Matt Pruit Discusses The Sykes Study
Here's an interesting interview with BFRO's Matt Pruit on Dr. Bryan Sykes and the Yeti revelation. Though the media tries to portray Bigfoot as a myth like the Loch Ness , Pruit has a great explanation for why Bigfoot is more believable.
first
ReplyDeletenow that is out of the way.. what's shakin'
DeleteWhy is this video immediatly unavailable? Why are things like this continually hacked or taken down?
DeleteAll BFRO minions are prevented by contract from making public announcements, without first obtaining authorization from Matt Moneymaker. Don't be surprised if you hear that Matt Pruitt has already been bodily kicked out of the BFRO, since that is MM's favorite thing to do in order to get the undivided attention of his followers/minions, and tighten up their sphincter muscles a bit. There is no such thing as too much allegiance to the BFRO.
DeleteQuite true.
DeleteAs well as making up bf facts on the fly, Moneymaker could give Mussolini a lesson on running a very tight ship.
Fear is the key.
MMG
A mafia model. Moneymaker will be abandoned once they figure out the FB $$ or fame do not trickle down. Why so many good researchers soil their name iwth his privately held group it's insane. That's footers. He lords dirty laundry over them for compliance and threatens to tell, or sue. Won't be long now for his fall from grace.
DeleteI've discussed the Sykes Study myself. I used words like, "Bunk," Bullshit," "Fraud..."
ReplyDeleteSweet, sweet Footard tears. So how's "2013 The Year Of The Bigfoot" turning out for you?? :D
Delete^^^10:26 skeptard who can't hack that Zana might have been of a primitive tribe, covered in hair, oversized, with brow ridge and other primitive traits, i.e., an almasty. This according to one of Sykes' theories as reported yesterday.
DeleteWhy are all the videos on this site getting taken down lately ? BS
ReplyDeletepruitt is ten times samrter than Moenymaker and knows it's no damn ape.
Deletethat was fast
ReplyDeleteRegarding Zana's son's mitochondrial DNA results to be revealed this Sunday. It should be easy and straightforward to estimate where Zana's mtDNA (inherited by her son - mtDNA is passed only from mother to child) falls within the human mtDNA phylogenetic tree. This type of thing is done routinely everyday in human genetics research, forensics and genetic genealogy companies. You wouldn't need to sequence the nuclear genome for conclusive evidenceof what Zana is. It's obvious to Sykes if she's the descendent of an archaic homo saoiens branch or not. I bet he's sequencing the entire genome of Zana's son to get the most hi resolution definitive evidence for publication.
ReplyDeleteYeah he did, Sykes found that Zana was 100% human.
Deletehttp://www.channel4.com/info/press/news/was-russian-bigfoot-actually-an-african-slave
Well, squatches are after all a human type species (perhaps originally alien like ourselves) they're not the ape animal myth the media tries to keep going on the insistence of science/authority.
Deleteanon1049 ..homo sapians is a ape also ..an uprite walking ape.. the naked ape.. some scientist say ,homo sapians is a aquatic ape..
Delete10:25 another skeptard ignoring Sykes' other theory, that Zana was of a primitive tribe of human (Ketchum kept saying A type of people, right?) which migrated from Africa through the Caucasus; son's skull has extra bone, brow ridge,wide spaced oversized eye sockets. The DNA may say SO FAR fully human, but the appearance and bones don't. Primitive features, brow ridge, if oddly large and covered in hair, you have basically an Almasty.
DeleteIf you have an oversized human with a bone structure with primitive traits, and the person is covered in hair, if there are others and they are all typically huge, covered in hair, you have individuals similar to descriptions of yeti, almasty, Sasquatch.
Skeptards are clinging only to the African slave theory, and ignoring Sykes' other findings and theories.
LOL. You bigfooters are nutters. Nutters!
DeleteAnd you guys are VERY selective over what you wish to post.
DeleteI for one cannot blame you.
Three episodes and two major shocks delivered to mainstream science.
Not that your average Tard is remotely interested in science....
MMG
I got me some Vaseline and I'm headed to Daniels home.
ReplyDeleteSshhhhhhhh...don't worry about it ^
ReplyDeleteShhhhh,don't worry about it.
DeleteThis is crap. Let's start a new "Fiends of Ponies and Turtles and People That Like Other People and Stuff" site Sign up right here after this blog. It's free and Shawn will have to do all the site maintenance and keep out bad people like he already does such a good job of! Yay!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI knew it. Sceptics are mentally ill people.
ReplyDeleteSelf identifying skeptics are mentally ill people. Scofftics too.
ReplyDeleteNo, bigfoot does not exist.
ReplyDeleteMoneymaker Mutiny in the air. What a friggin paranoid.
ReplyDeleteIt takes about $12 bucks to bail on that ass and start a new club.
Deletehahah moneymaker is such an idiot, this guy is so much smarter. even bobo is smarter than moneymaker. he must really have some homoerotic stories about them all. no excuse to continue to prop him up, he has two walking poles.
ReplyDeletedid he actually say anything worth censoring?
ReplyDeleteWho says the Loch Ness Monster is a myth.
ReplyDeleteMatt Pruitt has a big ol pecker! Go out in the woods with him and you will see!
ReplyDelete