Matt Moneymaker Interviewed on Popular Australian TV Show About Yowies And Bigfoot
Back in May, Finding Bigfoot's Matt Moneymaker took some much-needed time off from filming to stop by a popular morning TV show in Australia to talk about the connection between Yowies and Bigfoots. During the interview, Moneymaker was asked about the Marble Mountain footage that was filmed in 2000 on a mountain side near Ft. Jones California. According to Moneymaker, their field measurements have shown that the figure was about 8 to 9 feet tall (much bigger than a man).
Watch the interview below:
Moneymaker video.ATTACK!
ReplyDeleteIt's 2000, is it not ? Not 1991. Matt can't even get that right.
DeleteMatt Moneymaker was a man,was a real man,he went out looking for a Bigfoot and came back looking like a fool.
ReplyDeleteDaniel Boone series theme song!
DeleteMarble mountain footage could be 15 feet tall but it would be a 15ft tall guy wearing a back pack.
ReplyDeleteYup. The Marble Mountain footage is obviously a human hiker with a backpack. Anyone who thinks otherwise is blinded by what they hope to see, not what is actually there.
DeleteObviously? thats a dubious statement at best. Only fools speak so matter of factly when they dont in fact know.
DeleteMarble Mountain is the biggest joke of video in the history of footing. Well, besides Patty.
DeleteIn many ways it's actually the best footage there is, Patty's up closer of course but M.Mt.'s longer. Both are real squatches, one female the other male, not only does the anatomical evidence in both cases speak loudly for itself but also supported indirectly by the ever ridiculous clueless cynical comments.
DeleteIf the Marble Mountain footage shows a bigfoot, when did bigfoot start wearing a backpack?
DeleteWhat's with MM's hair? Is he going out to skate parks trying to pick up 15 year olds?
ReplyDeleteRelivin' the grunge days.
DeleteNot even grunge I think he is having a mid life crisis and is going to start a band called the fact street boys.
DeleteToo much squatch beer.
DeleteMoneymaker is the new sexy!
DeleteHe's more naive than anything really, the completely wrong guy to host a bigfoot show. Well, maybe right for this because it's taken on ridiculous proportions and turned almost comical. As expected. A serious programme needs a serious dude, problem is no such bigfoot person will be invited because networks prefer the monstrous animal stance - including sadly Matt. They aren't animals or apes, primates yes obviously but races of primitive giant hairy people. You ain't never gonna find them until you realize that and start asking the right questions in the right places. Connect the dots with logic not legend.
DeleteWhat happened to that Rob Fairless fella?
ReplyDeleteDid he finally find Bigfoot or did he quit looking?
The Bigfoot Whisperer? It's like he fell off the face of the Earth.Ain't no telling.
DeleteHe bailed, quit, audios. To many people gave him crap. His wife made him cause she thinks some psycho willl come after him??? He was a goober anyway and didn't know shit about Bigfoot.
DeleteWindingo,
DeleteNOBODY KNOWS ANYTHING about a mythical fairy tale beast kept alive by nincompoops who never have grown up.
You degenrate scumbag.....prove me wrong.
^ Dammit,Rob Fairless is back.
Delete23 YEARS!!!!!!
DeleteThis is a repost. Someone's gettin' lazy!
ReplyDeleteIve been following the world of bigfoot only briefly but this Moneymaker guy comes off as a total fraud.
ReplyDeleteFor your information anon, I have been an expert on the topic for almost 20 years and I can assure you Mr. Moneymaker is the consumate professional. Just a very generous human being. I met him at a town hall meeting and he called me "cheif". Then when I got his autograph, I told him to make it out to "cheif", and he did it! Ahhh, what a great guy...
DeleteYou need to lay off the Big Macs Mayor,it's affecting your spelling.
Delete"Chief"
Unless you mean this-
Urban Dictionary: cheif
www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cheif
When smoking weed, taking more than an appropriate number of hits of a blunt
LoLz
DeleteUmm, yeah... That's what I meant. Lol.
DeleteSmokin' dee ganja mon.
DeleteCheif, see da bigfoot.
Cheif again, see two bigfoot.
Cheif third time, see FB/FB video.
Hahaha. That haircut makes him look like a big penis.
ReplyDeleteThen again, he already looked like a big penis.
But now he both figuratively and literally looks like a big penis.
And you have a teeny penis!
DeleteMy pubes are longer than my penis. :(
Deletetime to shave
DeleteLOL!
DeleteIt's a wig.
DeleteA pube wig?
DeleteEver since I heard there is upcoming DNA results, I've been watching the clock for months nonstop and refreshing the page.
ReplyDeleteWhatever happened to Autumnforest? Did she die or just quit?
ReplyDeleteShe started a new career in porn!
DeleteActually you are correct sir!!!!!
DeleteShe's writing soft core porn.
Nice, I bet she just loves a good ol fashioned taterhole smashing contest. I'd rip her apart.
DeleteAlright im convinced bigfoot is not real.This was a fun site though.
ReplyDeletetaterhole, FB/FB will convince you of bigfoot's authenticity. Check them out, they have some of the best evidence out there.
DeleteThanks man have a good one.
ReplyDeleteTater, heard you got jammed up; caught holding during a pat-down on the last dee-wee and hit with intent to sell. Just cop to possession. They mandate you but you can still sneak out and get fucked-up. Security at rehab is a joke.
DeleteGood luck bro
Taterhole,just shove the shit up your taterhole next time.Dammit man,ain't nobody going up your nasty taterhole for a cavity check.
DeleteHe has a Molly Ringwald late 80's hairdoo ... what's with that?
ReplyDeleteYou mean Ally Sheedy.
DeleteNo, he means Judd Nelson.
DeleteNo, he looks like chunk from goonies!
DeleteLying about a sighting again. Body language. Stammers. Twice tries to quickly change the subject away.
ReplyDeleteWhere is Mr. BFRO's BFRO report of his sighting close-call growling incident? Oh, there isn't one? Gee, why is that?
ReplyDeleteOk, where else then has MM written about his amazing experience and sighting? Oh, he hasn't? Gee, why is that?
Ok then, where is the corroborating testimony from other witnesses who can vouch for what MM now says. Oh, there isn't anyone? Gee, why is that?
May I propose that you, on your all-things-bigfoot all-the-time blog, get around to asking MM some questions about his claims sometime, unless that's really not what you want to do...
DeleteHere's my plan for investigating these troubling allegations:
Step 1: Ask who Anon 7:34 is, because h implies that he knows a lot about Moneymaker's encounter, and wants people to be suspicious about it. If he is credible then he will identify himself.
Step 2: When Anon 7:34 tries to dodge that question and does not identify himself, then let everyone else know that he's most likely either a jealous rumormonger, or Moneymaker debunked him at one time for hoaxing, or Moneymaker banned him from the BFRO for being a lying shit stirrer.
Anon @8:57 = Matt Moneymaker
ReplyDeleteLet me get this straight. You think it is "troubling" to investigate, and challenge with cause, a claimed experience and should, rather, investigate the questioner?! Really? Why?
ReplyDeleteWhich questions did you find to be somehow troubling and why?
Please explain why you feel it necessary to attack an investigation of the witness's claims as that of a "jealous rumormonger," a "MM debunked hoaxer" or a "lying shit stirrer"?
Do you consider it possible that the witness is not telling the truth?