Does This Belong To a Bigfoot or a Bear? Dr. Jeff Meldrum Thinks He knows...


This photograph of a decomposed "hand" was sent to Dr. Jeff Meldrum. Some have speculated that it belonged to a Bigfoot. After examining it, this is what Dr. Meldrum concluded:

A decomposed carcass is getting some attention with undue speculation it may be a sasquatch. The paw remains are a dead give away. The decomposed claw sheaths have slipped off the underlying sickle-shaped distal phalanges (bones at the tips of the digits). Five toes with claws = BEAR. Compare with the second photo off a model bear hind paw in my lab. - Don Jeffrey Meldrum


Comments

  1. Nope. Must be the big guy, because even at such short distances with ample time to take photos, the photo is blurry.

    Either that or more and more people with Parkinson's go hiking.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a Tom Biscardi bigfoot hand.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Has anyone heard from MMG after yesterday's revelations?

    Absolutely smoked.

    Its clear on the previous thread that the bff have had to wheel out some of the big guns for damage control. Most likely mulder and dwa have been commenting on here trying to salvage the debacle.

    "They were here" - "Yes theyre here"

    Talking about this bear of course not a magic ape.

    Such is it to be a footer to think if he is writing a paper and a book that it HAS to be about a magic ape. This is all kinds of crazy.

    Sharon hill was right all along. That must piss you footers off big time.

    Also I have noticed that footers are now bringing out the excuse that a negative result does not disprove bigfoot. Well this is downplaying the situation in a big way. When the best, yes the BEST samples, vetted by none other than the head of bigfoot meldrum, sworn to be from a bigfoot, come back as bear or other known animals then this unequivocally proves that footers are full of horse shit.

    Got monkey?

    Bryan Sykes says nope.

    Bryan Sykes is the scientist that footers have wanted for years but the bigfoot community is not happy that he did not validate the fantasy.

    Absolutely pwned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But...Hollywood RO Hogan bro! Validation as a species by the simple recognition of Dr. Sykes! Ketchum gaining traction! Bigfoot family tree! Jeffrey Meldrum verified! Tick tock! Sykes is coming...and you're sweating bro! Conspiracy! Globalists! Grassy Knoll! It's clear where this is heading!

      If any footer needs a good slow cook crow recipe, I've been working on mine for the past 60 years and getting the seasoning just right for that day I just may need it...

      (Sigh)

      Peace.

      Schooled.

      Smoked.

      Pwned.

      PolarSquatch.

      Delete
    2. Dan Camp you are a loser!!!!!!! go away now

      Delete
    3. First you'll need a crock pot and two adult crows...

      Delete
    4. Dan. I have crow pot for you and I'm certain you have two adult cocks. :)

      Delete
    5. * tha above was just a weak attempt to get equal hate time. I retract it and apologize.

      Delete
    6. For Daniel Campbell "The Logical Skeptic from the seat of his ass guy".

      Hey Daniel, Why don't you get off your ass, fly out to New York State, I will pay for all your expenses and come see fore yourself, 4 very experienced Bear hunters chasing "animals" that are not bears! Come see please!

      If you cannot make "this' trip, will you come on our next trip in May 2014? Again I will pay for everything! How about it?

      I BADLY NEED A "confirmed SKEPTIC". Since Videos and photos are not accepted (no matter how good) then how about "On the site experience"! You can't get any better than that, can you? Then, you will be on this site defending Mike B., Joe F. or MMG! Come on, it'll be a blast! But, be sure to bring plenty of Toilet paper because you will need it (Unless you got steel in your balls)

      What do you say MR. Logical Skeptic, from your ass"?

      John W. Jones Spoke

      Delete
    7. You don't get it, do you? I don't give a rats ass about proving bigfoot, being a 'knower', running around NY with 3 geriatric farts wearing burlap sacks and trading ribs over the good ol' days.

      Mike B. is neutral to me, it's PJ and MMG who are jackasses.

      Why don't you spend your moldy money and give PJ your wilderness treatment?

      Delete
    8. Mr. Spoke: You could save yourself a lot of money by just offering up a bit of real evidence. A good pic, a single hair, perhaps a bit of scat. Surely there is a lot of scat. Any of that will suffice, thanks!

      Delete
    9. Crampz...

      Nobody asked you to prove Bigfoot, but run along and see what the fuss is.

      It'll be a little different from running around your yard with a plastic gun, but John will look after you!

      Schooled.

      6:22...

      Why don't you go and find out how hard it is to attain such things? Why don't you go and have a look at what all the fuss is about?

      Schooled.

      Delete
    10. Pfft. I'm not the guy saying there's a population of 8-10 foot forest people chilling on my property, PJ. Just seems obvious he could provide a bit of evidence if he's so sure of his claim.

      Delete
    11. 'The scientific method' would not use a new form of discovered bear to render a controversial species in Bigfoot a fantasy... Dermals, unknown primate DNA a transcribed language, ten thousand years of acknowledgement, footage... To suggest that a newly discovered bear means none of that is real, isn't particularly well thought out.

      Schooled.

      Delete
  4. Dan, so as not to sacrifice any crows lives would it be acceptable for Joe and Mike to gently and deeply rim the crows instead?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well look at Campz and all the other Tards who are living it up!

    Reality check -

    You have not disproved Yeti by bear being sequenced as DNA.

    You will not disprove Bigfoot, should known animals be sequenced as DNA.

    Sykes... As has been outlined; is only as good as his samples.

    Convenient that people ahould now look for as much closure as quickly as possible and suggest that these samples are 'the best this field has to offer'... The fact is, that you don't know much at all.

    The plain and simple fact IS...

    You still haven't debunked Bigfoot. Put that in your proverbial pipe and smoke it.

    And I'm not going anywhere.

    Reality check served.

    Peace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Goalpost moved 50 yards, check!

      Tinfoil hats in place, check!

      Blinders on, check!

      Tick tock!

      (Sigh)

      No shred of biological evidence EVER, check!

      All the top samples in history and submitted by the elite researchers of the field negative for yetisquatch family tree, check!

      Jesus walked on the Sea of Galilee, check!

      LOL!!!

      Delete
    2. Ahah this is good.

      How can you disprove something that has not been recognized as real? It's up to you footers to demonstrate his existence, not to the scientists to demonstrate that his non-existence. You don't demonstrate the non-existence. How can I demonstrate that 60 million years ago there weren't flying mega-dragons all over the world?

      AHAHAHHAHA go out and learn the basics of the scientific method.

      Delete
    3. There is nothing I need to go out and learn about the process of finding testable repeatable data. Are you laughing at yourself ?

      Delete
    4. "All the top samples in history and submitted by the elite researchers of the field negative for yetisquatch family tree, check!"

      "yetisquatch"??!!!

      Campz...

      You are soooooooo desperate for closure right there. You never managed to grasp this weeks ago when you had a meltdown and exposed yourself, but I have no problem with repeating myself as much as it takes.

      Laughably... You do not disprove a species by finding a new one. This is pretty basic child's mental capacity level to understand. The only person who is claiming that the samples submitted were the best that this field has to offer... Is you. Very obvious considering you require something so bad to back up your bitterness expressed at the gorilla that never materialized.

      Now you can come up with all sort's of funny new names for wild people in an effort to claim a premature win, you can exaggerate what these results mean in an effort back up your claims... But you are merely behaving like a child on a school yard by suggesting that a new species of bear, renders Bigfoot a fantasy.

      That is something that I'm sure most skeptics will tell you. It merely begs the question... What other species' remain hidden fro science in that region.

      3:41...

      'The scientific method' would not use a new form of discovered bear to render a controversial species in Bigfoot a fantasy... Dermals, unknown primate DNA a transcribed language, ten thousand years of acknowledgement, footage... To suggest that a newly discovered bear means none of that is real, isn't particularly well thought out and I would be careful for shouting about scientific methods if you cannot grasp that fact and latch on to irrelevancies. A scientific method would investigate those sources I provided and not assume a new bear renders them insignificant.

      But you maintain that science is right to now debunk Bigfoot because it has found a new species of bear?

      : )

      Schooled.

      Delete
    5. yes yes how many beautiful words. still no giant hairy people. talking about facts.

      this is science, not philosophy or conjecture.

      peace.

      Delete
    6. Yes. And you've blinded me with it .... You just made the profound statement this is science. Wow

      Delete
    7. Hi Joe! How's your taterhole feeling today? Get a checkup on that, ok friend?

      Schooled.

      Smoked.

      Pwned.

      Peace.

      Delete
    8. Goalpost moved another 15 yards, check!

      Fasten your seatbelts!

      PJ has his tinfoil hat on tight and is starting the engine on the 4th dimension spacecraft.

      Delete
    9. Mr Sulu, take us to (fake Kirk voice) warp speed....

      Delete
    10. Joe. Dan is trying to kick a field goal. Please stop moving the goal posts :)

      Delete
    11. 4:24... Just because you didn't read it the first time...

      'The scientific method' would not use a new form of discovered bear to render a controversial species in Bigfoot a fantasy... Dermals, unknown primate DNA, a transcribed language, ten thousand years of acknowledgement, footage... To suggest that a newly discovered bear means none of that is real, isn't particularly well thought out and I would be careful for shouting about scientific methods if you cannot grasp that fact and latch on to irrelevancies. A scientific method would investigate those sources I provided and not assume a new bear renders them insignificant.

      But you maintain that science is right to now debunk Bigfoot because it has found a new species of bear?

      To bring this silliness to your attention is not philosophy or conjecture... Those are facts that you ignore.

      : )

      Schooled.

      4:28... If you didn't read my comment to Campz...

      Laughably you do not disprove a species by finding a new one. This is pretty basic child's mental capacity level to understand. The only person who is claiming that the samples submitted were the best that this field has to offer... Is you lot. Great if you were on a playground, but when it comes to actually debunking this creature... Ask yourself;

      Has that been done?

      Corrected.

      Introduced to reality.

      Schooled.

      Campz...

      It is the funniest thing to see you trolling now that the reality has dropped. The fantasy is only with your reaching for a conclusion that isn't there.

      Sure... You'll enjoy this for a little while, but I'll always remind you that a bear in Asia, has nothing to do with a wild human in Asia, let alone America...

      I think in time when the excitement has settled, you'll realize that.

      ; )

      Peace.

      Delete
    12. VROOM VROOM!

      Listen to that tinfoil hat wearing captain rev that space ship!

      Goalpost is now a total of 100 yards downfield from where it originated.

      Note how PJ is following all the steps posted by the footard copy paster that has been prevelant as a late.

      Must be nice to live in such delusional grandure...never concerning yourself with hurricanes and tsunamis.

      (Sigh)

      "Sykes is coming...and you're sweating."

      "Tick tock."

      "Even though it's clear where this is heading."

      Ahahahahhahahaha

      Keep diggin that grave deeper and deeper, PJ! You might end up with your very own mound!

      Delete
    13. Smokes Added all through his poop chute!^

      Delete
    14. Crampz things that if he ignores comments, snakes around answering what is put to him and does lyrical acrobatics in calling other people deluded, that he successfully debates people.

      Funny that he should suggest anyone else other than an exhibitionist in himself should be 'delusional'.

      Still... 'A new bear debunks Bigfoot'... Right Crampz?

      (Sigh)

      Peace.

      Delete
    15. There is not a single thing you have posted (besides your indignity and severe hit on credibility) that you haven't already posted a bazillion times already. To continue to even acknowledge your terrible musings is borderline insanity.

      And you talk about MY wordsmith abilities?!? You're trying to talk your way out of months of trash talking not only me, but science, skeptics, and reality!

      "ARE YOU SCARED I KNOW SOMETHING YOU DON'T?!?!"

      Ahhaha hahahahahaha!!

      VROOM VROOM!

      Delete
    16. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

      Delete
    17. Wow, Joe got smoked and MMG got obliterated.

      Delete
    18. In correcting you Crampz... I posted 'parts' of the comment yesterday.

      But what's more delusional? Posting the same attacks day by day, prioritising your time with a hate campaign that basically goes a roundabout way in saying the same crap day in day out... Whilst now claiming 'a new bear debunks Bigfoot'?

      (Duh?)

      Or copying and pasting something that you struggle to come to terms with and have to resort to name calling and delusional labelling to which gives me a victory every time?

      Whenever you struggle with anyhtning, it's either 'people are insane' or 'conspiracy theory cop out'... But you never have a come back, do you?

      Remember Crampz... It's you that had the breakdown and exposed yourself because you couldn't handle what I was posting you and now, now that you have a newly discovered bear??

      Oh dear.

      Delete
    19. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you PJ, who pwns himself harder than anyone else can.

      VROOM VROOM!

      Countdown to launch...15..14...13...

      You don't get that this isn't even about bigfoot...it's about the months of trash talk about Sykes coming...and you're sweating. You're profusely sweating. I can't tell it it's just sweat or if you're actually crying too.

      Alllll Abbboooaard!!!

      Delete
    20. Hey Daniel Campbell (The logical skeptic from his ass guy)

      Fuck Sykes, Screw all those Academic book worms that never get out "In the field". Seeing is believing right? Wish you were here Daniel, the four of us woke up to a heavy frosty morning and around our camp their were many "Tracks" that were not bear tracks, but your not here to see this. Plus last night we all got pelted by Pine cones being thrown at us!

      Mr. Campbell, you seem like a smart guy, What animals throws Pine cones in the Adirondack Mountains of New York state or anywhere for that matter? Do you know of any? Don't say they were falling on us, as the nearest pines are 50 feet away! and it is not windy.

      Wish you were here! Then you wouldn't;'t be saying so much BS like you post on this site. You would be saying; "Holy Fucking shit, what was that that"! And Daniel, "There "is" something up on the hill"!

      Mike B., Joe F. and others that believe or know. The only way to end this back and forth BS is for these Skeptics to go "Out in the field" with experienced researchers, and then they can see & hear for themselves! I know 99.9% if I could only get a die-hard Skeptic like Mr. Daniel Campbell with us, we could easily change his "outlook"! Will you come Mr. Daniel Campbell? I "am" calling you out! Do you have what it takes? Contact me at:
      healthyhappylawns@Reagan.com

      John W. Jones Spoke again!

      Delete
    21. What, months of trash talk arguing the toss Crampz? I say white and you say black, it's just fortunate for you that a bear should be discovered and get you a little excited. Don't mean much as far as debunking this species and that's all that matters to me, I can handle being wrong about some samples.

      Bigfoot debunked Crampz?

      Delete
    22. John you mental old coot. Go and chase your magic man around. No one cares.

      Delete
  6. I'm not sure the commenter above conceptualizes that the Yeti determination and samples found in the Tibet/Bhutan region have no bearing on the Bigfoot Samples and their findings here in North America. I've been saying all along that its the only point of interest to me. I don't think most Americans kept up with recent Yeti sightings to begin with, as we look to verification of what has been seen or documented here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hypothetically, reverse the situation for a second.

      Say Sykes did find a monster bipedal cryptid thought o as the Yeti.

      Immediately footers would call to arms as the Yeti is proof of bigfoot because as PJ and his elite saviors have always claimed all these bipedal cryptids are close cousins.

      But now the Yeti has been debunked, suddenly it has no merit on bigfoot's identity.

      Rrrrriiigghhtt.

      Delete
    2. Oh I agree. Some would. But not the smart ones Daniel. They would call for caution. Lest they again get the proverbial sample 39 egg on their face. Melba set them back light years because she didn't listen to her best advisors. It happens sadly.

      Delete
    3. Just because one may have high intelligence does not correspond to a lack of gullibility.

      Delete
    4. Now as to your last part, it has minimal bearing. I mean. The Yeti has been margianalized for quite some time. Now it is the debunking of samples of a popular cryptid and it gave Sykes a cool answer to play with. But as to the real legitimate samples of the often sighted in blurry Brookreson Blobsquatches Bigfoot, no sadly it's barely relevant.

      Delete
    5. I am impartial to both yeti and bigfoot. I have no stake in their existence. I just would like to point out that the evidence of the yeti is and always was very thin. There were a handful of sightings and only few tracks.

      The body of evidence for bigfoot seems to be a bit larger. More sightings, more tracks. Of course, also more hoaxes.

      However, if you look at evidence in a Bayesian framework, it means bigfoot is more likely to exist than the yeti. Since the biological reality of both creatures seems unrelated, I think proving or disproving the existence of either does not change the likelihood of existence for the other.

      Delete
    6. Well let's get one thing straight.

      Bigfoot dont exist.

      And you don't need to just take my word for it.

      Have a look for yourself at the complete lack of any evidence.

      No monkey im afraid.

      Delete
    7. I would call for the skeptic army to save the celebration for when and if Bigdoot samples are debunked. Lets say they all come back Ursus Americanis, well then we are pretty screwed depending on from whom he received the samples, which I'd love to know. There are some Footers right now I'm none to ensnared with. They find Bigfoot exists only in their own photographs and thermals and cannibalize themselves. No Dan. Don't get caught up in the hype and catch a 15 yard penalty for end zone celebration before the late holding call beings it all back anyway. M

      Delete
    8. It's easy for me to make the statements I do because I'm not making extraordinary claims. It's all probability and psychology at play. What are the odds that such a giant ape with breeding populations in all these places across the country don't leave a single trace of biological evidence? All these top researchers gathering all these samples that "couldn't be anything but a Squatch cause I saw it leave it!" And because "it doesn't fit the characteristics of any known animal" but yet time after time the genetics tests fail, the photographs fail, the hoaxers prevail, and the footers weep and wail.

      Not a bone, not a hair, not a picture, not a Sasquatch.

      Delete
    9. Ball boy,how can you not be embarrassed. I mean to come back here after showing us your tiny ball sack?

      Delete
    10. Dan. PGF as well as Paul Freeman's footage are great films. I've got pretty good stills myself and they are from a sad ass iPhone. Come down to the ranch this weekend. Let me show you something. Of all these assholes you are smart, talented and funny. If you want to see one I'm pretty sure I can get you a view if you are patient.

      Delete
    11. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    12. I bet Eva has a bigger ball sack than ball boy does.

      Delete
    13. What am I to be embarrassed about? That you can't stop thinking about my genitals, day after day?

      Don't hate me cause I carry what you crave.

      Delete
    14. Is that all you got, ball boy?

      Delete
    15. Joe makes a good point Dan. They have found hundreds of giganto skeletons inside US. It's not a well kept secret. The fact that they used to cover it up for whatever biblical puritanical notions our old government possessed is beyond me. What I do know is that Melba used up many of the good samples. I hope what Sykes was given by Mullis and his associates as I've heard he blocks access to Sykes like an NFL guard will say alot about how internal fiefdom in Bigfootery may doom us all

      Delete
    16. PJ has lost what tiny amount of dignity and credibility he ever had. I bet all those words he just posted up yonder are the same tired and dated words he's been posting for 6 months just with more spite behind them. It's to be expected. PJ is the equivalent of a Westboro Baptist protestor.

      What you seem to gloss over is that everything leaves a fossil trail, regardless if they bury their dead under rocks, trees, mounds, or if they cannibalize.

      More and more and more outrageous and extraordinary claims with absolutely zero proof!

      PS - No Gigantopithicas Blacki has ever been found the US to my knowledge. Got proof to back these claims?

      Delete
    17. the loser is posting under Daniel Campbell again

      Delete
    18. Freeman was a known and admitted hoaxer.

      Delete
    19. Daniel Campbell is a known and admitted homo.

      Delete
    20. Sorry to disappoint you Anon 4:27 but you just lost that bet xx

      Delete
    21. Eva,didn't you make a coin purse out of your nature sack?
      And a laser pointer out of your Vienna Sausage?

      Delete
    22. Dan Crampz got schooled and again, avoided reading my comment properly.

      Check out some Jim Vieira and weep boy.

      Booooom!!

      Delete
    23. Crampz things that if he ignores comments and does lyrical acrobatics in calling other people deluded, that he successfully debates people.

      Still... 'A new bear debunks Bigfoot'... Right Crampz?

      (Sigh)

      Peace.

      Delete
    24. VROOM VROOM!!!

      Allllllllll Abbboooaard!

      Skipper PJ and first mate MMG on countdown to launch!

      Delete
    25. Joe got taterholed and is trying to act like he was the top all night. Lollers.

      Delete
    26. Says the exhibitionist who thinks a bear debunks Bigfoot.

      Pretty hilarious really!

      Schooled.

      Delete
    27. Anon 5:33,you seem very interested in other peoples genitals,don't you have some of your own? xx

      Delete
    28. Damn Joe, that was quite the taterholing you took yesterday. The silver lining is you are now loosened up for Sunday night. Enjoy!

      Delete
    29. No of course not,what i've got now is much better xx

      Delete
    30. But its much more convenient with it. especially when yo are busting to take a leak

      Delete
    31. When you got one you just got to flop it out and release the flow

      Delete
    32. Maybe,plus i can't write my name in the snow but these things don't really matter xx

      Delete
    33. I bet they gave you some heavy drugs

      Delete
    34. Well you have it done under a general anaesthetic,you wouldn't want to be awake xx

      Delete
  7. In other words, no Sharon Hill was not right all along and no verification of Himalayan Mountain range samples has no bearing on the question of the Bigfoot samples you dotard

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In fact the only thing Sharon Hil has proven is that Tina Fey looks better with a similar haircut.

      Delete
  8. You have over-reached. Start with the info on the back of the cereal box your mother just placed before you and do not poke your eye out with the deadly spoon

    ReplyDelete
  9. 4:00. Don't worry. We ain't a gonna take your uns' words on it no how

    ReplyDelete
  10. "My video needs more views before it goes public"
    - joe fitz

    Nice oxymoron fella or should we just say moron.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Replies
    1. I'm pretty sure all you've discovered is the moron. Don't cut him when you shave

      Delete
    2. He needs more views to go public.

      He cant get more views because its not public.

      Moron.

      Delete
    3. Actually. Now I "get it". Ok. Got me. See. I can at least admit it. :). Touché

      Delete
    4. Maybe I should lay off the oxycocodone before looking for oxymorons :)

      Delete
    5. Oxycocodone? don't you mean oxytocin?

      Delete
    6. :). No. I didn't mean either. Percocet is oxycodone. OxyContin is a much more deadly drug. I do neither. Bad joke.

      Delete
    7. OxyContin is pretty much prescription heroin

      Delete
    8. But do you know what OxyTocin is

      Delete
    9. Oxytocin plays roles in sexual reproduction, in particular during and after childbirth. It is released in large amounts after distension of the cervix and uterus during labor, facilitating birth, maternal bonding, and, after stimulation of the nipples, lactation. Both childbirth and milk ejection result from positive feedback mechanisms.

      Delete
    10. Well since drugs have been brought up. Maybe the footers need to try out the Russian street drug called Krokodil. It strips the flesh right off of the users bones. Please inject into you're scalp now.

      Delete
    11. Gangrene. Street desomorphine is to morphine what methamphetamine is to amphetamine. Basically 'morphine crack.'

      Delete
    12. He should know.Damn crack head.

      Delete
    13. ...or I was educated at a university in organic and biochem....

      Ahahaha

      Delete
    14. Go and inject your self with a high dose of Sodium thiopental Dan

      Delete
    15. Only if you lotion my nugget pouch first.

      Delete
    16. Go eat some Sodium fluoroacetate

      Delete
  12. 4:31 you're pretty funny. You guys got to admit. I accept my humblings in the rare instances they come just as I acknowledge your victories (in the same occurrences)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ok. New bet. I'll obtain a sample. Dan Joe and I will split the cost of testing by Sykes lab ill film it all and keep all protocols. If its novel or unknown Hominim or Whatever he's already found as Bigfoot loser pays entire vetting cost and buys me a 30 pack of Coors Light.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No way in hell I'd put a cent of my hard earned NSA income toward bigfoot genetic testing. Hasn't Ketchum and Sykes done enough damage?

      Delete
    2. How about you post your amazing photograpghs, and if people accept them as being of an unknown bipedal upright walking hairy 'Thing'

      Joe and Dan will have sex with each other.

      Delete
    3. 30 pack of Coors light....ALKY ALERT!!!

      Delete
  14. Nobody has to leave town. Or anything bad like that. It's an out of pocket deal. And I'm that damn confident I've got Bigfoots on my property. M

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The choice of coor light sort of indicates to me "Fat guy living in trailer deluded into thinking magic monkey is hiding under bushes on his property"

      Delete
    2. I'm damn confident you can't get one single clear photo or one shred of scientific evidence from the forest monkeys on your property. Your stick and tree photos were not compelling, Mike.

      Delete
    3. Far guy living in a trailer here. Taking pictures of trees. Just hanging on the porch all day. Gotta go. Fish are biting :). Wow.

      Delete
    4. 6:12. I'm "fairly certain" Thera hasn't been a thing happen to you in your life to make you damn confident about anything.

      Delete
    5. Although I am neither overweight nor residing in a modular home I would never judge someone who was nor insult someone because of either their appearance or their socioeconomic background. I'm gonna stand up for every fat beer loving trailer trash who ever shot a Blobsquatch!!! Now those are my people.

      Delete
    6. "Bartender I really did it this time, broke my parole to have a good time, when I got home it was six am, the door was locked so I kicked it in, she was screaming bout some bills, and I think she was high on some pills, shed thrown my shit out in the yard so I grabbed the keys to her fu...in car and wrecked that piece of shit.....and then walked away......."

      Delete
    7. ^ it's a simple request. Your lame deflection attempts are noted.

      Delete
    8. Now I know I'll probably get 10 years...so just give me beers till they get here.......all she ever did was just break my heart so I jacked the keys to her fu..in car and wrecked that piece of shit and then waked away.........."

      Delete
    9. I'm sorry. What was the request from the simpleton?

      Delete
    10. As Frank Rizzo would say, open your fuckin ears jackass. What was your request...,. Don't make me say it. You know what I'll say if you don't respond !

      Delete
    11. Ok. .... I waited. ...,.. And now .,........ Are you ready ......are you listening outside my double wide....,,..cause I can hear em......cue the crickets.

      Delete
    12. Hi Mike! I request you take more pics of sticks and trees. Your property is beautiful!

      Delete
    13. Id like to thank the Academy, Joe F , my man Dan, cool Anons, and that one pussy Anon for making this a kick ass thread. I gotta go weed eat around my septic tank. :). Y'all come back now. Heee Haw. I'm a a modern day Buck Owens. In other words. My name is Buck and I came her to........:)

      Delete
    14. 8:22. You want to see a picture of my big stick. :)

      Delete
    15. Sorry darlin. I gotta go. My winder unit done froze and my Merle Haggard CD is stuck on "Mana Tried". Y'all come back now. Ya here. :)

      Delete
    16. But let me close with a little Conway Twitty......"Hello darlin ,,,,,nice to see ya .,.,,,..it's been a looooooooong time , your not the Yeti,..,,.thst you used to be ......,.,"

      Delete
  15. Replies
    1. ^ angry footer, watch out!

      Delete
    2. Can't get Daniels' testicles off his mind ^^

      Delete
    3. ^ doesn't get the irony that he just posted about Daniels' testes.

      Delete
  16. So Dan has been right all along.Joe, Mike, MMG must now bow down to worship those testicles of his. So I guess it is back to discussing and arguing over Big gigantic static diaper butt Patty. Oh sigh, tic tock, nothing left to argue about. No bigfoot, no yowie, no yeti. All that is left is for all footers to apologize to Dan for being such stupid embecils, deluded morons, and lemmings lead by the pied piper of ketchum then sykes. Yet they will refuse to give up just like the little chunk of crap that does'nt go down on the first flush of the toilet. But at least that little chunk of crap has dignity something not found in those who insist on there being a magic monkey.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Laughably you do not disprove a species by finding a new one. This is pretty basic child's mental capacity level to understand. The only person who is claiming that the samples submitted were the best that this field has to offer... Is you lot. Great if you were on a playground, but when it comes to actually debunking this creature... Ask yourself;

      Has that been done?

      'The scientific method' would not use a new form of discovered bear to render a controversial species in Bigfoot a fantasy... Dermals, unknown primate DNA, a transcribed language, ten thousand years of acknowledgement, footage... To suggest that a newly discovered bear means none of that is real, isn't particularly well thought out and I would be careful for shouting about scientific methods if you cannot grasp that fact and latch on to irrelevancies. A scientific method would investigate those sources I provided and not assume a new bear renders them insignificant.

      But you maintain that science is right to now debunk Bigfoot because it has found a new species of bear?

      Corrected.

      Introduced to reality.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    2. VROOM VROOM!!!

      Allllllllll Abbboooaard!

      Skipper PJ and first mate MMG on countdown to launch!

      Delete
    3. Smokes Adderall through his poop chute!^

      Delete
    4. Dan you are a thick idiot piss off now.

      Delete
    5. What's wrong with exhibitionists?

      At least they have proof of subjects!

      VROOM VROOM!!!

      "You scared that I know something you don't?!?!"

      Rah nah ney do wap aaaRROOOP! Fllooower!

      Allllll aboard!!!

      Delete
    6. Says the exhibitionist who thinks a bear debunks Bigfoot.

      Pretty hilarious really!

      Got to sleep old man.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    7. Uh oh! PJ is starting to get ccccwwwwaannnkkkyyy!

      Seems Sykes didn't even wear a jimmy, he Musta went full raw dog on PJ!

      Ahaha.

      Dude, you bring yourself down worse than I ever could. Keep digging that grave you asshat!

      VROOM VROOM...

      PJ actually thinks this is the result of something bigfootbearyeti and not the months of trash talking him and MMG spouted off.

      Who gives a shit about ancient bears, really? Cool...but it's solely about callin you on all your assholish activities for the past few months.

      Eat it queer!

      Delete
    8. Argh, so we can back track on celebrating a bear now can we?

      Great! Didn't think you were that stupid... Ill yes, but nobody could be that stupid.

      Celebrate away Crampz... The only one who's starting to look a little cranky is you.

      Look out all! We all know what get's posted when Crampz get's the jitters!!

      Pervert.

      Delete
    9. Go eat some Sodium fluoroacetate Dan

      Delete
    10. Joe i have heard that you are a cop that owns a poodle that sits in the doughnut shop all day on BE

      Delete
  17. The "Bigfoot Files" are a series, right? Is it possible that a bigfoot discovery would be in the last episode? Please, I'm asking seriously. I don't care if I'm right or wrong, just asking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The greatest scientific discovery of all time, in a mini series? Think about it. He wouldn't waste his time, it would be released in a scientific journal.



      Delete
  18. This specie is not a new one and Sykes did not discover it. They have been finding cross breed bears in high latitudes of NA for some years now. Cross between brown bear/ grizzly bear and Polar bear called pizzly bear. In fact a hunter shot one in 2006 and could tell by the appearance that it was not a true grizzly. One of the discovery channel type shows did a special on it last year which I watched. Google it and you will see what I mean.

    All Sykes has done is shown that this also happened in Europe in the past, probably during the ice ages and probably a segment of these got stranded in the Himalayas, possibly the Urals also after the ice retreat and managed to survive.

    Still does nothing to address the mystery of the Yeti, almasty, yerin, rock apes, yowies, and of course the Bigfoot, except to say perhaps no evidence was presented from one of these. However all we have is a snippet of info. and I will await the documentaries, to get the true info. of what he has to say.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I recall that, was that the one were the guy was possibly risking prosecution?

      Delete
    2. Still... A bear surely debunks a Bigfoot... Right Chuck? Right???

      ; )

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. Well actually it DOES address the yeti issue. Just not for footers. Footers only accept 1 answer and until then for them it is unanswered.

      In 50 years time it will be no different. A bunch of deluded bleevers saying that the evidence is "coming soon".

      Delete
    4. Hey Joe Fitz it's the canadian guy we came back for a week off things r going as planned what's new in the Bigfoot world now?

      Delete
    5. Yeah Joe. Apparently the creatures that I have seen and heard, several of my close friends have seen, people I have interviewed have seen, the tens of thousands of people have seen including biologist, forest rangers, various types of police enforcement officers, and extremely experience hunters has been a hybrid bear that originates in the arctic. It has become so hybrid that it has moved as far south as the Everglades, learned to walk and run at speeds in excess of 40 mph, shed its bear frame into one that is far closer to a superhuman, and leaves prints that are human like, and no longer kills humans that it comes in contact with in its territory. Yep Yep Yep - it must be a new bear.

      Chuck

      Delete
    6. PJ still thinks this is about the results of a bear and not the months of trash talking him and MMG did about Sykes coming!

      VROOM VROOM!

      Delete
    7. Ya joe Canadian guy agian did u listen to the story on utube about the guy deer hunting who ran into two bf s. shot one in the center chest and than ran and the other bf picked up the shot one and carried it up a steep cliff ? He went to fish and game, they took blood sample than he was approached by two gov people told him to keep quit! What u figure story seems right to me that's why Justin's bf were not found , what u think??????

      Delete
    8. Ya joe Canadian guy agian did u listen to the story on utube about the guy deer hunting who ran into two bf s. shot one in the center chest and than ran and the other bf picked up the shot one and carried it up a steep cliff ? He went to fish and game, they took blood sample than he was approached by two gov people told him to keep quit! What u figure story seems right to me that's why Justin's bf were not found , what u think??????

      Delete
    9. Check it out guys! Right there in writing!!

      Crampz is now deflecting from his 'a new bear means no Bigfoot' dribble and now it is apparently about the breakdown that ended in him exposing himself which is the main focus of him trolling?!

      6:23...

      A new bear debunks Bigfoot? HA!! You do your theory group sooooo proud you know. Don't worry, you're in good company, Crampz thinks it's a logical means of concluding, there's at least one of your heroes to back you up.

      Chuck...

      Exactly!!

      Peace.

      Delete
    10. Go eat some Sodium fluoroacetate Dan

      Delete
  19. As a follow up, how did we know about the hybrid bear. You see the science community did not believe that a brown bear and polar bear could successfully mate in the wild. However hunters on the ground and flying in bush planes with astute pilots were reporting seeing bears with strange markings.

    Sound familiar

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it certainly does not present a case for a magic ape.

      Delete
    2. Pizzliea. Well documented. Good point. Back in the good old days there was just Giant Short Faceed Bear. But the Damn Grizzlies ran him into extinction. So says everyone but good ole JC Johnson.

      Delete
  20. Bill is committing the psychologist's fallacy here. He's deciding what another person definitely would or would not do based on his own subjective thought processes and behavioral modes, and pronouncing that decision objective, concrete and final. It is none of these.

    His illogical thinking goes like this: If I were a bigfoot hoaxer, I would never run across a creek bed during filming. Therefore, no other human being in existence would ever run across a creek bed during filming of a hoaxed bigfoot.

    He's also introducing reification (AKA hypostatization), a fallacy of ambiguity, treating an abstract belief or hypothetical construct as if it were a concrete, real event. It isn't.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Justin semina does another lie detector test on Sunday and the results arnt the same as the first one, but are still interesting results for bf community !

    ReplyDelete
  22. He concluded that the bigfoot community is full of cranks, of which he is one.

    ReplyDelete
  23. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2401175/Dyatlov-Pass-Indicent-slaughtered-hikers-Siberias-Death-Mountain-1959.html


    Joe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pretty good film I liked it

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1905040/

      Delete
    2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0NdbhEJHfo

      Peace.

      Delete
  24. Is danny campbell retarded? Seems highly probable.

    ReplyDelete
  25. All this time Dan/YGNALI has been right. So the tick tocking of the clock mechanism was actually being driven by the back and forth pendulum action of Dans mighty balls. So does'nt joe and mike now have to leave the blog forever?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would this blog be more entertaining if they left? No. Would you be less skerred? Seems so.

      Delete
  26. Wait, whoa. The Bet was called off due to multiple bannings by Shawn at the same time. But....my bet was on Notth Americam samples. I don't know a thing about a Yeti and that is truly any abomination I suppose. :)

    ReplyDelete
  27. Must everything that is close to being Bigfoot related be out of FOCUS!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Lots of pwned footers on here today. Morning fellas! Enjoy your taterholing? Take it easy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Drinking game for lame repetitive jokes.

      taterhole!

      *drink

      Delete
  29. I believe in things you couldn't possibly imagine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Strangely, that really made me laugh!!

      Thanks for that.

      Delete
    2. ^ needs a laugh after get his taterhole annihilated yesterday.

      Delete
    3. (Sigh)

      Bigfoot debunked? Must have missed that??

      Peace.

      Delete
    4. Debunked?

      There is nothing to debunk ya jackass.

      Delete
    5. Anon 7:55,do you believe in time travel,i know about time travel,meet me here last tuesday and i'll tell you all about it xx

      Delete
    6. Hey Eva!

      8:35...

      Dermals says there is.

      Schooled.

      Delete
  30. I'm just waiting for Sunday. Lol

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

Breaking: Derek Randles Releases Most Amazing Thermal Footage of Bigfoot Ever