This Comment Was Upvoted 1000 Times: An Update on the Disappointing Level of Intelligence of Our Regretful Skeptard Primitives
We are copying and pasting a recent comment that was posted here on Bigfoot Evidence blog regarding the Yeti-Bear discovery. Since the news broke out yesterday, skeptics seem a little too jubilant that Dr. Bryan Sykes has discovered an ancient bear in Nepal instead of a unknown hominid -- all the while, ignoring the fact that there are other animals that are referred to as "Yeti". Here's the comment that was "Upvoted" 1000 times today:
Pasting this from previous post in order to demonstrate the spectacular thickness of the average skeptard skull:
"No we've known that there's been bears in the Himalayas for centuries. The revelation that there's bears up there isn't earth shattering, it's just reinforcing something that was already apparent.
But nice try on wriggling out of this. Good effort, keep it up. :)"
Alright let's deal with this one.
The skeptard's comment is wrong and a grammatical sewer pit.
We have known of bears in the Himalayas, but not THIS bear hybrid. But why does the skeptard self-contradict by calling the findings a revelation?
Has this unprepared skeptard read the Independent article or not?
Sykes' discovery of an otherwise unknown type of bear, reinforces this skeptard's what and how and when and why does it??? What???
Look, this skeptard didn't know this ultra rare bear existed, he/she didn't know squat, Sykes just discovered the thing. Other known bears there have nothing to do with this.
That doesn't reinforce a damned thing. It "uninforces" the whole damned thing for you.
Also the skeptardical problem of not seeing the forest for the trees:
This discovery of this huge rare animal makes it clearly possible for other huge reclusive rare creatures to exist undetected by science for centuries.
Sykes' results were always going to be neutral at worst as far as bigfoot enthusiasts go. It's peculiar and pathetic and desperate that skeptards are trying to twist neutral results into a score.
But really these results are a bit better than neutral for enthusiasts, for the reason just stated: the Rare Bear demonstrates the feasibility of the existence of other huge and scarce creatures in the wilds.
Rare Bear results hardly disprove the yeti, nor are they a score for the skeptards. It's a "logical fallacy" to say that a few Rare Bear results disprove some other creature whose samples you do not even have to test!!! That line of thinking reveals an unhinged mind hard at work.
last
ReplyDelete...another anti...
DeleteFirst Bitches!!!!
DeleteGot monkey, motherfucker?
word in the hood is joe got triple hickory smoked
DeleteMMG GOT OBLITERATED
DeleteTrue dat. True dat.
Delete- stand-in guy
I think that the long drawn out subject of today's blog post shows how stupid believers can be. They seem to think that this bear has been roaming around unnoticed, just as bigfoot apparently does. This is not the case at all. This bear, these hybrids, wander around all the time and are seen, known, and no big deal. The only thing unknown about them was their DNA makeup. They have NOT been invisible at all.
DeleteSo to try to draw a connection between these hybrid bears, which to the untrained eye would look like any other bear of the region, and a bigfoot which nobody ever sees, is insane. There is no correlation between hybrid bears DNA finally being documented, and an invisible, undocumented giant hairy ape in north America.
I repeat, these bears have never gone unnoticed. They were always there, under everyone's noses, seen, hunted, killed, never invisible.
If a believer wants a better corollary, one would be like Maury Povitch doing a DNA test on some guy and finding out he wasn't the father of his wife's kid!
It's stupid to try to suggest these hybrid bears have gone unnoticed. Bleebers are so gullible.
True dat. True dat.
Delete- stand-in guy
I like the pic of Sykes inspecting Disotell's scalp.
DeleteThis is fantastic news, now that sykes has confirmed the legendary grizzpol what can we expect next, deodands? Twk men?
DeleteDid Meldrum see a Bigfoot?
DeleteIt's even possible that these bears have been in zoos for decades (just like the olinguito that was described earlier this year) and was misattributed as a different species.
DeleteThat comment didn't get "Upvoted 1000 Times", Shawn is full of shit.
DeleteMost of the people replying to the original comment were disagreeing with it so it actually got downvoted. I don't think that Shawn knows how upvoting and downvoting works so you'll need to cut him some slack.
DeleteAll he did was prove that a sample that might have been from a Yeti was actually from a previously unknown bear. It has no impact on whether or not the Yeti exists. Yes, the Skeptard's logic is wrong.
ReplyDeleteBAM... You Footards take a beating again. My gawd how many times do you have to be beaten down with science. RUBBING It all over your face again. Hey.... I have a bigfoot in a box hahahahahahaha
Delete^ Skeptard proof par excellence...
DeleteI just crapped my panties after reading this.
ReplyDeleteWOW,JUST WOW.
Eva?
DeleteHe proved bear and you like it.
DeleteGot monkey, motherfucker?
Repetitive lame phrases!
Delete*DRINK
Anon 4:38 ,not me honey,i don't post anonymously xx
DeleteWho cares about the bear? We're simply rubbing it into PJ's face after months of declaring he knew Sykes results were bigfoot positive.
ReplyDelete"Sykes is coming...and you're sweating."
"Tick tock."
"Scared I know something you don't?!?!"
"Fast forward to 29 minutes and weep!"
He wanted to dish it out first, it's only the natural cycle that he be torn to shreds when it all came crashing down on him.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDaniel how's the taterhole hanging?Did yo momma wipe yo ass this morning? So how does it feel to show your peanuts to the world?I bet every day of the week you get taterholed and want more!!!
Deletego work lately Daniel, good to see these footers getting the smoking they deserver
DeletePeanuts? Hardly! I gotta sack like a chimpanzee son.
DeleteReally dan? Thanks for sharing, since chimps have pretty small genitals compared to humans. You really are hung like a chimp. What a retard.
DeleteTrue dat.True dat.
DeleteDan with chimp genitals is the most compelling voice in the Figboot community.
DeleteChimps have massive balls. Female promiscuity leads to large nuts. It science people.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis Daniel Campbell guy sure does know something about chimp balls. I bet he chortles them in his fat mouth.
DeleteLMFAO!!!!
DeleteYou hate me cause I got what you need, a pretty little daughter that we call Mixie.
Deletewe hate you cause you have a filthy mouth !! try and grow up..
Deletethnx mike brookerson ,,FAG,!
DeleteDear Fag! , why you're welcome feel free to throw my name around any time. I don't have a dog in this bear hunt But I'm happy you thought of me.
Delete'Skeptard Primitives'? We prefer "Ancient Skeptard Aliens'.
ReplyDeleteHow does bear DNA prove bigfoot doesn't exist though?
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't.
DeleteThe fact that bigfoot doesn't exist though, proves that bigfoot doesn't exist
We're not trying to prove bigfoot doesn't exist. We're just laffin at your attempts to prove that he does.
DeleteSchooled.
Feces
Joe
Ah I see, so it's just lame trolling. I was hoping someone could offer an intelligent response.
DeletePerhaps if you asked an intelligent question you would get one. Prove bigfoot exists.
DeleteHot tip: Bigfoots don't exist.
DeleteYou're welcome.
5:00 I don't know if Bigfoot exists, but that wasn't my question. Do try to keep up.
DeleteDan Campbell is a mean man. My pony will expose him...
DeleteGeeks in this thread wouldn't be here if they thought or knew bigfoots don't exist. Geeks downed once more.
Deletefinding a hybrid species of bear undetected does NOT mean bigfoot is therefore a possibly
ReplyDeletethat is a crazy leap of logic
The comment posted/pasted by BEB doesn't state that exactly.
DeleteTo say that the yeti is a possibility, because this huge rare bear has eluded science for decades or centuries, is not a crazy leap of logic. It says a "possibility", not yeti exist, full stop.
A "possibility", based on reports and footprints, and that this massive rare bear is apparently found to exist, otherwise unknown to exist by science, shows that is is possible for a large creature to survive and exist unacknowledged for many years by science.
It's happened before, anyway. There is precedent.
Crazy? That's all we do around here. You must be new.
DeleteYou're right it actually proves bigfoot,nessy, and the smiling man.
ReplyDelete^starring Joe F. as Agent Smulder.
DeleteFOOTERS = PWNED
ReplyDeleteTrue dat. True dat.
Delete- stand-in guy
We're getting the little stuff first.This isn't the " unexpected and spectacular" result that "will change our understanding of Human history".....Wait for it....Rome wasn't built in a day....He's got something from the Pacific Northwest,we'll see how the rest pans out...eventually....patience
ReplyDeleteI know. There's a whole new season of Finding Bigfoot just around the corner! Gonna be squatchy!
DeleteTHERE'S SOMETHING ON THE HILL!
DeleteROAR!!!!
I can't wait to see the Nepal episode! Bobo and Ranae get presented with ceremonial penis sheaths!
Delete
DeleteI bet
I bet Renaes was a full two inches longer
Ranaes clit?
DeleteIn a Skeptards mind they know already that there own little world is safe from any mystery regardless of any results. Must be a sad existence. They are simply contrarians that infest message boards, blogs, groups, or troll video comments to laugh at themselves. We all laugh also. We laugh at them. Their mindless circular reasoning and ability to jump at every opportunity to make a fool of themselves is what gives them a reason for being. So we see them here, over and over.
ReplyDeleteTheir, not there. Sorry I'm at work.
Delete^ believes he has a magic dingus
Delete^ Wishes his daddy loved him.
DeleteJREFers own 455
Delete4:55 please.
DeleteHow about go and discover the real natural world. It is a fucking amazing, incredible beautiful world we live in. If you have to invent magic apes to make the world a better place then it is your loss.
^ This 1000+. Get out, enjoy nature, get some fresh air. You'll feel much better.
DeleteAnyone who uses the term "skeptard" instantly loses all credibility.
ReplyDeleteor the term "squatch"
DeleteHmm, and footard?
DeleteThey brought the fight, remember.
Resistance hurts, apparently.
Don't forget that skeptard is distinguished from our respectable skeptics, some of whom are enthusiasts of this topic. A reasonable skeptic accepts some evidence. A skeptard is a kneejerk reactionary rejecting all at all costs.
Top Squatch just slipped to Butt Scratch and "lost all credibility."
I get deeply offended when skeptics say "footer". That's OUR word damnit!
DeleteAnyone who posts on a Bigfoot blog instantly loses all credibility.
DeleteVroom vrooom you hear that 5:16?
DeleteThat's joe reving up his spaceship and he will be along to pick you up shortly.
Got monkey, motherfucker?
ReplyDeleteno they don't, not even close
Deletelots of bears though and bears are big animals so bigfoot must be real too!!!!!!!!!!!!
William Parcher, can I have your John Henry?
DeleteOh please!!!!
I just luv me sum JREFers!
No, and we have no interest in your mothers monkey either.
DeleteBTW- his John Henry is pink and shriveled.
DeleteToo bad nerds like 5:08 and other trolls know too well bigfoots are ets, and why the search goes on.
Delete"We have known of bears in the Himalayas, but not THIS bear hybrid. But why does the skeptard self-contradict by calling the findings a revelation?"
ReplyDeleteIt is a revelation, and it is an actual scientific discovery backed up by testable repeatable evidence. Not so much of that for a magic ape.
"Has this unprepared skeptard read the Independent article or not?"
Whats to read? Sykes has found a hybrid bear, no monkey
"Sykes' discovery of an otherwise unknown type of bear, reinforces this skeptard's what and how and when and why does it??? What???"
Not sure what you are raging about here
"Look, this skeptard didn't know this ultra rare bear existed, he/she didn't know squat, Sykes just discovered the thing. Other known bears there have nothing to do with this."
yes... and?
"That doesn't reinforce a damned thing. It "uninforces" the whole damned thing for you."
Again what is your point? Do you have an 8 foot ape or what?
"Also the skeptardical problem of not seeing the forest for the trees:"
Footers have that very same problem
"This discovery of this huge rare animal makes it clearly possible for other huge reclusive rare creatures to exist undetected by science for centuries."
Well not exactly. If you think this makes bigfoot a valid hypothesis then you are severely deluded or just mentally ill. Finding a hybrid of 2 thoroughly documented species with evolutionary evidence through thousands of years including full documentation of their habitats. Compare that with the magic ape where you have exactly nothing, in the same amount of time science has been studying the natural world. Such a creature would be painfully aparently.
"Sykes' results were always going to be neutral at worst as far as bigfoot enthusiasts go. It's peculiar and pathetic and desperate that skeptards are trying to twist neutral results into a score."
The worst case for a footer is ALWAYS neutral, based on the very fact that they refuse to acknowledge the overwelming case for the whole thing being a hoax and the underwelming evidence of the creature they claim exists. A creature which according to the footers is seen thousands of times a year and is 8 foot tall.. LOL!
"But really these results are a bit better than neutral for enthusiasts, for the reason just stated: the Rare Bear demonstrates the feasibility of the existence of other huge and scarce creatures in the wilds."
A BIT BETTER THAN NEUTRAL? WOW. Its an absolute smoking, yet again. The BEST samples footers have to offer come back as bear. Smoked.
"Rare Bear results hardly disprove the yeti, nor are they a score for the skeptards. It's a "logical fallacy" to say that a few Rare Bear results disprove some other creature whose samples you do not even have to test!!! That line of thinking reveals an unhinged mind hard at work."
They do as a matter of fact. All that yeti evidence that has been peddled as from a real yeti is infact a bear, shows people lie about this shit all the time. Skeptics still dominate the argument and they always will. Footers have the easy job, all they have to do is produce some evidence of this creature and its job done. Just the one monkey will do it and crow will be served all round. Stop blaming your disapointment in Sykes results on the skeptics. You want to believe some crazy thing like bigfoot then fine, but its your problem to prove it, not the skeptics.
I like italic best
DeleteYou missed a point Big Jim:
DeleteThe skeptard posted that the rare bear is no big deal, "aw heck, we've known about that for years!" Yet in the same paragraph, calls the bear discovery a "revelation."
Which is it, we ask the skeptard? A no-big-deal-we've-known-about-it-for-years, or a "revelation"?
It can't be both. Those are mutually exclusive.
Big Jim,
DeleteYes, these results are A BIT BETTER THAN NEUTRAL for enthusiasts.
See the reasoning comments below this article:
http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bryan-sykes-yeti-bear/#comments
Who even cares? Have you got monkey or not?
DeleteRegarding this whole thing, the Independent article info so far, if accurate, as a Cryptomundo commenter remarked, this means:
DeleteSYKES HAS DISCOVERED A CRYPTID
That sounds good for people interested in the existence of cryptids. It's also fascinating for people just interested in science, and for skeptics who would have dismissed such a creature's existence.
In other words, it's interesting for all of us, potentially.
Prof,..I tried to say something like that under the Randles post, but it was buried in another Joe vs Dan cyber battle..lol..
Delete"..11:48 is not far off the mark... Sykes is apparently working on proving the hypothesis that the yeti phenomena is caused by an unknown bear..The involvement in of itself by a professor of one of the many relevant disciplines is good for cryptozoology...."
I'll add that in his book Sykes will undoubtedly discuss his views on cryptzoology...He'll probably be sympathetic overall but will also have some criticisms ..
"SYKES HAS DISCOVERED A CRYPTID"
DeleteScience discovers 20,000 news species a year. Discovering a new animal might be a 'revelation' but it's not going to revolutionise biology as we know it. It's not terribly significant.
He didn't discover a new hominid, and THAT would have been VERY significant. A previously unknown bear hybrid ... yeah not so amazing.
"Which is it, we ask the skeptard? A no-big-deal-we've-known-about-it-for-years, or a "revelation"?
DeleteIt can't be both. Those are mutually exclusive."
Sure it can. It's a minor revelation. They're not mutually exclusive at all.
Oh yeah, well where is the bear body to prove it. It's just hair samples.
Deletewww.thebookseller.com/news/yeti-title-genetics-professor.html,,CHECK OUT THE BOOK SUMMERY(the quest for yeti. by,brian sykes) HEY DAN CAMPBELL ! you got fu_K in the ass.. by MMG ,JOE F and anon vag girl,, CHECK OUT BOOK ?? GUTLESS SKEPTARD!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteoobi doobi blahblahblah yip yip nip nip chang wow cow pow hung yung guy ding
Deletedamn h,may sounds very aggro today^^
DeleteHow do I upvote a comment here?
ReplyDeleteI too would like to know this.
Delete^ angriest footing guy
Deletey"all here that. D.C. h,may "s gonna stretch ya! watch out.
DeleteVAGINA GUD
ReplyDeleteUpvote!
DeleteHow many reddit points did this comment receive?
ReplyDelete"will change our understanding of HUMAN HISTORY"" quote un quote b sykes.. HE"S not talking about a hybred brown bear ..SO enouf of this speculative CRAP !!
ReplyDeleteSykes takes DNA samples from the locals on all his travels. I'm sure it has something to do with that and nothing to do with bf/yeti.
Deletecheezus what with all the verbage around here.. it is like the sinfield of bigfoot ... a blog about nothing... just show me a picture of a chebacca look-a -like , then i can get have a good chuckle without getting a headache reading all this logic proves no logic
ReplyDeleteYGNALI
Delete(clive squashy)
ReplyDeleteThis Comment Got Up-chucked 1000 Times: An Update on the Ridiculous Level of Intelligence of Our Regretful Footer Primitives
In a shocking development, the Golden Vibrating Buttplug was removed from the Jrefers and went straight into the raging butthurt footer's mouth...
ReplyDeleteHow did you know it was gold?
ReplyDeleteJOE GOT HOSED
ReplyDelete?
DeleteSo... when are you actually going to post evidence of bigfoot on your bigfootevidence blog?
ReplyDeleteNot as long as they're affiliated with the cover-up.
Deletethe proof is out. the prez of team hoaxer bailed and he is unloading the goods.. appears one member is an internet scammer.
ReplyDeletei forgot this blog doesn't dignify the ryder camp with publicuty. how about some evidence then.
ReplyDeleteLook @ your boyfriends taterhole.You will have all the evidence you need.
DeleteI keep my poop in a jar.
ReplyDelete*drink
DeleteMeester president! Trollandia salutes you!
Delete;-)
Deletei see we .. must uphold the dignity of this blog
ReplyDeleteI want Joe Fitz to answer my questions in the thread below, im genuinely interested.
ReplyDeletefooter: "whaaaa, mainstream science won't take this seriously"
ReplyDeletescientist: "we acquired samples and determined the animal is a hybrid bear"
footer" whaaaa mainstream science is part of a conspiracy to cover up the truth!!"
doesn't this sound completely insane? bleevers are not rational people.
Wow, just wow.
DeleteI love this new "But they found a BEAR! This is SIGNIFICANT! This means we've WON after all!" angle they're taking, that's simply hilarious. :D
DeleteIt is not surprising. It is the only stance they can take without admitting the obvious.
Deleteanother epic fail
ReplyDeleteSorry about your loss.
Deletehttp://www.bf-field-journal.blogspot.com/2013/10/dr-sykes-takes-cheap-shot-at-ketcum-dna.html
ReplyDeleteSykes lying through his teeth, who would seriously have expected anything else when being close to Cutino & co. all covert governtment.
DeleteBet they paid him handsomely to spout the usual mainstream science bullshit, wake up folks, these guys are enemies of free-thinking people. Bottom line is, they know this species exists just like they know about life elsewhere in space this is nothing but an on-going game to them to hide the truth from being accepted public knowledge. They call the shots and basically tell you anything which they do and have been doing for decades.
Your article is awesome! I have read through other blogs, but they are cumbersome and confusing.
ReplyDeleteI hope you continue to have such quality articles to share with everyone!