Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
FIRST!
ReplyDelete^fantastic false first, congrats!!
DeleteWHY THANK YOU.......
DeleteALL CAPS STAND IN GUY
How DARE you
DeleteFake mulder guy pretending to be fake DWA guy wearing a monkey suit at night getting a reach around from MMG whos wearing a big ole stinking diaper butt
Ketchum Paper Passed Peer Review (as Ketchum stated):
Deletehttp://bf-field-journal.blogspot.com/2013/09/exclusive-newly-leaked-information.html
Key extract:
Immediately after passing peer review:
Apparently someone had gotten to the staff of the JAMEZ and intimidated them so severely that they were now refusing to publish the paper. Even the attorney for the JAMEZ was under so much pressure from some outside source that he had threatened to resign if the JAMEZ published the DNA study.
+1000 if trolling
Delete-1000 if supporting ketchum
Absolute trainwreck diaper butter circus show full of delusional nutcases.
Sounds legit.
DeleteSounds legit - stand in guy
Been on delusional busted butt diaper duty too long, 4:59?
DeleteGosh, there's that JREF talking point word again:
Delusional.
Dang.
Someone needs to work in with this one and take his/her diaper duty shifts for awhile. He/she seems to have cracked.
Why don't you go back to the JREF board and have a little rest for a while, where you can temporarily live in your Delightful Delusion of Diapers?
Ah, the butthurt footer, eternally blaming JREF for your woes and frustrations.
DeleteObviously if someone uses a word that appeared on their site they are a dyed-in-the-wool JREFer complete with golden vibrating buttplug.
This is interesting, because it opens the gate for an entire new chapter of abnormal and sociopathetic behavior that you display.
That you are a deviant is obvious. Do you have a manifesto of sorts? It might be useful in calibrating just how much of a threat you pose to society at large.
+1 Nonarchaic.
DeleteThose that fear the JREF can not be reasoned with.
Hey nonarchaic hominin, you remember pee wee's play house?
DeleteThis butthurt footer reminds me of "OOOOHHH YOU SAID OUR WORD OF THE DAY!"
As for me, I've never posted a jref and that's a fact.
I did post at BFF almost a year ago but I only made it a day or two before I got into a huge spat with see-teh-cock and was permabanned on all devices.
That's what I get for clicking on the habituation thread.
I hear ya mike. Also banned from the bff. I guess they don't like the truth over there!
DeleteYou're not takin enough nonarchaic
DeleteYou're right. Everything in moderation. Including moderation.
DeleteLol excess in moderation always worked for me just do so much you never wanna do it again
Deletebff hasnt banned me yet but they banned a bunch of people for shit I posted here.
DeleteLONG LIVE BIGFOOT EVIDENCE!!!
Mike Honcho, obsessed with footer butts
Delete...get the heck outta here firsters!!...
ReplyDeleteIt's ok that you don't believe but this is only a small bit of information about the things they can do reported by all sorts of people in all sorts of professions. It's "stuff like this" that bolsters the knowers to come forward and want to share what they've learned. No matter how many verbal barbs you toss at me, my skin is almost as thick as the hairy guys' skin. BTW, their skin is really thick............. So fire away!!!!!!
ReplyDeletehttp://gifs.gifbin.com/052009/1243594993_cupcakedog-war-flashbacks.gif
DeleteKey extract:
DeleteNo monkey.
This dude thinks the dogman follows him around the woods and is so paranoid he mounts a camera on his shoulder facing behind him.
She self published. Her results have been refuted severely by several real scientists.
Also: bigfoot is a myth
lol...What in the world would they have done if their lawyer resigned? He had the only key to the men's room and every year at the company picnic he would get drunk and blow himself while doing back flips...Simply the best...
DeleteHad a friend that just got back from down under and he said the people in general down there dont take the yowie seriously like they take bigfoot here.
ReplyDeleteYea only those crazy yanks get really serious about this bigfoot Lark
DeleteI don't know, man. Seems like the Brits have proven to be the most bat-shit crazy about the Hairy Bastard. I can't figure it out....damn it.
Deletethe yowies don't exist. there has only been 2 proper reports in the last 40 years and they were by the same person. saying much
DeleteNo. Just joe. Literally 1 person in 70 million or whatever.
DeleteJust a bunch of traveling Gypsy's, not real Brits.
DeleteWonder if they believe the black beast of exmoor in their own backyard or leprechauns across yonder..
He just smiled...and gave me a Vegemite sandwich.
DeleteI can't get to sleep, thinkin' about the implications...
DeleteJoe needs to put his money where his mouth is.
DeleteIf Sykes' results don't make international headlines (easily verifiable) he should barbecue his dick for 1 hour and post it on YouTube.
My personal favorite was the guy who wanted him to surrender his taterhole to Rictor for 8 hours.
DeleteDo you guy's think he'll try to worm his way back in when he loses?
Joe watches ancient aliens and buys into it.
Delete^ brutal pwnage
DeleteJoe bought the Ketchum paper.
DeleteI'd like to state for the record that Joe is not representative of all British people, most of us are not that gullible, I hope! It is crazy that he's bought into Bigfoot so much yet he's thousands of miles away so it's impossible for him to have had his own personal experience. It's also totally pointless to try an debate with him as he will not admit he's wrong about anything either that or he side steps around tricky questions. I asked if MK was so right about Patty did he believe in the massacre theory and he pretended not to have any knowledge of it. He keeps sidestepping round the fact that Chris Packham has a degree in Zoology and might know something bout animals by saying he's just a kids show presenter even though when he did that Bigfoot show he hadnt done kids tv for 4 or 5 years. As for Bill Munns, forget it he won't accept the fact the man is not qualified to be an expert in SFX. Oh, I finally watched that Russian Yeti vid he's always banging on about and then watched Phill's breakdown where his conclusion was it could just be a guy in dark clothing and he'd also translated all the Russian and they're talking bout posting it on YouTube. Yeah very convincing video lol
DeletePBJ is about to call you names and type some ha ha ha's all up in this bitch.
DeleteI had a dream. That soon, Bryan Sykes would find novel dna of an unknown hominin living in the wilds of North America. Thanks to Joe and his arrogant dicketry, that dream is dead and buried. I hope to HELL he comes up with NOTHING and PJ keeps his word and leaves this blog with his pants around his ankles, red assed, and crying back to Kamp Ketchum never to be seen again.
DeleteOf course, if no unknown dna is identified, he'll just keep going on about how those evil scientists and the American government are just covering up the truth like they do with his ancient alien "theories".
sigh...
^^^^^^^^^^All the gay for Joe guys, u so funny
DeleteHad a friend that just got back from down under and he said the people in general down there dont take the yowie seriously like they take bigfoot here.
ReplyDeleteUm, just who takes bigfoot seriously? Oh! NO ONE.
DeletePeace Joseph is about to copy and paste some shit all over your ass.
DeletePwned joe
DeleteI already smoked this terrible copy paste job above. Next please.
Delete4:59 -- cool story, bro..................................................................................................................
DeleteMike ?
DeleteIt's time for bed in Texas, Mike. I don't know what I missed today, but it looks pretty weak. Saw Joe Black post, guess he got over the verbal bashing he took on the Facebook postings we all read here earlier. I begin to understand now how truly close-minded and disjointed the community is right now. Poor William Barnes thought he could unite this group. Sad really. And I'm the James Woods' True Believer type whose days are numbered its beginning to seem. Oh well Honcho. If I have to surrender my players card to somebody it might as well be you. Take it easy Honcho. M
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteBut parabreakdown goes and confirms such idiotic things like Curtaino's "therm" that Smegma and Smashebi and the "driver* (lol!) made. What a bunch of hooey. All of it, I tell you! Rubbish, bears, bullshit and liars.
ReplyDeleteThey pointed the thermal at the camp where they knew their friends were and they got human figures on thermal... better call sherlock folks!!
DeleteHow DARE you!
Delete- stand-in guy
No you don't get to do that here.
Delete-sweaty yeti
that was a mulder quote.
Deletewhy cant bleevers pay attention?
were they titfed pepsicola?
JGNFSALI
ReplyDeleteJoe got nothing from sykes and liked it
Shawn needs to get big ginger to moderate the comments!! Also we should talk about bill munns attempts to do science!
ReplyDeleteDiaper butter
ReplyDeleteBigfoot is real folks. A surgeon has reviewed munns paper. Yes folks its all over. No more "patterson was a con man" and "impossible film processing timeline" and "no similar film in 50 years" for you! You neysayers are eating crow now mark my words!
ReplyDeleteMunns found a plastic surgeon in Hollywood to review his findings on bigfoot.
DeleteThat's real science, folks.
Peter Piper Picked a Peck of Pickled PJ's.
ReplyDeletePJ be nimble, PJ be quick...PJ's taterhole gapes from Trollandia dick.
Delete+1s for all
DeleteKetchum Paper Passed Peer Review (as Ketchum stated):
ReplyDeletehttp://bf-field-journal.blogspot.com/2013/09/exclusive-newly-leaked-information.html
It's a long read.
Key extract:
Immediately after passing peer review:
Apparently someone had gotten to the staff of the JAMEZ and intimidated them so severely that they were now refusing to publish the paper. Even the attorney for the JAMEZ was under so much pressure from some outside source that he had threatened to resign if the JAMEZ published the DNA study.
Once again see above you got smoked.
DeleteThe crap keeps coming like sausage out of a meat grinder...
DeleteVacuVita
ReplyDelete4:49, living in Delightful Delusion of Diapers.
ReplyDeleteAnother hoax video, go figure.
ReplyDeleteI hope you catch your Yowza monkey boys.
Now go jump around out there in the woods at barred owls and make a bunch of racket.
This scholasticahq site looks like it lets anyone set up their own "journal" and get "peer reviews". Seems legit.
ReplyDeleteI am looking forward to issue 2 of the denova journal in which they will debunk evolution and prove the noahs ark story is the real deal. The big twist is that the first human hybrid bigfoot was concieved on the ark. BAM stick that in your pipe and smoke it scientists!
DeleteSounds legit.
DeleteHey Rush,send me some good bigfoot news for a change
ReplyDeletebigfoot bowled a 256 last night!
DeleteBigfoot vs. Jason Belmonte tomorrow night, PBA Championship.
DeleteGoing to be a rough game, Bigfoot has at times shown some vulnerability in his recent defeats, most notably to Pete "THAT'S WHY I DID IT!" Weber.
Delete"Sample 26 - It is stated in the study that Sample 26 was derived from a shooting incident. The inclusion of such a sample in the study may be inconsistent with contemporary scientific ethics concerning the treatment of both human and animal study subjects and the procurement of research specimens from such. Moreover, this description casts the provenance of such a sample as murky, at best."
ReplyDeleteHAHAHA PWNED
"6. The pictures included thus far of a supposed creature that is claimed to be a Sasquatch is of terrible quality and should be replaced with much more clear photographic evidence or video. These pictures weaken this manuscript. The inclusion of an image of sticks being put together in some kind of pyramid is inappropriate. I would strongly suggest removal of this image. "
ReplyDeleteI can't find any good reviews? Are you sure this "passed"?
Listen up Americans I am not goofy English boy I am Russian mobster with trunk full of shotguns.
ReplyDeleteBigfoot is real. Now you understand.
Ah, my countryman. Let's take Joe and Mike to the zoo and watch them play with the gorillas. Then we will debauch ourselves with vodka and hookers.
DeleteDa. Chechnyan hookers best. Disposable.
DeleteYou should put them in vending machines you'd make a fortune
DeleteYou guys are so cynical..
DeleteThere are humans and there are Russians!
DeleteMike Honcho do you work??!!
ReplyDeleteI spent the last 15 minutes reading a few BFE articles that have been posted throughout the day and you commented all day on every one of them!
P.S. Leave Joe Alone! (He is one of my fav's on here)!
It's curious that Streufert came out with his questionable Harvard scientist story just before, the same day no less, just hours before this:
ReplyDeletehttp://bf-field-journal.blogspot.com/2013/09/exclusive-newly-leaked-information.html
What timing, eh what?
Again this:
Apparently someone had gotten to the staff of the JAMEZ and intimidated them so severely that they were now refusing to publish the paper. Even the attorney for the JAMEZ was under so much pressure from some outside source that he had threatened to resign if the JAMEZ published the DNA study.
Consider that the news of passing peer review was Jan. 9 2013.
Consider that the news of the the editor apparently shaken to his core from being threatened, and publication being cancelled due to pressure from undisclosed quarter(s), was the very next day, Jan. 10 2013.
Wow, that was quick.
This is the world the skepfools love: Suppression and shutting up. Fun fun fun. Let's all shut up yay so fun, let's have fun.
We can only hope that the journal reviewing Sykes' study comes under the same pressure, then the skepfools can do their merry dance and celebrate its suppression too.
Yay for us, wow.
oh for fuck's sake
ReplyDeleteHow DARE you...
What was Bigfootery like before the Internet and what we see now?
I take for granted that Bigfooters can communicate and exchange things with each other in seconds now and even around the world. Things like the Georgia Boys Hoax, Jacobs Creature, Munns Report, Ketchum DNA Fiasco, etc. would seem to need something like the Web to get started and sustain any momentum. Now just about any Footer or Skeptic can engage in rapid message exchange at any hour of the day or night.
How did Bigfoot believers find each other? How did they exchange stories and experiences? I understand there were some club newsletters but how did you find those? Has the Internet caused a great increase in Bigfoot popularity and submission of encounter reports? I know at least one or two members here were involved or interested back then.
Water finds its own level.
Delete(clive squashy)
ReplyDeleteScoot over Yowie, Megalodon is here ! A "dramatized" documentary about Megalodon is taking the country by storm. My new favorite monster !
(clive squashy)
ReplyDeleteBreakup: The Pied Piper Yowie Foolery
(clive squashy)
ReplyDeleteBreakup: The Pied Piper Yowie Foolery
TEAM HOMOS!
ReplyDeleteHey Phil don't tell me you always hit the correct zoom in zoom out button on your video cam all the time?
ReplyDelete