This is the most brutal thing you'll see on the internet today. We've never seen people so excited about something like this that happens in nature all the time.
Well, acknowledgement is the first step to recovery.
In the meantime, you see, Patty's arms are too long to be those of a human being. As frames 61 and 72 show the fingers are prehensile, and this is a 1967 film, the skeptards' claim of arm extensions is, well, toast. Convincing mechanical arm extensions in 1967 are hugely unlikely.
Therefore, skeptards are faced with the problem that the arms are too long proportionally to be human arms, and that no arm extensions were used.
Those two pieces of information being facts, you are really done with claims of a suit. You have a problem with the PGF individual which cannot be solved with the suit theory.
Probably, most likely, you can watch the PGF and you will be shown a bigfoot, as you request above. The evidence in the film is in favor of the individual not being a human being, that's where it stands.
The prehensile fingers and arm length pretty much seal the deal. Maybe we can get Andre the Giant's proportions and see if we can fit them into Patty's, but with that arm length, particularly obvious in the long rear view sequence, it's not bloody likely.
Congratulations on your efforts at recovery from skeptardary.
OK, which fake Bigfoot are we most tired of seeing on the right side of these posts?
- Bear with his ass in the air - Scarecrow-looking guy in snug jacket with hood - Justin's dream-chimp - Photoshopped guy in yak coat - Camper with blanket pulled up over his back - Melissa's hairy-back fantasy - Mangy, skinny bear - Dead bear on tail gate (OK not BF but please go)
If an individual was to scan a PGF thread on the Jref forum for example, then their view of events leading up to, during and after the filming of the footage then their version of events would be skewed and very likely incorrect.
This photograph was first shown at a Bigfoot conference in Washington over the weekend where witnesses were blown away. While we're currently seeking permission to post the screengrab here, we'll provide the link to the image on Facebook for now. The image is just a snapshot of a 5 minute-long footage of a Bigfoot caught on thermal. Washington Bigfoot researcher Derek Randles explains the image:
Adam Davies visits Dr. Johnson at the SOHA base camp, and tries a new experiment to test the relationship Dr. Johnson has with his bigfoot friends. But how did it turn out?
Here's the latest update from Stacy Brown Jr. from the mine shafts in Hellen Georgia: Stacy Brown Sr. and Jr. stumble upon a very odd spot in the woods behind the cabin.
last
ReplyDelete...it speaks for itself...
DeleteShow me a bigfoot and prove all of us "skeptards" wrong.
DeleteWAKE UP YOU IGNORANT DOLTS!!
Euw DOLT GUY thats TMI
DeleteHA HA! hilarious
DeleteHmmm, 9:01 calls self skeptard.
DeleteWell, acknowledgement is the first step to recovery.
In the meantime, you see, Patty's arms are too long to be those of a human being. As frames 61 and 72 show the fingers are prehensile, and this is a 1967 film, the skeptards' claim of arm extensions is, well, toast. Convincing mechanical arm extensions in 1967 are hugely unlikely.
Therefore, skeptards are faced with the problem that the arms are too long proportionally to be human arms, and that no arm extensions were used.
Those two pieces of information being facts, you are really done with claims of a suit. You have a problem with the PGF individual which cannot be solved with the suit theory.
Probably, most likely, you can watch the PGF and you will be shown a bigfoot, as you request above. The evidence in the film is in favor of the individual not being a human being, that's where it stands.
The prehensile fingers and arm length pretty much seal the deal. Maybe we can get Andre the Giant's proportions and see if we can fit them into Patty's, but with that arm length, particularly obvious in the long rear view sequence, it's not bloody likely.
Congratulations on your efforts at recovery from skeptardary.
That explains why the dolt guy keep waking me up in my bed and tries to massage my shoulders so homosexually that silly butt pirate
DeleteLMAO, that your only rebuttal to a skeptic? You just proved his point you morons.
Deleteuh huh huh huh huh you said butt
DeleteReminds me of an ex-girlfriend who turned out to be a guy?
ReplyDeleteI like umi-zumi's!!!!
ReplyDeleteWhat is a "Dirty Sanchez'?
DeleteOK, which fake Bigfoot are we most tired of seeing on the right side of these posts?
ReplyDelete- Bear with his ass in the air
- Scarecrow-looking guy in snug jacket with hood
- Justin's dream-chimp
- Photoshopped guy in yak coat
- Camper with blanket pulled up over his back
- Melissa's hairy-back fantasy
- Mangy, skinny bear
- Dead bear on tail gate (OK not BF but please go)
You forgot patty who was caught on film by a known hoaxer.
DeletePatterson wasn't "known" to have hoaxed anything at all.
DeleteUm, wow! Do a little research before you post an argument. Even JOE will admit to the fact that he was a hoaxer prior to the PGF. WOW!
DeleteI would have saved that bee.xx
DeleteIt really depends on what 'research' one does.
DeleteIf an individual was to scan a PGF thread on the Jref forum for example, then their view of events leading up to, during and after the filming of the footage then their version of events would be skewed and very likely incorrect.
Keep working for the man boys!
MMG
I would have killed both of them.
DeleteYou don't mean it xx
DeleteWell
ReplyDeleteI'm half the bee I used to be
Lol!! :D
DeleteHa,First!xx
ReplyDeletestop with the hype. tons more brutal shit than that. 3 idiots 1 shovel.
ReplyDeleteBet you anything these rejects were high as hell off some marijuana. Moronic sounding nincompoops.
ReplyDelete