100-Million-Year-Old Spider Attack Found In Amber


Editor's Note: This is a post by Bigfoot Evidence contributor M. Strudwick, a Sasquatch enthusiast.

A piece of amber found in a Burmese mine dating between 97 million to 110 million years old, froze a moment in time, capturing several now extinct species of insects.

"This juvenile spider was going to make a meal out of a tiny parasitic wasp, but never quite got to it," George Poinar, Jr., a zoology professor at Oregon State University, said in a statement.

High Resolution
Researchers have found trapped in amber a rare dinosaur-age scene of a spider attacking a wasp caught in its web.

[via Discovery News]

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. and I like Bigfoot, let's stay on topic you guys. This isn't Spider Evidence or Turtle Evidence or Booby Evidence or Goose Hunting Evidence or Big Booty Evidence, this is Bigfoot Evidence.

      Delete
    2. yes and there is no bigfoot or real evidence of them so there really is no topic

      Delete
    3. Am I not turtley enough for the turtle club. Turtle, turtle, turtle.

      Delete
  2. The Knower here,

    Pretty cool! Thanks for sharing.

    Best Wishes
    The Knower

    ReplyDelete
  3. Finally! Real Evidence!!!

    Sarcasm implied.

    Please stop.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The chick is hot. I'd like to suck a fart out of her ass and hold it like a bong hit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's mildly disturbing.

      Delete
    2. EWWWW, that's as bad as wanting to drink diarrhea.

      Delete
    3. @5:35 Yup, I'd take a blast of that ass too.

      Delete
    4. Anyone remember Mellony the eriduserpant? Well Ms. Strudwick, and the eriduserpant are the same person! Not hot, just a sad old lady!

      Delete
  5. Dating anything past a couple thousand years is a farce - all the techniques are flawed and presumptious, but the sheeple never question anything anymore

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Finally! Someone who really gets science! I have been shouting this for years! Stupid scientists with their theories and methods. It's all right there in the Bible guys! The earth is only 3000 years old after all.

      Sarcasm implied.

      Shoot yourself in the face already.

      Delete
    2. Did he say anything about the bible? I too think that dating that far back is flawed. Has nothing to do with the bible, period. Sconce is wrong constantly....they continually force ideas on you and then have no.problems changing their tune and going another direction. To think dating things supposedly 100's of millions years old can't be flawed is just stupid.

      Delete
    3. @ 6:12 anon

      garbageman huh?

      Delete
    4. ^ I understand your argument, I just think you are an idiot. Even if off by millions of years it doesn't make any difference in the lifeline of this planet. They can narrow it down to an age of the earth, it isn't as iff they are saying the amber is exactly 97 million years or exactly 110 million years, they are giving it a span of THTHIRTEEN FUCKING MILLION YEARS douchebags. Exactly how accurate do you want it? I concede that the sample would have degraded at a different rate dependent on any number of factors, but just add another 50 million years either way and these measurements, even if off, still come out accurate in the whole scheme of things. I'm so sick of this new trend in the U.S. to shit all over science, what is the point to make yourself feel smarter? Because it definitely doesn't sound that way even if you feel it.

      Delete
  6. SAY THIS IS A SPIDER ATTACK IS LIKE SAYING BIGFOOT IS REAL.THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THE SPIDER WAS ATTACKING THE WASP.THE SPIDER COULD HAVE BEEN TRAPPED MONTHS OR YEARS LATER.SAME AS BIGFOOT THERE IS NO PROOF.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. there is proof of bf,but only in fairytales.lol

      Delete
    2. ^ then why are you reading articles and commenting on a site called Bigfoot Evidence? Asshat closet cases.

      Delete
    3. i love to see the hoaxs.horsecumsucker

      Delete
    4. Extra-extra slow day at the MIB office today.

      Delete
    5. Actually while i agree that there is no proof that the spider was attacking the bug.
      I actually think they loved each other very much.
      Your wild accusation that there is no proof of bigfoot is ridiculous!
      Do some research before you make outlandish comments.

      Delete
  7. Well it just goes to show...what, I'm not sure, but it's sure showing it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Or the parasitic wasp was about to sting and lay an egg on the spider to provide fresh nourishment for it's young.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?