Ro Sahebi: Sierra Kills Documentary Coming In 2013


Film producer Ro Sahebi has done an amazing job documenting the Sierra Kills story. He has already made multiple trips to the "kill site"-- the place where two Bigfoots were allegedly shot by a bear hunter named Justin Smeja. Sahebi tells us things are coming along as planned, and there are still plenty of interviews with experts to be done. His interviews includes people like Dr. Jeff Meldrum, Justin Smeja, "The Driver", Bart Cutino, and James Bobo Fay (from Finding Bigfoot).

The Bigfoot Discovery Museum V event coming up in October 20th is one event he said he will not miss. According to Bigfoot Discovery museum curator Mike Rugg, Bill Munns and Bart Cutino are scheduled to speak at the event.

Sahebi recently announced on Facebook that the Sierra Kills documentary should be out by next year:
Sierra Kills documentary won't be out until sometime in 2013 everybody, but I may have a screening in January. In the meantime, I'm gonna release a 2 minute clip within the next couple weeks... after the Stubstad video that is.

Here's a film clip he released a few months ago: "Justin Smeja's Polygraph Examination Video"

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Release the DNA test results, if they arent finished yet you need to seek a new LAB.

      Delete
  2. The Knower here.

    New source tells me that Gimlin is actually preparing an apology/statement, as, he has now found out who has the suit, and knows the jigg is up. He also is contemplating a book deal in which he details the hoax, and how it changed his life.

    Look for the suit to be exposed in a 17 week period. I wish i could offer more info but thats all my source can give me.

    Best Wishes
    The Knower

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The knower has no interest in Bigfoot. Just on here to listen to himself talk. Loves the spotlight. Loves controversy . Single non-married egotistical jerk to everyone around him, and just hopes Shaun has an article on him someday. Everything he says is bullshit and a lie. Heck by me just writing this gives him a rice grain rise in his Levis!

      Delete
    2. The Knower here.

      You sure i'm wrong?

      What if... This is the truth? The most amazing hoax in history, and i'm on here telling you all about it.

      If you choose to be a skoftic, that's fine.

      But i KNOW...

      Best,
      The Knower

      Delete
    3. The knower doesn't know squat!

      Delete
    4. It's Robert Lindsay, He is not a knower--- he is an idiot!

      Delete
    5. Gimlin finally comes clean, it's about time. I wonder if the film outtakes will also be made available. Many of these believers are going to need to see them to be convinced and even then some will still deny. They'll scream government cover-up. I was in on the whole Grable film (Michigan dogman) debunking on the David Icke forum and MonsterQuest and that is what happened. The hoaxer, Mike Agrusa, showed how he faked the footage but was not believed by some, especially S.O.L. The forum archives are still there if you're interested in the whole saga. It was epic. That's why I'm here, waiting for the shitstorm. :)

      And for the yucks.

      Delete
    6. Yup heard the same thing. Thought it was bogus until you said this.

      Delete
    7. The Knower here.

      From what iv'e heard, there IS lots of extra unseen footage kept by Patricia Patterson. She will NEVER release it because it shows SUIT.

      However, there ARE some photos that will be released along side Kitakazes FULL DISCLOSURE, that, besides WHO had the suit, an apology from Bob already prepared and his potentiall book deal, plus the actual suit itself.


      This is NOT speculation. Except the Bob part. He IS preparing himself and has been made aware the cats out the bag, and inquiries have been made as to how to PROFIT from exposure, so my sources tell me.


      Ps, to the person who thought I was Robert Lindsay, you really are borderline footdarded.

      Best Wishes
      The Knower

      Delete
    8. The Enlightener,

      The Knower is just a Blower.

      Believe what The Urinal has to say.

      That is all,
      The Enlightener,

      Delete
    9. Roger did plan on making a documentary, so one would expect that other footage exists. To be fair, however, it was once thought reel one was kept from view because of some smoking gun, but it turned out to be just cowboys riding around.
      Roger did not want it out at the time, probably because then he would have had to tell already skeptical scientists that he was previously shooting a fictional Bigfoot movie. it would not have been helpful, and he was right.

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. The Knower here.

      I only seek to help the Bigfoot community. By releasing news of hoaxes, you can better find any real bigfeetz that are out there.

      Yours in Footinz
      The Knower

      Delete
    2. And we're supposed to believe you why? Do you have any other hobbies you can afford? The PG film is solid, and so is Bob Gimlin. Let me guess, we have to put up with your childish "news" for 17 more weeks? Shawn, please save your website (and us) from this. Unless you clean up this website, it will become extremely irrelevant by years end, when Sykes DNA study comes out. We'll just navigate to where there is actually intelligent non-anonymous input. Save your site (and income stream.)


















      Delete
    3. Sykes DNA study. LOL. Want to bet that it never comes out. LOL. This is the type of believer that will never open his eyes to the truth. It's a gubment conspiracy, he'll scream. And throw major tantrums, tell people how to run their blogs and use spacing to try and keep their comments away from others. Don't worry, baby, run to Mommy, she'll help you build the wall.

      Delete
    4. Anon 7:38 your a tard ! You are the mommas boy!

      Delete
    5. That's all you got. Sad. By the way, it's "you're" not "your" in that context. I swear, schooling foottards can be exhausting.

      Delete
    6. The Sykes study is a lock. The only question is as to what samples will be included. It is certainly possible that nothing from NA made it pass the screening process, but at the very least some old yeti samples that were kept in a European museum will be used.

      Delete
    7. If your trying to correct grammar on the Internet then your a big loser! Gimme a break! Anon auto correct and lingo is used all the time and sometimes auto correct switches shit on people. So get over it you freakin grammar nazi anon 12:10. Your trying to correct the worlds grammar and change people's view on Bigfoot? You must like banging your thick skull against the wall. What a waste of time ! This was a waste of time typing this!

      Delete
    8. You still fucked up on "you're" (twice). And you are straining with all your might to get it right. Don't give yourself an aneurysm. You're such a moron.

      Delete
    9. Your the one bent out of shape asshole! Grammar ass!

      Delete
    10. Didn't fuck up! It's a way to type faster moron. U still know what someone is saying so shut up!

      Delete
    11. Anon 5:36 is definitely not married! No woman would live with an asshole who corrects people all the time !

      Delete
    12. Difference between you and I is that you lose sleep at night worrying about Spelling errors and I couldn't give a shit.

      Delete
    13. Amen! Fuck the spelling Nazi!

      Delete
  4. Stubstab vid out in a couple of weeks, should be interesting. Won't hold the breath though as a couple of weeks in bigfootery can be a hell of a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What's the results of the DNA? You guys have the results by now. What happened to complete transparency?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or better yet, what did they find at the kill site, a skull perhaps?

      Delete
    2. No bones. Unicorns and fairies eat Bigfoot bones, don't ya know.

      Delete
    3. I heard the researchers involved with the Sierras testing promise transparency both in person (bart) and online when everything was completed with no updates (if i recall) to prevent rumors and that's what I'll hold them to personally. I doubt and would hope they aren't concerned with what's likely one anon commenter on this blog agreeing with themselves. If i was getting dna tested on my own dime and time and nameless nobody internet trolls were questioning how long it's taking, I'd simply ignore them, but....I'm not

      Delete
  6. Hate to say it, but Smeja comes off a little faggy these days. He sounded tough in is first interviews.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow! Name calling is immature and your post really reflects on you - not Justin Smeja. Didn't your mammal teach you better?

      Delete
    2. Yeah, you shot your mouth off and now your mammal is going to show you what that hole is for.

      Delete
  7. Part 2 was supposed to be done in August.
    More hemming and hawing because there is nothing to it all.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Its funny how all these people are being dragged in this hoax..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And your evidence it's a hoax? None -then shut up moron!

      Delete
    2. I got no evidence that you weren't birthed out of an elephant's taterhole either. But that's not the way that I'm betting it.

      Delete
    3. Stupid comeback ! What a moron.

      Delete
    4. Anon 12:17 ! Use a example that is real and not impossible. Makes you look stupid! Can't win any arguments with stupid shit like that. I'm going with some Bigfoot evidence vs no shit from you!

      Delete
    5. Some Bigfoot evidence, Hurr Durr, is the same as no evidence.

      Delete
    6. Just like your mommas paternity suit . What the hell is Hurr Durr? Moron!

      Delete
  9. This band new Chevy with a lift kit would look a hell of a lot better with you up in it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's really the bottom line isn't it. This story sounds legit to me

      Delete
    2. No question on this one. Its the real deal folks

      Delete
    3. Is it looneytoons approved?

      Delete
    4. ^^^^^Looney toons' taterhole.^^^^^

      Delete
  10. Now you know why polygraph tests are not admissible in a court of law. It's because they're a crock. See you can learn something new everyday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yea like how fucking stupid you are that's why a you fail one and your ass goes to Jail sure they will say its not admissible but if he failed it everyone would be saying I told you so !!! Here's somthing New for ya "get a life"

      Delete
    2. Relax, Hurr Durr, let's review. No defendant or witness is required to take a polygraph test in the United States. Many "guilty" people have passed polgraph tests such as spies Aldrich Ames, Karl Koecher, Ana Belen Montes and Leandro Aragoncillo. Gary Ridgway, the "Green River Killer" passed one as well. A man named Bill Wegerle failed a polygraph test twice involving the murder of his wife. It was later revealed that she was killed by Dennis Rader, the BTK killer, not Mr. Wegerle. So you don't get thrown in jail for failing a polygraph, they are unreliable. As for me being "fucking stupid", I'd like to point out that, at least, I am familiar with basic sentence structure and use of periods and commas. I also know which words require capitalization. Lastly, I much prefer my life to yours, Hurr Durr, far less frothing at the mouth. :)

      Delete
    3. But yet you say hurr durr and capitalize it.
      What a crock of dumb ass.

      Delete
    4. You are Hurr Durr, it is the title I am giving you, thus it is to be capitalized.

      Just interested, did you graduate from high school? grade school?

      Delete
    5. I guess you can say I graduated from your Mom to your sister.

      Delete
    6. "Could" not "can". What a moron.

      Delete
    7. who is the moron crock of dumb ass

      Delete
    8. I'm sorry you just now learned about your mom and your sister getting porked in the butt by Hurr Durr himself

      Delete
    9. Who is the moron crock of dumb ass? That would be you, Hurr Durr. By the way, I have no sister and my mother has been deceased for thirty years. So if you're sodomizing her, it must be one heck of a stench. Probably beats those poor sheep that are your usual fare. Knock yourself out. LOL.

      Delete
    10. Wow good one crock of dumb ass

      Delete
  11. No dna... let's see the body before it completely decompose...can't leave it in that freezer forever.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Release the DNA or stfu about this stupid story

    ReplyDelete
  13. X 100 this is not transparency Bart

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What an idiot, this is Ro Saheebi's doc, bart said repeatedly that when they get final lab reports there will be transparency. As far as i know those are not completed as if you paid attention those guys said they started only about 4-5 months ago. Get factS straight jackass

      Delete
    2. There's no logical reason for any lab to need 4 to 5 months to identify an animal. 3 weeks is most typical. The tests them self take only a few days

      Delete
  14. Actually.....

    Anon 2:26 is correct as it was made very clear when announced by Bart several months back on Jeff/Alex Hearn's show I believe, that they had just recently started and didn't anticipate results anytime soon. To say there's no logical reason for any labs to take four or five months or much more, is utter ignorance on your part and the the longer it takes might just be a good sign. We can only hope!

    It's very irritating when I see some researchers attempt to do the right things with no guarantees or promises on time and some anonymous jerks behind their computers act as if they are entitled to info asap.

    Besides, Cutino also said that *all* email communications with labs will be shared publicly and those emails will have dates on them. so there will be some splaining to do if those dates don't jive. if that happens then go cry and complain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Honest question. I thought science was at a point where entire genomes of previously unknown animals could be mapped in under a month. I know I read that somewhere, just don't know if it's factual.

      Delete
    2. K, that's what I thought.

      Delete
  15. This is just like the Ketchum study. Big announcement. Set expectations high. Speak with confedence. Then nothing. Silence.... stalling is all they are doing now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep... sell a few more books, dvds and 'expeditions' while the gettin' is good.

      Delete
    2. A year from now it will be same shit different phony evidence. Scams, hoax, and dumbass eating it up with a spoon!

      Delete
  16. Hmmmm, sorry, i don't see those guys your referring to selling anything of the sort, nor did they set any high expectations or make promises about evidence itself like ketchum and all her minions. Completely the opposite as it makes me curious and concerned why they seemed to downplay the evidence if anything.
    JT

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think knowing the DNA results will probably ruin the ending of Ro's movie or possibly make it anti-climactic. Which I think we all know what the results of the DNA from Sierra Kills will show. Though, I hope I'm wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I dont think Ro's doc was dependent on dna results as that wasn't part of how bart, tyler and justin were sharing that stuff anyways? Am i missing something?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correct, not dependent at all, but releasing that the DNA results are a coyote or human is surely going to dampen the excitement for the movie.

      Pure speculation but I think once they got the DNA evidence back from the lab the direction of the documentary went in a totally different direction. But will probably make it a more interesting documentary about the wackiness of the Bigfoot world and the desire for it to be real overshadowing logic and reality.

      Delete
    2. Wanted to add I believe in BF just not the Sierra Kills.

      Delete
    3. 1242. Your far off bra. Not even close

      Delete
  19. 2013?! that sucks!!! thought it would be finished in august RO?!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Everyone is All impatient now because the joke that is ketchum made all these promises. I hope the researchers involved in sierra kills invest. Ignore this crap and remain prudent and wise in evid handling

    ReplyDelete
  21. This attitude doesn't how to get a girlfriend fast, because it can cause a lot of pick up lines are the ones who are suffering because of the fact that she lives literally down the street from Mike's house still.

    Ask the western man, if you really want to discover the best techniques to make your move
    on her.

    my web site - homepage

    ReplyDelete
  22. Someone please help me define How To Attract
    A Women. These scents like those filled with pheromones have
    been proven to be very attractive. How could you feel confident if you
    are on another date.

    Take a look at my weblog: how to attract women

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?