ESPN's Colin Cowherd Claims "Patterson-Gimlin film was confirmed as a hoax"


Did you know that the Patterson-Gimlin footage was confirmed a hoax? We didn't know either. According to ESPN's Colin Cowherd, on Monday, he stated that the Patterson-Gimlin film was proven as a hoax. He was making a comparison of a grainy video showing Kobi Bryant scoring 68 points in 15 minutes on Sports Nation. He stated that anytime there is handheld grainy video it's not believable. Twitter follower Daniel Winn sent the following message to Matt Moneymaker on Twitter:

Colin Cowherd stated that the Patterson-Gimlin film was proven as a hoax. He should do more research. - Daniel Winn
Matt's response?:
Yes, that Colin Cowherd (@ESPN_Colin) is a lying slimeball. - Matt Moneymaker


Comments

  1. Another example of mainstream media trying to shape reality, trying to say "All of us normal [!!!] mainstream people 'know' it was a hoax."

    Flunky US media at it again. They always go out guns blazing without the education and information they need. They just shoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it was a hoax.

      Do you feel like you are special knowing a secret no one else does?

      Delete
    2. Bigfoot's not real.
      Patterson filmed a man in a gorilla costume and claimed it was Bigfoot.
      Therefore
      The Patterson-Gimlin Film is a hoax.

      Delete
    3. LMAO...Anon @ 8:24 did a "Matt Moneymaker". Stating something as fact without evidence.

      Goes both ways...MM shouldn't be stating opinions as fact...same rules apply to skeptics.. so yes, "Prove it" other than stating an opinion as fact.

      Delete
    4. Bigfoot's non-existence is self-evident you retard.

      Delete
    5. stfu wanker trolls, it's no suit due to species anatomy facts making a hoax impossible so that equals no fake. Most TV anchors are d!ckheads like that dude, picking on this subjects just the latest bully sport for insecure morons like Mr. Coward there.

      Delete
    6. Sorry to say it was a hoax. It's been proven many different times many different ways unfortunately it's the Bigfoot communities holy grail. so they ignore the facts. It is kind of sad, if you hoax and don't admit to it even though it's obvious you're guilty you're okay in the Bigfoot world.

      Delete
  2. If you watch this show you know Cowherd is a blowhard. He is not well thought out, like say a Michael Wilbon. He makes blanket statements and is a chauvinist. People on national television talking about things they know nothing about sounds like every other t.v. show.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The poor co-host is constantly covering for some obviously foolish comment he makes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is confirmed as a hoax, to sane, rational and intelligent people. Only a moron could know the whole story and come away believing it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If there was a "whole story" as you state, people wouldn't be discussing the film after all this time.
      Nobody has confirmed anything. Weighing evidence and coming to a personal conclusion is an opinion and "confirms" nothing.

      Delete
    2. The whole story. Their life history, the fact that he was on the ANE payroll. The fact that the ass doesn't flex but the ass section "shifts" as you'd expect some sort of padding to do, the fact that the suit is scrunching up at both hips. Hairy titties in which no other primate has, the hair line down the middle of the back in which no other primate has. The fact that Gimlin lies EVEN when there's verifiable evidence to prove he's lying. What else has or is he lying about? Patterson drew a pancake tittied female Squatch (just like the suit) prior.

      That's why its confirmed as a hoax to me and like I said: "confirmed to sane, rational and intelligent people" as well. Furthermore, what part of that statement did you NOT understand?

      Delete
    3. ^^^^^^and that's not everything that confirms this as a farce to me. Not even close to being everything. The bottom line is: go on through your life believing a known conman and a documented liar filmed Sasquatch when all you have to do is "research" if you want to.........that's your decision and right, its just a poor one.

      Delete
    4. At least you clarified yourself that it's a hoax to YOU. That still doesn't confirm anything as FACT.

      Exactly where did I say I believed the film was real or not real? Oh that's right, I didn't.

      I've read plenty on the film, I've read all the ANE stuff, I've seen the pictures, I've watched the film numerous times, and the list goes on.
      At the end of the day, whatever personal conclusion I come to does not make the film fact or fiction, it makes it my opinion.
      Maybe ask questions next time instead of making assumptions about what I think.

      Delete
    5. You better study the real evidence- the body dynamics for a creature walking on river deposits and the way it turns, soil interaction dynamics, and the anatomy...stay away from the horsecrap. The evidence can be deemed powerful to support a real 7'3" or so creature, especially when combined together with a proportion analysis of the shot showing the bottom of her feet. The 14.5" footprints (more or less the foot size)can be used to measure the body height by anyone to be about 7.5'. The points that you made are inaccurate and not on the table for strong evidence against the figure being real. Better do some research and reasses your inaccurate conclusions.

      Delete
    6. I 100% BELIEVE IN SASQUATCH..I JUST CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHY BOB GIMLIN WILL NOT TAKE A LIE DETECTOR TEST..AND THAT IS WHY I THINK THE PGF FILM IS A FAKE! IMO..

      Delete
    7. Well he just needs to be tested by that girl that got her polygraph machine out of a cracker jack box and everything will be fine.

      Delete
    8. ^^^^^Ha ha, no doubt. However, all joking aside while I'm thoroughly convinced PG is a farce I have to admit that I believe Smeja. If I'm wrong I quit. Its really that simple for me.

      Delete
    9. Amazing and amusing that ^^^^^^^ can call a video that has been studied, critiqued, analyzed, and studied again a "farce" yet you willfully believe Smeja on a polygraph test w/o any further evidence. The reason lie detector tests are not allowed in court is because they can be beaten. I personally believe the PG film is real because the time/date it was videoed (over 40 years ago) yet it can't be reproduced w/o CGI and Hollywood elite even today. The creature depicted in the film is accurate by thousands of eyewitness accounts (most current) Smeja on the other hand....well, he might be telling the truth but he has not film, no tracks, nothing. Again, you attack the most believable piece of evidence yet you blindly believe a story and a lie detector test. I don't get it. The weak argument about "padded suit" or man in monkey suit is absolutely ridiculous. Out one side of the mouth your camp speaks foolishness, then you jump to the other extreme with foolishness for the other side of the debate.

      Delete
    10. "You better study the real evidence"

      The real evidence has been put forth by the Munns report, the NASI report of 1998 and exhaustive enhancements by MK Davis. Why don't you @ssholes start there and then come back and spew some more crap. The evidence is the FILM. Not who or what Patterson or Gimlin may or may not have been. There is NO Fucking suit anywhere that can replicate what is on film!!!! How many fucking times has it got to be laid out for you dickheads? Either open your fucking eyes or go fuck yourselves.

      Delete
    11. GEEEZ..CALM DOWN DUDE!! ALL IM SAYING IS GIMLIN REFUSE TO TAKE THE POLY AND THAT RIGHT THERE RAISES A FEW RED FLAGS WITH ME.. IM JUST ON THE FENCE BECAUSE ALL THE CREDIBILITY ISSUES PATTERSON HAD..I WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT BELIEVE IN THE BIGMAN JUST UNDECIDED ON THE PGF..AND DO NOT TELL ME TO FUCK OFF!!! lol

      Delete
    12. He we go again, the Randi troll geeks can't leave it alone and must rant in long incoherent rambling posts on the subject of all they fear real the most. LOL

      Delete
  5. That Colin Cowpie is an arrogant douchebag. I had to quit watching that show because I couldn't stand him anymore. Love his new co-host though--she's very personable.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Replies
    1. Yeah, anybody that doesn't believe PGF is real is a dick.

      Delete
  7. Stupid, arrogant male in the media sucking d**k.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So was the Moon Landing. And the Holocaust.

      Delete
    2. All lies thought to advance the position of politicians towards a one world order lol just like the river on mars it's just a blanket over our eyes haha

      Delete
  8. Well it sure as hell hasn't been confirmed as real, you delusional freaks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure it has but the media prefers the faitytale monster just like the clueless trolls.

      Delete
  9. sane, rational & intelligent people keep an open mind. would you say that it's impossible for bigfoot to exist?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 100 years ago...maybe. NOW...no fuckin' way. The bleebers have helped me to reach this conclusion.

      Delete
    2. This is the same person who commented on the PG film above. I believe Smeja's story, the meat and potatoes of it exponentially. Does that answer your question?

      Delete
    3. To the guy who said "100 years ago...maybe" News flash: Only a little over two hundred years ago we were forming this country. The internet was only "invented" approx 12-14 years ago. GPS was unheard of until 1996ish. Camcorders were to expensive for the common man until recently. To assume we have discovered everything there is to find is niave and the very reason why Sasquatch can so easily elude man.

      Delete
    4. Word, perfectly put sir. Also cover-ups, bad luck, intelligent species of primal people, crappy cameras on moving objects handled by scared crappy photographers, fear of ridicule, fear of ramifications, the list is long why.

      Delete
  10. I've heard this over an over again in the media that it's confirmed as a hoax. It's become an urban legend. Confirmed means PROOF, not opinion or hearsay. So NO, no one can say it was confirmed as a hoax PERIOD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. weigh the evidence,watch Bob H walk,do research.
      Patterson was a con,If you believe Smejas polygraph that was done for a documentary you have to believe Bob's that was done for a T.V. show or you are a hypocrite.proven hoax pretty much.proven real not at all.

      Delete
    2. Indeed and a very stupid one at that, plus his whole typica human body build gives him away as a fat old liar not able in any shape or form to fit let alone operate a complicated suit. People are so incredibly gullible and the silly trolls misuse people's unawareness.

      Delete
  11. Ran into this guy once in Portland. He looks like a human rat. Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your mom looks like a human turd. Just Saying.

      Delete
  12. Yep confirmed a hoax decades ago.

    Here we have a perfect example of a footer raging when someone talks badly of their holy pgf.

    Seriously footers at least get a new film to cry over.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's all they have to hold onto. The Bigfoot myth is almost dead.

      Delete
    2. Where is the evidence it was a hoax! I hear the same stupid comments , but the so called suit has never shown up! Give it a rest !

      Delete
    3. Actually the Bigfoot field is bigger than ever! Have you been living in a box the last five years? We have more than a film to hold on too. They already tried to discount that film unsuccessfully for years. Skeptics like you keep trying to use the film as your rallying cry! Give it up. All you have to hold onto is a bunch of comments and zero evidence to disprove it.

      Delete
    4. Anon 8:15
      They sound like Cheney stating al qaeda was in it's death throes. LOL

      Yep, it's all over even though Oxford is doing a DNA study. Yep, yep, pass the mustard greens and tighten my suspenders.

      Delete
    5. LOL Yeah these JREF geeks are really shaking in their boots nothing scares them so badly than Bigfoot proven real because it'll make them doubt in science/evolution so far. And these clowns like status quo so they'll promote a lie the film's proven fake even though it clearly isn't, quite the contrary's the case.

      Delete
  13. I won't even bother watching the video. I think Bigfoot's existence must be proven first, before proving the authenticity of the film.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good luck with both but the outcome will be the same:HOAX.

      Delete
    2. Even if they do exist, PG is a farce of epic proportions. Why people hold on to it as their only crutch for preaching the existence is unequivocally dumb. You can believe in it or have an open mind and STILL be thoroughly convinced that PG is a great big joke.

      Delete
    3. No it's personal experiences moron! They get off their ass unlike you. It's you as a sceptic who keeps preaching and bringing it up. Guess who brought it up this time? Urban dwelling espn sceptic announcer who considers the outside smoke terrace of his office building as a wilderness experience!

      Delete
    4. To ^^^^, the simple fact that it is talked about repeatedly and still brought up daily proves its authenticity. Period, end of discussion, prove me wrong, 43 years of trying to discredit, over 15,695 days standing up to the feeble attacks of people like yourself solidify the PG films credibility.

      Delete
    5. ^^^^^^No, all that proves is that there are some implausibly dumb and gullible schmucks out there. That's a proven fact.

      If Gremlin is a 10th of the man you think he is then he'll admit it was a hoax prior to..........you know.

      Highly unlikely considering the fact that he'll lie to your face about things that happened in which one (the questioner) could "easily look up" and get the truth about.

      Delete
    6. Furthermore, I'm happy that those same gullible schmucks aren't the majority of the population over these last 44 years (October 20th will be 45 years) or I would have no hope for man-kind. Feeble attacks? OR logical facts?

      I know it hurts you, it would hurt me too if I had wasted years of my life hanging my hat on some conman's shenanigans.

      Delete
    7. The socalled skeptics - assh*led cynics in natural fact - are the ones writing page up page down about this. LOL You wonder why they need to, obviosuly the either fear it's real (which it is) or they already know and continue the cover-up.

      Delete
  14. Do you JREF butt plugs still bleeve the suit has been found ? I see a couple of you lemmings buying it hook, line and sinker.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear lord. Do you EVER post anything else? Make a bonafide contribution or stfu. You remind me of an idiot on the street corner rambling the same thing over and over. Is it just that you're too dumb to engage in an intelligent debate? Hell, screw the debate. Just try focusing on making one "thought out" post before you click "publish". You give blievers a bad rap. They'd be doing their group a huge favor by shunning degenerates like you.

      Delete
    2. So, I 'll put you down as a bleeber ?

      Delete
    3. Sounds like someone hit a nerve with the JREF rump buddies. Definately got their panties in a wad.

      Delete
    4. ^^^^If I'm going to half ass a word I'm going to at least half-ass it correctly and not in some childish, 3 year old pronounced leet bullshit. Idiot. Bleeb it out your own taterholed ass.

      Delete
    5. ^^^
      Are you pretending to be a skeptic ?

      Delete
    6. If by "skeptic", you mean: me thinking the character Forrest Gump would slap you around in a debate, then no. I believe it.

      Delete
  15. Yes 7:46 is definitely a sensitive JREF footer butt plug. Are you clowns embarrased that the self described "Skeptic Icon" and your BFF representive is conducting his "investigation" like a parody of Creekfreak's bean eating Bigfoot hunt ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LMFAO. No, its OBVIOUSLY the other way around. The proof to that is all of the responses to my post at 7:46 AND to this day, I STILL DO NOT know what a JREF is. That's the best part about all of this........besides the fact that there's been 4 (as Im typing this) replies to my post at 7:46 and STILL NOT ONE decent contribution to this site in terms of a well thought out Bigfoot reply. Its comedy gold!

      Delete
    2. Now you are at post #5 (and we'll go ahead and say: still counting) in reply to 7:46 and NOTHING. I'm not skeptical when it comes to the thought of Forrest Gump slapping you around in a debate AND he's a "character".

      Delete
    3. I don't blame for not admitting to be a JREF footer considering the current contingency of morons over there.

      Delete
    4. They let their frustrations over bigfoot reality out here, over there they can't use the foul language.

      Delete
  16. Ohhh my, the brain dead, jock worshiping idiot said it was a hoax, well its on ESPN, it has to be right. I guess everything was for not ladies and gents. Just go home and slurp down your "Brondo" cause "Its got electrolytes"...Duhhh. Yet another reason to ignore professional sports. I swore off football 10 yrs ago and dont miss it a bit. As for the other sports? Never really watched them either. I suppose that Jerry Springer will be hosting NOVA next, what a bizzarro world we live in... truly an idiocracy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! You're just mad that even a brain dead, jock worshiping idiot can figure out it's a hoax but you can't.

      Delete
    2. Too bad it's no hoax except to the spooked lamers like that male organ flute player.

      Delete
  17. Here's one for you 7:46. Have you ever wondered why hundreds of witnesses claim to see a 7ft to 8ft tall creature in the woods & not a 3ft to 4ft hobbit running around. its called evolution(natural selection). the only way a human like creature could survive in the woods with large predators & large prey items is by being that big. people are really witnessing a large biped because it would have to be large to stand toe to toe with bears, mountain lions, etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right, if it wasn't for the fact the squatches are in reality a hominin species of primal people - not creatures as they're often called implying a wild cartoonish beast.

      Delete
    2. Primal people or not something 8ft tall with hair all over will always look like a wild cartoonish beast.

      Delete
  18. Greetings! Quick question that's completely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My weblog looks weird when viewing from my iphone. I'm
    trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to fix this issue.
    If you have any recommendations, please share. Thanks!


    my weblog :: checkroom
    Visit my site ... corresponding

    ReplyDelete
  19. Howdy! I am about to begin my own blog and was wondering if
    you know where the best place to buy a blog url is? I am not even
    sure if that's what its called? (I'm new to this)
    I'm referring to "http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2925104810508047182&postID=116141503501016670". How do I go about acquiring one of these for the website I'm creating?
    Thanks a lot

    My blog: google
    Feel free to surf my web-site - concrete concrete

    ReplyDelete
  20. Good day I am so grateful I found your webpage, I
    really found you by error, while I was researching on
    Google for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like
    to say thanks for a marvelous post and a all round thrilling blog
    (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to look over it all
    at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds,
    so when I have time I will be back to read more, Please do keep
    up the superb b.

    my web blog; driveway series
    Also visit my web site ... marshalls

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hello! Quick question that's entirely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My website looks weird when viewing from my iphone 4. I'm trying to find a template or plugin that might be able to resolve this
    problem. If you have any suggestions, please share. Thanks!


    My weblog; dereliction
    My homepage eyeglass

    ReplyDelete
  22. I am really enjoying the theme/design of your weblog.
    Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems?
    A handful of my blog readers have complained about my site not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari.

    Do you have any tips to help fix this issue?

    my page; emptily

    ReplyDelete
  23. Amazing! I'm really enjoying the design and style of your blog. Are you using a customized theme or is this freely available to all users? If you don't
    want to say the name of it out in the general public, please e-mail me at:
    randal-brandon@gmail.com. I'd love to get my hands on this template! Thanks a lot.

    Feel free to visit my web site eco-farm.org

    ReplyDelete
  24. Please let me know if you're looking for a writer for your blog. You have some really good posts and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I'd really like to write some material for your blog in exchange for a
    link back to mine. Please shoot me an email if
    interested. Kudos!

    Feel free to visit my blog post: trees Stump

    ReplyDelete
  25. Have you ever thought about writing an e-book or guest authoring on other websites?
    I have a blog based upon on the same information
    you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information.
    I know my readers would enjoy your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel
    free to shoot me an e mail.

    Take a look at my web blog :: strec

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hmm it looks like your blog ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I'll just sum it up what I had written and say, I'm thoroughly enjoying your
    blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I'm still new to the whole thing. Do you have any helpful hints for beginner blog writers? I'd genuinely appreciate it.



    Here is my blog - vage

    ReplyDelete
  27. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up
    and let you know a few of the pictures aren't loading correctly. I'm not sure why but I think its
    a linking issue. I've tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same outcome.

    My web blog; profesionalna

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hey. I noticed your blog title, "Blogger: Bigfoot Evidence" doesn't really reflect the content of your web site. When writing your blog title, do you believe it's best to
    write it for SEO or for your visitors? This is one thing
    I've been battling with mainly because I want good rankings but at the same time I want the best quality for my website visitors.

    Look into my web-site removal prices
    Also see my web page: action stump

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hmm is anyone else having problems with the pictures on this blog loading?

    I'm trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it's the blog.
    Any feed-back would be greatly appreciated.

    Also visit my web page vaga

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the images on
    this blog loading? I'm trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it's the blog.
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    Also visit my site ... http://www.inaturalist.org/

    ReplyDelete
  31. Heya! I'm at work surfing around your blog from my new iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the fantastic work!

    Check out my blog - folije

    ReplyDelete
  32. I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme.
    Did you make this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you?
    Plz respond as I'm looking to create my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from. many thanks

    my web-site; vaga

    ReplyDelete
  33. Hello administrator, I just wanted to give you a brief heads up that your current
    Domain name: http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2925104810508047182&postID=116141503501016670 is being flagged as a possibly malicious site in my browser
    opera. I would highly suggest having someone look into it.

    You can easily lose a lot of guests due to this kind of issue.

    Very best of Luck.

    Have a look at my webpage ... tasteysinger.tumblr.com
    my site: lost data

    ReplyDelete
  34. I'm starting up a internet blog directory and was wanting to know if I can submit your website? I'm hoping to grow my directory gradually by hand so that it maintains good quality.
    I will make sure and put your website in the correct category
    and I'll also use, "Blogger: Bigfoot Evidence" as your anchor text. Please let me know if this is okay with you by e-mailing me at: chet.christopher@aol.com. Many thanks

    Also visit my web-site; lost data

    ReplyDelete
  35. Would you mind if I quote a small number
    of your articles or blog posts as long as I provide credit and sources
    returning to your blog: http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2925104810508047182&postID=116141503501016670.

    I'm going to aslo be sure to give you the appropriate anchortext hyperlink using your blog title: Blogger: Bigfoot Evidence. Be sure to let me know if this is okay with you. Many thanks

    Here is my page :: computer

    ReplyDelete
  36. This design is incredible! You most certainly know how to keep
    a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos,
    I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost..
    .HaHa!) Excellent job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it.
    Too cool!

    Visit my homepage ... comp

    ReplyDelete
  37. Asking questions are truly pleasant thing if you are not understanding anything
    completely, but this piece of writing provides good understanding even.


    Also visit my web blog - http://Www.Jokemusic.jp

    ReplyDelete
  38. Greetings! I've been following your web site for a long time now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from Kingwood Tx! Just wanted to tell you keep up the fantastic job!

    Review my blog; paving

    ReplyDelete
  39. I've loaded your website in 3 totally different browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Would you mind e-mailing me the company name of your web hosting company? My personal e-mail is: tiahelton@freenet.de. I will even sign up through your affiliate link if you'd like.

    Thankyou

    Feel free to visit my web-site ... dietetic

    ReplyDelete
  40. Hey there. I'm wondering if you might be interested in doing a link exchange? I notice your blog: http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2925104810508047182&postID=116141503501016670 and my blog are structured around the same topic. I'd love to switch links or possibly guest author a article for you.
    Here is my personal e-mail: tammystaggs@gmail.
    com. You should contact me if you're even remotely interested. Appreciate it.

    my webpage - advokati beograd

    ReplyDelete
  41. I was wondering if you ever considered changing the structure of your blog?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or two images.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

    Here is my web blog :: advokatska tarifa

    ReplyDelete
  42. It's a pity you don't have a donate button! I'd without a doubt donate to this excellent blog! I suppose for now i'll settle for bookmarking and adding
    your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group.
    Chat soon!

    Also visit my blog :: advokatska tarifa

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?