This Mangy Bear Looks a Lot Like The "Jacobs Creature"
Check out this Bald Black Bear (Demodicosis or Mange) filmed by a Florida couple. Strange looking isn’t it? If that thing was standing up and I didn't know any better, I would probably think it's Bigfoot. We're not saying the "Jacobs" creature isn't a Bigfoot, we're just saying the mangy bear would look a lot like it if it was standing up.
[Thanks, Ro Sahebi]
Looks nothing like the Jacob Creature!
ReplyDeleteIndeed, like that poor bear this socalled bigfoot blog is becoming a joke of its former self and a true wannabe debunking site. Possibly where it always wanted to be, one big fake.
DeleteJacobs creature is a bear you two dumb fucs!
Deleteyes yes it is.
DeleteJacobs creature is simply a smaller mangy bear.
DeleteWrong dudes, Jacobs subject is no bear but a young squatch.
DeleteWe are right dudes its a fucing bear you douche!
DeleteDamn he has a big set of huevos.
ReplyDeleteMine look bigger when there isn't any hair on them
DeleteWhat, your ears?
DeleteWe're talking about eggs, like the ones you were sucking last night.
Deletewhy is there any debate over the Jacob's creature? Its clearly a bear. I wish someone with better computer skills than me could highlight the bears eyes and snout. Its looking directly at the camera.
ReplyDeleteThere's obviously debate because the Jacobs subject is not a bear but a juvenile squatch.
DeleteJacobs creature = bear you fuctard!
Delete^^^^ juvenile sasquach.. Filmed seconds after juvenile bears the same exact size. Face it. It was a mangy bear cub.
Delete1:58 you numb nutted idiot!
DeleteToo bad trolls, but the only thing the Jacobs subject's not is a bear. All the signs of a primate.
Deleteyou are a fool and would believe anything. For those of you who can't come up with an intellictual debat and resort to cursing and name calling: this proves my point. The Jacobs photo has been analyzed and limb to body ratios have proven that it is impossible for the creature to be a bear. I know, I know, the science is a lie, the person who did the study is a fool, everyone is bleevers, ya-da, ya-da, ya-da.
DeleteAnonymous 5:40 you are a fuctard and need to quit BF research if you think the those photos show a sasquatch. BTW YOU ARE THE FOOL!
DeleteBare bear bares it all
ReplyDeleteNO, no it doesnt
ReplyDeletehow does Dogman start a fire?
ReplyDeleteby scratching its crotch
We all know that the body proportions of a Bear and the Jacobs creature don't match, so it's not a bear .its what it is and thats a Juve Sasquatch.
ReplyDeleteNot WE. I think (as many others seem to) it's nothing more than a bear in an odd pose. Don't speak for others.
DeleteJacobs creature = bear you fuctard!
Deletefurry giant is a dufus, its a bear.
DeleteFury Giant, the Jacobs creature is your hairy & mangy ballsack.
DeleteFury Giant is right this anon fucktards are losers, how on earth does a bear have such long arms, like really that is a juvenile sasquatch i agree
DeleteDefinitely, young bigfoot in those Jacobs pics no doubt.
Deletethat's because the Jacob pics are of a young, mangy, black bear, as evidenced by the young bears in the pictures just before the famous "Jacob Photo" that all you idiots think is a BF.
ReplyDelete^Jrefer clost bleever checking Bigfoot sites.
Deleteabsolutely
DeleteYeah, the Jacobs object is clearly a young bigfoot. Case closed.
Deletesays a celuded boob. BEAR!
DeleteYou may see yourself as a bear of a man, lacking in brains though, but the figure in the Jacobs photos surely is not one instead it's a sasquatch.
DeleteHonestly, I am a very level headed person. To say the bear in this article looks like the Jacobs photo is WAY off base. To say the Jacobs photo looks anything like a bear is a complete joke. The subject above who stated that the bear cubs in the trail cam photos prior to the Jacobs photo proves the point. There is absolutely no resemblance to the Jacobs creature and the bear cubs. The logs are arms look very human. Maybe a chimp, no way a bear. I could care less about mange, or whatever. The extremeties of the creature do not remotely match those of a bear. Those of you who say they do have obviously never seen a bear in the woods, in a zoo, etc. You are either blind or simply refusing to acknowledge the obvious. Note that I have never claimed the photo is of a juvenile sasquatch, only that it is no way a bear. I personally think that if it isn't a chimp, then it is a baby gorilla or a sasquatch.
DeleteANONYMOUS 7:32 YOU ARE A FUCTARD!
DeleteLooks like Fatsano is back out doing some Skunkape research. I guess the people recording it doesn't know what Fatsano looks like and they think they're filming a bear with mange.
ReplyDeleteUh.. no..
ReplyDeleteNothing like what is viewed in the Jacobs photo's.
I take that back.. they both have dark hair.
1%
Fuzzy Wuzzy was bear, Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair...
ReplyDeleteThe people who argue that the Jacobs bear is a Sasquatch wouldn't change their views if the actual animal was placed in front of them. They are set in their ways, and some pretty irrational about the situation. We have much more to compare and prove it's a bear , than a juvebile sasquatch. The fantasy surrounding bigfoot lately has grown tremendously.
ReplyDeleteShut up Randi spanker and beat it, you're so stuck up you'll even deny your own impotency.
DeleteYeah, Randi spanker, Bigfoot, Jesus, mangy bears, Moses, mangy Moses, whatever. We want to grovel in front of our gods. So piss off.
DeleteWhat are its limb to torso ratios? Bet they are not in the hominid ballpark.
ReplyDeleteWhich one, this or Jacobs? This is a bear the other a Sasquatch.
DeleteJacobs creature = bear you fuctard!
DeleteOhhh mr FTard . Nice language freak!
DeleteIn your head only, anon 2:56.
DeletePoor little simple minded fool at 2:56 can't come up with any two or three syllable words so they have to resort to their baby/infant cursing fits. Go back to JREF fool.
DeleteANONYMOUS 6:03 ITS NOT LANGUAGE DUDE ITS A TYPED STATEMENT YOU ARE A DUMBASS.
DeleteANONYMOUS 7:35 I BANGED YOUR MOM AND SHE COULDNT SAY AN YWORDS WITH MY JOHNSON IN HER MOUTH!
Shoot that F*ck*r. Do the population a favor.
ReplyDeleteI have always been of the opinion that the "smoking gun" was all the bears present before, during and after the main photo. It seems odd to assume it's a squatch instead a bear when there are, you know, bears everywhere...
ReplyDeleteSo Hill Billy, when the owner of the camera come to check his photos or change out the feeder, do we assume that the trail cam photo of him is a bear too? No, we look at the arms, the legs, the head, and say, huh, thats a man, not a bear. Same scenario here.
DeleteHill Billy-Stank Ape-Mr.Bigfoot=JACKASS!!!!!
DeleteFunny how both of those videos are very very clear.
ReplyDeleteThe Jacobs photo is not a sasquatch.
I,like you am still waiting for a clear photo or video of a Bigfoot and don't even start with the PGF crap because thats a hoax.Every other Animal can be recorded clearly but not bigfoot.Why is that?
Of course its not a Sasquatch. Blurry photos are the ONLY reason Bigfoot exists. It IS the ONLY way the fairy tale can be kept alive. Its no coincidence that ALL of the supposed evidence of this mythical beast is blurry blobsquatch pareidolia or a man in a suit.
DeleteGive it up commissioned cynics, you know they exist and prove so by you very troll presence. Now buzz.
DeleteI don't understand how people can't see the bear head/face in the photo that people think is bigfoot trying to do a head stand. The bear is looking right at the camera. The bear face is where the bigfoots left shoulder blade would be (if you think its a bigfoot)
ReplyDeleteAnon@2:07-He's talking about his mother in their family portrait.
DeleteThe cryptid (that I believe exists) is called bigfoot. Why is this cryptid called bigfoot. It is because its feet closely resemble those of a human foot, only typically much larger in size. Think of many of the casts of bigfoot footprints that you have seen.
ReplyDeleteNow, objectively look at the feet of the Jacobs Creature. Those feet look NOTHING!!! like a human/bigfoot foot. The cryptid is called bigfoot, not bearfoot.
The Jacobs creature is a bear. If you still want to believe that it's not, you are entirely ignoring the feet of the creature.
If you're objective, the case is closed on the Jacobs Creature. It is NOT a bigfoot.
Sorry there man, but without a doubt the Jacobs photos show a small bigfoot with all those typical characteristics so all that bear talk from you guys is laughably primitive and fooling no one.
DeleteAnonymous 2:14 you probably think that every photo on the internet of a bigfoot it real. The feet (or lack there of) are actually the paws of a bear. You are a douche bag!
DeleteYes,Yes, I see, but the beara canis have the midtarsal break so prevalent in the walking apparatus?
ReplyDeletethat is the classic bigfoot that is reported. a bear the number 1 sighting are people in gorilla suits. let me fess up. 20 yrs ago i was with some fellow high school students and one of them had a gorilla suit he put it on and walked out into the yard. immediately a yard full of kids that once went into hi panic mode running into each trying to get into the house. i haven't laugh so hard since then. i'm sure those are probably some of todays researchers trying to answer what was that.
ReplyDeleteLol +1
DeleteYour a dork. Kids! What about hunters , law enforcement, DNR, and biologists that know what they are looking at! You have a shallow knowledge on this subject. 98 percent of average people would pick out a cheesy Gorilla suit (not kids). Maybe u were fooled by the funny gorilla suit and was crying like a baby! Waaaaaaa!
DeleteWaaaaaaaaaaaa! Suck suck ( that's u sucking your thumb u freak anon 3:58)
DeleteRight, obviously the suburbinite above thinks that "kids" can reason and recognize forest creatures w/o bias as well as a Game Warden, Lawyer, State Trooper, Doctor, etc. Get some since.
Deletei think he meant todays adult researchers experience a "bigfoot" sighting as a kid.
DeleteI used to think that the Jacobs creature just might be a Squatch but after I came across a pic of a bear with mange from almost the same angle as one of the pics in the Jacobs photographs I changed my mind and now I am thoroughly convinced its a bear.
ReplyDeleteI just can't believe people like Meldrum are dumb enough to say things before they thoroughly look into it. Yeah, sure the proportions do not look bear like but if you still won't move from that statement once you see a bear stricken with mange (just not fully bald yet) then you're just not as smart as you think you are.
I don't know if Meldrum has moved from that statement or not BUT if he has seen a pic of a younger bear with mange from a rear angle and still won't acknowledge that the Jacobs photographs could after all be.a.bear then he has lost all credibility with me. I'm sure others would feel the same way as well.
Furthermore, looking closely as you can at the feet, they look very much bear like. They're sure as hell NOT Bigfoot like.
DeleteMust be a pretty demeaning job for you back room Intelligence boys this reduced and shitty bigfooting keyboard stint, having to only troll about here while watching your better payed colleagues out in the action fields having all the real fun.
DeleteThat poor bear. He he was minding his own business, eating left over jello and beers from spring break and those horrible vicious college kids shaved him AND his business after he passed out. Now he has to wait for the fur to grow back and blend into the mohawk they gave him, all the while worrying that his sac will freeze if it gets cold this winter. Damn punk college kids. But on a serious note, this bear is close to the Jacob's creature, but when he drinks from the pond and pulls up his rump, the ratios are too far off. I have doubts now about the Jacob creature but not big ones.
ReplyDeleteThere are no doubts. Look at the feet. It's NOT a big foot of a bigfoot.
DeleteThe Jacobs squatch is not fully grown. Duh.
DeleteHow come a paprazzi can get 200 pictures of princess Kates tits from over half a mile away and we can't get a good clear photo of a bigfoot?
ReplyDeletePaparazzi is afraid of the woods. Too many bigfoot and bears hiding behind all those trees. Plus those trees prevent long range photo shooting. But you have a good point.
DeleteBecause the poparrazi use $20-30k Cameras and sit and focus for an hour and have an idea where their subject is ahead of time. Not quite like your average Jo with a 35mm or cel phone camera shooting objects by surprise and in wooded or dark settings! Use your brain and think!
DeleteThe paparrazi generally don't have the blurring lens in their camera bag.
DeleteThree Best things in the World for me now:]:]:]:]:]:]:]
ReplyDelete1. Shawn------My boyfriend!
2. bigfootevidence. com--the best bigfoot site！
3. the video above---- the most ironical and interesting video I think:]:]:]:]:]:]:]:]:]
Bob hieronimous has fooled you all again in his mange bear suit.
ReplyDeleteLOL. Didn't he pass a lie detector test on the mangey bear costume?
DeleteNo, he faked it.
DeleteBig foot will often disguise themselves as bears so they can sneak in and steal the bears food.....bears will often disguise themselves as big foot and don little hats and ties and thus walking erect on two feet will successfully steal picanic baskets and goodies from a shocked human race.The famous Ranger Smith has documented this fact
ReplyDeleteThe ranger isn't going to like it.
Delete-Boo Boo Bear
Heed..why not make up a name and stop being lazy?,
ReplyDeleteit is what it aint.
ReplyDeletewhat? you mean the jacob's creature is finally a bear? after all this time now its a bear? no no, i think the naked bear is a bigfoot acting like a bear, and he fooled you guys. see, you guys are so easily swayed.
ReplyDeleteNegative, finally confirmed squatchy.
DeleteSally here,
ReplyDeleteConical head, confirmed! This is the real deal folks!
^Stank Ape.
DeleteI ass pounded a mangy bear once and his name was Jacob. He almost clawed my balls off!
ReplyDelete