This is what American fashion designers in 1939 predicted women would be wearing today. The clothes are downright ridiculous, but what do you think of this video, are they far off?
Don't really need a source. There last video was proof enough. They can get all that so called audio, and they don't use cameras. That makes a whole lot of sense. Anyone with common sense who had repeat encounters would be prepared, and the absence of any substantial evidence goes a long way towards saying HOAX. Hate to admit it, but that townsend clown was right.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
anti
ReplyDelete...anti-first... chewbitcha sucks as well as this article.
DeleteGet a job, hippie.
Delete^ha! I don't need one you ignoramus!!
DeleteWAR ON TRAVIS!!
DeleteI have that same dress!
DeleteThis just in!!
ReplyDeleteAccording to an anonymous source.
Sasquatch Ontario caught hoaxing!!
Animal Planet's Finding Bigfoots team of researchers call footage "honey soaked garbage".
Anonymous Source is one of the most credible voices in the bigfoot community.
DeleteDon't really need a source. There last video was proof enough. They can get all that so called audio, and they don't use cameras. That makes a whole lot of sense. Anyone with common sense who had repeat encounters would be prepared, and the absence of any substantial evidence goes a long way towards saying HOAX. Hate to admit it, but that townsend clown was right.
DeleteI didn't realize the evidence for bigfoot was this compelling.
ReplyDeleteObviously these designers were visionaries, but did any of those women have tramp stamps? That guy's metal banana belt was gorgeous!
ReplyDelete(clive squashy)
ReplyDeleteI wonder if Shawn reads alotta muscle magazines...
Just wonderful! I love fashion!! OOOO swhish!
ReplyDeleteLarry
Candy for cuties?
ReplyDeleteThis site has really went to hell!
ReplyDeleteyeah so what is your point what are you wanting to say here
Deleteanon12:56??
Awesome! This is indeed pretty impressive. I think the prediction is somewhat true. This is amazing. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDelete-http://bigfootandfriends.com/