This Was Presumably Sent To Dr. Melba Ketchum's Lab-- What Is The Man Holding? (Update: From Tree-Twist?)


Bigfootology's Dr. Webb Sentell wrote the following description to Dr. Melba Ketchum accompanying the photo above. There is mention of "sliced off limb" and "blood spots". It's a mystery to us what this could be related to, but our tingly spidey-senses tells us it's about Sasquatch.

there appeared to be one clear splattering with a few other possible blood spots. All were sliced off limb with sterile blade and sent to lab in Texas — with Melba Ketchum in Shreveport, LA.

[Update]
A commenter below suggested that the object could be part of a "tree limb" that was broken off from TimberGiantBigfoot's "tree twist". Back in November 2011, Canadian Bigfoot researcher found an interesting tree-twist with blood on it and this was the last update from him about the tree limb:

Comments

  1. Unless I'm mistaken YouTube Bigfoot researcher timbergiantbigfoot found what he called a "tree twist" that appeared to have a few spots of purported blood. He suspected it was from a Bigfoot and said he would hope to follow up with a DNA diognostic. could be wrong, but the sample in the picture looks like a tree limb.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Congratulations on correctly identifying a tree limb! Now if you could just teach the footers to correctly identify bears then we'd really be getting somewhere.

      Delete
    2. man you trolls blow you know find your sorry asses some place else to be ya know I'm sure you have some porn sights to watch or is your mom home and you are hiding in the basement where you have been living for years now after you dropped out of school playing video games and living off mommy

      Delete
    3. Do you specialize in weak comebacks anon 10:25?

      Delete
    4. I'm a footer and I hunt bear. What do you want to know about bears Anon 10:03?

      Delete
    5. I do get a kick out of an asshole spending his Saturday night and probably every night for that matter looking up Bigfoot stuff calling other people footers like he's somehow more intelligent that them. What an idiot...LOL

      Delete
    6. You're undoubtedly aware of the 2009 study published in the journal of biogeography in which it was found that the “ecological perimeters” of the the fictitious Sasquatch and the very real black bear were nearly identical. Perhaps you could explain to your fellow footers how to correctly identify a black bear so as to avoid future mix-ups and rectify past mistakes?

      Delete
    7. i'm a sasquatch skeptic myself with a cursory interest in the bigfoot phenomena, anon 11:01, but to simply dismiss all sightings of sasquatches as misidentifications of black bears is to ignore the testimonials of witnesses who have allegedly seen these cryptids walking bipedally. not sure where you live, but in minnesota, where i am from, black bears are quadrapedal. also, having perused the bfro database, i know there are sasquatch sightings where there are no known black bears (black hills, so dak, for example). perhaps, the geographic overlap between the two has more to do with those regions' abilities to support large predatory species.

      Delete
    8. Anon 11:01,

      You do realize that you yourself are on a Bigfoot site on a Saturday night?
      Oh, and I am automatically more intelligent than you because I don't believe in Bigfoot you dumbass.

      Delete
    9. Anon 11:14,

      That thing you did where you introduced yourself as a skeptic and then proceeded to be an obvious footer was an interesting approach, but you're not fooling anyone.
      Oh, and you know perfectly well that black bears are capable of standing up you moron.

      Delete
    10. ^^^^
      Lonely closet bleever ashamed of his own footerality.

      Delete
    11. Ha! Ha! You just said footerality thereby proving yourself to be retarded!

      Delete
    12. @11:16 & 11:24

      Go back to JREF and pretend to be somebody you're not where you can get away with it you jackoff.

      Delete
    13. ^^^^
      Go back to bed and get your girlfriend to pretend that you don't have a chode.

      Delete
    14. God these JREF footers that post here are f'n strange. But then again you have to take into account their role model is a gay magician who's lover was arrested for being in the country with a stolen indentity.

      Delete
    15. Your role model is a thieving charlatan and career con-artist whose greatest achievement was sewing tits onto a gorilla suit so I don't think you have any grounds on which to criticize anyone.
      Oh, and you can take as many shots at Randi as you want pencil-dick. Nobody here cares about that that dumb old fag, except you apparently.

      Delete
    16. ^^^^

      This imbecile just proved 11:57's point.

      Delete
    17. ^^^^
      This imbecile just proved he's inbred.

      Delete
    18. ^^^
      Go back to JREF and let the adults talk please.

      Delete
    19. this is 11:14 again, and in spite of what has to say, i am a skeptic. in fact, i have a substantial amount of money riding on this issue in the form of a proposition bet with a friend (i bet him 5:1 that they don't exist)th. if 10:03 wants to bet they don't exist i will gladly take a bet from him that they do (i'm a gambler, and i know to hedge my bets). if he REALLY wants to bet on this issue and he is absolutely certain that sasquatches don't exist, he will respond to this and i will have a bet notarized between him and me in which we both agree upon the terms of the bet. if you are so certain sasquatches don't exist, i would love to take your bet. you seem to know EVERYTHING, so put your cash up and let's bet. i don't think they do, but i DO know that this guy is so adamant about his DISbelief in sasquatches that he is foolsih enough to give me good odds. what do you think, nancy? are you willing to go 100:1? you SURE seem certain they do not exist. put your cash up, pussy. will check this thread tomorrow. WILL MAIL YOU MY DOUGH ON MONDAY IF YOU WANT AS LONG AS I GET CONFIRMATION OF YOUR EXISTENCE AND THAT YOU ACTUALLY HAVE MONEY. come on, man, i gotta hadge my bets and you are so stridently ANTI-bigfoot that i know i can make money either way.

      Delete
    20. Anon 12:45,

      A grown man who believes in Bigfoot calling someone else childish is like Tim Fasano calling someone else a degenerate whooping lard-ass hoaxer.

      Delete
    21. Anon 1:21,

      Who the fuck do you think that you're fooling you stupid retard footer? And why the fuck did you write an entire page worth of nonsense? You think that I don't remember you? You're that same dumbass looser who showed up here to troll on the 14th (at 6:02 AM) and claimed to have 100,000 dollars. You utterly suck at lying and you utterly suck at life. You're some stupid 17year old burger-flipper who will never convince anyone (not even a footer) that he has any money whatsoever. Quit trying to bet money that you don't have. You shouldn't have fucked up your life by smoking crack, drooping out of high school, and knocking up some dumb slut.

      Delete
    22. i did not "droop," as you call it, out of high school, nor have i EVER posted on this site before tonighi am willing to bet you that they do exist. gotta hedge my bet and i know you are being foolish for so being so ardently anti-bigfoot. give me my 1 to your 100 and i wll bet you as much as you want to up to my 1 grand. will send you my bank statement (if you wanna go bigger, we can and there's a lot more there) and have our agreement upon the terms of our bet notarized. if you are willing to show me you bank statement and are willing to, as the old cliche goes, put your money where your mouth is, then please respond to this thread, SALLY. sorry, man, but you are being way too dismissive about the sasquatch phenom. i already bet on YOUR SIDE, but your reasoning for why they can't exist (misidentification with black bears) is only kinda, maybe, sorta, if the wind is blowin right compelling. what do you? let's make a wager, know-it-all.

      Delete
    23. Oh my motherfucking god! How do you not get it? No one is ever going to believe you have any money, ever. You've got to be the shittiest troll I have ever encountered. Do you not understand the concept? All of those folks that post comments like “Belch!”, “Fart!”, or “I get an erection when I eat a spicy burrito” are properly trolling in that their comments are intended to be nothing but disruptive. You seem to be too stupid to realize that your comments are making you look profoundly unintelligent. You have got to give this shit up dude. Get off this website, get a job, pay your dealers, and quit trolling.

      Delete
    24. Anon 11:01 - I assume you've read Lozier et al. 2009? I think it is amazing that made it to press, esp. in the J. Biogeog. I can think of quite a few other species that could under some circumstances be misidentified that also share the same habitat and overlap in distribution to some degree (e.g., bullsnakes and western rattlesnakes). If you restricted points to a small portion of their total geographic distribution, as was the case in this paper, and ran a model for each, they would likely show similar overlap... However, to anyone who really knows what they are looking at bullsnakes look nothing like western rattlesnakes! My point is that the study was flawed from the beginning unless sasquatch really don't exist. If they do, it just confirms that observations of both black bears and sasquatch occur in similar habitat.

      Delete
  2. So.....where does this info come from? What is the status of Justin Smega's sample-test? Not the one with Ketchum but the recent one to another lab? What about Erickson? Where do these stories come from and where do these "projects" disappear to?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soon, it will be forthcoming. Have a little patience.

      Delete
  3. Chill....Didn't Justin first mention recent independent testing in interview with Ro & Bart Cutino just announced and discussed it for long time on Alex & I believe, Jeff's show.

    They promised to release everything when complete but no updates. Why would anyone expect updates, especially if something good is happening? That's the stupidest thing they can do.

    ReplyDelete
  4. She is the worst Scientist to send anything too! You will NEVER get a result!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Calling Melba Ketchum a scientist is like calling Tim Fasano a track star.

      Delete
  5. I'm sure James Randi is a decent person, but some of his loyal minions are jackasses. They come here daily checking out the latest Bigfoot news, commenting that Patty is a bad suit. lol. I'd like to see them or any hotshot artist try to recreate her with today's superior materials. Those clowns just don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You just don't get it. Bigfoot’s not real. Patty is Bob Hieronimus. And you're a cock sucker. Your “feeling” that Patty exhibits muscle moments inconsistent with a suit is just your fantasy. Why don't you come up with some way to quantifiably measure “her” muscle movements because until you do you're just giving your retarded opinion.

      Delete
    2. obviously you are wasting ylur time with 96% 0f guys on here! they are rabid in their belief and dont require proof[there is none,other than blobsquatches famously, the hoaxed patty 50year old film, footprints an eye witness ;stories'],the just know!
      the op and kr will be inconclusive,as we all know,hence the years of putting it off in hope something crops up before they release inconclusive dna and ridiculas video footage. if they had decent reputable interesting footage.we can be sure parts would be released for maximum worldwide coverage.its only the BF community[whatever that is] that knows of these projects and studies! if they had footgae it would have been released in part year ago.it would then recieve funding fron=m media outlets. it would be a bidding war! we all know that.We also know they have zip.wht they are going to pay top dollar,when it could easily be paid for, to release it years later! utter shite and we all know it will e

      there arent families[ive heard reserach scientists say 10k of them in north america] of 6-10foot 500-1.000pound ape men and their families walking about america/canada in their thousand completely undetected for centuries! they point to the African mountain gorilla. that wasnt sought by the west until thenwe are talking deepest africa before modern equipm3nt made such trips easy. yet when they did they found it sraight away,so thats a null argument,they found them easily. bigfoot has been sought in feckin north america with trail cams,heat seeking photos, scientific study of blood/dna/hair etc...et they have tuned up nothing other than hoaxed BF film by a crooked cowboy,students dressing up and filming blurry images or 1 [one]shot of 'something'. why would presumably ,otherwise intelligent people, believ something that has no basis in fact or any kind of scientific basis,eyewitness tesimoy isnt worth anything. if it were the loch ness monster,hiant spiders in south america, dinosaurs in the congo, lizard people, mithman etc etc...al exist as people 'have seen them'. wow ,only in america surely.

      i live nxtto loch ness. everyone in Scotland knows it was sturgeon for 100 yearsbut due to tourism boast to local economy we all told the stoies that brought in americans[lol],japanese, mainland Europeans etc etc...for years to the rea,on the back of ut stories. there are many reputable people who WERE witnesses in the 30-70's. they werent locals ,in the main,and didnt know local wildlife in the loch. so rhey werent lying but just didnt know.we were happy to indulge them as it brought millions[still does] to the area. that would be an wasteland otherwise!
      Sadly.i say sadly,as we would all love a bit of mystery in our post modern world were evrything is accounted for[deep ocean animals apart]and catalouged by science. im sure there are varations of monkeys,lizards,insects tht are still to be found. its a different universe from that to saying in north america there are healthy breeding populations of ape men 10 foot tal with kids etc..walking about forests. i understand there are unhabital areas of North America.its still one of the world most densly populated and technialy advanced areas in the modern world. satelite photos,trail cams,hand hels]d cams,cell cameras,dead bodies,dna samples etc etc etc... would have been done 100 years ago. i know ome in your community of believers say its a government conspirac to cover it up.even if that were so the bigfoot arent in on that so wouldnt know they are protected by governments[lol]. surey the time is 30years past in admitting to yourselves this concet of breeding populations of thousands of MASSIVE animals are here in North America. its laughable in the extreme. PS he guy at 1;14am is amazing! wanting a bet whether bf exists.would he put his mortgage on it.he slam the guy 4 being so certain,yet he is the 1 claiming they do,based on what? SH(OW ME,crazy guy,wow!!!love the fact Bf'ers think that non believers[or ft thinkers] are called retaded.oh the irony

      Delete
    3. Um, post an entire page worth of text much?

      Delete
    4. WHAT the FUCK are you talking about, you rambling fool.People like to bitch about my grammar all the time but you just made me look like a fuckin' Pulitzer prize winning genius.

      Delete
    5. The Randi geeks are basically retarded little kids stuck in adult bodies, poor them. Both bigfoot/patty's real you blowhards or you wouldn't be here were it not for that personal fear you hold.

      Delete
    6. Could you be any more retarded and still type anon 6:05? You need to stop trying to project your own personal insecurities onto others. No reasonable person is afraid of Bigfoot. Bigfoot has never harmed anyone ever because Bigfoot isn't real. I think what you're really afraid of, more so than your mythical ape, is admitting to yourself that your an idiot who has wasted years of your life searching for something he can't find. If you finally do acknowledge Bigfoot doesn't exist what does that make you asshole? It makes you a moron and a liar who's lied to a lot of people. And that's exactly what you are, and sooner or later you're going to have to deal with it.

      Delete
    7. There's nothing wrong in concluding Bigfoot doesn't exist. Many have come that conclusion then lost interest and moved on with their lives. That's what well adjusted intelligent adults do.
      The mental defectives that hang on for years after coming to that conclusion (or pretending to) are either doing it out of an internal belief struggle or stupidity and it shows in the calibur of people who label themselves Bigfoot skeptics.

      Delete
    8. Anon 11:22,

      You really suck at pretending to be smart you know that? So by your standards Richard Dawksins is a mentally defective because he decided that there was no god but continued to champion that truth? The thing with you footers is that you know what you're doing is wrong, but you just don't want to stop. Tell you what you retarded douchebag, the next time that someone comes up to you and lies to your face repeatedly you just lay down and take it like a bitch, don't fight back, just take it you inbred shithead. When will you footers learn not to lie? When are you going to learn that you are advocating that people believe a lie and that that offends reasonable people? You footers have truly earned all your enemies and your going to have to deal with that asshole.

      Delete
    9. ^^^^

      You've just proven 11:22 right. Congrats !

      Delete
    10. Yes, I was referring to Lozier, I assumed a footer would know who he was because he was mentioned on wikipedia.

      I don't know what you mean by “restricted points to a small portion of their total geographic distribution” Unless I am misunderstanding his methods Lozier used supposed Sasquatch data to PREDICT a range for the mythical ape, He didn't just note that a lot of “Sasquatch sightings” occurred in bear country. What “points” are you referring to exactly?

      You seen to be willing to admit that Lozier's methods could accurately predict that two snakes ranges can overlap, but then immediately discount the possibility of misidentification by the lay observer because “anyone who really knows what they are looking at bullsnakes look nothing like western rattlesnakes” Well that's some really “scientific” thinking there. The lay observer is not a herpetologist. And your feeling that the two snake look nothing alike and cannot be confused with one another is just your feeling.

      In what way was the study flawed from the beginning? I thought it was pretty clear that Lozier intended his paper to be a criticism of ecological niche models and wasn't really particularly concerned about the Sasquatch myth one way or another. Your correct use of some terminology makes me think you might actually have some education, but your application of overtly flawed logic makes you look like a garden variety retard footer because your statement that “the study was flawed from the beginning unless Sasquatch really don't exist” is utterly nonsensical. Lozier's methods illustrated that an unknown (and nonexistent) species was actuality a known species. Consider a hypothetical example:

      The land of Oz if full of people who are dressed up like ghosts.
      Someone in the land of Oz claims to see a ghost.
      It is more likely that they saw someone dressed up like a ghost (because oz is full of them) than an actual ghost (which is not known to exist).

      Black bear are known to exist, while Sasquatch are not. Showing that a large number of “Sasquatch” sightings occur in the black bear's range is a perfectly logical way to illustrate that most sightings are actually of a known species. You seem to have an overwhelming desire to ignore parsimony or strict logic in making your argument.

      Delete
    11. Yes, 4:32 is obviously a simpleton with mental problems. He seems to think it's an issue of national security that a few people think Bigfoot may exist....LOL

      Delete
    12. Anon 432...You make it sound like everyone is a cynical snake oil salesman . Some people think there is an undiscovered primate about, and if we are wrong that does not mean we are liars.

      Delete
    13. The very best proof of Bigfoots actually existing is all these Randi geeks wasting their time here, they all - each and every one of them - know this species is there or they definitely fear it and getting proven wrong, or wouldn't be here at all writing their long scared comments. Best proof, yes Mam.

      Delete
    14. That was a nice stream of consciousness post... my favorite word in there was "unhabital"

      Delete
  6. timbergint is nothing but an obvious hoaxer who is trying to forge a career out of bigfootery.filming behind him etc..and he captures a BF whilst ,not knowing whathes filming,is utter nonsense. youdont know yet FOLLOW it across the horizon step for step.NOT A CHANCE! imo,then there was the footage,where he claims a BF snuck up and pushed him over whilst filming.of course the camera dramaticaly caught him falling over but not the BF.the camera is in his hand and he pans rouns,nOTHING! he was on a blanket of dry leaves yet the 1,000pd BF 'floated'across the cornflakes he was crunching through [he 200pds]and pushes him over,then at lightening speed runs upa tree 50yards away!!! what he feck. this guy is a joke. he wears a necklace of a bear claw he says was 'given to him by a BF'. this guy is mentaly ill,either that or we should follow this guy about as thats how we'll prove the existance of BF.they follow himevrywhere,leave gifts,attck him.funny thing he hasnt 1 fecking shot that isnt a blob or cleary his mate in a suit.utter nonsense. wy bother giving him time

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bigfoots twist branches off of trees and use them to brush their teeth. The Bigfoot that used this one probably had Gingivitis.

    ReplyDelete
  8. That's NOT Timbergiantbigfake's tree limb but why not give him credit I mean he is the Real Bigfoot Whisperer. Ever notice how Dr John Buyabagel didn't hang around very long? It's because there is NOTHING there to see that's why! Bet he will take credit for the sample though and leed people on that it's his. Well I guess it doesn't matter really everyone knows that Everything he says is Golden. Where are the Real Deals and why are they not posting stuff on here? Get little Jonathan to write another useless article or better yet get the Bigfoot Skanks to post the usual Crap. Bigfoot has become a Joke due to the Trash that's looking for their 15 minutes of Fame or maybe it's just been that way all along .GMAFB!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. That's NOT Timbergiantbigfake's tree limb but why not give him credit I mean he is the Real Bigfoot Whisperer. Ever notice how Dr John Buyabagel didn't hang around very long? It's because there is NOTHING there to see that's why! Bet he will take credit for the sample though and leed people on that it's his. Well I guess it doesn't matter really everyone knows that Everything he says is Golden. Where are the Real Deals and why are they not posting stuff on here? Get little Jonathan to write another useless article or better yet get the Bigfoot Skanks to post the usual Crap. Bigfoot has become a Joke due to the Trash that's looking for their 15 minutes of Fame or maybe it's just been that way all along .GMAFB!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Body creatіng, рregnancy οr ωeight lοss might be the
    reason for stretch marks.

    Visit my blog lan.helsingkrona.se

    ReplyDelete
  11. For giгls who're pregnant, this solution can also help avoid the formation of those ugly stretch marks.

    My web blog ... zumu.us

    ReplyDelete
  12. Not just that, you can indulge in extra works while
    wearing this.

    my homepage ... Http://Www.theblissexperiment.com/

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article.
    I'll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I'll certainly return.


    Feel free to surf to my homepage ... best registry cleaner for windows 7

    ReplyDelete
  14. You do not have to spend hours at the gym or exert so substantially work and power
    in undertaking function out just to be able to tone your
    muscle tissues.

    Feel free to surf to my web site ... http://www.sky-globe.com

    ReplyDelete
  15. The most we reached was five PIDs of 17 accessible.
    So this had to be an OBD I motor vehicle with an ALCL
    diagnostic connector and not an OBD II connector.


    Visit my web blog obd 2

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?