TimberGiantBigfoot Films Red Bigfoot In B.C.


Oh, my lord. This TimberGiantBigfoot guy just caught one of the most impressive Bigfoot footage we've seen in quite a while. The only problem is that he doesn't explain why he only has still images instead of the full HD video -- which is a huge red flag. Here's what he wrote: "This is what I found while out in the forest . I had heard the sound of stone knocking , similar to that filmed two weeks ago . I found the source of the sound , and filmed it . This is what I filmed ."



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. I hate fisters because i'm a big whiny bitch WAH!

      Delete
    2. IS TIMBERGIANT THAT 4EYED FUCK FEOM OHIO THAT HOAXED MATT MONEYMAKER ON FINDING BIGFOOT??





      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    3. No Caps..That was the Squatchmaster-another one of those youtube clowns..This fool is from Ontario...

      Delete
    4. Nice bro there alot of kids on this site

      Delete
  2. This timbergiant is a hoaxer. I will NEVER forget his earlier B.S. Videos (which were deleted) or the Parabreakdown by Phil Poling.

    Just more African Lion Safari crap....or how about The Killman Zoo, which, by the way, is just as close to Jim as the African Lion Safari.
    .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TImbergiant never filmed the zoo video that Phil did the break down on..know what your talking about before you say stuff that isnt true..

      Delete
    2. Squatchmaster from Ohio was the person that posted video of a gorilla at the zoo that Phil Poling debunked.

      Delete
    3. Squatchmaster from Ohio was the person that posted video of a gorilla at the zoo that Phil Poling debunked.

      Delete
    4. What a fucking idiot. And the Parabreakdown guys are not authorities on anything.

      Delete
  3. VIDEO COMING IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS!!!!!!

    I'm not going to work or even going to sleep until this gem gets released!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fuzzy wuzzy was a bear. Fuzzy wuzzy had lots of red hair.

      Not referring to you Fozzie. Just to the screen captures. But it seemed appropriate to post this under yours. :P

      Delete
  4. Well, maybe just stills because it is good enough to sell. I hope so. I want to see something decent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It takes time to upload a video. Plus you have all the editing to do as well as alerting the news media and setting up a press conference.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, he's got to edit out any footage that clearly identifies whatever that (known) animal is that he filmed.
      Otherwise, it could not be a Sasquatch!

      Delete
    3. could just have one computer and a house full of kids that need to use it for school work, did you ever think of that? and from what i heard it takes quite a while to upload videos to youtube, im sure there is a logical reason, and some of you have no manners, really shows how well you were brought up, my mother always said, if you dont have anything good or nice to say, keep it to yourself.

      squatchladypa

      Delete
    4. could just have one computer and a house full of kids that need to use it for school work, did you ever think of that? and from what i heard it takes quite a while to upload videos to youtube, im sure there is a logical reason, and some of you have no manners, really shows how well you were brought up, my mother always said, if you dont have anything good or nice to say, keep it to yourself.

      squatchladypa

      Delete
    5. "AnonymousMonday, September 16, 2013 at 10:46:00 PM PDT

      Yeah, he's got to edit out any footage that clearly identifies whatever that (known) animal is that he filmed.
      Otherwise, it could not be a Sasquatch!"

      Ha ha ha ha, you called it.

      Delete
  5. Only schmucks believe in Giant-Timber-in-His-Ass-Bigfoot. You really have to be on a whole new level of retard to buy into it. Congratulations........degenerates.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi everybody! Sorry I haven't commented lately, but I was just recently married for the fifth time so I haven't had much time for hobbies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Congratulations Mayor! Welcome back.
      5th time might be the charm.

      Delete
    2. CONGRATS TO YOU AND MRS. MCCHEESE!!





      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    3. Thanks guys, I really feel like this is the real deal this time. It was a whirlwind romance and I know I've only known her for a couple weeks, but the heart wants what the heart wants, what can I say?

      Delete
    4. We haven't gone on a honeymoon yet, because we can't decide where to go. She wants Martha's Vineyard, but I'm leaning towards Des Moines Iowa. Oh well, no big deal where we go as long as we're together.

      Delete
    5. Does she have kids? I think you would make a great stepdad...Way back when I was single and wilder I was dating an older chick with 2 children..My dad used to laugh and say "Anthony is so lazy and afraid of exerting himself he found a girl that already has kids.."..lol...

      Delete
    6. Having a gf with at least one pre-existing kid is a big advantage. She will be more mature, secure and have the right priorities. She will be thankful for any support you give her.

      Also, you will know she can give birth to your own little bigfoots more easily.

      Delete
    7. That's true, but you have to like kids..If she's a good mother she will care how you treat hers...

      Delete
    8. Congratulations Mayor to you and the First Lady. Enjoy your honeymoon. M

      Delete
    9. I hope it's not that porn "star" leather chick. I think she has a thing for Mayors and I heard she is a gold digger.

      You did sign a prenup right? It would be a travesty if she absconds with the recipe for the secret sauce.

      CONGRATS!!!

      Delete
    10. Come on Mr Mayor

      One just isn't enough

      MMC

      Delete
    11. Aaaahhhhh, if it isn't Mayor McDickcheese.

      Delete
    12. Congrats Mayor!! I met my wife at a family reunion too......

      Delete
  7. He's obviously uploaded these stills to build up some hype for the video and every single time something like this has happened in the past I've been disappointed. I'm setting my expectations reeeeeally low for the video.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bigfoot in a bear suit
    Case solved

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Them nasty Bearfoots are always playing tricks on honest decent Bigfoot hunters.

      Delete
  9. Replies
    1. it's a racoon in a beaver suit

      Delete
    2. it's three racoons in a beaver suit in a bear suit in a bigfoot suit

      Delete
    3. ITS A BIGFOOT IN A BIGFOOT SUIT,TOP THAT!

      Delete
  10. I like this guys work. I bleev that he is the one who came up with the idea of having a camera facing behind you as you are walking.

    I look forward to his hopefully upcoming video

    MMC

    ReplyDelete
  11. Scott Carpenter is the first person to use the backtrail camera method.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree MMC. I look forward to it too. To the commenters above. I would love to be shown some evidence that Jim at Timbergiantbigfoot has hoaxed. But to date I'm not aware of any. Questionable stuff. Sure. It's Bigfooting. Show me a proven hoax please

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hoax (hoÊŠks)

      n., v. hoaxed, hoax•ing. n.
      1. something intended to deceive or defraud.
      v.t.
      2. to deceive by a hoax; hoodwink.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-bctnJ8KLc

      Delete
    2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFmjFjljZaA

      Delete
    3. Believe me Mike, if I did not work full-time with a family and bills to pay I would take the time to go to these silly, ridiculous areas he has been "researching" and prove to you all it was just a lie.
      Everyone around here knows he is full of shit. Why do you think NO follow-up interviews with his alleged encounter witnesses?

      Remember the circumstances regarding the Honey Island Swamp incident?? Same thing here Mike.

      However, no matter what, many of you are desperate for proof and will continue to support this liar just like they do so many others in this field.

      Delete
    4. Wait a second... TGBF is the one making the claims that a video of something that is not clearly identifiable is actually a Sasquatch so HE is the one that has something to prove, not the naysayers. The subject in the video could be a number of things so to claim positive identification requires more than just assumption. If Jim is sincere how does he know he is not being hoaxed by someone in a suit? He is declaring it a Sasquatch apparently without investigating the possibilities.

      Delete
  13. So that Is a stunk ape? It am small.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Replies
    1. It's not a bear, that part of canada doesnt have bears..

      Delete
    2. what part is that genius? says BC, bears in the backyards in the biggest city of province, im sure they are everywhere, Like saying no bears in alaska.

      Delete
  15. Well it MUST be a Bigfoot in a bear suit wearing a bigfoot suit then!!

    ReplyDelete
  16. If you follow timbergiant you would know he films hours of film, it takes time to cut out junk stuff so you can fit it on you tube..

    ReplyDelete
  17. If you follow timbergiant you would know he films hours of film, it takes time to cut out junk stuff so you can fit it on you tube..

    ReplyDelete
  18. He didnt ride his bike to BC you idiots, Hes in Ont. You should get your shit right even for this asswipe rag of a blog...

    ReplyDelete
  19. i am very disappointed that Jim is always the guy who has the best chances to film bigfoot evidence but he throws the opportunity away to do so, he should have filed as long as the sasquatch was there instead of alerting it to his presence....FREAKING PISSES ME OFFFF JIMMM!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bigfoot-Biglies......yawnnnnnnn! Yea jim why zoom in-out and bang the tree with your wood? LMAO,

    ReplyDelete
  21. COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN, COMPLAIN! When you guys film something squachie, you can do it the way you want. Until then just remember, he never claimed to be a photojournalist. Mistakes will be made, this video (once he uploaded it) is one of the best, most interesting I have ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 44:55 of "The Giant Revealed , Narrated , with The Missing Clips" tells me all I need to know. It's a dude (you can even see part of his face when he sits up) facing the bottom right corner of your screen holding a smaller person, who has his/her left arm around the right (his right) side of the dude's neck. You can see the man's right arm/hand (right under the stripe) lose contact & move up the smaller person's lower back.Also, notice the difference in the "stripe(s). That means the dude was facing our left @ 35:00 & our right @ 45:00.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?