Dafuq?
We find this video irresistibly hilarious! It's from an old Bigfoot flick titled, "The Long Way Home: A Bigfoot Story". This clip is about a lady who answers some questions revolving around the recent chicken kill at her bar. Seriously -- It's so weird...
Boom! First!!
ReplyDeleteNicely Firsted.
ReplyDeleteI believe that's Sasfooty in that video. Crazy bitch.
9pm on Sunday.
ReplyDeletePwned.
Is this documentary footage from the upcoming Erickson project?
ReplyDeleteYes.
DeleteA question I ask myself every time I visit here...
ReplyDeleteDafuq?
Dont worry a smoking will be delivered on Sunday and all will be good
DeleteJoe Fitz couldn't be here with us tonight folks.
DeleteHe's got a mouthful of cocks.
Dan Camp go get a life loser!!!
DeleteWhy do you come here then danny? What an fking loser.
DeleteLOL @ danny.
danny boy has add and comes for the attention
DeleteI've just been sent a copy of the trailer for Channel Four's Bigfoot Files.
DeleteThe trailer ends with a short but telling exchange....
Mark Evans ' So they were here?'
Dr Brian Sykes 'Yes. They are here'
MMG
I think it's pretty obvious how Patterson modified the suit. Look at the mouth and nose in the unmodified suit. It projects outward further than Patty, is hairless, and has features too ape-like for Patterson's purposes. If you will recall their testimony afterwards specifically called attention to the nose not being ape-like (not looking down into the nostrils).
ReplyDeleteMorris also indicated the nose was not his.
It looks to me in comparing photos of Patty and that nice little "swivel Boogie" William Parcher submitted that Patterson essentially cut this portion of the mask off and then re-covered it with a hair patch after replacing the nose. Observe how flat it looks by comparison.
Morris sold him a brown costume. (He had two color variations - black and brown.)
DeleteHe also told Roger to brush the fur down after Roger asked him a question about it. He put effort into teasing the fur up to make it look wilder for customers (like in the photo I showed) and did that on Roger's costume too. But Roger brushed it back down.
There was some very interesting material in the Morris interview.
Morris remembered Patterson for several things that stood out. Most of his customers were doing what was called the "girl to gorilla" illusion, where a hot little scrumpet disappears behind a curtain at the end of the act, and the gorilla then burst forth menacingly, charging the crowd and scaring them out of their wits, sending them towards the exits screaming.
Other show-businesses ordered too, but Roger was unusual because he told Morris he was a Rodeo Cowboy. It turns out that the ad Morris was running in the magazine called Amusement Business was also distributed to Rodeo, carrying articles on Rodeo personalities and Rodeo shows. That would be where Roger saw the ad with a gorilla costume illustration now published in Long's book - the very ad placed in Amusement Business.
Roger tried to scam Morris by telling him to send the suit, and Roger would pay for it later if he liked it. Morris laughed at that. He told Roger he had a better idea - send the money first!
That was actually corroboration as to Patterson's Modus Operandi. Roger's propensity to scam like that was something not generally known outside local circles until Long's book came out.
Patterson called back and asked how to make the shoulders bigger. Morris told him to go to a high school and get some old football pads. Patterson asked how to extend the arms, what to do about the white areas around the actor's eyes inside the mask...
But even more telling was Roger asking for additional fur to be sent.
Morris also related that when he was talking to Roger on the phone, explaining how to do alterations, there was another male voice in the room with Patterson that he could hear relaying questions.
If I had to guess, I would say DeAtley. Maybe Gimlin, or even Merrit - but I'm leaning towards DeAtley because he was involved in financing, he was also clearly involved in the processing of the film, and most of all because made a lot of money knowing it was a hoax.
DeAtley personally did all the marketing and management of those shows they did the first winter after the hoax - the ads, the bookings, the travel and all...
So the most logical scenario in my mind is that given how often Roger was hitting him up for money, and how he was obliged to help out Roger (sister of Roger is DeAtley's wife), astute businessman/millionaire DeAtley steps in when he sees Roger with a scheme that can actually be pulled off for some big money.
Roger didn't even have a phone. He would have to use someone else's for this long distance call. Too many people were wise to Roger by then, and he is going to be discussing his hoax over the phone. So it is most likely to be a conspirator's phone.
DeAtley used his place of business as the operating headquarters for the bigfoot money schemes they cooked up with DeAtley as president of their Research organization, and of course the road shows he organized. But he never was a bigfoot believer, admitting his scorn for it readily.
So I think DeAtley's voice was the one heard with Roger as he was asking Morris how to do these alterations, making sure his wayward brother-in-law pulled off this stunt more professionally.
Thanks for the detail. Interesting stuff.
DeleteFooters will still say its plausible that roger bought a suit with intent to hoax but just happened to film an actual bigfoot. Lol!
Footers will also tell you that a large bipedal ape goes dumpster diving in Chicago, too.
DeleteFucking looneytunes.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Deletehuh hey say wha? were you saying something?
Hey!....the south side of Chicago is squatchy bro! How DARE you!
DeleteHow's ralph
DeleteHe's busy in the 4th dimension right now. The 3rd isn't his most stable dimension therefore any trace evidence he leaves behind goes right back into the 4th dimension. Damn physics.
DeleteCan you not pluck a hair when you sleep with him?
DeleteInteresting account, but you neglect the fact that the ass looks more like the one on a Gemora suit...The advocates therefore make a good point--if it is a hoax the costume is very elaborate and the details of its construction are complex and not obvious....
DeleteWhat a crock of bullshit regarding Patterson and Morris.
DeleteSmoked footer^
DeletePole smoker^
Delete^
Deleteyep sure you know everything you are the boy in square pants with a zit on his nose and buck teeth trying to fit in as you flip the patty's on the grill with your spatula you are obsessed with. do you wake up every morning and say to your self "i'm ready" and repeat it over and over again until the guy with the funny nose next door to you goes mad. your best friend is as thick as a brick and you get your ass kick by a chick from Texas every day.
you are a LOSER that needs a life.
peace . . .
Campz, Why would a 346 Lb. woman need breast augmentation surgery anyways?
Delete"Roger didn't even have a phone!"
DeleteThat is because, MOBILE PHONES FOR THE PUBLIC, WERE NOT INVENTED YET !
Nice try at fabricating the historical record. But you do not get to make up your own facts. This entire "CUT AND PASTE" diatribe at 3:17 and 3:19, is a complete falsehood straight out of the BIGFOOT DISINFORMATION DATABASE, that was prepared by persons who were paid to prepare it. The proof is in the 2 minutes that the Disinformation Smear Artist took to prepare the 3:19 entry, since it would have been impossible for him to have prepared, typed and proofread that phony recollection of history, in just 2 minutes.
We now have proof that BE is being invaded by DISINFORMATION SMEAR ARTISTS WHO UTILIZE A DISINFORMATION DATABASE, FROM WHICH THEY CUT AND PASTE THEIR LITANY OF FALSEHOODS, IN ORDER TO SWAY THE NAIVE AND UNINFORMED PUBLIC.
This makes a lot more sense to me - DeAtley being involved in the staging of the hoax.
ReplyDeleteRoger Patterson had no job. He had a family to feed. He got $700 from Vilma Radford, allegedly for the camera, but it not only wasn't enough for the camera, gorilla suit, expedition(s), development, and the promotional capital to front the numerous bigfoot enterprises - Roger had to feed his family for months too.
Numerous individuals have pointed to DeAtley as the financier, while DeAtley admits to a post-hoax role and minimizes his pre-hoax financing of Roger's various schemes. His involvement was self-described as "not paying attention" to what Roger was doing and just handing small amounts of cash over here and there.
But this is a shrewd businessman who is aware of the sensation over bigfoot tracks, and it is only logical that a film would make some real money, which it most definitely did for DeAtley.
The Greg Long book also reveals something I now think more important: Roger had purchased a cheap movie camera from Harvey Anderson, owner of a Yakima camera store. This was before the Patterson-Gimlin film.
Roger told him more or less what he was up to, and furthermore showed him some disproportionately poor bigfoot casts. Anderson criticized the casts, so Roger came back in a few days with casts that were better proportioned.
Roger also explained he had rented a gorilla suit from a costume rental place in Los Angeles, and it was coming on a bus that week-end. Then Patterson came back in with the film after the week-end and Anderson shipped it to be developed.
When it came back in, Roger picked it up and reviewed the film. He returned to the shop once again, so Anderson asked him how it turned out. Patterson said "The pictures came out pretty good. Some parts were better than others."
Roger sold the camera back to the guy after he did his movie.
Patterson asked him not to say anything about it because he had cancer and wanted to leave something for his wife. It was the last time he saw Roger Patterson.
There was corroboration later in the book as to this story, with another individual in the book explaining where this filming took place.
All of this didn't fit in with my impression of the Patterson-Gimlin film sequence though. But what I think now is that Patterson did just this. He showed it to DeAtley.
DeAtley was probably struck by the money-making potential, but thought they could do a better job. It's pretty clear to me from the way they modified the Gorilla Suit they bought that the face looked too much like a gorilla.
They needed a more human-looking face. But to do that they would have to buy a suit and modify it. You can't rent a suit and cut it up. They also got better camera equipment.
What makes the best sense to me is Roger doing a movie, and based on that DeAtley became involved and helped finance a better hoax that could make some real dough.
Good stuff. Someone actually doing the research rather than drawing on a still frame in ms paint and saying derp derp derp.
DeleteWrong dildo breath.
Deletewhere are these facts from exactly?
DeleteThe mind of a mental patient
Deleteyawn
DeleteMore WILD, DESPERATE speculation.
DeleteAnd who can blame these guys.
They look at the footage and pull their hair out.
MMG
3:58, Sharon Shill, is that you?
DeleteDerp derp derp
The typical
Delusional much? Yay and yes
Copy/paste convoluted made up theories about the PGF are all null and void because suits don't reposition joints, lengthen arms/bring hands closer to knees while keeping the fingers prehensile (see frames 62 and 71), nor do suits have moving muscle and tendon and mass.
DeleteAnother skeptard fail.
You'll notice that on the cusp of the Skyes release the skeptards are frantically attacking the PGF.
Delete#SkepTool approved
quick question. anyone who has heard the radio interview with Bob Gimlin.where the interviewer asked him did he ever use the camera.Bob replied no never,roger did all the filming and I never touched the camera,roger always had it.and I still don't use camera's now as I don't really understand them. The interviewer was taken aback with that answer,paused for a second not knowing what to make of the answer .Obviously thinking the same thing.Who is filming roger taking the casts if Bob never touched the camera????
ReplyDeleteWell, he could have meant he didn't film the Patty sequence when he said he never touched the camera....Heironymous' defenders call this kind of thing nitpicking...It goes both ways....
DeleteYou'll get nothing and like it...both ways
DeleteThere is NO REASON - none whatsoever - that justifies the lack of explanation regarding the film's development other than being a hoax. The film was not developed the week-end of the 20th, and that's all there is to it.
ReplyDeleteSince it was not developed that week-end, the con-artist deadbeat crook Roger Patterson and pretend Indian tracker side-kick Bob Gimlin staged the event of the announcement, with the film already in hand.
yep sure you know everything you are the boy in square pants with a zit on his nose and buck teeth trying to fit in as you flip the patty's on the grill with your spatula you are obsessed with. do you wake up every morning and say to your self "i'm ready" and repeat it over and over again until the guy with the funny nose next door to you goes mad. your best friend is as thick as a brick and you get your ass kick by a chick from Texas every day.
Deleteyou are a LOSER that needs a life.
peace . . .
that wasnt a quick question you bore
DeleteNeither LOSER
Deleteyawn
Delete5:20's Copy/paste convoluted made up theories about the PGF are all null and void because suits don't reposition joints, lengthen arms/bring hands closer to knees while keeping the fingers prehensile (see frames 62 and 71), nor do suits have moving muscle and tendon and mass.
DeleteAnother skeptard fail.
This blog is funny. Got nothing to invent about bigfoot (but I repeat myself)? Post something anyway. I think the people who believe in bigfoot are off the wall: fucking crazy. If it wasn't for this forum and their access to this I suspect they'd snap and jump off a bridge or be part of yet another horrible shooting. They need this outlet for their crazy. We all do. Their little make-believe world of a hairy giant in the woods..... LOL.
ReplyDeleteGrow a pair retard
DeleteLOL. Mother beat you down, kid?
Deletedo you have daddy issues
DeleteJuvenile OP.
Delete5:33 = author of Skep Yourself Silly: The Confused Skeptard's Guide to Self Pleasuring
Delete#TooneyTard Approved Baby
Keep on tardin'
So why the fuck, are you on here?
DeleteCause he's a fucking troll with nothing good in his life.
DeleteI KEEP MY TESTICLES IN A JAR.MIKE B. KEEPS HIS HYDRO IN A JAR.
ReplyDeleteDoesnt matter who made the suit, who wore the suit, who was involved. Bigfoot does not exist so therefore it is a hoax.
ReplyDeleteGame set and match.
^Oh great you won something? Now you can take a hike since you apparently "won."
Deleteyes. Go away 7:51.
DeleteWTF do you care so much about something you claim does not exist?! Why are you wasting your time trying to convince others? Why do you care what what we choose to believe? Are you a control freak?!
7:51's Copy/paste convoluted made up theories about the PGF are all null and void because suits don't reposition joints, lengthen arms/bring hands closer to knees while keeping the fingers prehensile (see frames 62 and 71), nor do suits have moving muscle and tendon and mass.
DeleteAnother skeptard fail.
Now go troll a muslim website , and talk shit about allah.
DeleteIf you are speaking of AlphaCine Labs, Greg Long interviewed several individuals that worked there at the time, including the owner and President of the company. This is all in Chapter 17.
ReplyDeleteThey are all adamant that whenever AlphaCine labs received Kodachrome from a customer at the time, they shipped it to Kodak's Palo Alto Lab in California. So were the other labs he spoke to.
*sigh*
Greg Long demolished any theory of the film being developed anywhere except Palo Alto Labs in California, unless DeAtley and Patterson took special pains to send it even further away. It isn't just that it is Kodachrome II, it isn't just that it was the proprietary film speed 64 k-12 process, and it isn't just that they have specific specialists for 16 mm itself. You have to process massive volumes of this film - all of every one of those specific categories - to justify the tremendous expense of a laboratory and highly specialized staff.
You had to have people that did nothing all day long and machines that did nothing all day long except this one thing. AlphaCine did not have the volume to buy the machines and hire the professional staff to do it. I think the owner and president of the company is a pretty good source for that information.
Yes, they developed film on week-ends. But not this extremely specialized and expensive kind of development.
This was an elaborate process set up only in a few major metropolitan centers to serve millions of customers. It was very expensive and the machines had to operate eight hours a day or else the chemicals would go bad.
A chemist had to be there first, as it is a complicated chemical process. The machines had to warm up to bring things up to temperature. Then the chemistry would be tested. Then a test film run would be done. Finally, processing could take place. Then a special cleaning process would have to be undertaken by professional staff.
Sure, it could have been processed in a matter of hours: four to six hours to be more precise, if a lab had to open on a Saturday to do it. Kodak refused to open on Saturdays. It would have cost at least two thousand dollars. It would have been legendary, like the Marilyn Monroe and Kennedy assassination film developments.
What AlphaCine did was make COPIES of the Patterson film, and the people who made the copies were interviewed by Greg Long and remembered doing it.
Greg Longs work is definitive. Anyone taking on his research in this area has to come up with the names of the people who did it and the lab it was performed in. They are going to have a very high burden of proof demonstrating they had all the expensive machinery and personnel to do the job.
GT/CS has his finger on it: People with vested financial interests or reputation at stake on keeping the Bigfoot Myth alive are going to peddle hokey half-baked theories that neither Patterson, Gimlin, nor DeAtley themselves offered.
There is NO REASON - none whatsoever - that justifies the lack of explanation regarding the film's development other than being a hoax. The film was not developed the week-end of the 20th, and that's all there is to it.
Since it was not developed that week-end, the con-artist deadbeat crook Roger Patterson and pretend Indian tracker side-kick Bob Gimlin staged the event of the announcement, with the film already in hand.
you will not convince true believers. You are wasting your time. Go find another hobby.
Deleteyawn
DeleteYour right. Wasted his time. To think his parents has such high hopes for him.
Delete8:51 Greg Longshot is a hoaxer.
DeleteCopy/paste convoluted made up theories about the PGF are all null and void because suits don't reposition joints, lengthen arms/bring hands closer to knees while keeping the fingers prehensile (see frames 62 and 71), nor do suits have moving muscle and tendon and mass.
Another skeptard fail.
Rush back to your JFEF friends and take your NO REASON idiocy along.
This old woman is the most credible source in the Bigfoot community!!!!
ReplyDeleteWell folks, after watching this video you have now seen for yourself one of the most famous southern super heroes of all time. His name: The Incredible Mullet. One of his powers is uncontrollable and inappropriate laughter.
ReplyDeleteChick