Listen To Live Matt Moneymaker Interview About Matilda On Team Tazer After Hours, 6:30PM PST (Archived)


Ladies and gentlemen. In a moment, we will be interviewing His Holiness, Mr. Bigfoot himself, Matt Moneymaker. Have questions? Post them in the comments section and we'll try to get to them. Rictor Riolo, Nadia Moore and Tammy Murray will be conducting the interview. Brace yourselves people!

The YouTube to watch it in is: http://www.youtube.com/user/rictor

We'll also be embedding the video here when the show starts.

[Update] The show has been archived. Watch this explosive interview with Matt Moneymaker below:

Topics dicussed:

  • Trail Cameras
  • Bigfoot and infrared cameras
  • Being zapped by Bigfoot, Infrasound
  • Matilda Footage
  • Dr. Melba Ketchum DNA study
  • Latest Bigfoot Hoax and FBFB
  • Finding Bigfoot


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Stop it guys. Clinic said I had all three of these.

      It's not funny.

      I was alone in the woods and I was uneasy.

      We've all been there haven't we? Anyone? Anyone?

      Delete
    2. On a boyscout camp out, I was awakened when something touched my weenie. The scout master told me it was a bigfoot. Good thing he was standing nearby and apparently scared the ape away! So, I've known since childhood these wonderful and playful beings inhabit the forests.

      Delete
    3. Hey Fatt Monkeyfaker do you like Sativas or Indicas?

      Delete
    4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClVW09Y33S0

      Delete
  2. Is he taking a wait and see attitude about Dr Ketchum's report, and does he honestly think Dr Sykes has samples as good as Dr. Ketchum had to work with?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Matt, who can eat more pizza, you or Bobo?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well after the bobe and I burn a fatty and there's a pznat sitting there, the shit starts flying and it's hard to tell who got the most.

      Delete
  4. How did they get so close to a sleeping Bigfoot??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You get a great guest and screw up the intro & on top of all this have this annoying queer start this podcast off? Fuck man!
      I watched 25seconds & had to stop to leave this rude comment! Why the annoying fag? Come on man it's painful, for the love of Bigfoot!! WTF?

      Delete
    2. This annoying fag thanks you for watching and hopes you subscribe to his faggy channel. Tune in next time for our interview with Justin Smeja! It's bound to get queer and hopefully for the love of Bigfoot you will leave another amusing and highly unclever comment.

      Delete
  5. Have you ever seen Ranae naked?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why are they not showing the whole video to the public?

    ReplyDelete
  7. HI Matt, from Dax. Keep up the good work. Thanks for helping bring Bigfoot into a better light than when I had my encounter. People are coming around.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prove it taterhole. Edumacate me.

      Delete
    2. why don't you just go to Matt's house a blow him Dax, What a dushbag...

      Delete
    3. Dax does more for Bigfooting than you trolls calling each other morons and taterholes. you all can suck my dick, eat my ass, and gag on my cum you pathetic pieces of shit!

      Delete
    4. Goll Rictor. Just stoop to their level why don't ya. Idiot.

      Delete
    5. But I like to be dirty on here. It's Shawn's blog! Dirty is fun. Can I suck your dick too?

      Delete
    6. Rictor may die of AIDS., its possible. The greatest Rectum Wrecker of all time.

      Delete
  8. Will the show continue when they "find" bigfoot????

    ReplyDelete
  9. When you were in Vermont did you hear about the Beddington Triangle in remote Vermont?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seriously, WTF are you talking about?

      Delete
    2. Prove it or hide behind your science, which sucks compared to my scientists who are doing their jobs.

      Delete
  10. Hi Nadia, Tammy, Shawn and Rictor. Ask Matt if he is going to get a chance to use that mobile home thermal bus some more. From Dax.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Nadia, Tammy, Shwan and Rictor, ask Matt if he has any of those old McDonalds spoons leftover from the '80s. He'll know what I'm talking about.

      Delete
  11. I am Glad the show is on Thursday nights'

    ReplyDelete
  12. What does Matt think about Les Stroud teaming up with Todd Standing to search for bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure his ego won't afford even the slightest bit of jealousy.

      Delete
    2. Anon 6:55 you made a gay comment on every single persons question ! Are you mentally challenged or just that stupid? You choose!

      Delete
    3. He is on a roll. Funny shit, dude....

      Delete
  13. Wow, Matt is totally schooling the trained biologist on how magic apes have glowing eyes. lollers

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Chemicals in the eye" more like an excess of chemicals in your blood stream Mr. coke head. Shut the Fu*k up and let the interviewers talk and ask questions.

    ReplyDelete
  15. who is matts favorite to hang out with in the finding bigfoot group ???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The guy who wears the suit in the reenactment.

      Delete
  16. I'm hoping that when Rictor posts this on YouTube as a completed work that he adds subtitles to the video. The audio is terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I beleive there is something to the zapping. I have spent alot of time in the woods, and have had strange sensations go through my body in Bigfoot spots. Never when around bear, moose, or deer.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Jane Goodall spent some 22 months in the bush studying a troupe of chimpanzees, and was even accepted into the group as a member, albeit the lowest ranking female.

    Where's the dedication and focus like this in the Bigfoot community? It's not like these supposed habitats are in some far-away somewhere like with the famously elusive and rare Snow Leopard est. worldwide population of 4000-6500 of which we have HUNDREDS in captivity with brilliant photos taken in the wild to boot?

    Who's spending weeks and months straight in the bush pursuing this subject as opposed to all this drive-up one and two nighter nonsense?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The uni-bomber before he was rounded up?

      Delete
    2. I've met Jane Goodall and have been to Tanzania and hiked high above lake Tanganyika to visit her chimp families relatives. They like to hang out in the lemon trees. I believe Todd Standing spends the proper amount of time in the field and has been enabled to spend infinite time in the field at this point and is getting the research that is necessary done.

      Delete
    3. Ken: You get them Rumy, Your right, that guy has spent 8 weeks and 4 days out deep in the Canadian wilderness, and 3 weeks of that totally alone. He is into the gig with both BIGFEET, so to speak.A couple others really go after it to, you just don't hear a lot about them.

      Delete
    4. Tod Standing is another one of those "Save the Forest people" nut jobs from what I've seen.

      We need proper non-ambiguous documentation, and we need a body; no tears or hesitation about it.
      No grandstanding. No teaser teasing. No squeamishness. No build up promotions. No stupid stories about how it happened. No moronic appeals to government agencies or any other agendas.

      Give us a raw real body, just the body, the whole body and nothing but the body, or it didn't happen.

      Delete
    5. Jane Goodall is one of those "save the forest nut jobs" as well.

      Delete
    6. Druscilla Alix: There are no bigfoots. The people claiming to see them are full of shit. It's something people use to fool others, like a snipe hunt. Mostly bored women make up the habituation situations. It's all stories with no substance = truth.

      That is why you do not see real scientists going into the field for months or years documenting a real animal. There is no real bigfoot to document, only sometimes deluded peoples claims.

      Delete
    7. "Druscilla" - you're new here, huh? You should go do a little research yourself before you make such inane comments/demands. What do you everyone who can spend time in the woods (like Jane Goodall - LOLOL)is doing? Also, just curious...................can YOU fund such an endeavor like Jane's study??

      Delete
  19. When are we going to get to see the rest of the footage!?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and by soon he means not.

      ___
      _ _.-"_< }
      ""--"" 7(
      /())
      / )/
      ^ ( \
      / /
      /.'
      //
      ______/L_____

      Delete
    2. this blog doesnt format spaces very well lol.

      I've spoken with people that saw these videos. I've heard it looks like a wookie mask from star wars.

      Delete
    3. Soon!..damn

      ('soon' is the new 'first')

      Delete
    4. I saw "Star Wars" and it had a character dressed as a bigfoot...

      Delete
    5. It looks like your mom when you were oozing down her leg.

      Delete
    6. Bill Munns said he saw the video...he said he hopes they never release it because everyone will be disappointed and that in no way is it better than the PGF.

      Delete
  20. ask him about bart thermal footage.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sounds like moneymaker is jealous of Ketchum... childish rebuke, I read the paper, seemed complete and needs other geneticists to critique.. Matt sounds lame and jealous.. Did he want to be part of it or something? His answers are pathetic regarding her

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You guys slamming Matt are not considering the possibility that his friend and backer of the study, Mr. Hersom , may be unhappy with the project. There is a good chance Hersom was given a copy awhile back and asked experts to comment.
      A guy like that has university contacts....

      Delete
    2. That would be a proper response with sufficient details to back it up, but Matt is attacking her person instead. Who cares if he likes her or how she does things, the issue is is the paper good science? -- he has said nothing on the science. I wonder why???

      Delete
    3. That is a fair point. I guess if Matt had heard about a bad review from an expert he would have mentioned it...

      Delete
  22. Moneymaker removes all doubt about his desire to destroy Ketchum, in order to keep himself as the goto man for the news media. Moneymaker has to pull no punches in order to destroy the DNA study that Moneymaker's own Mr. Goodbar paid for. I am hoping that Hersom drops Moneymaker like a hot potatoe, ASAP. Moneymaker's behavior during the interview, is inexcuseable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't you think it is possible that Wally is unhappy with the study as well?

      Delete
    2. I did not hear anything to support that. The attacks he employed, fairly severe in my opinion, need to be supported and what he said did not. The uproar over the journal is curious - what difference does it make? The question is, is the paper good science or not? Did not hear Moneymaker's input on the science.

      Delete
    3. he is not unhappy with Melba at all, but with Matt, how can he be happy with him, he just basically called wally a moron for supporting her.

      Delete
    4. I assumed Matt would not bash the study if Mr. Hersom was thrilled with it. Maybe Hersom is happy and pissed at Matt for going off the reservation. I doubt that, but like I said above I do now think that if Matt heard of a bad review he would be mentioning it.

      Delete
    5. I also agree with the remark about the uproar-I've been critical of this study but I always maintained that more important than peer review is whether or not anyone reads the damn thing. That goes for any paper..

      Delete
    6. Isn't that so cute MM and Bart are such good buddies as we all know they plotted together to destroy Melba to protect their little ape theory.

      to bad it didn't work guys as she hit a homerun with her paper and will be forever recognized as the protector of an indigneous poeple and you can stick it trolls.
      it was an outstanding paper as she gave us her best and sciecne will fight her all the way until they concede what she's done.

      I also know bart is a plant (thats right bart) because think about it people

      he's infiltrated every major group and org since he came on scene about a decade ago
      he's clean cut and speaks well but certainly not my type talking like MM
      he pushes the ape theory but does so very nonchalantly these days
      his family goes back deep with former CIA head Panetta as he let this slip out once on a radio show and my sources have confirmed this as Panetta is from Bart;s hometown and friends with his father
      they tried to pull fast one on Melba but she's wayyyyy too smart for them switching bigfoot sample with bear meat to destroy her and protect his buddy smeja

      to I even need to go on? wake up people

      Delete
    7. These are the type of nuts a good researcher like Bart has to deal with my god.

      Btw, sorry that your living in a fantasy about Melba. Her paper completely flopped if you haven't noticed and is going nowhere fast. The gig is up

      Delete
    8. I think Robin has a crush on you Bart

      Delete
    9. Bart is a GOD. On your knees! I am! Worship him! I do!

      Delete
    10. I know he's working for the CIA
      They wouldn't have him the maf-I-A
      Why cant we be friends?
      Why can't we be friends?..

      Delete
  23. I agree - he appears lame and obvious. Lets learn about the papers content. If it is so bad, would it not be picked apart by now by Moneymaker -- he seems quiet on content.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Matt we need to see Matilda!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bring out the moooooonnnnnkkkkeeeeyyyyy!!!!!!!!

      Delete
  25. OMG ! It's talk show with all of the idiots in the bigfoot world ! only one missing is Dyer ! LOLOLOLOLOL!!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ken:That Money Maker sure has a pretty mouth, I bet you could ask ole Bo Bo and he'd say Matt squealed like a Pig too. But seriously, Great Comedy, best Since Earl.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I am dissapointed in Matt ( but a fan of the TV show) The Ketchum paper has been out for over a week. If you read the paper, she in great detail lays out the work that was done, how it was done, precautions that were made, etc. etc.etc. That amount of detail allows anyone with this expertise to rip it apart if it is bad. Matt was ripping on her, but not the paper. Does Matt not understand the science or have people that can pick it apart? I find his personal attacks without attacks on the science making me question his character and his motives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt is out there glowing eyes and zapping bigfoot

      Delete
    2. I would think Matt knows just a little bit more than you about what happened "behind the scene".

      Delete
  28. There is not one credible piece of evidence to support the theory of Bigfoot. Not one.
    Every single bit could have been made up and hoaxed.
    But it does make people some money and get them some fame, doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the Ketchum paper demonstrates evidence.. Two labs, similar results of many samples. I am not sure if the evidence is conclusive or if the paper will be received as good science, but it sure appears to be credible evidence.

      Delete
  29. Wow what a professional piece of video and broadcasting. NOT.
    Really extremely childishly done

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's the point! For the fans, by the fans. You want real good interviewing, go get Oprah.

      Delete
  30. Ken: Please tell me Know one really buys that train load of hilarity he's shoveling. He can't even keep a straight face himself, what a clown. Good job Matt or whatever your real name is, keep shoveling it out and raking it in.lol

    ReplyDelete
  31. This audio couldn't get any worse. Terrible and unlistenable.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Love how Moneymaker backtracks on the quality of the whole Erickson footage and whether it will convince people or not.

    Sounds like he's really jealous of how much of Wally's money Melba was able to con out of him compared to his take.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Melba conned a lot more money out of Ericson.

      Delete
  33. Shake that Moneymaker Matt,shake it baby like a polaroid picture but please don't do the harlem shake cuz that really sucks monkey balls.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The host acts like a gay groupie on a celebrity high. He said, "I'm not kissing ass," however, that's all he did for the first 45 seconds, then he continued throughout the vid. People like this represent the Bigfoot phenomena to the world. No wonder the masses label bigfooters as "loons, the extreme fringe, and uneducated idiots." Here's what's sad...the people on this show might actually read this, and if they do they will deflect these serious observations with the words and attitude, "Just another hater." Hello! This is not going to change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OMG I love you that made me laugh and giggle. And thank you for watching. Be sure to subscribe and watch our next show which will feature Justin Smeja, my personal gun range instructor!

      Delete
  35. Someone should have asked him how much money he's bilked out of Wally throughout the years.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hi Matt, this is Stu. Can I come on a camping trip with you one day ?
    i always wanted to see a squatch up close.
    We can roast wieners and sing campfire songs to attract bigfeet. it would be such fun outing.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Mr. Moneymaker, you are without a doubt the world's preeminent sasquatch researcher. Thank you for taking the time to answer our questions. My question is this:

    Is it true that sasquatch may have telepathic abilities, i.e., the ability to move objects just by thinking about them, read thoughts, or sense human presence by thought alone? For the past couple years there have been mixed signals RE sasquatch's psychokinetic powers or lack thereof coming from Dr. Ketchum's camp. As a researcher myself, I am interested in what you might have to say on the matter. Thank you for your time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why don't you just ask him if he was ever pulsed with a mindwave? I'm pretty sure Dr. Ketchum also said that 'foots can use infrasound to scramble the brainwaves of their pursuers. This not only allows the 'foot to escape, but the one who sighted it is left with a rambling, incoherent tale of the encounter which no one believs.

      Absolute tooners.

      Delete
  38. I am sorry but after watching this interview, I can't believe what a bunch of goofs team tazer are. Wow. I can't take them seriously. The biologist question about eye shine was stupid. Then moneymaker's answer was weird. Talking about squids. I believe in bigfoot but never knew how goofy team tazer really is. Definitely not the best site for evidence. Although it can be funny on here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's the general idea. Entertainment. Thank you for watching. Be sure to check us out next time as we interview Justin Smeja!

      Delete
    2. Really - entertainment? Are you serious - you just lost my respect. I am here for the excitement of possible new science discovery and am sick and tired of the bickering/name calling and disrespect of one researcher to the other. That seals the deal for me, I think Ketchum is the sane one of the bunch. Entertainment??????

      Delete
    3. Yes. it is ENTERTAINMENT. This is NOT National Geographic. Team Tazer is a fan based group that enjoys Bigfoot content. Shawn's blog is ENTERTAINMENT. If you are here for serious scientific research, then you are sadly distracted. I suggest you focus on Dr. Meldrum and his work because he is the only credible scientist out there. Hands down. Good luck. I don't want your respect. I just want you to watch, and you did. AND I THANK YOU FOR IT.

      Delete
    4. Being entertained is fine , but at what point does entertainment exaggerate evidence for the sake of entertainment and those entertaining. I suspect the reason people come to this site is for actual "news" on current evidence. Does entertainment take advantage of this in a bad way?

      Delete
  39. Matt Moneymaker is no doubt the greatest Bigfoot researcher. PERIOD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, because he is no doubt the greatest Bigfoot researcher, PERIOD!

      Delete
    2. Thanks, that explains it. Have you watched the show??

      Delete
  40. I can explain: He's brought out more information of sightings, interviews of witnesses, methods that don't work, methods that have some results...

    The list is endless everyone else in the Bigfoot world is just jealous of his greatness when it comes to the subject of Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have a hard time buying that - watching the TV show sure does not give that impression - If they were interested in research, they would not leave sites 2 hours after they hear/see/suspect something - Talented researchers would have a plan in place for serious observation and tracking.. or maybe they really isn't anything to follow. Their methods are frustrating.

      Delete
  41. No man has ever accomplished as much as Matt has in his life and he's still going. If Bigfoot is found we will first see it on Finding Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story