Sharon Hill Busted For Trying To Promote Her Bigfoot Stuff on The BFRO, LOL
Want to know who posts just as much Bigfoot stuff as Bigfoot Evidence? The blogger Sharon Hill is one of the most active bloggers on Bigfoot, even though she is a self-proclaimed skeptic. Rather than posting random, and questionable Bigfoot videos for people to decide for themselves like we do, Hill's take is from a different, more skeptical approach. Her knee-jerk critical reaction to anything Bigfoot related earned her the respect of The Huffington Post who ultimately gave her a platform to scoff at Bigfooters. It seems her recent acceptance into the community may have given her the wrong impression that she's welcome to "self-promote" her Bigfoot material on any Bigfoot-related website. Last year, Hill and her JREF goons attacked the President of the BFRO, Matt Moneymaker with a blog post titled, "You are Not Entitled to Your Own Bigfoot Facts". The piece harshly attacks Moneymaker's opinion on what "Facts" are. Since Hill does not reciprocate and vows never to link to our website (only mentions us by name) we're not compelled to link to that piece.
You can only go so far before the truth catches up to you, however. Posting hoaxie Bigfoot-related on your website and attacking Bigfoot sites like ours for posting the same type of materials does not automatically grant you acceptance into the Bigfoot community -- hell, even Bigfoot Evidence sits on the sideline sometimes. From our experience, Bigfooters will see right through you whether you're being honest, or trying to take advantage of them. Last week, after posting a Dr. Sykes Yeti article, Hill took her Bigfoot piece to the BFRO's Facebook group where things did not go well when she was asked to explain her credentials. Hill sees herself as a savior of the Bigfoot community, (or the Messiah?) or someone who's trying to save the community from itself. However, the admins there sees her diffrently. They see her as someone who's trying to "slam" the community and a self-promoter. In defense of herself, Hill writes:
"And if you think that the Bigfoot community does not need to be criticized for their relationship with the public, I respectfully disagree. Because nonsense is rampant, hoaxing is the norm (sadly) and the reputation is in the gutter. If you listen to the new Bigfoot show, you will see that my goal is to bring it out of the gutter."In the statement above Hill thinks she's the person who can save us. God help us all, right?
BFRO member Dw Darkwing Lee's response was harsh:
"How am I slamming you? Are you a geologist? And if you want to get things out of the gutter, I said you should write policies and procedures, etc. I think you are just out to claim being a victim from the Bigfoot community instead of doing what you are claiming, trying to help us out of the gutter. Seems you can't take constructive criticism yourself, so why should anyone take you serious. JMHO"
"I just don't like people trying to proclaim themselves to be a victim without offering some solutions. I've seen it so many times over the years, people claim the Bigfoot Community is so messed up, but they don't want to offer solutions. Sharon, participate here, by all means, but do it by contributing, not slamming everyone and then claiming you are the victim. I asked you, are you a geologist? Is that your scientific background? And you say I slam you for that. Lady, like most in this community have to have, you need to get a thicker skin, I'm being nice to you compared to what some of the other old timers in this community would be to you. And that is the truth."
In our opinion, posting questionable videos and photos on your blog and being critical of it (ala Sharon Hill) is no different from what we do here on Bigfoot Evidence blog. Anyone can do that all day long without breaking a sweat. We have staff on call 24/7 ready to tear hoaxie down things down as soon as it shows up on our radar. Just take a look at our Breakdown section where we expose all kinds of questionable videos.
Judging by the mega-platform Hill is given at The Huffington Post to discuss Bigfoot, it may not be surprising to see her labeled as "Bigfooter of the Year" by the end of the year.
I win
ReplyDeleteCongrats on a great first.
DeleteFirst.
ReplyDeletesorry Bigdad, great false first, congrats!!
DeleteGreat false first Bigdad.
DeleteI have a monster in my pants.
ReplyDeleteI have a surprise in my pocket.
DeleteMisspelling in the title of your post: It's Sharon Shill.
ReplyDeleteShe posted here ad nauseum as Bigfoot is BS and probably as Timmy and others. Her normal mode was attack. When commenters here put up resistance, she complained this blog was unfriendly to skeptics. Yes, she brought attacks in the first place, encountered resistance, the whined that there was resistance.
The gutter? She is trying to bring Bigfooting out of the gutter?
Go and read her own comments in the comments section of her I Doubt It (and I Doubt You Sharon!) blog. She is not averse to screaming all-caps obscenities.
Also in the I Doubt It comments section, while she screams all-caps obscenities, sometimes when someone disagrees with her, she warns them to keep it "civil" and "clean" etc. or they are barred. It's truly laughable to see her warnings just a ffew posts down from her screaming F**KING!!! and the like. She can't see her own hypocrisy on the screen in front of her.
She so far is just another JREF-worshipping hypocrite. It's a cult. Hypocrisy is the most consistent crime and blunder committed by Shill et al.
Yeah, HOW DARE these JREF people with their fancy logic and rational thinking argue with us, the chosen tribe of Bigfoot? :)
DeleteFancy smancy!Them Jrefers just love their mud helmet.:)
DeleteShe wasn't Bigfoot is BS, but like that character who was rabid about "bigfooters attacking biology"..lol...she is a little paranoid about the potential harm that can be caused by what she believes is a pseudo-science....
DeleteGreat thread. It's about time her BS was called out here.
DeleteThe 'saving the BF community' crap isn't fooling anyone.
This cultist is very clear what she stands for and we'll fight her every step of the way.
No disinformation.
No smearing
No paranoia
MMG
Holy Shit! That comment was actually interesting and informative. I learned something as a result of it, and I am now wiser.
DeleteSo what's a mature, intelligent reply doing in this preschool chat room?
You may have prevented one of those fucking idiots from being first?
How dare you!
Selfish bastard!
Don't you realize that being first to comment is the high point of their entire lives?
Take your educated and mature ass out of here, so the little cretins can post a thousand comments about who was really first.
You sir, do not belong here . . .
This is your one, and only warning.
2:21, what "fancy logic?" Can't you read? If you read the original post you are commenting on, you would have understood that Shill and JREFers lack any logic whatsoever, never mind "fancy." Shill and JFEFers show illogic, not logic.
DeleteLook: She came here on the attack, then complained the BEB was unfriendly to skeptics. How is that logical? It's illogical, and the JREFing specialty, hypocritical.
Commenters here should be friendly to skeptics and usually are; skeptards are another story; they are extremists, zealots, cultists. When they come here and go on the attack, they have to expect a reply, and not complain about it.
The guilt lies with the aggressor. They are the aggressor. Most people here don't shower the skeptic forums with abuse.
And many enthusiasts are skeptics, or skeptical about much evidence. JREFers and Shill come here with the attitude to insult, and try to convert. Truly, they are religious zealots who are atheists who worship skepscience. They give no thought to the truth that many enthusiasts are skeptical of much of the bigfoot information. They think they have to teach us this, but we already know it, so it is highly annoying and off-putting to have them make these idiotic assumptions about anyone interested in bigfoot.
It's the same as when a religious moralizer lectures you presumptuously, without first checking what your beliefs are, who you are. In the JREF case, they are cultists who first attack and insult, then try to force you into their beliefs--and they are beliefs; they aren't operating soley on facts, not by a bloody damned longshot. They are operating as religious zealots.
You make me laugh 2:21.
Come on, be genuine; we all know that Shill and JREFers have no fancy logic. They do not have logic at all. The organization is based on a falsehood, therefore every premise they create based on the bedrock of the organization, is false, faulty, an error. You can dismiss the whole organization and anything any member of it says. It's a cult.
Not only not fancy logic, no logical at all.
Congratulations 2:21: you, Shill, and the JREFers, are all without logic; your comment lacks logic, you are all illogical.
It's hilarious how the ones who most often claim logic, rationality, science, are the most emotionally explosive, unstable, illogical, twisted personalities of all.
3:46, you speak with knowledge about the identity of Bigfoot is BS? Would you reveal on what info you base this knowledge?
DeleteIt was fairly clear Bigfoot is BS was Sharon Shill, based on the wordplay of BIB's comments (which Shill prides herself on, as "punning skillz"), and her announcement one day to everyone that "I'm a girl." That combined with her hard-assed attitude and wording matched her own comments on her I Doubt It blog.
Bigfoot is BS seemed to morph out of Timmy. As Timmy was called out on being a tin foil cap wearing nutcase, Timmy withdrew and Bigfoot is BS stepped in. Their comments and verbal mannerisms were oddly similar.
Some of Bigfoot is BS's comments had Shill's characteristics and fingerprints on them. It looked pretty clearly to be her. Especially once Bigfoot is BS was identified as Sharon Shill, oddly enough, Bigfoot is BS disappeared too, and now we mainly only have anonymous comments with her stamp on them.
Based on that especially, that once Bigfoot is BS was IDed as Sharon Shill, Bigfoot is BS bailed out and disappeared, it is pretty obvious BIB was Sharon Shill. If it weren't, BIB would have continued and enjoyed being misidentified.
I think most here would like to hear why you authoritatively say Shill was not Bigfoot is BS. That surely means you know BIB/Sharon Shill, in order to claim to have that inside knowledge.
6:11, allow me to apologize for being such a ruddy selfish bastard. ;)
DeleteToo much reading " what a shock ".
DeleteYes, I know the reading is tough on you, 7:44. What grade are you in now?
DeleteAnyway, since Shill brags about her verbal and "punning skillz," it's quite a wonder that she could blunder so awfully into the false screen name of Sharon Hill, which simply begged mercilessly to be altered to Sharon Shill, for alliteration's sake as well as for accuracy, for at her Huff 'n' Stuff Puff 'n' Stuff Puff yerself Up blog, she is most certainly:
Sharon Shill.
My, how embarrassing for her.
7:09 aka "What a shock"...Not based on anything definitive to be sure..Its just that the comments by Bigfoot is BS reached a level of nastiness that her comments on JREF and blog come nowhere near...Maybe I'm naive...Sorry for the late response, wasn't on line much yesterday....
DeleteThe BFRO Blue Forum peeps will believe anything.As long as Bigfoot is real in your story.With eyes that glow in the dark......They'll kick you off for just disagreeing with them.
ReplyDeleteSharon Hill of idoubtit.wordpress, has a closed mind that forever prevents her from seriously considering the existence of a phenomenon that has been witnessed to some degree by hundreds of thousands of people. There is no point in entering into an argument, a discussion, or any sort of internet jousting as the believer/knower is completely wasting his or her time. Time that they will never get back. On her website, she deals with persons who have an alternate viewpoints as herself, or who point out not only her lack of field experience, but her continous failure to obtain that experience, by deleting their comments. Only the "attagirl" comments remain on her website. That behavior does not qualify as a scientific enquiry, a study or an exchange of ideas. It does qualify however, as a textbook example of scientific prejudice, IMO.
ReplyDeleteCan't be to closed. She is a lickety splitter.
DeleteLOL!
ReplyDeleteWhat the hell did you do to piss her off so bad Shawn? She used to comment on here quite a bit back in the day.
I don't think it was anything Shawn did; she just got fed up trying to argue logically with people who were personally invested in believing in BF but unable to provide any compelling evidence. I don't blame her. Arguing with footers here is akin to psychological torture for anyone who wants to bring reason and sense into discussing BF.
DeleteRetard that spends his time on a Bigfoot site bitching about believers believing in Bigfoot.
DeleteAbsolute Retardation folks..
True dat.He should be watching Barney and telling his mommy that Barney is a real dinosaur.
Delete2:05, see comments above yours about those claiming rationality, logic, and reason, being the most irrational, illogical, unreasonable, unstable people of all.
DeleteThey might be a revelation to you, personally, intimately, as is clear from the ignorance demonstrated by your misguided post.
I'll tell you why, Fozzie.
DeleteShawn allowed for nasty, sexist comments about Sharon to be posted here. When called out on it, Shawn promised to delete said comments. He never did. In fact, he later claimed he didn't see any such comments here.
Last time I checked (which must be at least 6 months ago now) the comments in question were still there.
a proofless animal only given to show itself to those willing to scream, tree thump and walk around at night aimlessly in the woods? I'm open minded but these kinds of people are why the bigfoot phenom is so smeared as well as a hub to those like Mrs Shill, Hill or whomever. When someone calls themselves a proffesional BF guide or anything that equates them in that manner can only be looked upon as a fraud. Nothing to study other than the reports of others only offers the opportunity to become a reporter oneself. A proffesional seeker maybe, a searcher of facts at best. Proffesional, or expert on the actual animal, that has yet to be proven real? Yea,OK..
ReplyDeletetru that. anyone who gives more than oppinions is wrighting checks on someones money that facts cant cash. I am a believer, but not a following fool.
DeleteSharon Hill used to hang out in Cherry Hill Park;
ReplyDeleteThe game she played lasted all day to way after dark;
Now, all the girls, they criticized her but all the guys just idolized her;
Cause Sharon Hill was such a thrill after dark;
in Cherry Hill Park
^^I give you props for the 70's pop culture reference. Well done.
Delete^ Word on anon 1:15, good riddance to SH @Fozzie ^
ReplyDeleteAnother JREF shill, with a bleeding heart that all bigfooters are HS dropouts and don't know shit from shinola.
I sure hope the BFS doesn't serve up a marshmallow platform for her to spew her garbage (who cares if the Huffington Post does).
DW Darkwing was a major player in the "Daisy" Bigfoot "Team Quantra" hoax. He has NO credibility.
ReplyDeleteDW was not involved in that. A forum member there was making something out of nothing. What was his name? Ed Smith? I wonder what happened to that guy.
DeleteI like how "Darkwing" (ooh, scary) boasts that if he doesn't like what somebody has to say he will delete it. That's perfect--we don't like your argument so bye-bye. How do y'all ever expect to get to the real truth of the Bigfoot phenomenon with such close-minded thinking?
DeleteTim Fasano, the man who never met a donut he didn't like. That should be your slogan, TF.
DeleteTalk us through the Palmetto Monster pics Tim?
DeleteYou remember the Palmetto Monster right?
A hoaxer trashing other hoaxers. You couldn't make this shit up.
MMG
I read your Blog Tim, You are so assbackwards on your information, mis quotes and all out fabrications, But thanks for chiming in here with your brilliant observation skills. LOL Now get on back to your donuts, chubby !
ReplyDeletewhat do you mean backwards and mis-quotes? What about the $2.00 I just donated? Better not go towards a donut ....that's bullshit.
DeleteI would so tap her
ReplyDeleteHey!! That's my imaginary girlfriend you're talking about!!
DeleteShe gave me 50 cents to come on here and talk shit about Bigfoot! Yay!
Deleteyou got ripped off son
DeleteActually, there isn't any such thing as a sasquatch/bigfoot, etc, etc. NO. SUCH. THING. She's getting a rise out of annoying complete dumbshits who believe in this imaginary thing. And so am I. Fucking bigfooters are stupid stupids.
ReplyDeleteHI SHARON!^^
DeleteThey are stupid stupids?
DeleteOK.
What else did you learn in kindergarten today, junior?
Hey, dumbasses, show the entire conversation, not just the part to support your point of view.
ReplyDeleteSharon H. is usually right with what she has to say about BF. I know that's painful for some of you to hear, but it is true.
On a more personal note, I still love this hot skeptic babe, even though she tossed me aside like a week-old moldy slice of Little Caesar's pizza. I forgive you, S.H. Call me, OK?
she needs to get a life. At least bigfooters know what they want. Even if it is nothing and liking it.
DeleteSharon?^^
DeleteLOL. Anyone who dares disagree with the cult of bigfoot (like point out the obvious: THERE AIN'T NO SUCH BEASTIE) is cut. God you people are stupid.
DeleteLOL 3:33, bleever in the JREF CULT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteAnd anyone who disagrees with the CULT of JREF is cut, right?
God 3:33 you are utterly stupid, Christ.
And look at yourself: atheist who self-attributes godlike qualities by declaring there is no such thing.
Narcissist much? Egotist much?
Go walk off a pier you utter idiotic lowbrow fool!!!!!!!!!! Do us that favour!!!!!!
Sharon Hill gives me gas. And Sharon Lee gives me diarrhea. What is up with these Sharon bitches?
ReplyDeleteSharon is carin'
Delete(clive squiashy)
ReplyDeleteI'd like to nominate Sharon Hill for "Bigfooter of the Year" award.
Skeptard of the year and you have my vote.
Delete(clive squashy)
DeleteGD it, King Baby ! I was counting on your support !
Darkwing you are a complete ass.... Did you listen to what you just posted... you make comments all the time about situations you have no clue about. You did it to me 4 years ago... You claimed my video wasnt legit because of who I dealt with... Maybe just maybe it is real and just didn't know who to call. Know your facts before you speak.
ReplyDeleteWay to take the high road Shawn. Thank God you don't post Hoaxy stuff here. Or articles that have no bearing on Bigfoot. Because if you did, that would be the pot calling the kettle black now wouldn't it?
ReplyDeleteFYI Sharon Hill has a degree in science, which is more education then 99% of the idiots here have.
That alone gives her a say. The application of scientific protocols is the one thing that will present the truth to the public.
Promoting the non sense you are eye ball deep in, won't.
Misinformation is the cancer eating away at legit research. It's as bad as Hoaxing. And attacking ever person with a science background because they actually are speaking some sense, is not helpful.
We need more people with science backgrounds to look at this. If you're butt hurt because someone isn't backing up your quest for a larger revenue stream, then I'd say you're in the wrong business.
Sharon studies rocks asshole! Why don't you copy and paste this same post over and over you dumb sumbitch!
DeleteReally very happy to say, your post is very interesting to read.I never stop myself to say something about it.
ReplyDeleteYou’re doing a great job. Keep it up