Analysis of the Jacobs Photos by Jarrett Mangus
Editor’s Note: This is a guest post by Jay of the Bizarre Zoology blog. For info on weird and amazing facts/theories of zoology, paleontology, and cryptozoology go to bizarrezoology.blogspot.com or follow him on Twitter.I recently received an email from Jarrett Mangus where he shared an illustrated analysis of one of the two Jacobs photos. The Jacobs Photos are two trail camera photographs taken in the Allegheny National Forest on September 16, 2007. The trail camera belonged to R. Jacobs, and these photographs have thus been referred to as the "Jacobs Photos".
The photographs show a chimpanzee like animal, which is on all fours in the first image and then is bent down with what may be its head (or a juvenile if it is a bear with mange) between its legs in the second. Because of its similarity to a great ape, it has been suggested that the animal in the photographs is a juvenile wood ape (Sasquatch or Bigfoot). For more about the possibility that the Jacobs photos are a juvenile wood ape, please read this article: link.
Click here to continue reading "Analysis of the Jacobs Photos by Jarrett Mangus" at bizarrezoology.blogspot.com
who's first?
ReplyDeleteYou dumb deluded footers. Keep peddling the same lies year after year, its not going to magic a bigfoot into existence.
DeleteHey, is magic a verb? I don't think so.
DeleteI was. And you are pwned.
Deletehey 32:00, did you see the name of this web site? it's bigfoot evidence!!! what the f*@k are you doing here? go back to your gamer sites idiot! deluded??? what kind of dope goes to a bigfoot site and sh#ts on bigfoot? a deluded idiot that's who. now "magic" your ass over to a site that will peddle your existence.
DeleteLOL. This response deserves some kind of award. Hilarious.
DeleteWhos first??
DeleteWhat's second?
Deleteam I third?
DeleteI dunno
Deletedam-uno
Deletethat's all I got
Who's on first, What's on second, Idontknow is on third, Why is on left field, Because is center, Nobody is on right, Today is catching and Tomorrow is pitching.
DeleteMy dear gentlemen,
DeleteI do believe that 5:43 served 4:32's head to him/her on a platter.
Now I wonder if 4:32 happened to be Sharon Hill. Well, a grammatical mistake in 4:32's post, but could be her.
Well done, 5:43.
Sherry, anyone? Do come into the conservatory; I've a fine one for you to try.
All of us bigfoot enthusiast gentlemen deserve a tipple after that performance, don't we?
Sharon Hill looks like Jack Palance.
DeleteA lot of people re saying that is a bear, I don't think so. I saw a bear once on a camping trip to yellow stone. I think it may be a young female Sasquatch, possibly with anorexia. We don't know kind of body image is forced upon female Sasquatches by the patriarchy, but anorexia is a big problem with humans, and if Bigfoot is related to humans, then they may have some of the same social problems we have.
DeleteShow us your tits
DeleteJay we're tired of your stupid wood ape expression when they clearly aren't apes so why dontcha grow the hell up, will ya please.
Delete^^^^^First of all, its not an expression. Furthermore, it's not "his" expression. He didn't coin it, he just chooses that term (from many) when describing Bigfoot. <----------(My chosen term).
DeleteWood Ape is no different than any other term used to identify Sasquatch etc etc etc.
Lastly, you can tell you're one of those "Sasquatch is human freaks". Newsflash, humans are Apes.
Next time, just keep your taterhole shut and learn something before you speak.
I watched Finding Bigfoot last week....this can't be a Bigfoot. Dimensions aren't right. According to Master Expert Cliff the legs would be much longer.
ReplyDeleteHas to be a bear.
Dont make fun of Cliff, he is well respected here. You are dumb fuck however.
DeleteDimensions are all right here 4:25 dummy, bf legs are shorter and their arms longer.
DeleteBear shitting
ReplyDeleteWhats on second
ReplyDeletefecking feck feck feck
ReplyDeleteJust splurge and spell it correctly.
Deletewell said, H, well said.
DeleteI think it is a prepubiscent teenage girl in a monkey costume and Robert Lindsay just yelled "Assume the position".
ReplyDeleteThis is clearly a bear with matted hair u idiot bigfoot morons!
ReplyDeleteI wasn't suggesting it was a bigfoot. Calm yourself sir
DeleteJay, I think the subjects of both appear to be some kind of ape. However, the picture on the left has been matched to a photo of a bear. That proves that a bear in an odd pose can mislead. Furthermore, all the other photos in the series show bears.
DeleteWe can conclude, with a very high degree of certainty, that ALL the Jacob photos are bears...
I agree, I have seen the pictures of very thin young bears that are nearly exactly the same as the Jacobs photos. Besides look how short the feet are, looks like a bear paw to me not a human type foot.
DeleteI work at a zoo and those are not bears. The legs are way too long and straight so please check a bears anatomy and rethink your bear theory.
DeleteWELL JAY WHAT'S YOUR TAKE ON THE JACOBS PHOTOS??
DeleteALL CAPS
Its bear zoo guy,now sweep up that shit
DeleteThat must be quite a zoo. Scores of bears of all shapes and sizes, displayed under all kinds of lighting with many, many lines of sight and viewing perspectives.
DeleteThose are dark, 2 dimensional photographs of wild animals. They need to be compared to similar shots of animals-and when one does that, they learn those are pictures of young, skinny bears...
No it's pretty clear that the leg dimensions even if blurry don't match a bear.
DeleteAnon 8:14 the guy who works at the zoo knows more than you Moron! Bears legs are shaped like a letter Z and the are not straight like that! Get the Hell off of your computer and out of the asphalt jungle and get a biology lesson on bears Prick Dick!
DeleteHe is gay and rush sucks sweep that shit up
DeleteSorry girls, those picture are of bears. Adults realize this. Children put their fingers in their ears and cry: "I won't listen!! Its Bigfoot! Its Bigfoot!". SLAP!! Grow up, fools...
DeleteAnon works in a zoo cleaning shit out of cages. Makes him an expert ...
DeleteHey zoo keeper..... How's those piles of shit you play with each day?
DeleteWe can't see the feet that well so that's no good excuse, on the contrary, there's nothing bear-like about this fiugre instead it's a totally bigfoot typically primate anatomy of longer top body and shorter bottom.
DeleteRush Rules,bears are okay,go to space farms and see that big ass grizzly
DeleteClearly the young simian was presenting my namesake.
ReplyDeleteWhy do they call the cryptid bigfoot? Because it has very large human looking feet. Look at the feet of the creature in the Jacobs photos. Do those feet in any way, shape, or form resemble large human feet? The answer is a resounding no.
ReplyDeleteThe cryptid is called bigfoot, not bearfoot.
I don't reject the idea that bigfoot may exist. However folks, this is 100% not a bigfoot. That's all there is to it. Case closed.
Wrong douchebag it's exactly the known squatch profile of their build, 100% genuine squatch youngster.
DeleteAu contraire! H has confirmed it on it's salty meat rattle.
ReplyDeleteI'm sus of this anon...his too witty to be from the conqured lands...
Deletej'taime! Even your crappy Englaize gives me the raging bon'er!
DeleteSpoken like a true american
DeleteThe figure to the right is a dog licking his nuts. Next!
ReplyDeletethat's one of the better guesses.
DeleteNext Week: More trailcam photos from the chimp cage in Zoo Atlanta.
ReplyDeletebear.
ReplyDeleteYou apparently have never seen a bear retard^ or a chimp^^. Go back to school idiots!
Delete^ You suck at this cryptozoology thing. Whats worse, gullible know-nothings like you make what is already a dubious subject a source of ridicule.
DeleteThose are bears, and everyone with a brain knows it. That, apparently, excludes you. What a dick you are moron boy. Stop trolling, you suck at this blogging stuff, too...
^ Fuck off kid, it's no bear but one of your squatch siblings.
DeleteIt IS a bear. I just wish someone would finally produce the monkey. Until then, he doesn't exist.
DeleteGotta say this for all of the folks on BFRO's blue board ..... MANGY BEAR! :)
ReplyDeleteYou have my sympathy for your bodily affliction, but seek medical help rather than roaming bigfoot blogs.
DeleteTo a footer everything's a squatch. To a bleever every shadow is a wood ape.
ReplyDeleteThere's no such thing as bears, hoaxers or gorilla costumes. These things simply don't exist. They cannot.
It's a squatch. Every motherfucking time. It has to be.
Lest we face reality.
At least you have come to your senses now.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteShut up cat shit jay...
DeleteCat shit jay.... You ready for your first big hoax yet?
DeleteThere are no damn wood apes.
DeleteWe've got nothing and liked it from these photos for 6 yrs now. New Nothing Please.
ReplyDeleteHey, we've been getting nothing and liking it for decades. We're no dummies.
DeleteAt least this "evidence" is from the current millennium. Doesn't beat the classic stuff,though. Personal favorite: Bossburg Cripple Foot.
DeleteGreat chicken and egg type of thing. Did Marx plant all the tracks, or did he get the idea to hoax footage of a gimpy bigfoot from real prints?...
Anonymous, Marx did not plant the Bossburg tracks as he was invited to investigate after Rene Dahinden was told about them. So Marx didnt find them first. But I do believe that it was these tracks that inspired him to hoax that footage. He probably got tired of people not being convinced by the good footprint evidence and tried to make convincing footage.
DeleteEvery bigfoot sighting ever recorded has either been a misidentification or a lie.
ReplyDeleteYes, tens of thousands of people mistaking bears for an bipedal,manlike creature, that makes sense
DeleteWe don't get out that often
Delete(clive squashy) - Best damn sasquatch researcher of all times. ...Sloppy Joe Jones.
ReplyDeleteWeeks before his disappearance the obsession of bigfoot was getting way out of hand. He started walking like a bigfoot, he ate like a bigfoot and even started communicating like one...a few grunts and a howl every now & then.
The last time we saw him he was packed up with all his gear to go live in the forrest. I said "Slop, you're not a bigfoot ! He stopped - turned around and said, "Not yet...
bear
Deletebigfoot
DeleteBEAR!
ReplyDeleteBIGFOOT!
DeleteTASTES GREAT
DeleteJAY, WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON THE JACOBS PHOTOS?
ReplyDeleteALL CAPS-
I'm on the fence. While some features make me think it's a bear, it does look a lot like an ape in its proportions and head.
DeleteAGREED.. SO AM I!!
DeleteALL CAPS
It's a fuckin bear and you know it All Caps! Stop trying to stroke Jay's balls!
DeleteJay, given that there is another subject in the same pic that resembles a bear cub, as well as a whole series of other pics showing two bear cubs (from the same game cam) & the very well known and documented fact that sows often give birth to twins, there is really only one side of the fence to be on.
DeleteBesides the obvious, everyone knows that baby bigfoots do not hang out with baby bears, they hang out with baby squirrels, and since there are no baby squirrels in the photo, its a bear!
Mayor, I never said it was a bigfoot :). Anonymous, I do see what may be a bear cub underneath the animal in the second Jacobs photo so you are probably right.
DeleteI knew you were daft, Jay. It's a young sasquatch and you're quite typical of a certain type of footer when confronted with good evidence they know deep down it's real but at the same time afraid that it is, because then the search and mystery is over when/if proven real.
DeleteI am right Jay. I am right! There are more photos. Conveniently you readily only see a cropped and zoomed pic floating around showing the "squatch".
DeleteGoogle has been around a few years now, seek and you shall find
That mangy ass bear looked just like it
DeleteIt's not a bear cub under the creature. It is the mineral lick and the tray it was sitting on flipped over and leaning on the lick. As for the rest of the pics there are several. One shows the twin cubs. Another has mama bear in it. But all of those were taken almost a half hour before the single creature shows up. The unzoomed pics have the time stamps on them.
DeleteOkay it's a mineral lick and tray and one of the bear cubs. So there is a family of bears licking salt for more than a half hour, some times on camera sometimes off camera.
DeleteNon-mystery solved!
Definitely bears.
DeleteMangy Mangus and his dingus circus bears...
ReplyDeleteI know for a fact that he is hung like an elephant? Wanna see his trunk?
DeleteIt's a bear you morons.
ReplyDeleteNo it's not you moron.
Deleteits a fucking bear. toss this picture in the trashcan. if you look at a picture long enough it will become what you think it is. its a bear. no ifs ands or buts about it. case closed.
ReplyDelete^ You go girl !
DeleteFuck you 8:45 you've obviously looked at it too long you've told yourself it's a bear and it clearly isn't but a young bigfoot. Case closed.
DeleteBearfoot,bigbear
DeleteTHIS PAST WEEK I WAS KIDNAPPED BY A FAMILY OF BIGFOOTS, THE MALES TOOK TURNS RAPING ME, AND I IN TURN RAPED A COUPLE OF THEM TOO. AND YOU KNOW THE FUNNY THING IS, A 7 FOOT SQUATCH IS HUNG LIKE A POODLE. AND THE FEMALES ARE TIGHT, THEY REALLY LIKED ME RAPING THEM. THE MALES FINALLY MADE ME LEAVE BECAUSE MY COCK WAS BIGGER THAN THIERS. TRUE STORY, I GOT SHAKEY PICS AND VIDEO TO PROVE IT. BUT I HAVE TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO BLUR MY FACE FIRST.
ReplyDeleteYou need help my friend.
DeleteAll skeptards do.
DeleteAll bigfoot pictures blur automaticaly so no worries
DeleteO.M.G.! you people are all certifiably insane! and hilarious!
ReplyDeleteJust one good set of clear pictures and film of some (not just one) bigfoots and I might re-think magic ape in woods for thousands of years. No proof as of today. Means no such thing as wood ape or sasquatch or bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteWhy is this...no proof to research?? Its how it is for scientist.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteEspecially since the whole subject's being covered up, bet one hot summer night the Bilderberg group decided to set up this blog at least what I'm hearing in spy circles.
DeleteWow,a group so secret only you know about them,but now the cat is out of the bag thanks to you.Screw you Shawn Bilderberg
DeleteAfter seeing the video of the mangy bear in FL on this site, it put some serious doubt into my head on these photos. But that said there are a few things that need pointing out.
ReplyDeleteIf I remember correctly there were only a couple other pics from the same night taken. Those pics were at the same time as the cubs pics shown. There were no pics of bears cubs taken after the "creature" showed up.
The "creature" showed up almost a half hour AFTER the bears were photo'd. You can see the time stamps. Even 15 minutes in the woods is a long time.
The "bear cub" everyone is pointing at in the picture with the "creature" is the mineral lick and the black tray it was sitting on flipped over.
As far as I know, no pictures exist of the bear cubs with the creature. With so much time between when the bears were at the lick and the other thing showed up there is no way to say one was with the other. For all we know there could have been a bigfoot family tailing the bears hoping to chase them off a kill or to kill the bears.
As before, I have serious doubts to these being bigfoot pics now. But it could still be possible. Just because the feet are smaller than reported in sightings means nothing. Everything is born smaller and grows into full size. Do you think Shaq was born with size 22 feet?
Exactly Jim, guess feet are hidden in the grass or dirt. Bears don't have front legs this long their hind legs are the somewhat longer limbs, and we know that Bigfoots have long arms and relatively shorter legs.
DeleteDo we really now?And where did you learn this fact from?
DeleteAnon 2:16,
DeleteDo some research on mangy bears. The subjects limb proportions in the first pic have been shown to line up just about perfectly with a mangy bears limb proportions. Case closed.
What? The proportions were calculated there it had 560mm arms and a 476mm long torso that was impossible for a bear.
DeleteThis sighting came in 2nd place in the Top5 of the 5 Most Compelling Pieces Of Bigfoot Evidence! As of this year 2022 it has 4.2 million people looking at it. https://youtu.be/KiI7OE0ho8I
ReplyDelete