NO magic monkey. PGF = gigantic static diaper butt. All Meldrums track castings are fake as are Cliff B. Compliant gate = No such thing. No skunk ape. ONLY bears. Lots and Lots of bears. Hell the teddy bear is based on an actual bear.
Best case for footers will be Bigfoot once existed. But he will not. What he will say is the samples contained a new species of BEAR. Joe you have been smoked deal with it
No monkey man. Just a BEAR. Like Joe has been told the whole time it's just a bear. The chances of a 8 foot 500lb bear undiscovered in the Russian wilderness is certainly plausible. The chances of a 8 foot 500lb magic monkey man abundant through out the US Russia and Asia undiscovered well . . . Sure signs of a mental disorder there.
You will find them in the dark murky waters of the BFF.
Their one and only argument is that it is real because no replication. Well that's a nice position for the footers to put themselves in knowing that any replication attempt they will state as failed because it is simply impossible to recreate a piece of film footage exactly. There are far to many factors involved, most of them unknown. Munns can't even decide on which lens or camera was used.
Its a sad cult where they can sit there and say the pgf is real perpetually despite no bigfoot ever being found anywhere ever.
It is the nature of people to do some very extreme things when they are seeking closure to something that threatens their way of looking at the world. There is no better example of this than in the past 24 hours.
The logic that one would use in requiring closure for reasons of fear & hate;
*a region as big as the Himlayas, that has yielded a new species of bear, would contradictingly be no way be big enough to have any other undiscovered species residing within.
*that two samples should be enough to conclude in all confidence that there is no such thing as a giant hominid that people have reported for thousands of years.
*that two samples of undiscovered bear should now render clear full frontal eye witness accounts, much of which are mutiple person as mere misidentification... Even accounts from the most experienced of hunters and out doorsman.
*that two bear DNA results should now condemn the unknown hominid DNA that has been sequenced before it.
*that the same person that was condemned as a quack, should now prematurely be celebrated prior to any real knowledge of the long term results of his research by skeptics who would have flocked to condemn him in droves if he would have submitted evidence for Yeti, and laughably, still may should he produce Bigfoot evidence.
*that people should suggest that people have clung to a misinterpretation of Sykes' agenda, off the back of suggesting that there is no such things as Bigfoot in any of Sykes' work after one airing of a documentary series.
Could it be that we end up with merely another controversial conclusion that rendered 'Bigfoot The Definitive Guide' exactly that to the enthusiast camp. Here; we had a situation where we had a programme that was quite obviously pro Bigfoot, even down with the theory that Bigfoot was a type of human, that suggested however that there were no Bigfoot in Florida, suggesting they are in fact escaped chimps? Now as much as this programme is celebrated, that conclusion leaves many in the enthusiast camp scratching their heads at those findings, and though not all agree with them, are willing to swallow it and move on in the understanding that because the field knows so little, that not all can agree on everything.
Could we have a situation where Sykes' camp suggest that there are no Yeti in the Himalayas, but then find two samples of hominid DNA in the States? It would have the same effect on the crypto field, because we all believe Yeti are in the Himalayas, in the same respect that we all know that Skunk Ape in Florida are not escaped chimps?
Anyway... Long story short... Don't pipe up and Sykes is only as good as his samples.
Oh... And there is nothing sadder than someone prioritizing their time towards hate on a blog they have the cheek to intrude upon every day of their lives.
Now that is pretty sad.
If it get's you so mad... Then simply stay away. Nobody is keeping you here.
Hi ToonyLard here. That is a dog jumping in the lake. Nothing more. I know you see bugfarts everywhere but not everything as dramatic as a hoax munky, albeit half as funky.
Yeah well, my cat doesnt shit all over the damn house and smell like ass all the time and eat it's own shit. Cat's are much cleaner and guys only say they like dogs better because they think they are supposed to say that, like it's some kind of man law. I can kick any man's ass that says he likes dogs better!
My dog has never shit in the house and he wouldn't eat any things shit ever maybe a pit bull or Dalmatian or any of the other dumb as rocks breeds will that's why you buy smart breeds
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Turds!!
ReplyDelete...another anti!!!...
DeleteThat's why dog is mans best friend
DeleteThen it craps on the rug
DeleteNO,BUT MY CAT CHASES DOGS AWAY IF THEY GET TO CLOSE TO MY HOUSE.
ReplyDeleteThey must be some pretty soft dogs. Any cat goes near my dog the cat will get turned into mince
DeleteCats and dogs are mans best friends
ReplyDeleteI believe that Bigfoot is real.
ReplyDeleteMe too.
DeleteAre you saying the next show sykes is going to say "yes bigfoot exists"?
ReplyDeleteUtter delusional dreamer.
^ In total denial.
DeleteNO magic monkey. PGF = gigantic static diaper butt. All Meldrums track castings are fake as are Cliff B. Compliant gate = No such thing. No skunk ape. ONLY bears. Lots and Lots of bears. Hell the teddy bear is based on an actual bear.
ReplyDelete^ Black ops guy sipping too heavy on the tequila...
DeleteBest case for footers will be Bigfoot once existed. But he will not. What he will say is the samples contained a new species of BEAR. Joe you have been smoked deal with it
ReplyDelete^ Real retard.
DeleteNo monkey man. Just a BEAR. Like Joe has been told the whole time it's just a bear. The chances of a 8 foot 500lb bear undiscovered in the Russian wilderness is certainly plausible. The chances of a 8 foot 500lb magic monkey man abundant through out the US Russia and Asia undiscovered well . . . Sure signs of a mental disorder there.
ReplyDelete^ Just another day at the cover-up office...
DeleteHaha brilliant.
ReplyDeleteSo these 2 samples turned out to be for this bear.
No monkey is coming.
No you have misunderstood.
DeleteThe bear samples should not be confused with the bigger news to come.
MMG
Looks just like a guy in a suit. Reminicent of that old PGF.Remember when people actually thought PGF was a real bigfoot?
ReplyDeleteI'll give Tooneytard a few more nonsensical posts before the plug gets pulled.
DeleteTrolling at it's most undignified.
MMG
The internet crazies still do - tragically.
ReplyDeleteYou will find them in the dark murky waters of the BFF.
Their one and only argument is that it is real because no replication. Well that's a nice position for the footers to put themselves in knowing that any replication attempt they will state as failed because it is simply impossible to recreate a piece of film footage exactly. There are far to many factors involved, most of them unknown. Munns can't even decide on which lens or camera was used.
Its a sad cult where they can sit there and say the pgf is real perpetually despite no bigfoot ever being found anywhere ever.
It is really quite sad.
It is the nature of people to do some very extreme things when they are seeking closure to something that threatens their way of looking at the world. There is no better example of this than in the past 24 hours.
ReplyDeleteThe logic that one would use in requiring closure for reasons of fear & hate;
*a region as big as the Himlayas, that has yielded a new species of bear, would contradictingly be no way be big enough to have any other undiscovered species residing within.
*that two samples should be enough to conclude in all confidence that there is no such thing as a giant hominid that people have reported for thousands of years.
*that two samples of undiscovered bear should now render clear full frontal eye witness accounts, much of which are mutiple person as mere misidentification... Even accounts from the most experienced of hunters and out doorsman.
*that two bear DNA results should now condemn the unknown hominid DNA that has been sequenced before it.
*that the same person that was condemned as a quack, should now prematurely be celebrated prior to any real knowledge of the long term results of his research by skeptics who would have flocked to condemn him in droves if he would have submitted evidence for Yeti, and laughably, still may should he produce Bigfoot evidence.
*that people should suggest that people have clung to a misinterpretation of Sykes' agenda, off the back of suggesting that there is no such things as Bigfoot in any of Sykes' work after one airing of a documentary series.
Could it be that we end up with merely another controversial conclusion that rendered 'Bigfoot The Definitive Guide' exactly that to the enthusiast camp. Here; we had a situation where we had a programme that was quite obviously pro Bigfoot, even down with the theory that Bigfoot was a type of human, that suggested however that there were no Bigfoot in Florida, suggesting they are in fact escaped chimps? Now as much as this programme is celebrated, that conclusion leaves many in the enthusiast camp scratching their heads at those findings, and though not all agree with them, are willing to swallow it and move on in the understanding that because the field knows so little, that not all can agree on everything.
Could we have a situation where Sykes' camp suggest that there are no Yeti in the Himalayas, but then find two samples of hominid DNA in the States? It would have the same effect on the crypto field, because we all believe Yeti are in the Himalayas, in the same respect that we all know that Skunk Ape in Florida are not escaped chimps?
Anyway... Long story short... Don't pipe up and Sykes is only as good as his samples.
You were very welcome.
Oh... And there is nothing sadder than someone prioritizing their time towards hate on a blog they have the cheek to intrude upon every day of their lives.
DeleteNow that is pretty sad.
If it get's you so mad... Then simply stay away. Nobody is keeping you here.
Schooled.
Wow joe, that's a lot to digest!!
DeleteDid you come up with all that on your own?
Joe is awesome !. He is the 4 in my 20 < B-)-'
DeleteHi ToonyLard here. That is a dog jumping in the lake. Nothing more. I know you see bugfarts everywhere but not everything as dramatic as a hoax munky, albeit half as funky.
ReplyDeleteYeah well, my cat doesnt shit all over the damn house and smell like ass all the time and eat it's own shit. Cat's are much cleaner and guys only say they like dogs better because they think they are supposed to say that, like it's some kind of man law. I can kick any man's ass that says he likes dogs better!
ReplyDeleteI don't just like I love my dog more and I like it rough big girl lets go
DeleteMy dog has never shit in the house and he wouldn't eat any things shit ever maybe a pit bull or Dalmatian or any of the other dumb as rocks breeds will that's why you buy smart breeds
Delete