FB/FB So Far Has Made $7,999 From Book Sales-- Cost To Produce Book: $130,000
It hasn't quite made it on The New York Times best-seller lists yet, but if the Facebook Find Bigfoot boys stick with it, they might be able to pull it off. They've just recently sold their first 1,000 copies of their book, "You Are Sasquatch" for $7.99 per copy (Free for Kindle prime members). According to FB/FB, The Smarter Ape Theory, "completely fits with the sighting, fossil and genetic records in each of us".
"The Smarter Ape Theory" is a three series book containing the "definitive work" on the subject of Bigfoot. It took over $130,000 to produce and that "includes the cost of the movie, editing, illustrations, dollars invested into this site, 12 FLIR cameras 15 low-light cameras. The key insights came from our expeditions and interviews with experts around the country."
The authors are Jack D. Barnes, Jeffrey L. Andersen, Christopher Noel and the illustrations are by Jeff Caramagna. There are a total of 238 pages with 84 illustrations.
Description:
The discovery of Sasquatch as a living, breathing member — along with us — of the primate family tree is emerging as the most profound revelation of the early 21st Century.
But equally astonishing is the new theory set forth in You Are Sasquatch — that not only do we share the Earth with a fellow upright-walking, language-speaking creature, but that this species is none other than the still-surviving representatives of our own earliest ancestors!
This dizzying conclusion is derived through a clear presentation of evolutionary steps,logical links, and pictorial/video demonstrations.
Just as the many breeds of modern-day dogs are diminished descendants of their common ancestor, the gray wolf, so do the races of mankind represent a domesticated version of our mighty progenitor.
In many ways, Sasquatch is our superior, for we have lost most of our original character, our sheer, animal wit and wisdom, our genius for strategic survival, our awesome physical prowess.
So Sasquatch stands before us today as the living embodiment of our former greatness. We can learn much from this teacher, but only if we wake up, wise up, and recognize our place in the History of Life.
Good for them, but they won't get any of my money.
ReplyDeletelol, you must be a "smarter ape" then, like me. I have also avoided this purchase.
DeleteConed head for protection against running into trees...(facepalm)
ReplyDeleteI think the coned head is for better aerodynamics while running.
DeleteWhat do you think all that wood knocking is from.
Deleteplaying with their wood
DeleteSloooooooooow day for footin'
ReplyDeletetheres a sucker born every minute
ReplyDeleteYou oughta know.
DeleteAnon 6:03 is a PRIME EXAMPLE of a sucker.
DeleteIf they titled it "how can guys bang squa-snatches"
ReplyDeletebook sales would be well over a million.
I would not waste my time reading it if you paid me too. In fact I would not grace my fireplace or garbage can with it either.
ReplyDeleteA million go on, be a devil.
DeleteBUT, a million what?
Areal live fu.king sasquatch must have wrote this horse shit no wonder the sh.t wont sell.
ReplyDeleteWhat a tax write off though, OH nobody thought of that?
DeleteDon't understand why people prejudge this before reading it. I read it twice and there are many compelling theories presented in a clear and scientific method. Read it with an open mind and then arrive at your own conclusions. But I think to pre-judge the book is to be ignorant. If you don't want to spend the small amount of 7.99 to buy it, fine, but then how can you have an opinion on it ? Face palm.
ReplyDeleteno actual evidence though as usual
DeleteAnon 6:14,
DeleteYou are a retarded fuck. You aren’t even committing a logical fallacy, you're just flat out lying. Try to pretend that you don't have a chromosomal abnormality for just a few moments and consider the argument that you just made. It's really very simple:
1. You guys do not know what FB/FB is saying.
2. So you should not criticize them for saying it.
Your' argument is wrong because your first point is wrong. Anyone who has been following them at all knows the outrageous claims that they have been making. I think the single most moronic thing that has come out of FB/FB is the claim that “Sasquatch must exist for you to exist” which is so obviously untrue that that it needs no refutation, it really refutes itself. I think all you ass-clowns who say that “you shouldn't knock till you try it” need to give suicide a chance.
For every real researcher out there there are a hundred delusional bastards.
ReplyDeleteThis blog is really going down the pan with all the tatterhole and ridiculous comments that keep being posted.
ReplyDeleteSo, I have decided from now on to post thought provoking sensible questions, so here goes.
Is it wrong for a vegetarian to eat animal crackers?
Anything a vegetarian does is wrong.
DeleteDepends on if the cracker is alive or not.
Deleteonly the animals that are herbivores.
Deletea few months ago I started visiting this blog. Back then, I found most of the comments and smart-ass remarks offensive and childish.
ReplyDeleteRecently though, with most of the you-tube videos/pictures and stories from the last 3 or 4 months, I find the majority of all this sarcasm to be definitely justified.
Smeja/sierra shootings/Ketchum/Temagami/rob fairless/teamtazer/hovey/squatchmaster/Olympic project...it just goes on and on! You can't find entertainment like this just anywhere!
somebody who finally gets it :)
DeleteWait until BFF leader HRPuffnSkank gets the incredible footage he witnessed released. We'll all be bleevers !....lol
ReplyDeleteHahaha.
ReplyDelete"It took over $130,000 to produce"
ReplyDeleteBullshit!
Coned head for less thinking ability.
ReplyDeleteHenry May read it, and this is what it done to the poor guy :)
ReplyDeletehttp://3.bp.blogspot.com/_NURTFz-26UI/SqcZVcyA5zI/AAAAAAAAAqk/QB2Unj85Lsw/s1600-h/65113974.jpg
OH YEAH!
DeleteThat replies actually pretty scary.
DeleteI read the book without paying for the damned thing (thanks Kindle). It is interesting, but at the end of the day, no matter how convincing Jack Barnes may be, no one is going to believe that we came from Sasquatch, and that Bigfoot is the ancestor of all the other hominds too including Homo Erectus.
ReplyDeleteLol ouch. Moneymaker has this market cornerd
ReplyDeleteConed cock.
ReplyDeleteany tree peeking?
ReplyDeleteI pee on trees all the time
DeleteThe premise is flawed from the outset. Sasquatch can't be the progenitor species of mankind, as it still exists (allegedly) and has continued to evolve alongside us over Millennia. It's a cousin; a fellow hominid likely.
ReplyDelete*Sigh*. Someday actual scientists will write about bigfoot. Until then we're stuck with this kind of mush-brained psuedoscience.
You're a tard. Why would you criticize their pseudoscience by making pseudo-scientific claims? Does it make you feel insecure when other people are dumber than you?
Delete11:44 is dumber than Gump
DeleteGo fuck your' mom anon 1:08.
DeleteAnon 11:19s claim that “Sasquatch can't be the progenitor species of mankind, as it still exists (allegedly)” is a complete load of horseshit. Anyone with even an extremely basic understanding of speciation know that the existence of a descendant species does not necessitate the extinction of the ancestor species. Bonobos are a blatantly obvious example of a descendant species that is descended from another extant species (chimpanzees). Also if evolution worked the way that anon 11:19 claimed that it did then the number of species on earth could only ever decrease.
You and anon 1:08 need to shut your flat-earthing faces and go perform some menial labor. You fucks aren't fit to speak.
Your are slightly wrong that is quite a classic misconceptions about evolution. Bonobos are not a chimpanzee that has evolved a bit the same way humans are not a chimpanzee that has evolved a bit. The bonobos and chimpanzees are evolved from a common ancestor which does not exist anymore. They are both equally different genetically from this original species - genetic mutations tend to happen at a set rate over time hence we can say roughly how long ago hustatement chimps split for example, so yes the original statement that Bigfoot can not be our direct ancestor is completely 100% true simply because evolution continues it does just go "species 1 *lots of time with no changes* *suddnenly* species 2" that isn't how evolution works it is slow change over time. If you took snap shots along the way you'd see the differences we see between different people today = not much but if you skip large period of time you see differences. What we see with living species today is Lots of species that have been evolving separately for long periods hence no living species is the ancestor of any other living species. So you are correct the ancestor doesn't go "extinct" as in it does not have to die out but it evolves at an equal rate as the descendants the reason speciation occurs is due to separation of breeding populations both can continue to exist.
DeleteDon't mention dogs etc that is a fair point but is not evolution. We can say they are descendants of wolves and that the wolves are the same species they were when we came up with the idea of dogs, however dogs have undergone genetic mutations at a faster rate than the natural standard due to selective breeding by humans hence the massive changes to dogs compared to the wolf. So unless some super smart alien none of us are aware if selectively bred us away from bigfoot they can't be our ancestor because they would have undergone the same nber of changes from that ancestor as us - they may appear more similar or act more similar but equally different at genetic level
Wow why did I waste my time on that. Someone who "understands" evolution and is "educated" will probably say it is lies and I'm a knuckle dragging moron who trolls Internet boards to annoy the "smart people" - just to point out I'm not a biologist however I have undergone several years of university level education in biology and am currently working towards a masters degree in chemistry so I think I know what I'm saying ^^ but if you with to not believe it fair enough but don't read a biology textbook you won't believe it either V.V