Carl Olinselot Driving Home From Sierra Kills Site As A Changed Man


There were a lot of things that happened to some of us at the Sierra Kills site that we haven't shared yet. While we're all waiting for Ro Sahebi to finish up the documentary, Carl Olinselot decided to spill the beans in his latest video. After leaving the site, Carl went home 100 percent convinced that Bigfoot is real.

Watch below:

Comments

  1. Well I havn't seen shit to convince me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't have to see shit to know it's there,you can smell it.

      Delete
    2. So Carl is a BF researcher? Why, after an obviously fruitful and exciting research trip that confirmed you passion, would you wait AN ENTIRE YEAR to go back? I mean, why mot call in sick and spend a few more days there while the evidence is presenting itself? Convincing story and presentation so far....but like so many other Bigfoot stories so far it is just that....another story with no evidence.

      I still say if Justin did not keep the baby bigfoot body he supposedly shot, he is a complete fool and tool..and his story is nothing but crap no matter what other evidence is presented.

      Delete
    3. You won't find Bigfoot on the Internet Anon 3:23! He doesn't tweet ! Get your ass off of your urban couch and get out in the woods. Hey you might even see a bird!

      Delete
    4. I got news for you pal, he's not in the woods, he's in my living room, hiding behind the couch. I'm fixin' to go get my broom and flush 'im out, he don't belong there.

      Delete
  2. Well I know people personally who have seen Bigfoots. That plus all the anecdotal and other evidence has me convinced. Looking forward to more on this story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know what? I'll give you that but have come to the conclusion that reading Bigfoot forums or blogs is detrimental.

      Most times 99.99999% is bullshit, but, and I mean but, that miniscule small percentage of facts or info that gets posted is lost in all the crap.

      Delete
    2. That's why people need to get off their ass and spend time in the woods! Trying to find truth on the Internet is like trying to ski without ever leaving your living room!

      Delete
    3. Actually the Nintendo Wii has a ski game that you can play in your living room.

      Delete
    4. I wish they had a Bigfoot expedition wii game, that would be so cool.

      Delete
  3. and some will never be convinced. No matter what the evidence is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why do you need to convince other people, is this a contest or an ego trip where you have to be absonerated and proved right?

      I've seen stuff out in the wilds you wouldn't believe and told nobody and never hopped on a forum, as I know it would be futile. But yes, I am looking for answers! And guess what? theres none.

      Just limp dicks sitting behind their keyboards who wouldn't know a multi day or week wilderness hike if it came up and kicked them in the balls.

      Delete
    2. R U frustrated? angry maybe?

      glad I'm not THAT unhappy.

      Delete
    3. Because they come on here wanting to be convinced otherwise what the hell are they here for? I guess Just to argue! Some people that's all the do is argue and they seek confrontation! They argue for arguing sake! Argue with their spouse , children, coaches, and schools. We all know them. They are the idiot in the grocery store holding up the line shouting so everybody can hear and they want everybody to agree with them while everybody thinks the person is a moron! Then the moron goes home with a perverse satisfaction because they think they stuck it to the man!

      Delete
    4. I take it truth hurts and no I shop on-line as I hate crowds.

      Delete
    5. If I had inconclusive proof personally that they existed, I wouldn't try to convince anyone of anything. I would still come here and laugh at those that do though. I also doubt that I would go looking to see it again.

      Delete
    6. Wow, there's a lot of folks on here with pent up anger and frustration it seems. Calm down babies, it's just a blog, a blog about an imaginary creature, at that.

      Delete
    7. Because of trolls like u prick! Anon 8;09. So if you think they are imaginary why do you follow imaginary creatures? Ohh I'm just here because I like wasting my time and i like to stir the pot and argue! I heard that California is imaginary too because I've never been there and all I've heard Is that somebody told me that it existed and they saw it!

      Delete
    8. I'm here to laugh at you sweetheart.

      Delete
    9. It's "exonerated" or "absolved" by the way...

      Delete
    10. Oh yeah I go on pigeon and fairy sights and laugh! WTF? Do you laugh at retarded and handicap people? Pastors and nuns? Your twisted anon 8:34!

      Delete
    11. Anon 8:34 needs to find Something else to humor her cynical attitude. You do match the moron at the grocery store. Your basically an adult bully! Laugh at people and actually go out of your way to do it! Incredible!

      Delete
    12. "Do you laugh at retarded and handicap people?" See my previous post for your answer @8:34.

      Delete
    13. I'm neither but apparently you must in public you loser! Pathetic!

      Delete
    14. My cousin is handicap and I take offense to Anon 8:34 who said she comes here to laugh at others expense. Too bad there has to be people like that in the world! You laugh at others who are passionate- ha ha your soo funny! Great person to be around I bet!

      Delete
    15. Anon 9:36 is an asshole!

      Delete
  4. Somehow I feel that this guy just spilled too many beans. I bet he gets reprimanded Big time. Did he sign a NDA? cause he just blew it. But all in all, pretty convincing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jim Jones would've loved you...and Carl.

      Delete
    2. Sounds like one hell of a trailer for the documentary. Carl - you do not sound silly and there sure as heck is no shame to be had. Welcome to the club of the Knowers.

      You guys and gals involved in this endeavor talked yesterday about making connections with an outside production company. I have already strongly suggested weighing all the options and bringing it out on History, Discovery, Nat Geo, or Animal Planet, and thus playing to an audience of millions. There must be a Doug Hajicek type person out there that would do this.

      I look forward to documentary.

      Chuck

      Delete
    3. this is just a lot of B.S. man. let's go camping show us all of the food and the new hat crap. but when it comes to the weekend story you can't talk about it. what's the deal with you west coast types? can't you people tell us what went down without checking it out with the head clown. and dude what is ok with you? not telling us what went down! or being loyal to a scum poacher(justin smeja) let's not forget that fact he is a poacher and should be hung up in a tree. oh better watch out you stupid people all signed the non disclose act.yea they signed it too, but you won't get any of the cash. so next year (korn look a like dude) you'll be on a pedal bike going to them there hills. and the poacher will be in his limo.

      Delete
    4. You have no idea what you are talking about. Justin works for the department of conservation and department of fish and game. He is very much the oppesite of a poacher. In a radio interview Ted nugent described justin as a conservationist and a protector of the great outdoors.

      Delete
    5. HAHAHA 9:50! Best one of the day!!

      Delete
    6. Like anybody should respect the opinion of a CONVICTED 2-state poacher and SELF-ADMITTED draft dodger. Great guy there.

      Delete
  5. next time you go with all the cameras i bet nothing happens. Anyway did the angry mama come back and chuck rocks or something?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bigfoot moansand screams all night. the mom recognized Justin and made a mourning stick figure. Other male bigfoot tried to shoot justin and ro as revenge. kind liek aliens vs predators except delusional idiots. s fake bigfoot. no one wins

      Delete
    2. Please do not text and drive Anon 526

      Delete
  6. W H A T is he saying ??? This video's not making sense. How did you know (as the header said on the first video of him going there), that he was a "changed man" already then when this is supposed to be his return video?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I predicted this video when the first Carl video was shown. Grunts from the bushes and shaking trees does not a Bigfoot make, well of course, unless you happen to be looking for Bigfoots in the first place. My next prediction is: this documentary will give us more anecdotal evidence, nothing more. Yeah, yeah, I know 'you had to be there', you would believe too, if you were.

      Delete
    2. Same o, trying to justify everything to themselves. Why the Polygraph, why this blog, why that, this etc.,

      PROVE it to mainstream science......and forget douche bag blogs and forums, ah hold on, only those will listen.

      Delete
    3. Oh but they have sensational new evidence and would've been able to document it if they'd only had the right equipment. Most rational people would need to have a fac-to-face encounter with the big beastie before believing so, I'm assuming Carl was looking old biggie right in the eye, since he seems like a rational fella. If he'd only had a thermal viewer, he could've shared his up close experience with everyone and we would all now be believers, but alas, all we hear are stories about the one that got away.

      Delete
    4. why are you on a douche bag blog,ah hold on you're a douche bag.

      Delete
    5. fair enough, but much like you as well :)

      Delete
  7. One legged man looking for one legged woman, interested in long walks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Take a long walk on a short peir...tell me how it turns out...

      Delete
    2. What by myself? no sodding way.

      Delete
  8. What is he saying? What made him convinced that this did happen all he keeps saying is that it was a great experience for him. Did he see a Bigfoot and video tape it or hear something that he could not explan what made him so convinced? I hope he will make another video and tell everyone what made him such a believer in Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They set the hook, now they're reeling you in.

      Delete
    2. I think we will find out all of this in Ro's doc.I would like to know what they had for equipment though.

      Delete
    3. You don't say. If and it's a big if he ships it free, and I mean totally free, I may have some respect for the guy, as at present I've lost all respect for them.

      Too many red flags. In the Smeja video, why didn't they video the computer so professionals could scrutinize the screen results to the questions? an over sight, maybe? and more...

      It just smells wrong all of this. Like Melba, Biscardi, Moneymaker and all the rest.

      Delete
    4. You've said in a few posts now gnrfan that your not book smart. I have to tell you after reading a few of your posts this.

      Intelligence comes in different forms, book smart or wilderness or just plain old common sense. Theres an old saying "If you want to sound smart go to college, if you want to be smart go to nature" don't cut yourself short man, or not again!

      Delete
    5. Yep, 5:46. NOTHING seen or heard from this jaunt can be considered seriously because they were led to those spots by a group with a HUGE vested interest in promoting belief in Sasquatch (whether it really exists or not).

      Delete
    6. Right! What we need is a group with NO INTEREST in promoting the the belief in Sasquatch to agree to go up there. By the way, when does Hell freeze over?

      Delete
    7. 21/12/2012 and I do agree BTW.

      Delete
  9. I believe you carl 100 percent,its common sense.

    ReplyDelete
  10. So , the video to sell us on the documentary tells us they didn't have much in the way of camera equipment.....I'm sure this is gonna be a professional job indeed....Bigfootery gold is going on right now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Didn't you watch the video? The guy with the ultrathermalated Mega Bigfoot squatchalizer viewer didn't go.

      Delete
  11. WHY didn't they video the computer screen while the lie detector test was being performed so professionals could strutinize it later?

    ReplyDelete
  12. So funny... All of it as to peeps holding info for future documentory and offers... Once again, no real science folks... Move away from the kool aid because it has too much sugar.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wow, that Carl is just full of information. If you you go to youtube to watch the video, check out the comments. When asked when the video would be released, he said this: "It will either be on television or in theaters. For certain a DVD. All my footage will be used as the behind the scenes content." So then, I guess this is just another Bigfoot money making venture. They never said they weren't going to make money off of their documentary so, it's no big deal, right? Looks like in the end, Carl may even profit from the whole thing. It's like there's a race between all of the footers to see who can get on a TV show first. My vote is for SWP, but Fasano is trailing at a close second.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can't fault the guys for wanting to recoup their expenses at some point, but a straight-to-DVD customer base will be pretty small. Plus, they'll have to spend more money humping it around to BF conventions and such. Fasano? You're joking right? What evidence has he EVER produced?

      Delete
  14. Until we get a body in a box, we are left with 2 wild stories. SWP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or until one of you guys get your own TV show on TruTV after Operation Repo.

      Delete
  15. Oh dear, the things a person finds out when they just do a little research. The poygraph 'expert' got her credentials by taking an online course from a dubious site. The course is called, 'polygraph-academy-in-a box', I shit you not. If you know her full name, it's not too hard to connect the dots, just go to her Linkedin page for a start.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh my... do tell more! Let me guess -- the "Academy" just happens to sell the units as well.

      Ro said they had to find an operator "they could afford". I guess it falls to how experienced she's become since becoming accredited (or did she, and by what agency?)

      Delete
    2. This has smelled from the start because of Bart composing the questions for his friend. It should have been TOTALLY independent with a broad range of questions, not just the obvious and expected Sierra Kills stuff. The questions were also too lengthy to be considered reliable.

      Delete
    3. Well the site says the 'polygraph-academy-in-a box' weighs 50 pounds so, yeah, I'm assuming the truthy machine comes with the package. That or maybe a George Foreman grill.

      Delete
    4. Her testimonial, from the site - "If you want to become a trained Polygraph Examiner sooner than all the
      students at the distant academies, get the extensive "Polygraph Academy in a Box".

      Honestly, I looked into several training programs that were very expensive
      and took several months to complete. None had all the coverage I was looking for.
      Instead, I went with the PolygraphAcademy.com package-- it was exhaustively
      thorough and very detailed. It is the kind of materials that teach you all
      that you need to know in order to be a competent examiner, quickly
      and completely, without wasting your time in long class sessions where they
      spend much of their time on non-essential time-wasting matters.

      Another reason to jump on this exhaustive package is that you can do it on your
      own time and with the convenience and privacy of studying in your own home".

      Jeannie Hobbs, POLYGRAPH EXAMINER
      www.PrecisionPolygraph.com, Arizona and California

      Delete
    5. Just another branch of the Bigfoot Multi-Level Marketing Opportunity exposed. The 50 lbs of freight includes 10 lbs of flyers you leave on gas station counters with your name rubber-stamped on the back.

      Delete
    6. PLUS a George Foreman grill if you ACT FAST! xD!!!

      Delete
    7. Bart Neutrino will be along shortly to give everyone a reasonable explanation for all of this.

      Delete
    8. So, so glad you brought this up original anon. She also has an assoc degree from University of Phoenix, LOL LOL LOL. HOW IN THE WORLD CAN ANYONE TAKE HER SERIOUSLY? Can you really get a license to give polygraph tests from an online course? God, you people who fall for this shit are seriously damn stupid!!!

      Delete
    9. Oh, looks like someone is jealous of a damn good researcher (Bart) who doesn't make irresponsible comments.

      If I were Ro, I'd explain and remind shallow idiots like you who merely googled Jeanne Hobbs name, that she appears to be:

      1) Credentialed and expereinced (botom line)
      2) She'a a PI who a decade ago wanted to add polygraphs to her business which is very common.
      3) she made a testimonial a decade ago for training materials that have dumb marketing name..so what?
      4) research others who made testimonials with same product and majority have impressive careers currently

      investigate that idiots instead of lazily just googling someone's name.

      Oh and, You've been served

      Delete
    10. We've been served? You sir are the idiot! ROFLMAO. Hey, I'm sure I could get a diploma to be a MD on line.... Do you need any surgery in the near future? You are the type of imbecile that would go to the Philippines for psychic surgery. We've been served.... LOLOLOL

      Delete
    11. Actually, though I agree it was an immature send off about being served. he/she's got a point there and people are making a huge deal of nothing about this woman's testimonal as polygraphs are polygraphs. and getting a MD online is a really poor analogy as one thing is literally brain surgery and one isn't. Not sure where people thought polygraph training is years and years of rigorous training as I could've told them that's not the case. personally, Im more impressed with years of experience, though I'm not a huge poly believer anyway.

      For what it's worth, I thought questioning was fine and covered quite a bit as there's only so much you can ask and word differently. the primary examiner decided what was acceptable or not based on what we learned from her interview after test. the only way to really, really have done the poly right was to spend quite a bit of money (in thousands I imagine) where you would've had to brief examiner on long sierra story and they would formulate questions from that.

      would be curious to know what was spent on this as my guess would be three-four hundred$

      Delete
  16. from the dark grove of thatch.....morgan freeman appears dressed in a brown suit and wingtip shoes. with a smooth and casual stride he exclaims,"who did you expect, aliens?" "come sit around the campfire so i can explain whats going on up here"

    ReplyDelete
  17. This guy has bigger breasts than Pattie.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Bigfoot researchers are simply money hungry, non educated idiots and those that follow them are morons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are just jealous because we are on the verge of the biggest discovery ever and you are too scared to handle it.

      Delete
    2. The biggest discovery ever are the exoplanets and all life that does exist on them.

      Delete
    3. Anon 10:55 you are a damn fool. This whole thing is one big money making joke and you are one of the stupid sheep about to fall off the cliff.

      Delete
    4. It's only a short drop, I think I'll survive. No problem anyway, I'm getting tired of Bigfoot stuff. That end-of-the-world stuff looks kind of interesting. I might just latch on to that fad for a while and become fervently involved.

      Delete
    5. That's demonstrably untrue, but keep flapping your virtual lips if it makes you feel safe at night.

      Delete
  19. Na i think the the believers are going to shove it down your fu.king throats this time.You ready for a belly full you bunch of fagg.ts.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I will make sure theres plenty of corn and peanuts on it for you.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Replies
    1. Um, yeah, that's how I spell it. You spell it differently maybe? Is there like a UK way of spelling it or something? Help me out here sugarplum.

      Delete
    2. What I meant by that is you aint already got the evidence? Its always gonna be on the "verge".

      Delete
    3. Virgil? Is that you Virgil?

      Delete
  22. Wow Bigfooter heads are exploding for sure after this interesting news. To be continued...indeedy.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yea im on the verge of knocking mutha fuc.ers like you the fu.k out. i aint ever hit no tat.r ho.e ,but i would beat your as. over double and rip the baffle out of your a.sh.le.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Hey anon 1126 it would look like a ardvark trunk hanging out cha ass.Turn that fuc.er inside out.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Dont call me sugar plum i hate effection lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You hate proper word usage as well, or so it seems.

      Delete
  26. Sorry i read into stuff way to much i guess.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ok what the fu.k ever. i drank to much gotta go cocoa puff.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Changed man, huh? Does he still hunt? Does he still kill innocent animals with his other fat redneck friend Smegma?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Animals sure are tasty. My favorite part is slitting a hogs throat and watching the blood shoot and flow. Makes you feel alive.

      Delete
  29. I think I'm moving on also. This shit is getting boring. Just remember everyone the results will be released soon......very, very soon. I'll be back in 4 months to check the status and It will still be soon.... very, very soon. Peace out taterholes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You could check back 5 years from now and the sheep would still be saying.... Soon, very, very soon. The Ketchup DNA Study will be released any day now. It IS getting very tiring and PT Barnum was right.

      Delete
  30. SWP's farts smell like Vaseline.


    signed,

    Carl

    ReplyDelete
  31. Can we please get Carl's next update while he's on the shitter.

    ReplyDelete
  32. He was changed into a complete homosexual!

    ReplyDelete
  33. I believe you, but wouldn't it make more sense to release this after the documentary, so you didn't have to cut out all the parts that really put your feelings into context? We need to know what happened there before we can appreciate this.

    ReplyDelete
  34. He sure does have a pretty mouth on him. It looks kind of like a 1970's vagina!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story