Episode 2 of "Bigfoot Files" With Dr. Bryan Sykes Will Be In North America
Bigfootologists Rhettman Mullis and Todd Neiss had a chance to spend some time with Dr. Bryan Sykes when he visited the U.S. earlier this year. While Neiss is not allowed to discuss the details, he seems very excited and tells us Sykes has some "serious revelations" and "things are about to get very interesting". While the first episode of "Bigfoot Files" hasn't aired yet (airing this Sunday on October 20th), new information about episode 2 has already surfaced:
Mark Evans visits America's Pacific Northwest in search of 'Sasquatch'. In 1958 a digger driver called Jerry Crew found a series of huge footprints in Willow Creek, Northern California and the Bigfoot legend took off.
Since then the region has had over 1000 Bigfoot encounters. But for decades science has scorned the idea of Bigfoot, and anyone who studies it.
Mark meets some of the Bigfootologists who believe they've come face to face with these creatures: Justin Smeja, who claims to have shot two Sasquatch; Vietnam vet Dan Shirley, who claims he can communicate with Bigfoot by 'wood knocking'; Derek Randles, who's been a Sasquatch obsessive since a close encounter in 1985; and Native American Marcel Cagey, who says a Sasquatch changed his life.
And Professor Sykes reveals the results of his DNA tests on the hair samples he's collected. Will the results confirm the Bigfootologists' stories or will it be bad news?
You don't debunk Bigfoot with a bear.
ReplyDelete(Duh?)
Schooled.
Reality check -
DeleteYou have not disproved Yeti by bear being sequenced as DNA.
You will not disprove Bigfoot, should known animals be sequenced as DNA.
Sykes... As has been outlined; is only as good as his samples.
Convenient that people should now look for as much closure as quickly as possible and suggest that these samples are 'the best this field has to offer'... The fact is, that you don't know much at all.
The plain and simple fact IS...
You still haven't debunked Bigfoot. Put that in your proverbial pipe and smoke it.
Reality check served.
You are soooooooo desperate for closure right now. You people never managed to grasp this weeks ago but I have no problem with repeating myself as much as it takes.
Laughably... You do not disprove a species by finding a new one. This is pretty basic child's mental capacity level to understand. The only people who are claiming that the samples submitted were the best that this field has to offer... Is you people. Very obvious considering you require something so bad to back up your claims.
Now you are quite welcome to exaggerate what these results mean in an effort back up your claims... But you are merely behaving like children on a school yard by suggesting that a new species of bear, renders Bigfoot a fantasy. That is something that I'm sure most skeptics will tell you. It merely begs the question... What other species' remain hidden fro science in that region.
'The scientific method' would not use a new form of discovered bear to render a controversial species in Bigfoot a fantasy... Dermals, unknown primate DNA a transcribed language, ten thousand years of acknowledgement, footage... To suggest that a newly discovered bear means none of that is real, isn't particularly well thought through. A scientific method would investigate those sources I provided and not assume a new bear renders them insignificant.
But you maintain that science is right to now debunk Bigfoot because it has found a new species of bear?
: )
Keep it up Tards... You're doing your theory group very proud. Just the way I like it.
Schooled.
No kidding right? Whats all of the fuss about?
DeleteRush, you never got in touch with me bro?
DeletePeace.
Sykes is coming Joe
DeleteTICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
Joe, I sent you another YouTube message and subscribed.
DeleteThe skeptards can't see the forest for the trees:
DeleteSykes has apparently discovered the existence of an absolutely enormous creature in the Himalayas dismissed by science, related to a creature extinct for at least 40,000 years.
Skeptards and probably skeptics would have laughed at and dismissed any claim of the existence of this bear 'till Kingdom Come. They would have never let up. Anyone reporting seeing a prehistoric bear would have been laughed and laughed and laughed at by skeptards. Skeptards would have said No way. But because this is not a primate, they are dancing and saying Oh yes way! Yes way! Yes way!
This is not a little, easily concealed animal, but a damned enormous thing. It is supposed to not exist, but apparently does. according to DNA.
That, as a model, bodes well (Sharon Shill is wrong) for the existence of a large creature, in general, which has been reported but dismissed, yeti or bigfoot or not--large creature in general. As a model, this result shows how wrong scientists and naysayers can be.
This huge creature, which skeptards would have said under any other circumstances could never ever exist no way no how, exists (at least in the past decade).
This thing is supposed to not exist, but apparently does. The model means it is possible for other large but scarce creatures to exist. Skeptards are rushing right past this obviousity and embracing the bear because it is not a primate. They are missing this point.
Hey Joe. King of Reality here. All I needed to do was read the first few lines to let you know something....well....realistic. You can't prove Bigfoot without a body or DNA. So while you keep copy/pasting the same garbage like "You can't disprove", the point is you have never proven. Not once with hard actual evidence. There is nothing to disprove, therefore it can't be done. Disprove that Aliens didn't just take a shit on my lawn. Try me. Go ahead....I'm waiting. You can't, and it sounds pretty stupid of me to even ask. I know, I know... trillions of sightings and video....blah blah blah. The ball has been, and always will be, in your court. This crap pouring out of your mouth about only as good as his samples, well I guess your "Best researchers" aren't good enough to get good samples then....meaning what Joe? You have crappy people you rely on to bring samples about something that has hearsay sightings and bear DNA as it's best evidence. Good job son, but you need to just do yourself a favor and try and figure out the pyramids with some other bullshit theories.
DeleteLeave the poor Bigfoot alone. He is tired of you mentioning him, and he doesn't exist.
Very
Very
Very
Smoked at school while being pwned in the principal's office.
War.
All the smoke was generated by the friction of Joe's taterhole being torn apart by Dan Campbell. Sadly it will never heal. He is scarred for life.
DeleteNo we've known that there's been bears in the Himalayas for centuries. The revelation that there's bears up there isn't earth shattering, it's just reinforcing something that was already apparent.
DeleteBut nice try on wriggling out of this. Good effort, keep it up. :)
The reason people are seeing more of Bigfoot is because deer numbers are soaring. With deer, fish, elk, and the vegetation... There you have a steady diet that would maintain such a creature. For 70% of the United States that is covered in wilderness, who is anyone to make the claim that they can vouch for every deer, elk and fish that has gone missing that would render these creatures attaining the exact amount of food and nutrition that they would need to maintain survival.
DeleteBigfoot is not Gigantopithicus. When the remains of these creatures are found, which they do from time to time, they are either encouraged to be buried again due to their Native American connections (which I very much respect), or they are taken away by state appointed archaeologists with connections to institutions such as the Smithsonian. I understand that the sightings require biological evidence to back up, but that's pretty hard when this evidence is hidden from the public.
Jim Vieira has come across a 100 years worth of printed media up and down the country, that describe giant skeletons being uncovered up and down the country, in a time when populations were separated geographically. Many think that this creature is a dumb ape which would obviously leave a fossil trail and would have been found by now. Burial mounds suggest a much higher intelligence capable of culture and evasion capabilities and would also explain why there are hundreds of accounts of disturbing such in libraries up and down your country and would articulate further why we don't come across the remains of these creatures, especially when 70% of the country is covered in wilderness, to which it turn suggests how hard it would be to locate such burial areas, especially once the old native regions of New England for example were churned up and taken over during the industrial revolution and then covered up as quickly as possible to suit the economic boom.
That cut & paste was just for you 11:50... Notice it completely knocked you on your arss though? Funny that... Easier to cry about cut and pastes as opposed to providing any counter argument that worth a fart.
Sc-c-c-c-c-chooled!
I heard the CFZ in England has an opening for another arrogrant obnoxious asshole. Joe will fit right in.
DeleteSykes is coming Joe
DeleteTICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
Joe has gone into crisis mode and is desperately posting posting posting.
DeleteYou noticed that also? funny eh?
DeleteJust doing what I do best... No different to any other night on here really.
DeleteBy the time I'm done with you all, bears won't have any baring on Bigfoot.
I promise you all that.
Schooled.
Sykes is coming Joe
DeleteTICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
PROMISE
DeleteLMFAO
"Just doing what I do best... No different to any other night on here really. "
DeleteYeah, you're copy/pasting old crap, changing the goal posts to argue about irrelevant details rather than engaging with the actual matter at hand and being an obnoxious jerk.
No different to any other night on here really INDEED.
And indeed he came, and brought you a bear.
Delete"Sure as heck no god damn stank ape boy!"
(Sigh)
Let me help you with something... Bear are just bear.
Booooooom!!
Schooled.
Ha ha ha ha!!!
Sykes is coming Joe
DeleteTICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
This is odd... Aren't I meant to be the one that's getting cranky?
DeleteIs it because I pissed on your parade and dropped the bomb that bear ain't Bigfoot?
Ha ha ha ha!!!
Boom, Schooled...DAMN so you are alive Mr Beckjord afterall. It should of been Bonk! lol
DeleteJoe....King here...again. Going to bring some (Sigh) ....reality ....into it again. To use a very famous quote," Don't believe everything you read." Your printed media is at best, again, hearsay.
DeleteAnd what is "Sc-c-c-c-c-chooled!" ? Do you stutter when you're angry like the German from Die Hard 3? I picture you looking just like that little weasel as well. Don't get angry son, Just realize you were wrong more times than there are stars in the Universe.
And to steal from above.....
TICK TOCK TICK TOCK JOE.
YOU ARE RUNNING OUT OF BULL SHIT TO SLING IN HERE.
Why don't you go ahead and present real evidence for once....just once. Then I will accept your fairy tale.
Smoked.
Joe is Erik Beckjord, ah he's not dead he faked his own death for the insurance and moved to Wales to look for crop circles and friendly looking sheep. lol
DeleteI give it 5 minutes before PJ pastes another thing, using that as the basis for his argument. Then says yeah, you complain about copy and pasting because you can't argue , all the while ignoring the FACTS in the post that blows his retardation out of the water. Tard on sweet Joe. Tard on.
Delete"joe fitzgerald
DeleteThis is odd... Aren't I meant to be the one that's getting cranky?"
No, you're meant to be the one that's getting schooled.
S-S-S-S-S-SMOKED
"Boo hoo boo hoo"
DeleteThat's all I'm getting from you guys!
Ha ha ha ha!!!
How about you boys bring me something to actually counter my comments up top instead of 'boo-hooing' and complaining?
Hang on... Anyone who thinks a bear debunks Bigfoot shouldn't be expected to have the capacity actually.
(Sigh)
Schooled... Again.
Who said I was a guy? I didn't.
DeleteGod wrong again, you really need to give this up. lol
oh and REALLY SCHOOLED on that one. LMFAO
Delete..11:48 is not far off the mark... Sykes is apparently working on proving the hypothesis that the yeti phenomena is caused by an unknown bear..The involvement in of itself by a professor of one of the many relevant disciplines is good for cryptozoology....
DeleteFrank Evans here, John Jones was a Bear hunting guide for over 20 years, He and I hunted bears together for many years. All his 3 team members have hunted and shot Bears.
DeleteThey are not chasing Bears! They are chasing Big foots! End of story!
VROOM VROOM!!!
Delete"Sykes is coming...and you're sweating."
"Scared I know something you don't?!?!"
"Recognition by Dr. Sykes is validation as a species!"
Oh PJ, it's a great thing you completely welched on that bet like a b-roll bitch!
Now everyone can share in your indignant backtracking, and your destroyed little pile of what credibility you had.
Not only have you never been to America (which makes your claims of soaring whitetail numbers hilarious, as your 70% wilderness crap) but the best thin you have ever done is completely leech your name onto "research" that you've never participated in and obviously can't handle.
My grandmother can easily upload videos to YouTube but you? You're a special kind of retard.
PJ, you are the Westboro Baptist Church protestors of Internet bigfooting!!!!
You can keep up whatever shenanigans that you need to make it feel like you're gaining traction as backtrack and delete..,but no one will EVER let you live it down.
In other news.....
Deletehttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24564375
MMG
Crampz...
DeleteComing from someone who exposes himself during a complete breakdown is rich... Guess we've all got things people won't let live down eh?
The thing is... The things I quote are facts. Facts that get to you as I write them out from across the pond and that's what's always got to you about me.
You are in fact not as clever as I thought if firstly; you think facts are meaningless if you haven't been to the States (duh? If that was the case these facts about yeti wouldn't be so hot, purely cause you haven't been to Asia), and secondly if you think that I am gonna just sit back and let a bear sample, something that was always out of my hands, set me back on what I am about, and that's coming here and upsetting stupid people who can't handle the truth. I can make that claim because of the way you idiots react in realizing you can't debunk Bigfoot with bear from Asia.
Sorry to spoil your day.
BOOOOOOOMMMMM!!!!!!
I have never approached anyone to participate in research, only the other way around. Why? Because of the way I handle you people. That has always been the case, people have approached me Crampz, not the other way around.
Oh and what's that??
Oh yes!! Looks like I pissed on your parade as far as bears and yeti's are concerned isn't it Crampz?!
Why's that? Because you've deflected to this as opposed to saying anymore about a damn bear that can't debunk Bigfoot.
Absolutely, well and truly schooled.
Now I expect another 'VROOM VROOM' comment as opposed to an actual embrace of the facts and truth that renders you a complete hot steaming pile of exhibitionist sadness.
; )
Now that's a schooling.
MMG, that is a very interesting article actually. Thank you for posting something real unlike Joe the Great White Hoax.
DeleteLove,
The King of Reality
Joe Bolam Lake, Ben MacDui, The Shrug Monkey, Cannock Chase so as the best of the best I take it you have been to all these places and......................
DeleteBoth Joe and Daniel are acting like damn four year olds.
DeleteDaniel goes vroom and Joe goes boom.
What a couple of pathetic excuses for men.
Go and play with your plastic army men.
Better yet, give it a rest.
Couple of degenerates I tell you what.
love it lol
DeleteFor someone who is apparently the 'King of Reality' who are pretty much the king of BS... And bitch slaps can act like boomerangs when you're talking shit.
DeleteDo me a favour? How about you prove my points and pastings wrong? Wow, that's a bombshell for you eh? Now that would be something that would be expected from a so called 'king of reality'... However I don't see any of that, only claims and bum licking? Odd??? If my points were in line with three year old thinking, surely you'd prove me wrong, would you not?
No... Just another stupid little hater that for too long has had his arss handed to him by me. It's quite special that someone would come along, merely state in a number of ways that 'Joe is wrong', bring nothing else to debunk my points and then have the balls to suggest anyone else is debating above the abilities if a three year old.
As for Sykes, I only ever recycled what I took to be truth from researchers that I respected. A couple of bear samples won't do so much harm as it will the entire field of research that is being conducted as we speak half way across the world.
" I can't wait for this show to come out so I can post awesome things like.... "Fast forward to 30:29 and cry." Because that will be the minute mark where Sykes says something to the affect of "This shit is a fairy tale."
Ha ha ha ha!!!
And there it is everyone... The genius, the 'reality talking king' that is nothing more than the BS-King.
"Duh... A bear in Asia means no stank ape in 'Merica"
That's what I got retard. You truly are a retard or too thick to read, cause that's all I've talked about is samples. Ha ha ha!! I think it incredible that anyone would over look that fact, after avoiding reading my comments to which have outlined desperate lies like the so called 'king of reality' claims in his comments.
Laughably... You do not disprove a species by finding a new one. This is pretty basic child's mental capacity level to understand. The only people who are claiming that the samples submitted were the best that this field has to offer... Is you people. Very obvious considering you require something so bad to back up your claims.
Now sit down and shut up, cause there is no 'King of Reality'... Just a King if shit talk.
; )
Schooled... Oh and learn to read.
Dear 11:56 Apparent Nitwit:
DeleteYour comment is wrong and a grammatical sewer pit.
We have known of bears in the Himalayas, but not THIS bear hybrid.
Where have you been? Have you read the Independent article or not?
Sykes' discovery of an otherwise unknown type of bear, reinforces your what and how and when and why does it???
Look, you didn't know this ultra rare bear existed, you didn't know squat, Sykes just discovered the thing. You had nothing on this. Other known bears there have nothing to do with this.
That doesn't reinforce a damned thing. It uninforces the whole damned thing!
What the hell are you on? Yours was an exceptionally poor comment.
God the current fleet of skeptards is even dumber than the last batch. Can we trade these brite wuns in, Shawn?
Campz... The guy who backtracked, claimed small percentages of Bigfoot and then when a bear from Asia is presented, claims evidence of no Bigfoot resulting in a 'fringe subject'. Priceless.
DeleteNothing creepier than someone who answers his own comments on a thread and brags about exposing himself and the supposed public contempt of others.
Still! No acknowledgement regarding Asian bears eh?! Ha ha ha!!
"Your friends don't like you!" (Embarrassing)
Silly little child schools himself. Run along and play with your plastic guns Crampz... It's evident at this stage I've upset your bear party and the tone can only get lower from here. I've achieved what I set out to do today.
For the sakes of not contributing to it for the rest of the night... I'm off.
Leave a few comments Crampz, your just an obsessed little pervert that's desperate for closure.
Schooled.
Damn, MMG and PJ got F'd in the A yesterday!
DeletePJ keeps pwning himself worse and worse. I don't even need to egg him on now. He has....gone full retard. You never go full retard! Ask Sean Penn, I Am Sam - 2001. Award season came around and he went home empty handed.
DeleteI've got all the closure needed, 10,000 years and not one shred of bigfoot. No recognized unknown hominid DNA, no clear photographs by even wildlife photographers or bird researchers, no bigfoot turds, nada.
I can smell the desperation and fear.
Better run along now, PJ, you know they restrict your Internet at the looney bin at 8!!
I think this Dan Campbell guy is a hoax, just like his stories. Out of all the commentators here Dan Campbell is the fullest retard there is on this site! Bar none!.
DeleteWow, that shit danny wrote has to be some of the lamest attempts at humor I've seen. Nothing original, recycled jokes from shitty 4 year old movies. What a pathetic sack of shit.
DeleteCool story bro. You wanna talk about rehashed and recycled material?? Every post Joe Fitzgerald has EVER copy and pasted. Every...damn...one!
DeleteI like Dan and find him entertaining.
DeleteDammit
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe count failed kids.
Delete^great false first, congrats!!
DeleteMy pants have been removed by the author.
DeleteRemind me how discovery of a bear disproves Bigfoot?
ReplyDeleteHey look at that, a animal that's evaded man all this time, and it's not even a hominid.
It doesn't disprove Bigfoot but it shows that the 'evidence' for Bigfoot is just smoke and mirrors and that the Bigfoot hypothesis is unsupported and can be discarded.
DeleteOh well, it had a good run.
Exactly. The bear hybrid's existence bodes well for the existence of a large, rare highly elusive and intelligent creature. The bear is supposed to not exist.
DeleteThat is, "Exactly" 11:31/OP.
DeleteObviously it hasn't evaded man, we have 2 genetic matches at 100%...jackass.
DeleteHow many positive Sasquatch results? 0. In fact after all these fails, year after year, decade after decade...I propose footers are now at a negative 352 points.
Danny, just shut the fuck.
DeleteFooter so butthurt they can't even compose themselves for a sentence ^
DeleteLOL
Jacobs photo Looks like a bear to me. Yeti DNA = bear. Jacobs photo = bear. Bigfoot is most likely bears being mis identified as bigfoot. No Joe. no matter how much you scream and rant and paste up the same bs. It will not make bigfoot real. I would like to see a formal written debate between Joe and Sharon Hill. I'm pretty sure if it was conducted with a moderator that Sharon would be able to put him in his place so deep he would never reappear.
ReplyDelete"Duh... Bear means no Bigfoot... Duh?"
DeleteHa ha ha ha!!!
Sykes is coming Joe
DeleteTICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
And indeed he came, and brought you a bear.
Delete"Sure as heck no god damn stank ape boy!"
(Sigh)
Let me help you with something... Bear are just bear.
Booooooom!!
Schooled.
Ha ha ha ha!!!
Sykes is coming Joe
DeleteTICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TICK TOCK
And of all things gave you a bear to debunk Bigfoot...
DeleteAnti climax eh?
Schooled.
^ SMOKED
DeleteJoe
DeleteThese non- bleevers are watching this site for good news as much as you. They are just messing with you. They probably find it hard to bleev that the big guy exists, whatever he is. Understandable.
As far as the yeti goes I bleev that he is some kind of ape because of the prints that The Hillary group photographed. I'm not saying that he is the only cryptid living on top of the world though.
MMC
Hey MMC...
DeleteI'm just having some fun bro. They're quite welcome to the gloating, it was always either gonna be me or them.
There is nothing that a couple of bear samples from Asia can do to Bigfoot in America.
It's logic that these people will come to swallow by the time the proverbial penny drops.
Peace.
Joe
DeleteI would like to think that there are wild places close to you that may harbor the big guy. I bleev that you would be a great candidate for habituation. You have a lot of patience judging by the way you have schooled your skeptical followers over time.
Peace
MMC
Density population in the UK says there's no bigfoot in Wales.
DeleteBig foot ? Big women? I'm in !
DeleteKing of Reality here. The only thing that realistically is in Wales......is bad dental hygiene.
DeleteWar.
12:02 = black ops guy.
DeleteLet's review ladies and gentlemen:
ReplyDeleteKeep this straight in your mind:
The Sykes study has not been released yet.
Instead of a science journal, we have a preliminary newspaper article.
Skeptards have attempted to enact point 1 below, and have prematurely leaped to enacting points 2 and 3 (thereby retracting their actions re point 1).
Should any later Sykes results show a primate, you will see a mad reversal and confusion and infighting amongst the primitive skeptard tribe.
It's interesting that part of the Sykes study spilling into a newspaper article instead of a science journal is approved as A-OK by the skeptard primitives, and onto a TV series instead of a science journal is A-1-OK to them, yet they damned and damned Ketchum for similar actions -- self-publishing, and doing the TV rounds.
Sykes and Ketchum have so far taken similar paths: Where are the so-called mainstream science journals publishing either of the studies? Yet skeptards approve one and reject the other, based on conclusions reached. It's the usual skeptardical hypocrisy in action.
SCHEDULE OF SKEPFOOLERY
Mission Plan:
1. Attempt to preempt/short-circuit Sykes study publication by tailoring a tin foil hat for the doctor's head and continuing the smear campaign.
2. If the Sykes results show only known animals, hurriedly withdraw the tin foil hats and smear campaign and embrace Sykes.
3. Claim that neutral findings of known animals prove a negative, that bigfoot doesn't exist. (Please enjoy this fantasy.)
4. If the Sykes study reveals the existence of an unidentified (hitherto by DNA) hominin, switch gears, ignore it, and attack the PGF, and claim that Patty is not one of these unknown creatures discovered by Sykes. (This must be done at all costs.)
5. If the Sykes study reveals the existence of an unknown hominin, redouble your efforts in attempting to fit the doctor with a tin foil hat. (This is imperative.)
6. If more clear footage, especially if linked with DNA per Sykes, comes to light of a creature appearing obviously to be of the same species as Patty, with the huge buttocks, enormous arm length, and the other matching details, though you will now have to accept the existence of the creatures, you must continue to attack and berate the PGF and all of those connected to it and decry it as fake, despite the mountain of evidence standing before you. (This is also imperative.)
7. To be clear, if bigfoot is proven to exist with another film in conjunction with DNA, no matter how precisely the creature filmed matches Patty, you must continue to proclaim the PGF a fake. This is our battle cry, and our main talking point.
We'll be seeing you on the usual skeptoid sites and forums.
We wish you good luck.
Wow, that's a pretty impressive strawman argument you've constructed there. Was it all your own work or did your mother help you spell the big words?
DeleteToo much reading
DeleteYou know. That's the most accurate thing I've read this thread and I don't get it The bulk of the science us unreleased. The Yeti was part one. Ok so giant short faced bears kids had a baby and hrs still chilling in Bhutan and Nepal. Who Cares. That's not Sykes' big delivery. He's either going to swing the hate wide open with another species for the North American Sasquatch. Or he's going to reveal we tested our best samples and all we got were Grizzlies and Blackies. Either way there is so much more to come. You guys have done your touchdown celebration before the play was reviewed. Holding, No 69 Dan Campbell. After the play we have an unsportsmanlike conduct on both skeptics and Jrefers. The ball will be placed back at your own 5 yard Line! Repeat first down!
Deletenice try DWA
Deletethe hospital staff will be along soon to sedate you
The greatest scientific discovery of all time, in a mini series? Think about it. He wouldn't waste his time, it would be released in a scientific journal.
DeleteNo No Mike. Dan Campbell with stick that football so far up you're taterhole it will count as a touchback. AND YOU WILL LIKE IT!
DeleteGarrrbbaggge. It's called a scoop. It was done by one of UK's most credible news outlets as well as several other now, ahem...COMPLETE with in-depth interviews WITH DR. SYKES himself.
DeleteMike B....haven't you learned anything about bigfooting yet? There is never any proof...never. Sykes isn't going to drop some giant bigfoot pie at your feet.
The best you can hope for is that bigfoot are ET's and they'll scoop you, PJ, Kelly Canuck, a blonde for you and a man in a blonde wig for PJ...fly you away to Planet Squatch where the houses are stick formations and the mating calls are tree knocks...
Once again the Bigfoot community is the world's laughing stock.
ReplyDeleteReal great work guys, keep it up.
/slow clap.
I don't know, Ufologists and Ghost hunters are pretty funny.
DeleteNot really.
Delete12:25 is that you Mikey Merchant? are crying again about how no one gives a sh*t about you and your Hippy BS go die already
DeleteIt is a proven scientific fact that bumbles bounce. Until one of these polar bear hybrids is captured and thrown off a cliff to see if they bounce, then there is no way we can prove that they are in fact the legendary yeti.
ReplyDelete..lol..Yukon Kornelius is the most credible voice in cryptozoology today...
DeleteStank Ape why are still posting anonymously? Everyone here knows it's you. You are the only Asperger's Patient around here.
ReplyDeleteAt least that's what you claimed when you were bitch slapped out of the BFF. Ha!Ha!Ha!Ha!Ha!
Poor little Stank banned from all forums, effectively silenced, go ahead and scream your head off here. It exposes your retardation.
nice try Mulder
DeleteDoes'nt the photo of Derek Randles look sort of neanderthalish?
ReplyDeletehe just looks like the obnoxious knob he is
DeleteSmug-looking hoax promoter
DeleteHey Derek, time to leave Team Tracker. Even dumb Frank is gone now. Get your hoax-loving self off those ads before your big debut on the Beeb.
ReplyDeleteFrank left? when?
DeleteRick pulled the old bucket on the door prank on him using Wayne's "filled to the brim" shit bucket...Poor old Frank got pissed off and went home....
DeleteDude, get over to Racer X's blog. Frank is squealing like a stuck pig. Jealousy and intrigue at Team Tacky. Says he's doing a big radio show tonight to tell everything we already know, because he basically knows nothing more. He says he has the goods on the fake body he saw, if you believe him. But he's also blathering about being a plant from the feds.
Deletelink please?
DeleteDon't know if Shawn likes links to other blogs. Google racer x bigfoot
DeleteShawn doesn't give a rat ass
DeleteRandy did some excellent work on Dyer but it was over almost 6 months ago.
DeleteWho is still keeping up with this train wreck?
MMG
People who like to watch trains wreck. It's a bit of a diversion after disappointing news from Dr. Psych.
DeleteTrain wreck? It never got enough speed to even crumple a bumper, unless you had pig shit for brains.
DeleteI've found that blog and no reference to Frank. So again link please.
In the comment section of the most recent post.
DeleteBlog comments are the most credible voices in the bigfoot world.
Delete..lol..
DeleteDerek could have told you Bigfoot was a bear without all that trouble, Dr. S.
ReplyDelete^ Randles trolls. Go get 'em Big Jim Latham.
DeleteHe hates being called out on his bullshit as well and gets really fucking pissy.
DeleteDick Proenneke[1] lived alone for over 20 years in Alaska (prime bigfoot territory [2]) and never encountered anything. BUT today all you have to do is go to a trailer park or camp ground and have an encounter.
ReplyDeleteNo wonder, footers are laughed at most times.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Proenneke
[2] Toward a Resolution of the Bigfoot Phenomenon 1998
http://www.henryfranzoni.com/nasirpt.pdf
Comments with footernotes!
DeletePlus Muppets, Onomatopoeia...this thread has it all!
I thought it would help :)
DeleteI even like it better they HAVE ZERO answers
DeleteAnd Les Stroud was on the Alasakan coast for one week and had an encounter. What is your point? His video is easily found.
DeleteWhats this? Science just discovered a large land mammal that previously didn't exist?
ReplyDeleteThey existed already ya dunce. Just never know to be in the Himalayan mountain range.
Deletedanny you calling someone else a dunce is fucking gold.
DeleteI kind'a like his logic and thinking unlike Joes
DeleteOf course they already existed, but they were previously UKNOWN. Are you are fucking retarded Dan? Because Jesus Christ you're stupid.
DeleteDon't hate me because OP phrased it "that previously didn't exist?"
DeleteFool.
Who cares what the op said, you can't even string some logic together. You're handicapped
DeleteDan if something is not discovered, if it is not known in by science, it is generally considered that it doesn't exist. Get it?
DeletePoor poor footers.
DeleteI think a number of people on this site are confused over the definition of the word "Skeptic". A true skeptic simply wants to be presented with observable, testable, physical evidence vis a vis the voracity of a claim.
ReplyDeleteIf you are making the claim then it is up to the "claimant" to present the evidence; it is not up to the skeptic to disprove it. That's how it works!
If the evidence is good enough to be rigorously tested and then accepted by science the true skeptic will then accept the claim with open arms.
I am a skeptic...but I would fucking LOVE Bigfoot to be real. I live in the UK but I've been interested in the entire field since seeing the PG film on tv in the early seventies. I'd like to see some physical proof first though, ideally a body, before I go the whole hog and say "I'm in!",and that's my criteria.
If a skeptic STILL refuses to believe in something even after the presentation/acceptance of the evidence then they are NOT a skeptic; they are a cynic. They are churlish, childish, and their views are largely irrelevant.
Ketchum and crew still have the proof that can't be denied, despite threats, payoffs, smear campaigns, agendas, black ops, etc.
ReplyDelete