M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
First..haha..
ReplyDeleteThose guys have for BF Balls
ReplyDeleteHeroes, outlaws, or morons with too much time?
ReplyDeleteI didn't realize the evidence for bigfoot was this compelling.
ReplyDeleteFuck the police
ReplyDeleteNot a good idea?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMy pants have been removed by the author.
DeleteAnother bad idea?
Deleteseriously shawn, wtf. why would you post this shi??
ReplyDeleteARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!!
DeleteIf it's illegal not to wear a seatbelt or to be using a mobile phone whilst driving over a ton of steel at more than 60mph then surely people should have to pay the consequences.
ReplyDeleteThere have been numerous stories in the news where accidents have happened whilst one/or both of the drivers have been using a phone, for example; personally I'd prefer it if people didn't do that and just concentrated on the road ahead.
These two guys aren't heroes, they're just a couple of pricks.
The act of merely driving a vehicle is grounds for search and seizure. And if your'e any color but white it's a good idea to just stay home.
DeleteCalifornia Police State
If I'm driving my two kids to school and some fucker crashes into me because they were using a phone then I'd be pissed. These jokers think they're "protecting people" by telling them to adhere to road safety, which they should have been adhering to in the first place? wtf?
ReplyDeleteYou guys are stupid. Whether you are not wearing a seatbelt or talking on the phone, this type of policing is illegal. Its a 4th amendment violation.
ReplyDeleteYou're choosing to argue outcomes rather than the behavior. Whether an act increases safety is irrelevant: random checkpoints are illegal.
Those guys are doing something most fat lazy ass Americans would never do: take a stand against violations of our constitutional rights. They should be applauded.
You Americans and your fucking constitution. A two hundred and forty year old document that was created to govern a country in a bygone age, and now you use it to tell people who are breaking the law that there's a roadblock ahead. Fuck me!
ReplyDeleteThe people on their phones need to shut the fuck up and concentrate on driving properly....or get the fucking bus.
Your problem is your country is full of assholes who won't do as their laws state becasue "It's against my human rights bro'". When it comes to driving LEGALLY just grow the fuck up and behave.
Hey asshole at 7:08--what fucked up piece of shit country do you live in? Please stay there!
DeleteAnd by the way 7:08, if it weren't for America and our Constitution, you'd probably be doing slave labor for some German or Jap right now. And actually, our problem is that our President and Congress won't do what the law states, not the people, and we're getting fed up with it. We're sick of our freedoms being taken away, little by little, and our money wasted on bullshit liberal causes and countries like yours.
DeleteGot that off your chest, now off with your pants!
Delete