FB/FB Analyzes Mink Creek Idaho Bigfoot Footage Sent In By Dr. Jeff Meldrum


Here's something to think about: If Dr. Jeff Meldrum is sending videos to FB/FB for analysis, does this make them the new authority in Bigfoot video analysis?

All we can say is, pay attention to them folks, these guys are quickly moving up the ranks in the world of Bigfootery, and no matter how ridiculous you think their "authentication" videos are, they are here to stay. After analyzing hundreds of purported Bigfoot footage, it now seems people are starting to trust their authentication methods. Regardless of all the annoying burping sounds coming from the FB/FB narrator when he does his videos, the guy is an expert at what he does.

Here is FB/FB's breakdown of the Mink Creek Idaho Bigfoot footage. Dr. Meldrum believe it's authentic due to the footprint photos shown to him by the student who filmed it.


New Analysis #59 of 78 "Mink Creek Idaho Bigfoot watches students" Feb. 2012 This is the second of two videos given to us by Dr. Jeff Meldrum. Given to us a few months ago, we did de-shaker to stabilize for the video for his analysis. HS Student noticed figure on a hill and films it briefly as it leaves. Confirms on Observing from strategic position, leaving when observed, hand held in cupped position, likely brow with no forehead, consistent coloring. The footprint was authenticated by 2:1 ratio and nearly square toes we compare it to the London OR trackway prints authenticated by Cliff Barackman.

Comments

  1. Why is the film still being considered after the crypto crew showed it was a bear? Maybe the print does belong to a bigfoot, but the video is a mama bear and some cubs. FACT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And you're nothing but a troll. FACT

      Delete
    2. You disagree with the analysis on the crypto crew website?

      Delete
    3. The crypto crew are JREF James Randi troll skeptics. Take your James Randi troll JREF footer garbage to some other skeptic JREF forum, troll skeptic.

      Delete
    4. So you're saying the mama bear left a bigfoot track?....are you on drugs?

      Delete
    5. The crypto crew are skeptics? I did not know that, but it does not matter: they made it clear the Idaho footage is a bear and cubs.

      I did not say a bear left the track, but yes it would be long shot that a bigfoot print was left independently at the scene, so yeah it is probably a fake.

      Delete
    6. Posting facts is trolling? Only to morons I guess. Some people have an IQ above room temperature and actually know what they're talking about. 99.99% of the time the people who can only muster up a peon brained comment like "troll" have not a clue, none. I'm so glad I'm smarter than them. So glad my Mom and Dad didn't fail at life.

      Delete
    7. Since there are varying oppinions, and no proof. It is not a fact! fact!!

      Guess old mom and dad raised an Idiot!!!
      Fact!

      Delete
    8. So, leon, if I claim the ocean is filled with tomato soup its no longer a fact that its filled with salt water because there are now varying opinions? You are not very bright, we can tell by your comments. Just because people want the vid to be of a bigfoot does not change the fact that it is a bear. Anyone who claims otherwise is desperate for vindication or has an agenda. FACT

      Delete
    9. No dumbass, we can PROOVE the ocean is full of salt water, FACT.

      we can't proove anything about the video, so it's an opinion.

      ARE YOU REALLY THAT FUCKING STUPID?

      Delete
    10. WITH THAT LOGIC, YOU GOT TO BE A LIBTARD!

      Delete
    11. Also, i didn't claim it was a bigfoot or a bear. thats the point shit for brains.
      I, nor you, nor ANYONE else has proof of what it is.

      SO THERE IS NO FACTS ABOUT IT-- IDIOT.

      Delete
    12. leon, the video shows a bear. What is the BFD? Do you own the rights to it or something?

      Delete
    13. You bear people are fucking nuts, always think your seeing bears everywhere.

      Proove it was a bear!

      Just another blob-bear, what a waste of my bear finding time.

      Delete
    14. By his "libtard" comment, it seems Leon is a conservative/Republican/tea party whatever. So that explains his belief in this debunked video - with his (apparent) political leanings he will believe anything.

      Delete
  2. This is the real deal, folks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^Who is this guy? I swear this gets posted on every video lol.

      Delete
  3. It's not a fact because you capitalized it. The crypto crew doesn't know shit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a member of the forest tribe. FACT

      Delete
  4. DOES NOT LOOK LIKE A BEAR TO ME

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well you know the saying,''Does a bear $hat in the woods?'' Just saying... P.S. PLEASE STOP THE HOLLERING,Thank you.

      Delete
  5. One person's Troll is another person's Hero. One person's Hero is another person's Troll. And so the wheel of stupidity turns.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When will fb/fb be enough. This asshole like joebblack1963 find bigfoot in there yards..Enough is enough

    ReplyDelete
  7. Meldrum decided to bring his level of credibility down to Ketchum's level?...excellent.

    ReplyDelete
  8. When Jeff Meldrum is asking Facebook FindBigfoot for video confirmation analysis you know the Bigfoot Field is in dire straights. FACT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And whom do you suggest that is better, or are you just here to crap?

      If you don't have a good suggestion, well shut the ^%&^& up!

      Delete
  9. Some of you people have absolutely no tact. What's wrong with starting off your comment by "I Believe" instead of ripping everything apart. Are you all really that mean spirited and rude? I repect your right to believe what you believe. Why can't you give the same respect? No wonder the Bigfoot community is tearing itself apart! Kris

    ReplyDelete
  10. that's a heck of lot of analysis for about 3 seconds of footage. Once again, either a Bigfoot or a fake (due to the nearby footprint which rules out a bear). Based on all the recent footage, either the U.S. supports a population of around 1,000 unknown creatures or 1,000 bigfoot hoaxers.

    ReplyDelete
  11. LOL...Completely useless due to limited scope, time, and observer distance.What can be seen in the few seconds to me appears to be an animal with it's back to the camera, then the motion of dropping (to all fours) occurs. I very clearly see the animal has a stubby rear and can make out the front. It appears to be a bear. Two questions BTW, before I go

    1) What rational thinking person dismisses all people with opposing view points as "trolls"?
    Go look up the definition of internet trolls.

    2)What rational thinking person would consider three seconds of stabilized video footage as definitive evidence of a creature who's existence is "debated" to put it mildly?

    Put 1 & 2 together....Agree with anon above. If this is critical thinking going on--you guys are a JOKE.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story