Press Release: Mountain Devil - Search for Frank Peterson Movie Premier


New Bigfoot Docudrama, “Mountain Devil: The Search for Frank Peterson,” Movie Premier to be held November 23, 2013 at the The Clearfield Arts Studio Theatre located at 112 E. Locust Street, Clearfield Pennsylvania.

Phone 814-765-4474.
http://www.castbuilding.net/

The premier will be a full day of events and activities related to the movie release. Doors will open at 1:00 pm with Bigfoot activities for the whole family and Bigfoot Researchers including Eric Altman, David Rupert, Ron Gallucci and others will be on hand along with the film producer and director Ryan Cavalline of Raw Footage Films.

The brand new "Docudrama" release of Mountain Devil: The search for Frank Peterson is based on a historical case in Pennsylvania from the 1970's and is a mixture of Fiction and Fact. The majority of the movie was filmed in Central and Southwestern Pennsylvania and is written, directed and produced by Ryan Cavalline of Raw Footage Films.

The summary of the film involves an encounter two hunters had in the 1970's with a Bigfoot at their cabin in the rural mountains of Pennsylvania over a long period of time. The documentary portion of the film includes documentary film footage of the Pennsylvania Bigfoot Society members which include Eric Altman, David Rupert, Ron Gallucci. Also included in the film are Pennsylvania Bigfoot/UFO Investigator Stan Gordon, independent researcher Dwayne Pintoff along with several other investigators.
The film will be show at 7:00 pm and wrap up a day of fun and festivities for the whole family. More details including ticket prices and scheduled activities will be released soon.

Check out the trailer:



To learn more about Raw Footage and director Ryan Cavalline, visit http://www.facebook.com/raw.footage.7

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Before anyone attempts to read the comment section below, I forewarn you that it's not worth it.

      Turn back now and save yourself, there's nothing but melodramatic garbage posted below and there's nothing worthwhile to read.

      Save yourselves before it's to late.

      Delete
    2. Why,you embarrassed Ball Boy?

      Delete
    3. Fantastic foist Travis! congrats:!!!

      Delete
  2. I'll be there at that time, maybe I'll swing by and check it out.

    I know for a fact at least two of the PA bigfoot sightings/encounters listed on their website is fakery at its finest.

    I was born less than an hour from Clearfield county.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Daniel. Why are you even here? You seem to be the gay black ram of the blog.

      Delete
    2. I came for the bigfoot evidence and stayed for the MuldersWorld top 5 updates.

      Delete
    3. I am the english guy saying to poison bigfoot. Have you ever seen or used Sodium Fluoroacetate for animal control.

      Delete
    4. I like Daniel. It is good to hear opposite views instead of having a fishbowl of ideas.

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. Muir is just a little scared of his keyboard dribble. I think the moral of the story is (and ironically the same moral that has been suggested I have been exposed to), is don't pipe up too prematurely.

      Education in the States can be free!

      Delete
    7. "But Hollywood Ro said 29 minutes?!"

      "B-b-but... VROOM VROOM??"

      ; )

      (Giggle)

      Peace.

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    9. Joe have you ever been a patient of a mental hospital?

      Delete
    10. I fear nothing and no man. Grow up Joe. I admitted I may be wrong. I put forth an educated guess. You Have nothing and until you do it is pointless to engage you further.

      Delete
    11. Good to see you get out there and support your local BF scene Dan.

      Can imagine you standing at the back of the hall screaming 'It doesn't exist' over and over before being led away somewhere more secure.

      MMG

      Delete
    12. Muir...

      Quite the character aren't you when you post bitterness at someone like me off the back of some exhibitionist answering his own comments about me? Now run along, which is what I gathered you are going to do with the nature of your comment.

      Crampz...

      HA HA HA HA HA!!

      You can tell I'm getting you riled up when you start down the road of another exposure breakdown bet!

      And low and behold, Crampz seems to know the outcome of the long term study! Wasn't that same think you accused me of?? Snake like hypocrisy. I don't claim to know the results of the study are going to be, but what I do know is that you have got this entire episode so far wrong and love the fact that I pissed on your parade.

      Asian bears will be the least of your avoidance come the end of the study.

      "For the most part the samples he has tracked down for analysis have turned out to be known species such as humans, bears or apes; however two samples taken towards the end of his quest will "change our understanding of human history. Professor Sykes is a world authority on genetics and what he has to say about Yetis will shock the world".

      - Taken from a very recent book review

      "But Hollywood Ro said 29 minutes?!"

      "B-b-but... VROOM VROOM??"

      ; )

      (Giggle)

      Peace.

      Delete
    13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23669592

      You need to go here Joe

      Delete
    14. Wait for it guys!!

      Another name calling comment coming right up, bets and all!!

      HA HA HA HA HA!!

      Delete
    15. "B-b-but... VROOM VROOM??"

      ; )

      (Giggle)

      Schooled.

      Delete
    16. Time for your daily pill Joe

      Delete
    17. Joe would you eat Sodium Fluoroacetate

      Delete
    18. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    19. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    20. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    21. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    22. Avoidance with a little bit of creativity Crampz...

      You don't appear to have all the answers right now.

      Peace.

      Delete
    23. Ball boy is running scared.

      Delete
    24. Ok hot rod keep on quoting shitty radio hosts

      Delete
    25. Daniel,

      Although you annoy the shit out of me, I respect your views and your intellect. Would you mind taking my survey on paranormal phenomena? I'm curious how you would rank the four major categories of paranormal claims according to plausibility. http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GGKXDD7


      Delete
    26. Daniel Campbell is Jill your sister?She is from McKean county

      Delete
  3. Bigfoot is so elusive when ever science gets hold of a DNA sample it is able to restructure its DNA construction to resemble a bears DNA. Just shoot the damn thing put a definite yes they exist or no its a bear. My guess is that it is a bear. The likely hood of a 8 foot monkey man running around the woods completely undetected but the ever growing technology would be 0.01%. Over the cold war the US military had state of the art planes capable of detecting heat signatures on the ground from 10,000 feet in the air. The constantly monitored the USA and Russia for Russian threats. Yet no 8 foot magic monkey man. Russia had the same technology and undertook the same missions and again no 8 foot magic monkey man. This either means that there is none at all any where ever. Or. There is a multi nation cover up and the existence will never be discovered by the general public. My suggestion give up while you still have your mind and sanity. But i do see some people have lost this already on this blog.

    G M Fin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Dr Sykes is quite happy to discuss the negative findings of the research so far, but the groundbreaking results from two samples means that Oxford University require him to peer review these in a paper properly. This has not stopped British based newspapers running with the assumption that 'Bigfoot' has been proven to not exist via proven bear samples."

      - Fringe News

      "Sykes has publicly stated on the BBC that his main objective was and still is; to find other species' of human on this planet. If he has found a new species of bear in that process, that is pretty amazing... But you have to be of a very high level of needing closure on something to over-see the fact that a bear in Asia does not disprove a Bigfoot in America.

      (Sigh)

      It is newspapers that have gone with the misinformation that Sykes has dismissed the existence of the Yeti because of the discovery of a new bear. For Sykes to still have the fundemental stance and still be associating with Bigfooters, doesn't mean that the long term results of his study are already certain... It merely means that we have to wait a little longer... Because Sykes' obvious agenda has not been fulfilled yet."

      - Joe Fitzgerald

      "For the most part the samples he has tracked down for analysis have turned out to be known species such as humans, bears or apes; however two samples taken towards the end of his quest will "change our understanding of human history. Professor Sykes is a world authority on genetics and what he has to say about Yetis will shock the world".

      - Taken from a very recent book review

      No, no... The pleasure's all mine.

      Delete
    2. "But Hollywood Ro said 29 minutes?!"

      "B-b-but... VROOM VROOM??"

      ; )

      (Giggle)

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. No a bear does not disprove Bigfoot the lack of credible evidence does. Surely over the cold war with spy planes looking for enemy troops they would have found a Bigfoot should they exist. You can't say Bigfoot is intelligent enough to avoid technology because that is complete bullshit. Maybe back in the 50's but not since the huge improvements made in the 70's and 80's. Basically what people making these claims are saying is the Bigfoot is more elusive than any special forces troops because even with years and years of training they cannot avoid technology. The likely hood that there's a huge hairy man out there pretty much speaks for its self. There's not!

      Delete
    4. http://www.reconyx.com/shop/PC900_HyperFire_Professional_High_Output_Covert_IR/d/227/56

      Note invisible infrared beam. Joe this guy is right technology has smoked you.

      Delete
    5. I love the way that people watch the Attenborough box set and think they can account for every corner of the planet. Your Attenborough box set will not account for 70% of the United States that is covered in wilderness. I would recommend that you check out the plane flights over the Pacific North West, you'll find them on your Attenborough box set for sure. Spy planes would be sure to locate a creature that is widely accepted as nocturnal for sure, wouldn't they?

      The fact that these creatures are not dumb animals, have observed us and learnt to stay away from us over the past ten thousand years, would suggest why they stay out of our way fro so long. Also...

      "Hey Joe, just FYI. I was on an overnight trip last Thursday/Friday with the law and public safety class students I teach. We were in the field as I was teaching night surveillance, etc. I showed the students the difference between Generation 1 plus night vision and Gen 3. We used both to observe/collect data in total darkness. Gen 1 night vision uses the same technology that Infra-red trail cameras use at night to take photos without utilizing the "flash" that the trail camera uses during the day to take pics. (According to the trail cam manufacturers, the game will not spook because of the lack of flash). When using the Gen 3 technology at night it does not omit an infrared beam. The Gen 1 plus uses infrared to enhance its night vision. Although IR is invisible to humans, it is clearly visible to any animal that has nocturnal vision. I proved this to the students by allowing them to observe me using the Gen 1 plus while they viewed me using the Gen 3. The Gen 1 plus omits what looks like a huge flashlight beam when observed through the Gen 3. Although the Gen 1 plus cannot be seen with our naked eye, it is glaringly obvious with the Gen 3. Although I used this training to drive home a point about never using Gen 1 for surveillance (the bad guys may have Gen 3 or better night vision and they will know you are there, etc.) some of the students who are hunters immediately said, "any animal who sees in the dark could see the gen 1 plus."

      For those who are skeptical of this info. test it for yourself.

      Archer1"

      ... that was from my friend who is a hunter of many years.

      Burial mounds suggest a much more intelligent culture and evasion capabilities and would also explain why there are hundreds of accounts of disturbing such in libraries up and down your country and would articulate further why we don't come across the remains of these creatures, especially when 70% of the country is covered in wilderness, to which it turn suggests how hard it would be to locate such burial areas, especially once the old native regions of New England for example were churned up and taken over during the industrial revolution and then covered up as quickly as possible to suit the economic boom.

      Glad I could help.

      Peace.

      Delete
    6. And where did i mention the Attenborough box set? I am mentioning military grade technology that covered 99% of the US wilderness. How could Bigfoot observe something that only 20 high ranking marines and the president had knowledge of? Not even the secretary of defense had knowledge of some of the ground breaking technology. But some how Bigfoot does? The trail cam linked does not have a infrared beam. Using night vision you can see these and this is the one i use and you can not see this beam you say is there.

      Delete
    7. No, let me explain something to you... I am saying you are of the same armchair skepticism that thinks because they've seen the world on TV, that they can account for every corner of the globe.

      "I am mentioning military grade technology that covered 99% of the US wilderness. How could Bigfoot observe something that only 20 high ranking marines and the president had knowledge of?"

      And how would you know if they came across Bigfoot then??

      "Not even the secretary of defense had knowledge of some of the ground breaking technology."

      So none of us would know the results of such an operation, would we? For all you know, the government do have a cloak and dagger knowledge of such things, we know they are quite capable of covering UFO's up??

      The comment I posted was from an outdoors man and lecturer of many years, I would rather take his word over yours, with all do respect.

      Peace.

      Delete
    8. Exactly my point if Bigfoot is out there we will never know. You ask your friend about infrared that works on moonlight not Red luman light

      Delete
    9. That would be an interesting news day....

      Erm folks just to let you we have stumbled across a small population of large and extremely powerful hairy men in the woods.

      We ain't too sure what they are doing there but enjoy your family camping trip to Crater Lake all the same....

      MMG

      Delete
    10. Look bro, I don't mean to sound harsh to you, you actually sound like you are down with the possibility. No offense intended, I'm having fun with those up top and in attack mode.

      You have a friend in me sir.

      Peace (Sincerely).

      Delete
    11. The chances that we will every know is 0.

      Delete
    12. And I wasn't quite suggesting we would?

      Peace.

      Delete
    13. I think it is a possibility but the powers that tell us what we can think and what is real and fake say Bigfoot is fake and that is the way it always is going to be.

      Delete
    14. You and me don't think too far differently after all.

      Peace.

      Delete
    15. So what i say is what is the point It is a big waste of time and money trying to work it out for what something only you will know

      Delete
    16. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    17. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    18. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    19. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    20. Well that wouldn't be totally correct would it Crampz?

      I'm an armchair enthusiast.

      (Duh?)

      And the problem in hand has nothing to do with what I do, because in my eyes at least I know the vast wilderness areas out there from my armchair, rendering me at least better than those who are too stupid to realize this.

      Heck Crampz, you've shot big bad bears (yeah right) and can't get your brain around what an Attenborough box set tells him is out there... Who's worse??

      HA HA HA!!

      More names?!

      The exposure breakdown bets will be out and about again next, just wait and see everyone!!

      Schooled again.

      Delete
    21. Joe you are a armchair enthusiast is a under statement. You are mentally obsessed

      Delete
    22. Daniel Campbell has an IQ so low, it wouldn't even register!

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Daniel,i'm slightly confused by you,yesterday you were standing up for homosexuals for which i commend you but you gave me a lot verbal abuse for being TS and you do bring it up occasionally,do you have an issue with me or have i got that wrong? xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You missed a couple of dingleberries when you wiped me this morning Eva.

      Delete
    2. Who cares what sexuality people are. Daniel what has Eva's sexuality got to do with you. Get over your self. Are you a little boy? I know a grown man that is all there would not give two shits what the sexuality of other people are.

      You are a typical asshole Daniel Campbell

      Delete
    3. Hello Joe,it would seem so,i'm also being pursued by someone pretending to be my taterhole which is a slightly amusing xx

      Delete
    4. Eva, darling... The guy doesn't like people. It has nothing to do with you. You are a personality on this blog, an enthusiast and that merely makes you a target in his eyes.

      Don't ever be concerned with wondering what the guy means by what he says, he doesn't know himself half the time and says anything to do what he sees as winning a thread of comments.

      Heck, the guy was calling out Sykes' results on bear yesterday; that's a sure sign of the guy not knowing what he means. Celebrates Asian bear findings being 'the death of Bigfoot American Bigfoot' and then questions those results publicly?

      Peace Eva.

      Delete
    5. Sorry to disappoint you Joe,but Evas Taterhole is a knower of Bigfoots existence.Evas Taterhole just wants recognition.All everyone talks about is his/her gash which happens to be my neighbor.:-(

      Delete
    6. Crampz...

      "I'm very interested in ancestory and evolution, but I feel unqualified to even attempt to say what conclusions can be drawn until both scientific camps publish more information.

      Good chance you may be right in your assumptions.

      It's been heralded before that bigfoot was a H. Heidelbergensis as it was the largest known species of hominids.

      This type of stuff is really why drew me to bigfoot in the first place, but the loonies and actions of the community has been the catalysts for my comments here."

      ... D'you see what I mean Eva? It is apparent that Crampz thinks Bigfoot is a type of human also.

      The guy simply doesn't like people.

      Peace.

      Delete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Mike,i am more than happy to accept Daniels apology,we all say things sometimes without really thinking about it much and as far as i'm concerned it's water under the bridge,i just wondered that was all.Don't worry about the language,i work with a load of men who call each other things like that all the time,i know there's nothing meant by it xx

      Delete
    2. How many chances are you giving Ball Boy?

      Delete
    3. How about them Cards Mike?!!!!!!!

      Delete
    4. Yesssss and Boston is next. I have never forgotten the Boston series. I have never seen young pitchers as dominant as these since the Braves unleashed Glacine and Smoltz and company on the N L. !

      Delete
  9. Mother.of.God.

    I am a giant troll among peasant trolls.

    I love how people are still talking about pwnings from months ago like it was yesterday, thinking that I've been posting under anonynimity and blaming me for everything from being a paid CIA skeptic to being the lone gunman and everything under the sun.

    Trollandia, I present you this thread as my credentials and work history. All hail Mayor McCheese and Fozzie!!!

    LOL.

    PJ is crying and frothing at the mouth at the same time!

    You people take this bigfoot crap way to serious!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ball boy is back!!!!YAYYYYYY!!!!

      Delete
    2. Never left. I go for a cigarette and my email blew up, so I dealt with that and finally brought up BFE a couple minutes ago and I was greeted with what you have before you. Imagine my delight!!!

      I'm sure you are familiar with the phrase "bad press is good press," well after this thread if you didn't know me you now do!

      Look how batshit crazy everyone went over nothing.

      I'm impressed. PJ lost his marbles at the first sign of someone coming at me. That's glorious.

      Delete
    3. Crampz...

      "I'm very interested in ancestory and evolution, but I feel unqualified to even attempt to say what conclusions can be drawn until both scientific camps publish more information.

      Good chance you may be right in your assumptions.

      It's been heralded before that bigfoot was a H. Heidelbergensis as it was the largest known species of hominids.

      This type of stuff is really why drew me to bigfoot in the first place, but the loonies and actions of the community has been the catalysts for my comments here."

      ... D'you see what I mean people? It is apparent that Crampz thinks Bigfoot is a type of human also.

      The guy simply doesn't like people... But, if you didn't guess by the end of every comment he leaves... Is grossly obsessed with me.

      Apologies follow you about like a bad smell Crampz and today, you have been absolutely educated.

      You had it coming.

      Peace.

      Delete
    4. Tramp Dimple whats your game

      Delete
    5. You people take this bigfoot crap way to serious!


      This coming from Ball Boy who trolls this blog everyday. LMFAO!!!!

      Delete
    6. Oh,the Mayor sucks Ball Boy.

      Delete
    7. Goodness gracious, PJ can't even comprehend written English. No wonder you bleeve in magic monkey men.

      If you actually read what was written instead of seeing what you want to see (prime fault of many footers) then you'd see...

      It's been heralded that bigfoot is H. Hiedelbergensis because it was the largest known hominid species...

      Heralded by quacks like Jeff Meldrum and those in the field. Not by me.

      I still stand in the bigfoot doesn't exist as you know it and as a safety precaution (as with anything in this world) I give the probability of bigfoot existing less than a 1% chance.

      You went full retard, PJ. Just accept it.

      (Sigh)

      BURNED!!!

      Delete
    8. This from a guy who says other people take this seriously.
      WOW,JUST WOW.

      Delete
    9. And...

      "This type of stuff is really why drew me to bigfoot in the first place, but the loonies and actions of the community has been the catalysts for my comments here."

      ... Hmmmmm, I think you can come out of your 'skeptical suit' now Crampz.

      It is blatantly obvious to all you simply have a problem with people... Me mostly, as opposed to Bigfoot in general.

      I have stated from day on since I have been here that Bigfoot is a type of human and you have attacked me and tried ridiculing the subject because your character compels you to do so.

      Schooled... And you had it coming bro.

      Peace.

      Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    11. Joe tell me something. Are you still debating Bigfoot or are you just trying to prove you have a bigger ego than Dan. Seriously you are starting to sound slightly mad.

      Delete
    12. Doesn't take this seriously.^






      Yea,right.

      Delete
    13. And low and behold, again Crampz seems to know the outcome of the long term study! Wasn't that same think you accused me of?? Hypocrisy as well as contradictions. I don't claim to know the results of the study are going to be, but what I do know is that you have got this entire episode so far wrong and love the fact that I wee-wee'd on your parade.

      Asian bears will be the least of your avoidance come the end of the study.

      Swear and call me names Crampz... You will notice I have not done that through this thread and whilst I school you, you're knotching up the prospect of having to write up another suck up apology once you get banned again.

      I have debated you today and you have resorted to filth.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    14. Joe, you're probably going with Daniel.

      Delete
    15. I have only ever wanted to defend the subject from people who want to give a slap in the face to the researchers that have dedicated their hard research, along with the people who have been left traumatized by their experiences.

      I've got an ego yes, you haven't been here long if you haven't picked up on that... But if anyone... ANYONE has a problem with what I say on this blog, then they'll simply have to lump it. I am my own man and don't need anyone backing my corner cause I've always known that what I say doesn't sit well with everyone.

      Like I said... And this is to anyone... Even you MJA; in my thread of comments, I have not used any bad language, called anyone any names, except debate someone. Someone who everyday attacks me. If you want to condemn me for defending myself then suck it up bro.

      If anyone wants to overlook the fact that I don't use initials or anonimaty, and get called filth and obscenities all day, to which I respond with all the passion I have for this subject, then you simply have a mere problem with me and are not being honest.

      Peace.

      Delete
    16. Every one here who has defended the existence of bigfoot has been attacked. Mike seems to almost on a daily basis lately even Eva has. Best way to stop them is log off for a few days. There's many ways to defend your self but some people are just not worth getting sucked into. All dans doing is trolling you joe.

      Delete
    17. Joe, we understand the passion you have for this subject. I am not knocking you.But,there comes a point when you have to look back at all this and let it go.They sling words.That's all it is, words.Don't get sucked down the rabbit hole so to speak.;-)

      Delete
    18. Joe, awhile back there was a guy on here called GNRfan.He took everything to heart and someone trolled the shit out of him..But he realized that it's just words.Miss GNRfan,he spoke some good shit.

      Delete
  10. what tha.. we got ancient aliens and bigfoot on the same page. o the humanity!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's actually an episode on Ancient Aliens and Bigfoot. It's quite the riot!

      Delete
    2. Just like Crampz, Bigfoot and H. Hiedelbergensis... What a riot.

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. What happened to the civilized conversations you watch people will start to be banned just like last time

      Delete
    4. I agree MJA.Won't be much longer.

      Delete
    5. Well you may notice I have not stooped to that level today MJA, unlike some people, I learn from public apologies.

      How are you anyway ma boy?!

      Peace.

      Delete
    6. Busy working long hours you are starting to sound mad Joe.

      Delete
    7. I have to agree with MJA Joe.Just let it go.

      Delete
    8. Joe all that's happening is you are getting sucked in. Take Bigdad's advice and let it go before you both get banned.

      Delete
    9. Because are both two I very much like... I'll comply.

      But please take time to go through my comments and understand my intentions today.

      Peace broth.

      Delete
    10. Joe has gone mad.

      Campbell 2 points, Joe 0 points.

      Winner by being sane: Dan Camp.

      Delete
    11. its called bigfootonethebrainitus

      Delete
    12. You took the bait, so just spit out the hook joe and move to the next square. I saw in a movie once where the witch said "that the biggest fish in the lake got this way by never being caught". Now what the fuck that does that mean, I fuckin don't know, but sounded cool <B-)-'

      hey allie and co.

      Delete
    13. Hey skunkey. Its been a while. How has your stage been treating you?

      Delete
    14. The world is my stage as I sit in the corner and survey all that I see and try not to pass judgement ,rather seek solutions..So how;s the farm? E I E I O

      Delete
    15. Very busy. just brought my 3rd one so been sorting it out for the last week. Forgot how busy it gets

      Delete
  11. aahh the extraterrestrial that gave birth to a race of giants. now we know.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey, Cockmouth Joe!

    How's the mouthful of cocks?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now why would Joe get banned and this utter freak of nature 8:52 be allowed to continue this cesspool language where children come to read?

      Judas Priest, people. Joe is on topic.

      This nutjob is not.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

Questions of the day: Something's not right about Patty, why are the soles of her feet white?