Dr. Ketchum Confirms Statement By Dr. Igor Burtsev Regarding Bigfoot DNA Results (Update: David Paulides Provides Update In New Blog Post)


Dr. Melba Ketchum has just confirmed on Facebook that the statement release by Dr. Igor Burtsev about her Bigfoot DNA test results are indeed true-- at least some parts of it are. Ketchum plans to make a formal statement within the next couple of days. She posted this on her wall minutes ago:

It is unfortunate that the partial summary of our data was released in this manner, however, I will be making a formal response in the next few days. Even though Igor Burtsev released this, it was not Dr. Burtsev's fault. - Dr. Melba Ketchum

Ketchum's friends on Facebook are ecstatic. "I knew that the Ancient ones were human! Thank you Melba and all the other scientists involved! Maybe now, people will understand the importance of their being! Thank you, thank you!" one person wrote. "What is the link to the data that was released?" one friend asked.

Here is what Igor wrote regarding Dr. Ketchum's DNA results:
URGENT announcement from Igor Burtsev ...

"International Center of Hominology (Russia)
Urgent!

The DNA analysis of the Bigfoot/Sasquatch specimen conducted by Dr. Melba Ketchum the head of DNA Diagnostics, Timpson, TX, USA has been over!

Team of American scientists led by Dr. Melba Ketchum for five years has analyzed 109 purported samples of such creatures. The study has sequenced DNA of a novel North American hominin, commonly called Bigfoot or Sasquatch.

There were a large number of laboratories associated with this study including academic, private and government laboratories in which blind testing was utilized to avoid prejudice in testing. Great time and care was taken in the forensic laboratories to assure no contamination occurred with any of the samples utilized in this study.

After 5 years of this study the scientists can finally answer the question of what sasquatch really is. It is human like us only different, a hybrid of a human with unknown species. Early field research shows that the Bigfoot/Sasquatches are massively intelligent which has enabled them to avoid detection to a large extent. They are different than us, however human nonetheless.

The hybridization event could not have occurred more than 15000 years ago according to the mitochondrial data in some samples. Origin of this hominin was probably Middle Eastern/Eastern Europe and Europe originally though other geographic areas are not excluded.

The manuscript associated with this study has been submitted to a scientific reviewed magazine.

For years people have refused to believe they exist. Now that we know that they are real, it is up to us to protect them from those that would hunt or try to capture them for research or for sport. They should be left alone to live as they live now. After all, they are our relatives.

At this time, analysis of the Sasquatch genomes is still ongoing. Further data will be presented in the future following this original study. Additionally, analysis of various hair samples purportedly from Siberian Wildman are being tested in an effort to determine if relatedness exists between the Sasquatch and Russian Wildman.

Dr. Igor Burtsev,
Head of International Center of Hominology,
Moscow, Russia +7(916)812-6253
inhomin@yandex.ru "

[Update] David Paulides of NABS responds to the DNA test results:

Blog # 181
November 23, 2012

The DNA Project/Update

It’s been many months that myself and members of our team have silently watched the progress of our Bigfoot DNA Project under the guidance of Dr. Melba Ketchum. Silence in this research arena tends to push outsiders to make rash and irresponsible comments. In the technology world, silence about projects is routine, expected and is part of the landscape. In the bigfoot world, people in the past have been boisterous with wild claims, accusations and irresponsible behavior the norm. Our group (North America Bigfoot Search) has been trying to live by a different standard, a professional standard that the rest of the world understands and appreciates.

In the last twelve months you have seen a variety of groups suddenly take interest in bigfoot DNA. Where was that interest four years ago when we started our DNA Project? Dr. Jeff Meldrum has gone to Europe with his interest and utilized the resources of Oxford University in an attempt to develop a DNA sequence on Bigfoot. A weekly show about bigfoot also has just recently found an interest in bigfoot DNA and is trying to exploit this avenue, and there are others. There is not one group that has developed the scientific team and the high number of quality specimens to even come close to what North America Bigfoot Search and Dr. Ketchum’s team of esteemed scientists have accomplished.

The public perception of bigfoot, sasquatch and wild men is about to change forever. It has always been our belief that there would come a time when researchers would no longer be calling them animals, apes and human type gorillas, those statements will be reserved for re-runs of your favorite screamers and tree bangers. Yes, you are reading this correctly, times are about to change. I have consistently stated that we are close to a release date. We are very, very close.

Dr. Ketchum and her team of scientists and laboratories have been able to sequence three complete genomes, getting identical results independently verified by different labs. This is not a casual everyday finding, this will cause the scientific community to stand up and take notice. Many people have claimed to know what our results were, nearly everyone was wrong, even some high profile media people that have just recently made comments, all were wrong.

Dr. Ketchum originally found the combination to unlock bigfoot DNA and utilized top scientists in various fields to validate her results. The results were independently verified with the group silently sitting on these findings for months, as the results were validated a third and fourth time. Remember, this isn’t one total genome sequence; it’s three with dozens and dozens of other findings validating the results. The exact number of specimens, the number of mitochondrial results and the specifics of the scientific white paper will be released very, very soon. The paper is very complex and filled with amazing findings.

Before the world is enveloped in bigfoot, sasquatch mania and we lose sight of the real hero’s of this project, I need to address a few of the VERY best researchers in the world. Scott Carpenter, Richard Hucklebridge, Rob Alley and Harvey Pratt have contributed to the knowledge base of the scientists in a way never before accomplished. It was the vision and professional manner that these fine men have and the ability to overcome public ridicule and outright hostility that changed the course of the understanding of bigfoot forever. Where the majority of bigfoot researchers failed in getting specimens on multiple occasions utilizing innovative methods, these men did it.

The one person that was able to unlock the safe to understanding bigfoot DNA, Dr. Melba Ketchum. Where every other scientist gave up and claimed contamination, Dr. Ketchum continued to move forward. Where every other scientist was unable to turn the corner, Dr. Ketchum did. This lady did not understand the word “defeat,” she is a true pioneer in her field!

We need to express a sincere “Thank You” to the dozens of others who politely and professionally contributed to our project and the pool of specimens. We could not have done this without you!! Your patience and adherence to the Non-Disclosure Agreement shows your belief in the project and your stoic professionalism.

The days ahead are going to be exciting.

Happy Holidays

David Paulides

Director
North America Bigfoot Search

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. @Fasano Maybe if you get therapy for your attention seeking and stop hoaxing you would be more respected in this field.

      Delete
    2. Fasano takes it with a head first slide!

      Delete
    3. congrats tim your time is here, enjoy it

      Delete
    4. Thank you for the nice comments.

      Delete
    5. @ Fasano: You've behaved so desparately and with such little professionalism, promising huge things and delivering videos of monkeys and whatnot. Genuine, actual scientists and researchers have now spent millions of dollars and 5 years to give us real proof and you seem to feel that your amateur efforts, as hard as you may have worked at them, are somehow on the same par. That's pretty delusional. I understand you're butt-hurt, but you aren't number 1, number 2 or anywhere near the top when it comes to Bigfoot research, you made sure of that on your own with your desparate and dishonest antics. Take it like a man and stop being such a wuss. Like Romney, you lost.

      Delete
    6. Wow Tim, super huge news just came out and all you can say is you are number one????
      Wow you are so jealous that actual scientists beat you to the punch and found the evidence before you did.
      Admit it, you aren't the center of the bigfoot world. It doesn't revolve around you.
      Chad W

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. hurts doesnt it, had that happen to me a few times

      you build your hopes up and then the page refreshes and BAM reality hits and you didnt make it

      keep trying brother your time will come

      Delete
  3. Rush is #1,you're a tub of shit....fasano probably not a Rush fan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow,an overweight homophobe...not too cool

      Delete
    2. Go kill yourself Bumferlife. Your kind have no place in this world.

      Delete
    3. wow...lets all learn to love..not a Rush fan?

      Delete
    4. its a big world friend,if you see me passing through just look away,or come up and get a hug.

      Delete
    5. Homophobes are never cool, fat homophobes just smell bad as well.

      Delete
    6. "Living in the limelight the universal dream". Geddy Alex, Neil..such greatnes from Canada..I hear Bigfoot is the opening act this tour..

      Delete
  4. I think Guy Edwards rocks...if he takes off the sunglasses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like the wild ape days are over, now please join the real world Mr. Fasano.

      Delete
    2. He wears his sunglasses at night

      Delete
  5. Hlly shit didn't see that one commin'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Godamn it I meant holy shit no more posting and drinkin...after this weekend.

      Delete
    2. you forgot smoking and typing.it will be of just burn one for and i will do the same for you

      Delete
  6. zZz. I predict a lot of claims, and a fancy name to a human that was not in genbank already. lmao.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. when does the "for sale" something come out to make this into a for profit adventure LOL

      Delete
  7. Sally here, disregard this statement, expect another announcement in another couple months, but don't worry, the truth will be in the pudding so to speak!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Timothy Powell's elderly relative died an agonizing death (I hope). That brought a chuckle.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Russia, well that settles it then.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Does anyone know whether Dr. Melba Ketchum is single? She's pretty hot looking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No such luck... she gave up on humans and is now expecting a half Bigfoot/human within the next eight months.

      Delete
  11. Has anybody met Dr. Ketchum?

    She frightens me so!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. does she even exist?

      fails to attend conferences.

      her so called lab didnt even exist when people showed up to it.

      has anyone seen her?

      Delete
    2. Eat it Troll , Dr'K got the goods,
      You can line up with the rest of them
      for your CROW BURGER!

      SUCK IT SKEPTICS !!! U LOSE !!!!!!!!

      AHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    3. lol, don't get your hopes up just yet there junior! :D Watch it play out, and then bow :D

      Delete
    4. ^Do you really think that bigfoots are homo sapiens? An undiscovered race of human beings? C'mon. If they exist they may be in our genus, but I think they would end up being placed in a new genus that together with ours will form a tribe(sub-family).

      Delete
    5. They speak don't they, Sierra Sounds, so yeah they're definitely to be regarded of and classified in the human family.

      Delete
    6. We aren't Homo-Sapines either.. Were Homo-Sapiens-Sapiens. Homo-Erectus, Homo-Sapiens-Neanderthal, Homo-Heildelbergis, Homo-Sapiens, and Homo-Sapiens-Sapiens are all different, but all "human".

      Right now humans are classified as "Great-Apes". That might change if this turns out legit. But Gorillas, Chimps, Gibbons and Orangutans are all apes, but all different.

      It would be the same difference between us and them and if the Russian Wildman turns out being something completely different... A Neanderthal as they believe, then "Human" would once again be a class as separate from apes, as apes are from monkeys.

      Delete
    7. Tzieth, there is debate as to whether us and Neanderthal are subspecies under the same genus. Some believe Neanderthal DNA in modern humans is due to shared ancestor not inter-breeding.

      Delete
    8. ......I meant under the same species. ...not same genus...

      Delete
  12. This actually is accurate, but some important things were left out that the public is seriously not ready for if freaks like you guys are an example.

    ReplyDelete
  13. With the Sykes project deadline coming I am not surprised that all of a sudden info was "accidentally" released. The choice of a Russian Dr also does not surprise me either with all of the reports of wild men from there recently. If I recall correctly, this Russian Dr also has put out info about the Sykes study.

    What will surprise me is we actually get to see the studies soon. With the number of delays, ass covering and out right denial of "leaks" I have become very jaded that we will ever see anything.

    But even with confirmation of dna proof, I still see bigfoot not being accepted as real. People will say the dna is from old bones or such. Even if there are good clear photos and videos released with the study, it won't change much. I still fully expect science to demand a whole specimen to poke and prod.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are co rect big fella.

      Delete
    2. So TBRC is going to shoot a human-hybrid to prove it is a not any kind of human?

      Must be H. erectus x H. sapiens


      Delete
    3. TBRC are done for they can pack it in and forget it. Did you see the dead body of Bin Laden Jim, yet you believe he's dead right? A body undoubtedly will come by somehow sooner or later, maybe in Russia who knows, until then DNA is the way and if science accepts it I couldn't care less if mr. and mrs. six pack down the block doesn't.

      Delete
    4. Jim, They can't use the "Old Bones" argument, if this was done the right way..(And it had to be) All the samples are there. If one of the samples truly is a chunk of flesh from the Sierra Kills, then that would be the nail in the skeptic coffin.

      As for the nay-sayers... These very same types that call anyone who believes the existence of Sasquatch as "Gullible" are the very same idiots that believe anything the media tells them. Where is their skepticism that we actually killed Ben Laden as the above Anom stated?(I have seen better Blobsquatch pics that were higher definition.) Where is their skepticism that the footage of the moon landing was not in a studio? (I believe the moon landing was real, I am just making a point.) Or that JFK was solely assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald?

      They are Nay-Sayers until the nice News lady tells them it is real... So if this makes the news and the media accepts it as facts, there will be no Nay-Sayers.

      Delete
    5. ^1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000!

      Delete
    6. Tzieth makes more sense than every nay-sayer I have ever read here.

      Delete
    7. LOL Sling all the insults you want... But as long as you do it from a faceless anonymous title, you show everyone here what you truly are... A cowardly lil bitch ;)

      Delete
    8. Good points, Tzieth. People are like sheep and the powers that be know this as long as something's official people buy anything and ask no questions, keep it off TV or out of history/science textbooks and they'll buy that too and believe something doesn't exist. It's called control it's how the masses are kept occupied with daily routines like work and sitcoms.

      Delete
  14. TIME FOR ALL THE LITTLE SKEPTICS TO CLIMB INTO T?HE WOODWORK LIKE T?HE COCKROACHES THEY ARE, OOPS, caps

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. still no proof im afraid

      lots of fancy DNA talk but zero evidence as always

      Delete
    2. Patience is the first rule in this field and study, try to learn it even if you're American.

      Delete
    3. lol you bleevers are like dogs who fall for the fake ball throw every time

      Delete
    4. Speaking from the skeptic's point of view this "leak" from a discredited Russian BF promoter proves less than nothing. I say less because if this information were coming from somebody else it might carry more weight but as it comes through Burtsev and it concerns Ketchum you can see where the serious news media isn't giving this story even a minutes worth of time. If these two frauds are involved there's nothing to report. All the believers standing in line to make fools of themselves, again, would be much funnier if it wasn't so pathetic.

      Delete
    5. Well I for one trust the guy, after all he's been in the field forever and wants to make sure this gets out.

      Delete
    6. You guys need to get straight on this skepics/haters thing. Skeptics are agnostic on the existence of Bigfoot and have no dog in the fight. Haters are dead certain bigfoot is a myth and a hoax as a matter of blind faith, and come on here to flame and belittle people. Don't confuse them with skeptics. They're not.
      Skeptics are open to new information. Haters are not. Skeptics are polite. Haters are not. Skeptics are here to learn. Haters... well, you get the picture.

      Delete
  15. David Paulides is on the tree of evolutionary theory and ready to saw his branch to the ground.

    Dr.Sarmiento stated the the ape human break occurred one million years ago. After that, not much is known. What is known is that 50,000 years ago, after the ice age, mammals no longer needed large size as an adaptation to their environment. They were getting smarter and more efficient. The brain was getting larger.

    Humans of 15,000 years ago wete about 4'8" tall. It had been 200,000 years since the last giant primate. To claim that scat found on a trail in Noryh America had DNA of a race of giants is a lie.

    You made a point of today being November 23, 2012. A day that will live in Bigfoot infamy. Are you Mr. PAULIDIS going to eventually admit your part in this fraud? Or will the money you have extracted become a part of court record?

    I hope you like jail food for tjat may be it fir a long time. "Juice for cake" Has a nice ring to it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. is this "in" fighting within the bigfoot community?

      some kind of ape vs human argument?

      this bigfooting lark is getting more hilarious by the day, love it!

      Delete
    2. Woe,Fasano calling you out...wow..any rum in that cab trunk?

      Delete
    3. "Old Jim Dunn was a drunken old bum...old Jim Dunn really loved his rum."

      Delete
    4. Ha,there is some rum there...why do you walk around with popcorn bags on your feet?

      Delete
    5. The freaky cab driver has finally lost all his dimes. As far as I know Sarmiento has always said if this species exists, as many of us know it does and everybody else will soon, then it's not your precious ape it's a hominin.

      Delete
    6. The ice age ended around 12,000 years ago, not 50,000 years ago.

      Delete
  16. JESUS!

    Absolute looney toon dreamer bleevers.

    Every humans DNA is different.

    Just because some looney toon youtube researcher claims to have gathered some "DNA" with absolutely NO evidence to back up where it came from, and then that "DNA" subsequently returns a human result that is not in the database, does not then mean you have bigfoot DNA and that bigfoot is human.

    This goes beyond lunacy now.

    How can you claim to have credibility when your "very best researchers in the world" have videos on youtube where they zoom in to a black spot in the woods and claim its bigfoot.

    Absolute looney toons im afraid.

    PS Oh there he go!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You almost sound like a professional debunker, walking through their lines. Get some passion for your views please, boring!

      Delete
    2. Anony 6:26 doesn't seem to know enough about DNA. Or maybe he's a hardcore skeptic? I'm thinking both.

      Delete
    3. So what is it that makes you so credible @6:26 ?
      Why don't you wait until the results come out, and you can debate the dba professionals? (with whatever credibility you have. Do you have any other expressions besides "looney toons', Mr. Dimwit? You say "every humans dna is different", brilliant. Thankfully dna is a bit more complicated than your simplistic babblings.

      Delete
    4. Uhhhh....what are you ranting about? The whole backstory behind where the sample came from is the whole Justin Smeja "I shot 2 bigfoot" story. Or have you not been reading this blog for the last how many months????

      Delete
    5. I can't wait till a DNA specialist shuts down this nonsense

      Delete
    6. That is 1 sample and you can't even prove that sample was from whatever he claimed to shoot.

      Delete
    7. You are missing something very important. The dna is supposedly human with a nonhuman trait or mutation. So while every human is different in dna, except identical twins, we do not have nonhuman traits. There are many who have throw back genetic mutations and such, but I have never heard or seen of a human with other species dna whether known or unknown.

      So testing a piece of whatever and finding almost completely human dna with a nonhuman trait in the dna is what we have here.

      Look at it like this. A cop sees a puddle of blood and a tiny amount of tissue. Assuming someone was injured here, they call in the forensic team to start figuring out who. The forensic team discovers the blood is from something that is mostly human, but has a branch of primate dna in it. But tbe dna does not match any known human or primate pattern. So what do you have then? You have some sort of human with nonhuman traits in their dna who was injured.

      Is the case solved or closed? No, not until the injured or killed whatever is found.

      Delete
    8. Bitterness just reeks from anon 6:26's comments. LOL

      Delete
    9. And he/she is NOT a skeptic! This person's got their mind made up. That's not skepticism.

      Delete
  17. Why would any of you want so much fame for what you call a "discovery?" YOU HAVE DISCOVERED NOTHING!!! You have done nothing but confirm what Native Americans have told your people about for centuries!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sorry but nothing has been confirmed yet

      Delete
    2. We already know firewater is good...who do you think gave it to the native americans?...duh

      Delete
    3. "Okay my mistake. When it happens whether it happens soon or long later, nothing will be discovered. They will have only confirmed what the Natives told them...

      As for you rumferlife, may you some day face the horror that you put out...

      Delete
    4. Moderation my friend...people make their own "horrors"

      Delete
    5. If human, Sasquatch will be considered a type of native american.

      Delete
    6. Decedent of Cain and not your friend!

      It's blowing demonic smoke up everyones ass!

      Delete
    7. And we already know homo sapiens is not indigenous to the Americas, so, sorry... no such thing as 'Native Americans". Try "First Nations".

      Delete
  18. bigsploitation: the making and selling of bigfoot!

    ReplyDelete
  19. That thunderous sound you hear is the JRF minions running for the exits. Sayanora, suckers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well as it stands jref are still correct. This paper has been coming "soon" for 5 years now and as it stands there is no evidence for bigfoot. They will happily concede that bigfoot exists when evidence is presented and validated by the scientific method but as of yet it hasn't so put up or shut up.

      Delete
    2. Wrong JREFers make a huge sucking sound!

      Delete
    3. typical bleever logic - celebrating the announcement of a study as proof instead of waiting to read the actual CONTENT of said study

      Delete
    4. LOL Did you say wait? How hypocritical as to be expected from a cynic.

      Delete
  20. I can see it now, The new T.V. show ( Selling Bigfoot)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ (SOLD)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you think ALL the evidence ever gathered is ALL a HOAX then simple statistics tells us that YOU'RE ALL FOOLS

      Delete
    2. lots of people believe in Jesus too, and that's all a big sham.

      the plural of anecdote is not evidence. and this non peer reviewed, "white paper" is gonna come out (if ever) in some sleaze fringe journal and present simple human DNA as "proof" and the scientific community is going to laugh in her face (just like they did the 4 or 5 times they shot it down in real journals for being biased and without basis).

      It's a big con. enjoy!


      not the knower's brother in law's sister's stepuncle

      Delete
  21. Absolute bombshell first from Burtsev, then small comment from Ketchum, and Paulides statements were most welcome and I hope we learn much more soon. No one has been trash talked more in this field than Dr. Ketchum, and if what David wrote above is accurate, and he would be one of the few to know then there will be a lot of crow served soon.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This crow seems to be more elusive than bigfoot

      Delete
    2. Chuck, they have HOMO SAPIENS dna. This is very old news, and Dave here is announcing they finally found a way to package it. You see, bigfoot is now a given(above has only a tiny hint of pretense that they are proving it exists) and the big news is..bigfoot is one of us.
      Don't be a pinhead.

      Delete
    3. having a russian footer confirm your findings is like asking Bobo is Moneymaker really heard a squatch.........


      When a real scientist from a real school is talking about this to the real news, then you can start sucking each other's dorks... right now, no, just no

      Delete
    4. Right! But why be such an ass?

      Delete
  22. I will gladly eat that crow,when's that paper,next year?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Snowball, ---- Snowball, where are you Snowball???????

    Thought Id buy you lunch at the road kill cafe.

    one double crowburger with munster, and order of sweet potatoe fries with Apology sause.

    Are we going to get 15 min of you saying your sorry and how WRONG you were?

    ha ha ha ha ha oh Snowball? headshake:)

    Oh By the way Micheal, I'm with you on Dyer! You know he kept talking about going to Vegas Awhile back. You know they have all kinds of theatricl shops and masq makers in Vegas?????

    Every itme I see the tent vid, I think I'm looking at Cap'n Hook or Paul Sr. from O.C.C., only thats been cartooned. What do you want to bet Dyer got someone in vegas to make a costume or pull some other trick like a projection.

    I'm telling you Snowball, they answer to Freezer boys hoax, is in Las Vegas!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leon W, in 2008 did you think Dyer found a body until the hoax was revealed? Were you pissed off? Not trying to troll you. I was not following bigfoot back then and I learned of the claim through the print media, a day or 2 after the conference. Hence the reporter had time to get quotes from people( Moneymaker and Meldrum I think) who warned that Dyer was full of shit.

      Delete
    2. No, that was always a stupid looking frozen gorilla suit. Any time Biscardi's name is involved ---red flags go up. Even before his thing with Dyer.

      I did Bite for about a day on the Ben Matine thing.

      And I thought they had it on the Canadian widlife film, but alas, it was a guy on a quad.

      I think everyone hates being lied too, and Dyer has never really contimplated the Magnitude of what he did. People have endured years of crap from people who do not know what they are talking about. Dyer made the pile of shit 100 feet taller. I do think Dyer has now had a real personal sighting and wants to really get proof to kind of redeem himself. But when that got too hard, I think this latest deal is back at hoaxing cause he know's he can make money from it! Just my opinion.

      That is the thing to remember about this creature -------- It seems to tou or screw with us on it's own terms.

      The bible says we have Authority on all things on this planet.

      We don't win with this thing, and that is why it is NOT of this planet per say. There is way to many stories of wierd shit going down where these things are envolved. SOMETHING AIN'T RIGHT!

      Statistical anaysis says we would have had proof along time ago if it where only an APE or a MAN!

      I have seen one and had other experiences, so I'm 100 percent knower in the phenomenon, I just won't clame to know exactly what it is, so be careful my friend and don't EVER think they are harmless!

      One thing everyone needs to remember is that when you KNOW they are real (whatever), it is probably a little easier to convence oneself that a Vid is good/real, so believers get bit a little easier. But over time -------- we become the BEST at spotting fakes!

      Delete
  24. Ketchum confirms on several points, coned head glinting and glancing off timber as she propels herself vigorously through the forest.

    Good luck to all.

    ReplyDelete
  25. The paper is 2 weeks away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you related to the Fred Quimby of Woody Wood Pecker?

      Delete
  26. Without a body this issue will never be settled. Sample evidence has to be from verified "sasquatch" sources to have any relevance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dream on disbeliever, DNA is science and even with that proof you're still calling for blood? Don't worry, eventually we'll see one but let this be the start for crying out loud.

      Delete
  27. You know I hope when this report is finally released, there will be publish tracings showing that the samples used have come from more than just someone claiming they are Sasquatch in origin? If not I fail to see how anything beyond "UNKNOWN" can be achieved? As there is no Sasquatch confirmed DNA to compare with. However if they do have such evidence then that will be great. I have never really understood people arguing human vs ape, since in an anthropological seance we humans are apes. I have personally always tended to agree with the Gigantopithecus theory since that to me made the most sense. But I could be wrong there and if proven wrong, great at least we are a step closer to confirming the creatures existence which to me has been the main goal for the last 34 years. Who cares what they are as long as we can prove that they are there.

    Thomas Steenburg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We're animals too sure but we label ourselves humans, because of our intelligence, we'll have to do this here too eventually. Sounds like you've been wrong for a very long time, I like your books but the creature and Giganto angle just isn't that realistic anymore is it. Theoretically speaking, the odds this species is a nonhuman primate great ape is very slim as such an animal undoutedly would've been cought ages ago, thinking logically about this it makes a whole lot more sense for this to be some type of man that got away given that there's speech and other humanlike signs such as flat feet, upright and facial features.

      Delete
  28. I'm glad that we're going to actually read this study. But I still call BS on the whole NDA bull crap.

    "In the technology world, silence about projects is routine, expected and is part of the landscape."

    Yes this is true. But there is a competitive business reason for this. Tech moves at the speed of light, and the only way tech companies like Apple and Samsung stay competitive is to outpace their competitors, while keeping their product development plans secret from their competitors until their product is ready to hit the market.

    As for Bigfoot DNA research. I highly doubt that sharing information is going to damage anything or even give your nonexistent competition a leg up on your testing. The only risk is communicating less than accurate information at any given time. So please spare us the holier than though higher standard attitude.

    I don't mind the higher standard of study, but don't try to use another completely unrelated field and it's competitive practices as an excuse to keep things hush hush.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Try again, the drunk Russian says in his new statement the paper will not be published.

      Delete
  29. The difference between amateur and professional:

    On one hand, Ketchum's project is completely exposed and has suffered leaks all along about the findings, her personality issues, people quitting or getting booted, etc. Everyone knows all about it despite NDA's and attempts at control and secrecy. Attention-seeking behavior has been pervasive. Today's announcements break the rules of peer review that we have heard about for almost two years now.

    On the other hand, Sykes' project is open, with no NDA's. Yet, no one knows anything about it past what has been released.

    Think about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yea think about it. Its alot easier to talk shit about a NOT world renowned scientist like Ketchum.

      Delete
    2. If Ketchum is "world renowned" is isn't in a very positive light. I think you would do well not to place so much faith in either her ability or honesty. At least until her evidence is produced and other scientists, ones with serious credentials and clean records, take a look at it and sign off on the result.

      Delete
    3. I have to agree,.. My Father was instrumental in all of these DNA studies, financing,. gathering samples, analyzing the DNA findings,.. MORE SO than Ketchum herself which is why she shoved him aside and tried to make others in group "silent" so she could find the right time to take the findings ( that MY FATHER was responsible for) public and try to appear that it was all her doing. Sorry,.. Melba is a joke and those who worked with her know it...

      Delete
  30. How can you determinate chronological data from DNA ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can't. I've worked in a lab doing some DNA. You have to have a body, you have to have a comparison.

      There are no sasquatch to do comparison. It is and will always be "unknown" DNA.
      until you have a specimen.

      Mr. Pooper

      Delete
    2. They can determine when a certain mutation or trait appeared in human dna. Let's say humans 25,000 years ago had a mutation the appeared for tbe first time during that time period. Then let's say humans at the 15,000 year mark have another mutation that appears at that time mark. Now, they test some dna and find it has the first mutation but not the second. So it falls somewhere in between. That is how they can determine chronological data.

      Delete
    3. They can, it is determined through the mothers side of DNA. this is why we know we had a "choke" point about 12k years ago. About the same time as the flood!!!

      Funny, it was also to get rid of these ----------- "MUTANTS"

      Bfoots ain't the worst. Wait tell the "Predator" creatures show up! There is stories that the military found these in Iraq. They also have a couple skulls from S. America that looks a little like a skull from the "Alien" CREATURE ----------------- OH SHIT!

      Delete
  31. does this mean that justin killed two humans?if it did will he be tried for murder?

    ReplyDelete
  32. "It is human like us only different"
    Ridiculous. If it is different than us, it is NOT us.
    Stupid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No it's not ridiculous you just don't understand it, people always ridicule what they don't understand. it's simply a different human species, obviously they're not our own species but some other.

      Delete
  33. When they confirm bigfoot and release the photos I'll have to work on the house or something...maybe ghost hunting or ufo,who knows?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. rumfer, whenever you want to see good videos and photos of the big guy you let me know, I have lots of footage. Half the World is rockin'!

      Delete
  34. Half the world tries to be the other half

    ReplyDelete
  35. So WHERE did this thing come from to begin with?

    ReplyDelete
  36. I've started a topic about this in the Bigfoot Evidence Forum...Come over and debate this, all I ask it to please remain civil. We will also be having a live chat tonight at 10 pm EST. (11/25/12)

    http://bigfoot.forumotion.com/

    ReplyDelete
  37. Omfg stfu people! Your opinions mean nothing!

    ReplyDelete
  38. Bart Cutino told me he thought she's been a fraud from the beginning and I didn't agree with him at first because it seemed to big. Now I'm starting to think he was right.

    ReplyDelete
  39. When I get a rifle and start blowing them sucka's away, I will aim for the animal part. I won't shoot them in any part that looks human. Are you tree hugger/PETA felons happy now?

    ReplyDelete
  40. How can a bigfoot be a human / ape hybrid when humans and apes don't have the same number of chromosomes?

    ReplyDelete
  41. How can a bigfoot be a human / ape hybrid when humans and apes don't have the same number of chromosomes?

    ReplyDelete
  42. There are a number of statements that make me wonder. He says other scientists clamed contamination but Ketchum soldiered on. Was it contaminated? And how was that contamination handled? And what new method was used to "unlock" the DNA? That might be of immense interest in itself since degraded DNA is useless. Personally, I find this hard to believe. How could an male ape impregnate a human female and have a viable offspring? Usually if you even manage such hybrids the offspring are sterile. And considering how large a bigfoot is, how did the fetus find room in a human uterus, not to mention manage to get out the vagina? And assuming all that happened, what did this offspring mate with to continue the species? None of this seems to be possible biologically, which means all this is a hoax or the creature was genetically engineered. Perhaps if there is a paper it will address these issues.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Its true in the past a prehuman and another prehuman type mated this turned into big foot over thousands of years NO GOD NEEDED ! JUST HORNY APES!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  44. I am not capable of see this web site correctly on my cellphone :(

    Feel free to surf to my web blog; having trouble getting Pregnant the Third time

    ReplyDelete
  45. I've been browsing online more than 4 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the net will be much more useful than ever before.

    Also visit my homepage :: http://pornharvest.com/index.php?q=nubiles+whitney&f=a&p=s

    ReplyDelete
  46. Excellent website. Lots of useful information here.

    I'm sending it to several pals ans also sharing in delicious. And naturally, thank you for your effort!

    My page: Click Here

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Human Bait Needed?

Ketchum's Publicist Speaks Out Regarding "Rejected" Bigfoot DNA Paper