See Finding Bigfoot: Cliff Barackman In Pullman, WA Tonight at 6PM


If you're in Washington, here's your chance to meet Finding Bigfoot's Cliff Barackman. Details below:

Cliff Barackman from Finding Bigfoot the popular documentary show on The Animal Planet is coming to speak at WSU on Thursday October 17th 2013. He will be covering different topics and sharing his knowledge and experience on searching for the famous Bigfoot.

Finding Bigfoot: Cliff Barackman
Organization: SEB
Date: 10/17/13
Time: 6:00pm-7:00pm
Location: CUB Auditorium

Comments

  1. SEEMS LIKE A NICE GUY BUT,HE DID SAY HE HAS NEVER SEEN A BIGFOOT SO WHO WOULD LISTEN TO HIM?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ..First ..fo the other Cliff (Burton) rip <B-(

      Delete
    2. His wife or girlfriend who I have never seen him with either. mmh!

      Delete
    3. Cliff's Gay you moron! Like Ranae, she's a dyke!

      Delete
    4. He lets his gayness bleed over into his enthusiam for bigfoot.

      Delete
  2. Damn, MMG and PJ took a mighty pwning yesterday. It will go down in history as a lesson to all footards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^^2:44, Proud author of Skep Yourself Silly: A Guide to Self-Pleasuring for the Confused Skeptard.

      Book signing today behind Cleveland Burger King.

      What a winner.

      Keep on tardin' baby.

      Delete
    2. Haven't you heard?

      The Yeti/Bear connection was old news rehashed.

      Things may not be a clear cut as they seem my friends...

      MMG

      Delete
    3. LOL at the go down in history comment. Someone doesn't live in reality. Bunch of anons posting on a Bigfoot forum is really making history. What a tool.

      Delete
    4. Damn so you saying that my Quick AND Relentless pwning won't go 'down in history'?

      That's a bummer.

      Perhaps the JREF forum had some kind of pwning 'Hall of fame'?

      Would hate to see all that good 'pwning' go to waste.

      MMG

      Delete
  3. An Update on the Disappointing Level of Intelligence of Our Regretful Skeptard PrimitivesThursday, October 17, 2013 at 2:52:00 PM PDT

    Pasting this from previous post in order to demonstrate the spectacular thickness of the average skeptard skull:

    "No we've known that there's been bears in the Himalayas for centuries. The revelation that there's bears up there isn't earth shattering, it's just reinforcing something that was already apparent.

    But nice try on wriggling out of this. Good effort, keep it up. :)"

    Alright let's deal with this one.

    The skeptard's comment is wrong and a grammatical sewer pit.

    We have known of bears in the Himalayas, but not THIS bear hybrid. But why does the skeptard self-contradict by calling the findings a revelation?

    Has this unprepared skeptard read the Independent article or not?

    Sykes' discovery of an otherwise unknown type of bear, reinforces this skeptard's what and how and when and why does it??? What???

    Look, this skeptard didn't know this ultra rare bear existed, he/she didn't know squat, Sykes just discovered the thing. Other known bears there have nothing to do with this.

    That doesn't reinforce a damned thing. It "uninforces" the whole damned thing for you.

    Also the skeptardical problem of not seeing the forest for the trees:

    This discovery of this huge rare animal makes it clearly possible for other huge reclusive rare creatures to exist undetected by science for centuries.

    Sykes' results were always going to be neutral at worst as far as bigfoot enthusiasts go. It's peculiar and pathetic and desperate that skeptards are trying to twist neutral results into a score.

    But really these results are a bit better than neutral for enthusiasts, for the reason just stated: the Rare Bear demonstrates the feasibility of the existence of other huge and scarce creatures in the wilds.

    Rare Bear results hardly disprove the yeti, nor are they a score for the skeptards. It's a "logical fallacy" to say that a few Rare Bear results disprove some other creature whose samples you do not even have to test!!! That line of thinking reveals an unhinged mind hard at work.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^ damn you're one pwned footer

      Delete
    2. I hope you didn't think anyone would actually read all your garbage, did you? Oh well; at least you got to practice typing.

      Delete
    3. ^^After that post that is all you can come back with?

      You couldn't pwn your way out of a wet paper bag.

      MMG

      Delete
    4. You would know more than most about getting pwned MMG. You got brutalized, smoked, and pwned in the most emphatic manner.

      Delete
    5. Let's not forget this guy

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPbz5TDy6fs

      I could go on believe me....

      Delete
    6. Lol!

      A guy didn't see a BF.

      This proves conclusively BF's do not exist right? Lol!

      If you want to base the 'existence' of sasquatch on the accounts of just one man.... How about I offset that with the accounts of a thousand witnesses that say otherwise?

      Piss poor logic my friend.

      Next.

      MMG

      Delete
    7. A guy? a guy..there's two and one who lived in prime Bigfoot habitat based on reasearch for over 20 years.

      Or was that bit lost on you brain?

      heres more

      http://www.tv.com/shows/the-alaska-experiment/

      and many others. But fuck it, we don;t need to do that, we are footers, lets hit the nearest RV park or Salk Folk and have an experience.

      Delete
    8. A guy? a guy..there's two and one who lived in prime Bigfoot habitat based on reasearch for over 20 years.

      Or was that bit lost on you brain?

      heres more

      http://www.tv.com/shows/the-alaska-experiment/

      and many others. But fuck it, we don;t need to do that, we are footers, lets hit the nearest RV park or Salk Folk and have an experience.

      Delete
    9. There was 'Two of em'!!!

      Thanks for the pwning! It was nice!

      MMG

      Delete
    10. Don't try and deflect answer why?

      People who live in prime Bigfoot habitat for years see nothing, but all footers have to do is go to the nearest RV park or hteir local park. pwning damn right!

      Delete
    11. Well Joe fitz has that beat by a mile. He does not even have to leave his cranium to encounter a bigfoot.

      Delete
    12. So you are saying it's only 'footers' that report sightings?

      Stop typing garbage.

      MMG

      Delete
    13. Magic Bear Guru, just give it a rest you moron.

      Delete
    14. The only garage is you won't accept the truth, and thats funny 04:17

      Delete
    15. Garage? I need to stop drinking while reading this shit. Garbage

      Delete
    16. "But really these results are a bit better than neutral for enthusiasts, for the reason just stated: the Rare Bear demonstrates the feasibility of the existence of other huge and scarce creatures in the wilds."

      Yeah not really. If there's been a bear hybrid in the Himalayas that's been undescribed until now that doesn't mean that it's been completely undiscovered. There may have been buckets and buckets of data pertaining to these animals (footprints, photos, videos, even actual animals in zoos) which has been misattributed to other types of bear and the only thing that has changed is that someone finally checked the DNA and discovered that it is in fact genetically diverse.

      Delete
    17. Magic Bear Guru = MBG

      I despair....

      MMG

      Delete
  4. God damned trailer trash hominids. Probably already sucken up welfare and food stamps.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story