gives you critical license over me? Furthermore. On your best day what could you best me at. Met me give you a hint Don. As we say in Texas. You are all Hat no Cattle. A popcorn fart in the wind. Noone awaits the next nugget of wisdom from the great Dion, except well. Don. Ill bet your own aqaintencess avoid you at partitas you dim witted dotard. Now. Anytime. Any topic Don. I was sick before I deployed yesterday. But I saw shit you'll never dream of. You flying fucking squirrel. So. Here's the deal ladies and gentlemen. Ill show you some footage if the great Don can keep his sarcastic rat trap shut for 5. We clear don?

      Delete
    25. You don't seem someone that is on his way to revolutionize the Bigfoot phenomenon if you lose time raging a guy

      Delete
    26. Don came here once with the biggest ego imaginable... Claiming he never came here because of 'your moma comments'. Look how much he's been trimmed down to size...

      Don, you're a shadow of your former self. All your arguments got kicked back down the basement steps at you and you now instead of mock the daft comments, have become daft at best. You have never brought anything to the table as far as legitimately proving any of your crap, and you are as stupid as the little croney you phone up to cheer your shit comments along.

      Pretty pathetic old boy.

      Delete
    27. Joe, I don't need to explain the video. It is too short and too ambiguous to prove anything. I could guess at how it was done, but what would be the point? That would simply be my subjective guess. Because no one can tell you exactly how it was done does not mean it's a real creature. That is the critical thinking fallacy that you display here every day. And then you demand to be taken as a serious thinker. You're like a child when it comes to the way you think. No wonder people make fun of you all the time.

      Delete
    28. Aw Mike, don't let my comments get in the way and deprive the world of your super duper HD Bigfooty footage. That would be sad. The world needs more nothing. Especially HD nothing. mmmm, good

      Delete
    29. No one can tell me 'how it was done' Don, cause it wasn't 'done', it wax captured...

      Thank you, so, so, so, so much for proving my point. I reeled you in like a turd. This is exactly why I can vouch that you either have not seen the video properly (or MK's screen shots at least) or are in crazy denial about the stealth and details that is crystal clear for anyone... ANYONE can go on YouTube and see for themselves. If you actually take two minutes of your precious time to go and look at the video, you will see every little cynical unobserved claim that people have made falls embarrassingly flat. I know you are a little worried to go and actually watch the footage (MK's version), because it will make you look a little silly, but go and do it anyway cause you do not have to admit on here you have, you'll save face from anonymity.

      No, there is great need to explain how someone could achieve those movements, because they are not achievable by everyday Joe's capabilities... They would break their wrists jumping from bipedal motion to quadrupedal motion at that speed in that awkward terrain. I could claim that the creature actually does a sumasault; it doesn't but I could make that claim and not have to explain myself in the same way that you don't have to explain your cynicism... or even shaking the denial to come to terms with the way that creature moves in that way, at that speed.

      And who makes fun of me Don? The same group of hateful trolls that you align yourself with when you haven't the balls to man up and debate properly?

      Like I said old boy... Pretty pathetic.

      Delete
    30. Canadian Don basing his life on a Logical Fallacy.

      Send flowers.

      Delete
    31. Does Canada have its own branch of the JREF? Surely so.

      Delete
    32. If only Footers were so good in taking hard evidence as they are good with words...

      Delete
    33. Don... Just cause you can't counter the footage, doesn't mean you don't have to, what a chip you have on your shoulder?!

      That is the logic of a cheating little child.

      Delete
    34. Joe, I have seen the video. I watched it again before I replied to you. MK Davis is a fuckin lunatic and I would not waste a moments time listening to his insane ramblings.

      Joe, you keep using the word debate. Not sure you know what it means if you think the crap that dribbles out of your gob on a daily basis is debate worthy.

      Delete
    35. 11:25...

      Learn to read an entire thread and check out what I'm schooling Don-Dumpty-Doo about... There's one piece of evidence for you.

      Delete
    36. Joe, it's clear why no one wants to argue with you. It has been stated time and again.

      Stop accusing John of childlike behavior because you are acting like a spoiled twat.

      Delete
    37. I'll say it again... Don... Just cause you can't counter the footage, doesn't mean you don't have to, what a chip you have on your shoulder?!

      That is the logic of a cheating little child. And yet again you deflect, you pathetic soul... MK has nothing to do with filming the footage, do you know what you're talking about?? Have you even seen it??

      MK is ten of you, has contributed ten times more to the planet and doesn't have to call himself things like 'D-Maker' to feel cool and relevant.

      Delete
    38. Go away Daniel, you got schooled about Hypertricosis earlier... It's Don's turn now; he thinks he's some king troll, let him see what it's like with the big boys.

      Delete
    39. Yes, I have seen the video Joe. I never said MK has anything to do with filming the footage, but you recommended that I watch MKs commentary version and I was simply saying no because MK is a complete fucking lunatic and I'm not going to poison my brain with his garbage.

      So do you support MKs massacre at bluff creek theory there Joe? Also, didn't MK support Rick Dyers tent footage as real?

      Joe, how many points do you think Mikes upcoming earth shatter HD video will confirm on? Maybe we should ring up MK in the asylum and ask him?

      I don't call myself anything, its simply my a combination of my first and last name. Jesus, but you're a stupid twat sometimes.

      Delete
    40. I'll say it again... Don... Just cause you can't counter the footage, doesn't mean you don't have to, what a chip you have on your shoulder?!

      Are you stupid or something Don, do you not understand what I'm demanding of you? You demand I present evidence, I've brought it to you and now I demand you explain it.

      Again... You talk about MK and deflect from what is being out to you, and you want to suggest other's don't know how to debate?

      Delete
    41. You need professional help.

      I don't know how you have such lows about crying and everyone gangig up on you, then a day later you are brushing off your shoulders like nothing ever happened.

      You have never shown te slightest hint of humility.

      I really, honesty, truly feel sad for you. I like Mike, I like Don, I like Harry, hell I even don't mind MMG and Tzieth but you make me feel sain my heart, PJ.

      Delete
    42. Ha ha ha ha!!

      It's been pretty priceless you sucking on everyone's arsses the last two weeks, it was funny to see it pointed out by MMG yesterday.

      The only one crying is you Daniel, the only one begging for me to leave is you Daniel. When I came to this blog it was you, and the regular Tards plugging away having free reign. I ruined that for you and even got you to use your real name.

      It's no wonder you hate me so much, I took your social life away from you and your safety net anonimaty.

      Delete
    43. You're right Joe. Leaping Russian Yeti-Foot is real. I can't wait to see one in HD in Mikes upcoming video!

      Delete
    44. No Daniel, I'm not bro... None of us are.

      Delete
    45. In the last two weeks?! What happened in the last two weeks about Bigfoot? NOTHING. As always.

      Delete
    46. Schooled Don... Now run along back to JREF, tell em this time you got your arss handed back down the basement at you by me.

      Oh and Don, your little cheerleader is getting a little hilarious, give him a ring and let him know his cookies and milk are up.

      Delete
    47. Wow Joe you must be right if you have such an intelligent sarcastic way of speaking. I'm on your train now, recruited!

      Delete
    48. Joe, who do you think will be more interested in Mikes footage? National Geographic, Discovery Channel or maybe Animal Planet?

      Delete
    49. If there's something in it, probably them all. If there's nothing in it, we simply carry on looking for more back up footage for the other footage you can't prove is fake.

      Delete
    50. I can't prove something in a video is fake, but you could easily prove an animal is real. So why don't you get up off your ass in Wales and go get a Bigfoot?

      Delete
  17. I suspect delerium or dementia or he's just flat out lying.

    ReplyDelete
  18. thar be a 12 gage shotgun used – dang critters, followed up shots – slugs rounds and take that thar bigfoot down. Thar beez bigfeets abouts for sure

    ReplyDelete
  19. bigfoot spotted with two chupacabras walking behind him. There is supposedly a photo from an iphone being uploaded as i speak.

    ReplyDelete
  20. am uploading of leeping russian abdominal snowfeet

    ReplyDelete
  21. Watchin out for them thar 3 toed critters – them beez skoocooms critters eatin U right-up fer sure  gotz to shootin them ritely proper like. keeps U shotgun close fer shurre

    ReplyDelete
  22. yoe has brought shamings to this family. I kill self now.

    -yoe's ded father

    ReplyDelete
  23. Let us mourn for the death of Zana's 95 year old relative.

    ReplyDelete
  24. : ) George Noory be all over it!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Well done Mike B. I look forward to your videos. Maybe you can be an element that helps turn the tide of losers shouting for "proof" and a dead body. To them I say, go f*cking outside. They're not far away and the natives call them people. My .02.
    Thanks also to Chuck for great comments.
    JKH

    ReplyDelete
  26. AKs works deep in da woods........

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking: Derek Randles Releases Most Amazing Thermal Footage of Bigfoot Ever