Media Claims Dr. Bryan Sykes Has Proven "Yeti", But There Are 3 Types of Animals With This Name In Nepal

"Yeti footprint" taken 4000 metres
below Mardi Himal on Machapuchare last February.

For centuries, locals who inhabit the Himalayan region of Nepal have reported seeing ape-like beasts roaming the mountains. It is well known throughout the region that the word "yeti"  is actually referring to many types creatures. The word "Yeti" translates from Nepalese as "That thing there" and "that thing there" includes many things, including a known bear. What indigenous people also refer to when mentioning "yeti" is the so-called "Abominable Snowman", and according Scott Marlowe, a cryptozoologist at the Pangea Institute, the translation also refers to a known ape (the Hoolock hoolock which is a species of Gibbon). Famous cryptozoologist Adam Davies, who has visited the region, concurs with Marlowe. "Having had the benefit of visiting Nepal I can affirm that Scott is totally right," Davies wrote.

In the recent news revelation about the "Yeti" being an ancient bear, Marlowe suggests that we all wait for Dr. Bryan Sykes to present the entire conclusion instead of listening to the media-hype surrounding the study. He writes:

Before you all go off the deep end and start all the nonsensical ungrounded speculation, let's back up a moment. Bryan Sykes report is scheduled to come out on the 20th. Today is the 17th. Even if the BBC and CNN got some sort of scoop, there is nothing to guarantee that the information they are running with has come from Sykes. Furthermore, IF the DNA tested from a hair sample is indeed that of an ostensibly extinct polar bear, it only proves that a large animal has survived and escaped notice by mainstream science until now (not exactly shabby). IT DOES NOT PROVE that all "Yeti" signted are bears. In fact, Destination Truth did an episode on the bear issue some time ago. It's old news. It's far more likely that this "News Item" is dis-information coming from others who are trying to damage the credibility of Sykes to support their own nefarious agenda. Let's wait until Sykes release his work on paper before jumping to any conclusions -- don't go with verbal "announcements" as they are notoriously flawed. - Scott Marlowe

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. I'm taking this as a sign (again!).

      MMG

      Delete
    2. Harry my man!

      No fisting for me.

      My Tater is just not built for it.

      This could change come Sunday night however... :)

      MMG

      Delete
    3. Hahahahaha still hiding from the inevitable, MMG.

      How is it in Narnia these days?

      Delete
    4. Just shut the fuck up danny.

      Delete
    5. Dan my little man!

      Just heard from a highly credible source that Sykes confirms on Yeti, BF AND a whole gaggle of Russian Wildmen.

      In fact Sykes had uncovered so many cryptids he's landed a second season. Neat huh?

      MMG

      Delete
    6. My left nut says Sykes releases nothing and you will like it.

      MMMGG

      Delete
    7. There you go MMG that could be an underage drinking public service announcement kids drinking can destroy your life one minute it's fun time with your buddies till you wake up with someone's fist elbow deep in your ass

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Move along simpleton.

      Only Bigfeets, Not Yeti's and Orange Pentax's here.

      MMG

      Delete
    2. the suits in als private office

      Delete
    3. Now is not the time for this nonsense.

      MMG

      Delete
    4. William Parcher 3:37, is that you?

      Delete
    5. Typical Figbooter go in the opposite direction of the evidence/suit in question

      MMMMGGG

      Delete
    6. LOL @ lil chimp dicked danny.

      Delete
  3. Yeti
    etiy
    tiye
    iyet

    YETI.....easy.....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hang on a second now. So the discovery of a type of bear somehow disproves Bigfoot? How does that work again?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it's reverse logic you might get it someday when you grow up

      Delete
    2. Ah I see. So you can't actually answer so you dive in with an ad hominem attack. And you're telling someone else to grow up? Got it.

      Delete
    3. Yawn... Time after time bigfoot and yeti evidence comes back as anything but yeti and bigfoot. It doesn't exactly prove that bigfoot and yeti don't exist, but it is a pretty good indicator just the same.

      It's surprising that anyone actually keeps hoping that if people keep throwing whatever samples at the fan, eventually something will come back as bigfoot. It's not going to happen.

      I like the comment about waiting to see what Sykes will actually say. Duh, it's in the bag already, no bigfoot. Desperation makes people hold out hope well beyond the point of no return.

      Delete
    4. Das ist richtig, mein Feuhrer.

      Delete
    5. Reverse logic, 3:42?

      That's the same magic fairy dust which allows JREFing skeptards to do a massive twerk dance declaring that bear DNA = relict homind does not exist anywhere on Earth.

      Yeah, okay, reverse logic.

      It's funny though, on any other day, in the reverse situation, you JREFers call that a "logical fallacy."

      It's really entertaining from this viewpoint that when an enthusiast makes a reasonable claim with linked evidence, you call it a logical fallacy; and when you commit a raging logical fallacy as you just did, you dress it up as "reverse logic."

      Yeah, keep moving those goalposts skeptard, faster and faster, as more of the Sykes results loom. My God, you're moving them so fast, they are smoking!!!

      Delete
    6. Right, but what does Sykes have to say about bear DNA have to do with bigfoot?

      Delete
  5. MMG answer this

    Dick Proenneke[1] lived alone for over 20 years in Alaska (prime bigfoot territory [2]) and never encountered anything. BUT today all you have to do is go to a trailer park or camp ground and have an encounter.

    No wonder, footers are laughed at most times.

    [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Proenneke
    [2] Toward a Resolution of the Bigfoot Phenomenon 1998
    http://www.henryfranzoni.com/nasirpt.pdf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You want to get pwned on two threads.

      For the record Dick Proenneke's name makes me laugh lots.

      Not Dick would approve of desperate cultists using his experiences to disprove bigfoot once and for all.

      Totally compelling my friend. I'm turning my Bigfoot badge in today and burning Melba's 30 dollar paper.

      You guys got me good. Lol!

      MMG

      Delete
    2. MMG actually paid for Ketchum's kindling!

      Delete
    3. Just shut the fuck up danny.

      LOL @ danny.

      Delete
    4. Dan I'm sorry I doubted you're intellegence on this subject. Once the trilogy shows NO Bigfoot the hole in PJ's ass will be huge. But of course they will insist on watching until the last credit at the end of the show. Good work Dan

      Delete
    5. Let's see, yeti means "that thing over there."

      I guess all skeptards are yetis then.

      They are certainly "things over there."

      Well, okay, they are more "things out there . . . WAY out there."

      Delete
  6. Yeti
    Abominable Snowman
    Bumble

    There's your three.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Looks like it's Professor Sykes that got owned by the locals.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Perhaps bigfeets are just a little less human than we thought. They could have many bear-like characteristics. Remember, it was just recently that bigfeets were psuedoscientifically proven to have duck beaks and beaver tails.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a bear.

      If you'd like to know the scientific reason, it's because its mother and father were bears.

      Delete
  9. Stupid retard footers actually thought The Oxford collateral hominid project was about them. I can see Sykes quickly distancing himself from these knuckledraggers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He looked really proud to be at that press conference.

      Delete
    2. Oh? What about the intelligent footers whose knuckles don't drag?

      And stop stealing my descriptions of skeptards and trying to use them for footers. Invent your own material, you hack.

      Delete
  10. If two bears fuck in the woods and Bill gets fired from his job does that mean gimlin covered the tracks with pine bark?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not only does it mean that, but it also proves Joe got burnt to a crisp.

      Delete
    2. Pwned and prved in a single post.

      I like it.

      Delete
    3. ^^^Two or three low class JREFers.

      Nice examples, aren't they?

      Oh yes, these are the Brite Wuns.

      Delete
  11. Tick tock tick do do doo doo. Tick tock tick do do [doo doo all over PJ's ass] from being tatered so hard we can hear his screams on this side of the pond.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The worst intercontinental pwing in bigfootery was between Kerchak and my keyboard. Little fuck is still inactive. hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  13. "Even if the BBC and CNN got some sort of scoop, there is nothing to guarantee that the information they are running with has come from Sykes."

    Here's a BBC interview with Sykes where he says the 'yeti' samples were bears:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IADAeQgq1Ks

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story