We've Just Returned From The Sierra Kills Site

Nadia Moore, Ro Sahebi, Justin Smeja, David Batdorf
at exact location where "adult" Bigfoot was shot.

We left on Tuesday and didn't return from the Sierra Kills site until this morning (Thursday). As soon as we got Justin Smeja's polygraph results, we didn't waste anytime hitting the road to get to the famous "Body Recovery" / Sierra Kills site near Haskell Peak, California. We will be releasing some information on our findings in the following weeks, along with Smeja's polygraph results (hopefully by Friday). Here are some images from the "Sierra Project".

"The meadow"

The location where Justin stood when he shot the adult Bigfoot

Carl Olinselot, Nadia Moore, Justin Smeja, Ro Sahebi

Carl filming the spot where the "adult" was standing

The center tree is about where the "adult" was standing when
Justin pulled the trigger

The slope where the "juvenile" rolled down after
getting shot in the neck.

The bush where Justin Smeja hid the juvenile's body.

The body was pretty well hidden at the time.
This bush is near the side of the creek.


Comments

  1. The more i hear about this, the more convincing it is to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. not me....it hey are asking me to believe they discovered a large mammal and for convoluted reasons, failed to provide any decent evidence. this story is bullshit.FACT

      Delete
    2. btw Tyler, I am a big fan of the show and am looking foward to season 3..

      Delete
    3. Anon@4:02-Jrefer,sounds like your batteries are not up to optimum power.Please reload with Duracell Copper Top like your Queen Randi uses cause your arguement is weak.

      Delete
    4. That's a hide? Give me a break?

      Delete
    5. There is nothing to argue about, it's just a story. If you have something to gain from it great, all the best. I am not on rand, but I read some of the threads. I am leaning towards the existance of something, but I am not emotionally committed so they don't get on my nerves.

      Delete
    6. Anon@4:19-Reread what you wrote.
      Sounds like your at the least looking for an arguement.

      These people went out and did some research.

      That's cool that it doesn't get on your nerves ,but then why say it's "just"a story if it doesn't bother you?

      Delete
    7. And why don't you put your childish and repetitive JFER accusations to rest? Take the high road and shut up.

      Delete
    8. There is some guy that really got it handed to him over on jref and cries about it whenever a skeptic posts on this blog.

      Delete
    9. Maybe it was because like here, he's a boring boor that contributes NOTHING.

      Delete
    10. Randi kooks, they deserve to all be placed in a big black pot of stew and prepared for dinner left for Bigfoot.

      Delete
  2. The people who think Justin is lying about it really have no clue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hard to get a clue when no one is giving you any evidence. it's a joke that we even discussing it instead of possible physical evidence like the London tracks.

      Delete
    2. Oh I'm sorry? I have no clue? Let's leave logic and reason aside because we so desperately want to believe in the magic forest man.

      You bleevers only have yourselves to blame.

      Delete
    3. And your a wanna be believer for being on this site!

      Delete
    4. Exactly, the Randi geeks just can't leave it alone. If anybody's scared of the big bad forest man it's them. Bigfoot is the bogeyman to them and they exorcise it by talking about their fears, shrinks probably suggested it to them.

      Delete
  3. Uh oh Dads home.
    We are in trouble!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh no, one for the road: fuck you gay ball!

      Delete
    2. And there it is..

      Mark the time @ 4:13 pm 8/9/2012...

      This was a historical event!

      Delete
  4. I want to see a picture of Shawn!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon@4:06-Just Google Chris Hemsworth and you will have your answer

      Delete
    2. Shawn is just as elusive as Bigfoot man, you will never get a picture of him, so give :)

      Delete
    3. Anyone else realised that his name is Shawn evidence and this blog is called bigfoot evidence. Coincidence? I think not.

      Delete
    4. Has anyone seen Shawn and bigfoot in the same room at the same time?

      Delete
    5. Yes I have! Only once though.....It was late at night and lets just say it involved bacon, honey, gummy bears, laptop, 2 cell phones, Shaq, Wee man, and a fish! But thats another story......right Shawn

      Delete
  5. This is a HUGE if, but IF any of this is true, seeing the tree where Smegma claims the adult was...and seeing how far away it is, just proves he was not threatened and he murdered these creatures in cold blood. Smegma...name fits perfectly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes I said Smegma a while ago on here, thanks for keeping the truth alive! It's sick to kill an animal that is waving it's arms at you, just sick.

      Delete
    2. You moron. Murder can only be committed against another homo sapien sapien. Second of all, pay attention, he's never claimed to shoot the adult out of fear. You've made zero points in you post. Congratulations mouth breather.

      Delete
    3. Since when is a bigfoot waving its arms at a human typical behavior? First I've ever heard of one doing this. It's always stood out as one of the many oddities in Smeja's story. Boxer dog my ass!

      Delete
    4. A homo-something species is exactly what the big fella is so yeah Smeja did in fact commit murder. Twice even.

      Delete
    5. Yeah, that part about the squatch waving its arms along with the fact that he left the juvenile body instead of putting it in the back of the pick-up truck makes this story seem like a tall tale BS story.

      Delete
  6. Oh great now we can look forward to censored speech again. Just when this place was becoming funny again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

      Delete
    2. Anon 4:20, add a +million billion to that!

      Delete
    3. Funny in whose opinion? It's just you setting up your own jokes and responding to them. I was hoping you'd been booted.

      Delete
    4. Its not funny when bad men kill da good Sasquatch. Justin Smeja bad..Bobo good....I wish da big Sasquatch would-a turned Justin smeja over his knee and givin him a whippin!...That or plucked out his eye, and done a real bad ting to da socket (OH NELLIE). I am so sick of seeing that Smeja's face! He just has one of those faces I'd just like..to..Oh...Oh never mind!

      sbizkit38

      Delete
  7. Maybe 4:13 guess it depends on the differences in camera lens and human eye in this case though? Assuming the glove fits.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Doesnt ad up for me. You have the cold heart to kill the baby yet you dont have it in you to take the body away for evidence and to make a lot of money? Bullshit

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well thank you Shawn, TeamTazer, and Olinselot for doing this! I liked the pictures and look forward to more of your findings!
      Awesome.

      Delete
    2. Oh, and thanks to Justin too!

      Delete
    3. Relax no bigfoots were shot

      Delete
    4. Not in your fixed mind maybe in the real word yes.

      Delete
    5. Yes. Anon at 4:22 hit the nail on the head as to why this whole kills story is BS. No one would leave the dead baby and not take it out of there in the truck.

      Delete
  9. Who cares about the Polygraph test... The DNA will prove all...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope hasn't proved anything yet and never will. Getting human DNA from a "bigfoot sample" does not mean bigfoot is human. It means the samples are human or contaminated by human.

      The crazies will of course shout about it proving bigfoot. No such paper will ever be published in a real science journal.

      Delete
    2. Dream on dorky troll, they can tell contamination when they see it and DNA can't be faked either. Your mere presence here even proves that you know you're wrong and DNA settling this once and for all. Ketchum's or whoever, but DNA is science and how it's done today. No body in a box needed at this point, let's confirm the species first then bodies will come eventually by natural means.

      Delete
  10. Almost as much of a waste of time as all those guys going to the pgf film site.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To tell you it is a waste of time!

      If you want to go a place where there have been hoaxed with a bigfoot, go to a freezer instead!

      Delete
  11. I hope you guys were smart enough to take Justin and the Driver up separately to get their accounts, before posting this update.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow. If it was a hoax how could the driver possibly come up with the same story? Oh wait there's multiple interviews with Justin online.

      Delete
    2. Driver has already been interviewed extensively by Bart, Derek & now Ro

      Delete
    3. Not too bright right Anon 4:39:00?

      Verbal account matching is one thing. Being able to both point out the same topology, angles, and location is another.

      Hope you're not a cop or employed in anything requiring investigative logic.

      Delete
    4. Correct. If this is not a mickey mouse investigation that is what would have happened.

      Delete
  12. yep and i heard bart and derek did it a long time ago with derek talking to him in beginning and bart soon after without much opp for rehearse story

    ReplyDelete
  13. Did you guys break one of Smeja's legs, coat him with pig's blood and leave him out there?

    Cuz honestly, that's what he deserves if this is true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its a fucking Squatch. They kill people all the time in forests. Fuck Sasquatch..

      Delete
    2. SomeA$$hole- he didn't kill a human. He killed a creature unknown to science. Why does he deserve such harsh treatment?

      Go eat a bowl of dicks. Phucker.

      Delete
    3. Very powerful and mature contribution balzbag. Way 2 go. He didn't kill anything apart from some of the dwindling credibility this whole area of interest has left.

      Delete
    4. He didn't kill two creatures he killed two humans, the Indians were around these beings for centuries and never considered them anything but another human race. The beastly monster myth is soon history.

      Delete
  14. Good job guys for going out there and doing so much follow up on this story.
    It's one thing to talk about it but an entirely different thing to DO something about it.
    Kudos to all involved.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Can someone please explain to me, if Bigfoot DNA is human how the hell is it Bigfoot?I just don't get it,I mean if they are saying it is part human I'll buy that.

    Who is going to accept a paper that says holy sh!t we have discovered human DNA.I'm not very bright I know but,I have seen many humans and not one of them looked like Bigfoot.

    Could someone please do me a kindness and clear this up for me.This human DNA thing just dont make any sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First things first, there has been no published study on bigfoot DNA. Lots of talk but no evidence.

      Now what people are saying is the DNA is of a relic hominoid. This is not human but one of our evolutionary cousins. Now even if they had this DNA it does not prove bigfoot.

      There is no Bigfoot specimen to extract DNA from to make any comparisons.

      Delete
    2. Thank you I thought maybe I had missed something but guess not.

      Delete
    3. Nope, not missing ANYTHING. DNA will NEVER prove the existence. NEVER! BWAH HAHAHAHAHA!!!! Only a supreme idiot would think otherwise.

      Delete
    4. First thing is first alright i got a turtlehead a poking out.

      Delete
    5. This sucks everytime i get on this damn computer i got to shit all this fu.king praireedogging is pissing me off.

      Delete
    6. This isn't the 1990's. DNA is used for discoveries now. JREFer's need to pull their heads out of their asses.

      Delete
    7. I'll gladly bet the Randi jerks are very soon laughed at in public even more than they are already. Sasquatch is not only a very real species of upright humanlike primate they're another human species, hominin equals our own human line of the great ape family. It's only white man's ignorance and need to calm one self we've invented the dumb animal/ape movie monster theory about Bigfoot, this of course pleased authorities never knowing how to handle the subject preferring other wildlife explanations/misidentifications to explain away the sightings.

      Delete
  16. I need to see more of Nadia Moore.

    Justin, back fat is blocking my view.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Am I wrong? or does it read above that they got the results of the test and did not waste any more time and left. And in fact if they have the results why not post it now? Seems to me if they got the results and left that fast it does not look good for smeja.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, you are. They waited for the test results before going to the site.

      Delete
    2. LMFAO! BOZO BOY! They did the test and then went to the sight.

      Delete
  18. pLEASE allow to me to introduce my self this is fromundamynuts.I am taterwholes next door neighbor.

    ReplyDelete
  19. It's now official...Smeja doesn't own any shirts with sleeves, and he is a redneck poacher.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was a pink haired Jesus freak in his past.

      http://www.monstermuleys.com/photos/PhotosID2/617.html

      Delete
    2. and you a fuc.king nerd so fuck pus.sy boy.

      Delete
  20. That chick seems like she fot a fat ass. Is she hot? N e one.know? If u see this chick e mail me your hot crzywhte69@hotmail

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know...I'm 100% surprised noones mentioned her taterhole yet...seriously

      Delete
  21. Why is everyone so fat? .... curious European !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Americans have become ridiculously lazy, true story.

      Delete
    2. Why does Europe smell like armpits and ass? It also looks dirty as fuck, especially Sicily and Italy.

      Delete
    3. Real people yes not plastic.

      Delete
  22. If it's fake he must be a pretty good liar, I'd hate to be on my toes around those people the whole time in case you gave something away.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anyone think Larry the cable guy should beat the shit out of justin for raiding his wardrobe?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Dam son,tease, tease..I just want to read up, watch a video with some Wendy's.That place is BAWLIN' yo. Chicken nuggitz be crispy like you never SEEN. I tasted one and I was like "WHAAAAT! Are you serious Wendy?" Mean girls workin the friers, tho. This one chick wouldn't even let me holla. I was like "please you ugly anyway." I need some knowledge son.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its all dem churches chicken eating mutha fuc.kas. all these libs and white women in the u.s laid up on there asses getting them handouts woowee. hope that answered your question european.

      Delete
    2. Shawn, will you please delete and ban this a$$hole waste of space? Why do we have to wade through his garbage to get to anything on topic?

      Delete
    3. Shawn never monitors this site for profanity! Very sad because it's a very small group of people who have no intention of anything but to hear themselves talk. Very sad Shawn. Becoming one of the dirtiest sites I've been on that wasn't intended to be.

      Delete
    4. Wow. I saw a funny Wendy's review and applied it to a post to try to be funny about being anxious to read or see there results. I wasnt looking for someone to go 100 mph with some swears and I'm not sure what else. Anyway, can we get some results?

      Delete
  25. all u geniuses who don't even have a grasp of basic grammar (please learn the proper usage of you're and your) are just a buncha pussies who post under anonymous cuz you don't have a pair. good day sir!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I ain't no sir. You call me mister. You got that clear?

      Delete
    2. I rather use anonymous than some unoriginal name like "fox". Go watch the X Files reruns.

      Delete
    3. This coming from a piece of shit who's too lazy to type out whole words. Eat another dick you silly faggot. I bet you watch Tranny porn too.

      Delete
    4. The letter ( u) is basic grammar? Is this guy for real who goes by an unknown name of fox ? Yeah that identifies u. How about your phone number and address! Who cares about grammar! It's the Internet and everything is typed fast, abbreviated, and auto correct changes stuff. Get over it!

      Delete
    5. Complaining about grammar while using u, buncha, and cuz?

      Delete
  26. Oh this is so cool. I wish I could've been there and watched these people, with their video cameras and stuff, taking video of each other and of the bushes and trees and stuff. Can I go next time?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Fuckit i would have shot it throw it over my fuc.king shoulder and hiked out without mister driver.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Justin is still akid to me i defend him hey some one to kill one.Espesially if they are abundant procreating.

    ReplyDelete
  29. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hey Justin, it's me... Rictor. Here is how I feel about the whole thing. Being that I live in Las Vegas, I want you to see it from my point of view. You and I are sitting at a slot machine and the jackpot is 15 million. You need to put 3 dollars in each time you spin the wheels in order to get the jackpot. However, you only put in 1 dollar and hit the jackpot... but for only $500... when instead you could have won 15 MILLION DOLLARS by just betting the maximum bet! If you had taken that baby's body... you would have won the jackpot. Instead you left with blood on your boots and clothes and a condolence prize of some flesh found two weeks later. I wish I was there with you when this occurred. I would have said: GRAB THAT BABY'S BODY! Justin: But I'm scared... Rictor: B I T C H, GRAB THAT BABY'S BODY! REMEMBER MY 15 MILLION DOLLARS ALLEGORY I JUST TOLD YOU ABOUT?? Justin then quickly grabs the baby's carcass. End of story. End of debate. So kids, ALWAYS do the maximum bet when gambling... or shooting a strange unknown animal. If you win, YOU WIN BIG!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. High roller! Big money big money! Gambling is addictive!

      Delete
  31. I have pictures of Shawn! Hey Shawn, what are you going to give me to keep them private, ha ha! How about one whole week with no anonymous posts!

    If you don't want to say it with your real name, maybe you shouldn't say it at all......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol. nadia, are you blackmailing me? i have your picture too you know :P

      Delete
    2. I wouldn't blackmail you Shawn, well maybe a little, ha ha! Love You!

      Delete
    3. Shawn block the cursing and dirty talk! It's getting sick!

      Delete
  32. The Polygraph is all smoke and mirrors, I lied through a dozen in employment past.
    (minor indiscretions in my youth)and the one I told the truth on, I failed. They really are a crock.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have taken a dozen polygraphs? Wow that is impressive. The ones most employment offices use generally cost upwards of 3000 dollars and are less then 80 percent accurate and most are outdated and not properly administrated. The newer lime stones are 20000 dollars and 99 percent accurate

      Delete
    2. Anon 11:05 is a liar! Especially if he had to take all those polygraphs. Would not believe a liar!

      Delete
    3. So anon 11:05 your saying you lie all the time? What makes me believe your not lying now?

      Delete
  33. The ones they use for work situations are cheap and highly inaccurate. It also depends on how well trained the technician is. An employee is not going to spend the money needed to get a real legal grade polygraph.

    So many people are going to be eating so much crow, I fear for the Corvid population.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Crow? I would rather eat Italian Sausage thank you VERY much. Is it on the menu?

      Delete
    2. And I know who's "Italian Sausage" you would like to be eating Rictor!

      Delete
  34. I think Smoojda is telling the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  35. There are five huge projects going on in the Bigfoot World. NO. 1 is Sykes. No. 2 is Ketchum. No. 3 is Smeja. No. 4 is the London tracks. No. 5 is the other labs that are not know doing DNA research. This is only my order and not indicitive of how anyone else out there would rate them. Out of all of these the only one we are getting any information on is Shawn and his team befriending Justin Smeja and providing as much insight into the event as possible and that means boots on the ground, climbing into the ring, and providing investigative journalism to the max. I mean how many people get to get a lie dector test in this field. When I was young this was how investigative journalism was done, unfortunately it has become a lost art. I anxiously await your final result and opinions and write up on this adventure, and thanks Shawn for going all out. Mama's you can not put your children asleep.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can someone please point out where santa claus was standing when the kill shot was made? also on a lighter note,nadia has a nice butt

      Delete
  36. Everyone is so bent out of shape because he possibly shot a Sasquatch. Who cares? I understand that Sasquatch may be rare but with all of the sightinings it's not like he killed the last or only one. Murder? He didn't kill a human which doesn't constitute murder. IMO one does need to be killed for the resolution of the mystery. It's been said many times a body is needed for answers because photographic or video proof will never be accepted. 1000s of animals are poached each year, not that I don't agree with it, and nobody is calling murder or anything of that nature. If he did shoot one, it was his call. Nobody else was there so who knows if he did truly feel threatened.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shut up you haven't got a clue buddy. He did in fact kill two rare hominins that means he didn't kill animals but people, I know he's still struggling with it morally because he woke up to the reality of them not being animals like we've falsely been influenced and conditioned into believing by modern American popular culture and the researchers of the field - even they were unaware or didn't want to face it.

      Delete
  37. Seems like I remember when this story first started that they were down a very narrow road on a steep incline and the BF had no place to run but towards them, so he felt threatened and shot; well, if these pictures are ground zero of these events, looks pretty wide open and plenty of room for a BF to escape quickly. ?!?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes that's what robert Lindsay said. Nothing she says is accurate

      Delete
    2. You can't trust the Lindsay filter. He hears things and then adds stuff to it all the time.

      Delete
  38. Quite the contrary for me DS 5:57. I think that if this story is contrived Justin did all his homework and pre-visted the site prior to the story. As outlandish as the events sound things are starting to add up as being an actual event.
    1. story corroboration between JS and driver
    2. site verification to story
    3. purported polygraph
    4. purported tissue sample
    We shall see what we shall see once this becomes transparent if it does.
    I would hope that Bart Cutino is actively testing the boots as another key piece to this puzzle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to Cutino he is and he's teamed with Justin Seja and another guy from BFRO to get everything tested independent of Dr. ketchum. Didn't sound like they trust he much. He also said all results will be shared.....we shall see if they come through

      Delete
    2. I agree. I don't know why everybody keeps thinking results won't be shared. Justin just took half dozen people up to the site just to show everybody on camera where it went down. I don't know. If I killed something I couldn't identify I'd be careful what I shared and what I didn't too. Makes sense to me. I'm guessing the polygraph and the DNA will be shared as soon as it's done in detail.

      Delete
  39. All I see on these photos is a bunch of hoaxers.

    ReplyDelete
  40. If he did hide the body in that bush, why don't you look for hair or dna? There should be hair there, if there actually were a BIG bigfoot hidden there.

    But of course you didn't find anything. Because this is a hoax, created for fame and money.

    Think about what your grandchildren will think of you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A lot of assumptions there. Who's to say they didn't look and find evidence in that area maybe a bunch of hair or even bones but rather then jump to conclusions their sending it to Sykes to get tested? They are all talking on their Facebook about mind blowing things and how they can't wait to share all this crazy stuff with us

      Delete
    2. "Who's to say they didn't look and find evidence in that area maybe a bunch of hair or even bones but rather then jump to conclusions their sending it to Sykes to get tested?"

      - Justin is saying that. How? In his hoax story.

      The only mindblowing things they will release is just some yet not credibel evidence. Maybe they will fabricate a footprint, or find a rock that "the sasquatsh throw at them". No matter what, it will be some "evidence", that once again will tell us............. nothing

      Delete
    3. Justin actaully has not said anything on his Facebook or anywhere else sense he postee they had the polygraph machine hooked up to him. Maybe he failed?

      Delete
    4. Maybe he is cooperating with the investigation and is not saying anything until it is released officially.....

      Delete
    5. Haha Nadia, you only see what you want to see.

      Hoaxers will be hoaxers

      Delete
    6. Bigfoots will be Bigfoots.

      Delete
    7. @ anonymous 850,

      if your talking about S streufert's coalition page thats not true at all about any of those guys promising "mineblowing" things. Ill I saw was bart c on there discussing what they promised to do on Jeff S's show last week. He said that him, smeja and T hugings from canada have flesh at labs now and will be releasing all results, notes &emails when they get final reports with whatever lab findings are. thats all that was said and smeja didnt say anything you lieing troll.

      Delete
    8. I was there this week and the "bushes" he threw the body into aren't like lilac bushes or willow bushes. It's a dense thicket of manzanita bushes. I spent over an hour trying to crawl on my stomach and hands and knees back into that huge patch of manzanita and without a chain saw there is no way you could get into it very deep. That patch of manzania is probably fifty yards wide and close to a hundred yards long. My best efforts got me only maybe fifteen feet in and I was stuck.

      Delete
  41. If he fails it brings down the Ketchum study also. It was either Ketchum or Sally that said the sample from the killings in California were included in the study.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ketchum's study has many other samples besides this one single sample. This will not impact what ever is going on with her paper at all.

      Delete
    2. You really believe there will ever be a study Nadia? Or you just want to believe...

      Delete
    3. There is a study, goofball. Troll yapping won't change that.

      Delete
    4. There is? Could you please point me to the results or give me an update. Just keep telling yourself... soon.... very soon. I'm sure the DNA data will be beautiful and wonderful as advertised.

      Delete
  42. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  43. If see says Justin's sample is real and it turns out Justin is lying, I don't see how it couldn't affect it.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Also wanted to add nice booty :) .

    ReplyDelete
  45. Shawn I agree with Nadia but I would up it to a month with NO anonymous then we can see how they run. Bunch of keyboard pus*&%*!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  46. I'm a member of a couple forums where people have usernames and no anonymous is allowed. They still talk shit and you really don't know who they are. That doesn't fix anything. It also might be hard for you to believe but I would express the same opinion to your face as I have as an anonymous.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I can't get over the idea that anyone holding a dead juvenile bigfoot in his hands would leave the body behind and not put it in the pick up truck. To any skeptic, the fact that the baby was left behind means game over for this story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Completely agree, my sister could have come up with a better excuse.

      Delete
  48. i dont understand why this man is getting the attention he is. is it because we are all desperate ,s we know time is running out, if we are going to say BF exists. my view is trail cam,shrinking enviroment they live in, lack of ANY evidence[other than eye witness and footprints. not exactly convincing is it].
    the fact he appears to beat a polygraph test did impress me. What we do know is that it isnt foolproof. aldo the 99% certain is completely wrong. theres no way you can put a certian % on it,hence why courts of law,cannot accept it. if it were defo 99% it would be acceptble. if eye witness accounts are admsable,which at best is 50/50,im sure something at 99% ould be allowed.nonsense.
    i think if you told this story knowing it was a bear you would pass the polygraph. the story is correct only it was abear. that would allow,im guesing,margin for acceptable error. if the story is 955 true,only it was a bear!
    there is know way youd be a hunter in california and not heard of bigfoot or thought about it. its oneof the worlds biggest myterious and you are right at the heart of it and hunter and it doesnt enter your thoughts,lies![imo]
    the guy has a get out clause by saying he went back and got a steak from an animal n the area. hence it could be a coyote[deep down i believe we all know thats what it is][time will tell].
    no cell phone photo attempt at time
    wheres the driver???wheres his account[why is nobody getting his view to cross examone him. very odd.there were 2 people there yet the driver is not even sought or spoken about.his account would go along way to determining the truth here.hmmm!!
    no bone sample etc etc etc etc/.....
    utter nonsense. mpove on.i hope this whole ketchum paper we are waiting on isnt centred around this guys steak and story. wow ,what a nonsense that would be.it would end BF thinking for good
    in my view its ow time for researchers toput up or shut up.
    if not then the loch ness monster exists as the lcal police and minister have all seen it! hmmmm
    no

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story