Watch Dr. Jeff Meldrum Talk About Why The "Dr. Stephen Hawkings" of Human DNA Is Interested In Bigfoot


If you were a world-famous professor of human genetics at Oxford University and a famous colleague offered to send you hair samples from a possible Sasquatch hybrid, would you look into it?

On April 28, 2012, Dr. Jeff Meldrum of Idaho State had lunch with Dr. Bryan Sykes (a professor and author of and the New York Times best-seller The Seven Daughters of Eve) to talk about this Sasquatch hybridization theory. Although Dr. Meldrum does not believe there is any evidence to support such a theory, they both agreed to take a closer examination.

Watch this video of Dr. Jeff Meldrum give his talk about the discussion he had with Dr. Sykes over lunch. *This video was filmed by Guy Edwards at the Pacific Northwest Conference on Primal People held in Richland, WA.


Thanks to Bigfoot Lunch Club for uploading the video.

[via www.bigfootlunchclub.com]

Comments

  1. I have heard of half breeds in and around the mountains of remote Russia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And in Kentucky and West Virginia.

      Delete
    2. Anon, its usually the people who post stuff like that who are really the ones fucking their sister. Grow up, no one is ammused.

      Delete
    3. So...5:12..you are fucking your sister. Hmmm...

      Delete
    4. Just like the ketchum bullshit, starting all over again.

      Delete
    5. You mean the trolling does.

      Delete
  2. I'll bet Richland has a few, also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, being downwind of Hanford, I'll bet they do. LOL.

      Delete
    2. Haha! I live in Eastern Washington and from the Tri-Cities to the Northeast in the Colville area there are some strange looking people that could fall into the category. They could also just be the product of being raised in a singlewide meth lab.

      Delete
  3. Absolutely! To solely rely on someone who makes questionable remarks and or statements concerning their relationship to BF may be a huge mistake for an endeavor looking for the truth and trying to get it accepted by the public or by a gov.t institution needed to protect them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What has taken so long to get a recognized study on the DNA? About time. Can't wait to hear what Sykes has to say. Maybe it will raise some eyebrows in academia and finally get some real field studies going with financial backing.
    FLIR mounted helicopters, for one thing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, that and rope nets dropped from helo's and guys ready to rap down and tranquilize. At least for the first type speciman. They do helo work in New Zealand for red deer. Guys drop on the deer straight from the helo and bulldog them down for tagging. That might not work on an 8' primate though.

      Delete
    2. It's not impossible. I use to bullseye wamprats in my T-16 back home. They're not much bigger than 2 meters.

      Delete
    3. Or how about drones? It's completely impossible guys, any Sasquatch down there would be gone long before any drop. We're not talking about apes here, if people would understand how silly that discussion is and eliminated at last more could be achieved. Until then we're just blowing smoke in the wind. And who would the forces be perfoming such a task anyway? Not the powers that be they already know and leave them in peace, that's probably the only thing you can trust in all of this they must absolutely love and watch this dividing field friction with utmost glee.

      Delete
    4. Anon @ 3.22. I heard Sykes and Meldrum are wanted men. They have the death sentence in 12 systems. I'd be careful.

      Delete
    5. The powers that be are probably some of the posters in here that want everyone to believe they do not exist. Ive always felt this is the case.

      Delete
    6. Absolutely, they either joke about it or try to intimidate you neither of which troll activity works of course.

      Delete
  5. "There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that(our time)when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. Genesis 6:4. Bigfoot is a hybrid man, DNA will prove this. Gigantopithicus is close, just loose the pithicus, a human hybrid giant is what Bigfoot is. This also explains the Bigfoot UFO connection and BF's lust for human women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go away with your bible thumping. Bigfoot is not a nephilim.

      Delete
    2. Prove that it isn't! Fact is nobody knows.

      Delete
    3. Science has proven that the earth isn't 6,000 years old. How about you start there with your education?

      Delete
    4. Drop the Bible on your foot and it might get swollen. That is the only way a Bible would have anything to do with a Bigfoot.

      Delete
  6. I think it is great that a real scientist like Dr. Bryan Sykes is finally getting involved in a real DNA study.

    I doubt Dr. Sykes will start seeing Bigfoot families lurking in the woods surrounding Oxford

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No Bigfoots in them rolling hills of England, no.

      Delete
    2. 4 years ago: I'm glad a real scientist like Dr. Meldrum is getting involved, sasquatch will be proven soon!

      2 years ago: I'm glad a real scientist like Dr. Ketchum is getting involved, sasquath will be proven soon!

      This year: I'm glad a real scientist like Dr. Bryan Dukes is getting involved, sasquatch will be proven soon!

      10 years from now: I'm glad Dr. Fillintheblank is getting involved, sasquatch will be... proven... any... day.... now.....

      Delete
    3. Get a life 451. Seriously you must sit at home all day in front of your computer and post comments on this site.

      Delete
    4. He is the product of a joining trying to stop others discovering his lineage.

      Delete
    5. Yes, it's the same old troll crap even though they know they can't prevent this discovery no matter how hard the try so they'll try and discourage researchers by saying oh look how long it's been and no proof yet. LOL

      Delete
    6. 451 - I've never even heard of Dr Fillintheblank. Sounds suss, I think you made that name up.

      Delete
  7. Meldrum says in the vid that he does not believe in a hybrid. And he's probably right. But, anything to get Sykes to look at the DNA. BTW the image at the top of the article is very misleading. That statement was concerning bear DNA that was later id'd.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Melba and company aren't going to be happy about Sykes stealing their thunder or book sales. He has stellar cred and already has a publisher and marketing machine ready to move.

    Maybe, just maybe, SOON really will be SOON.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Competition never hurt anybody and maybe it will build a fire under M. Toast. Either that, or she'll realize she can't fake it now and back out.

      Delete
    2. And you KNOW Sykes has asked to review her paper and independently test her samples. There's no way for her to refuse if she wants to retain any shred of credibility.

      Delete
    3. The jealous crowd at it once more.

      Delete
  9. I AGREE,MELBA HAD A CHANCE FIRST!!!!!!!GOOD FOR SYKES

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dr. Melba Ketchum's last post to her Facebook page was May 6 at 9:33pm. I suspect she is going to cool her jets and hope all the attention will go away.

    If Dr. Sykes does pick up the baton on this one, that will mean we can at last get away from people depending on Ketchum's results; which I believe will never materialize.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Melba is like the mommy that most of us never had.

    ReplyDelete
  12. jumping on the DNA bandwagon, its where the money is with bigfoot hoaxing in 2012

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Too bad you still can't stop it from being proven a real species, isn't it. LOL

      Delete
    2. Too Bad Bleaver, If it is proven they have raped human women they will be exterminated. You can take that to the bank.

      Delete
    3. 4:37..try proving your point.

      Delete
    4. Just when will this bandwagon be rolling through???

      Delete
    5. anon 4:43, no you will.

      Delete
  13. Melba + Meldrum = The MELBRUM PROJECT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mel-dum well-done. Their goose is cooked.

      Delete
  14. DNA proof for Bigfooters = Don't Need Any proof. They just believe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Proof for the "high and mighty" critical thinking nitwits? They will always keep their head buried in the sand regardless of how decisive te proof really is or will be.

      Delete
    2. Yes, we belive, based on some pretty good clues. It's fun to believe as well. It's not a bad thing. But, we have to believe when we don't have definative proof, which we don't. I've never seen one, but those that have know. They're not guessing. Proof is for those that haven't like most of us. DNA though is some pretty solid proof, perhaps a little shy for the stout non-believers. That's ok too.

      But, what might hurt the non-believers a litle more is that sasquatches have probably transfered some of their DNA into modern humans. Neanderthals did, Denisovans did. So whom has hybridized whom? How many different variations are there?

      I haven't seen anybody mention another candidate.....Spaiens Idaltu. Considered an extinct sub-species of homo sapiens. They were very big. Estimated at over 7' on average. Perhaps the earliest of modern humans. Did their DNA die out as well, or did it get passed on to and thru us and other subspecies? This is going to end up being a tangled web our ancestors have woven with their weenies. (couldn't resist). When DNA testing gets cheap enough for everybody to do, it's going to be funny. But, also very, very, interesting. For the sake of arguement, let's assume bigfoots are alive and well. If so, we will end up catching one, disecting it, and learning a lot. But, the most interesting thing that we'll probably never know, is how do they live, communicate, what is the nature of their consciousness? Do they have a spiritual side, a trancendental ability, like humans? Is this function attenuated more, the more modern human dna they posess? Or the opposite? I would guess it's not a matter of if we have "soiled" each others DNA, but how much. Nature never stops experimenting. Is the best yet to come? Does DNA have a plan? Does the creator of DNA have a plan, if there is one?

      Delete
    3. I like your thought processes James.

      Chuck

      Delete
  15. Ketchum's DNA study is like the DNA study we never had.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Is Melba Ketchum the "Helen Keller of DNA?"

    ReplyDelete
  17. Well since this kidnapping and raping of human women is now bing romantisized about as soiling and penis crocheting lets not forget how much crap was thrown Justin Smegas way for shooting them. He should now sleep with a clear conscience as he may have saved a human female unspeakable horrors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The only thing being raped in the field of bigfootology is logic and common sense.

      Delete
    2. You're right. You're comment just made me realize you're a genius and I'm stupid. Thank you for showing me the light troll!

      Delete
    3. Shut your traps, damn trolls.

      Delete
  18. DNA seems to be the new "holy grail" of bigfootism, which makes sense considering that your average 'footer has a very limited, if any, understanding of basic genetics, so it'll be much easier to fool them with pseudo-science and technical jargon.

    What happened to Ketchum, btw, and all her fanboys? I thought she was the real deal who was gonna finally make all us skeptics eat crow. What happened to that whole charade? We just pretending like it didn't happen? Cool :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You seriously think your inane trolling here will discourage bigfooters from looking? Think again, sonny. LOL

      Delete
    2. I've never tried to discourage anyone from looking for bigfoot, weirdo.

      Delete
  19. Here's what kills me... The believers bash the skeptics, then look to science, a skeptical method to validate their case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Skeptics are not a believer's opponent. Nothing is wrong with wanting more conclusive evidence. It is trash talking and disrespect among opposing viewpoints that causes the false assumption that believers and skeptics sit at odds.

      Delete
    2. Not saying you were trash talking 9:58. Didn't intend for it to read that way.

      Delete
    3. Science is not a "skeptical method". Science starts by asking questions and looking for answers. A few here should understand the difference. DNA studies will give us one answer initially from mitochondrial DNA - is there a new species. Then it gives us more, hopefully a genome from nuclear DNA, and then we might be able to work out how close that is to other primates and when they possibly diverged from earlier forms. Knowledge is an evolving process and we learn more as we ask more questions. At the moment, no one has the answers, certainly not the believers nor those that refuse to accept even the possibility. Some simply use all their energy to refute anything and everything that diverges from their preconceived notions. Skeptiscm can be good but not when it is permanently blind to possibilities. Science delivers surprises. That is how you get to use a modern phone which is the most amazing blend of discoveries, all of which were found because someone, somewhere asked "what if".

      Delete
    4. True enough, I just wish more mainstream scientists would see it that way but it appears they're happy with the status quo because if/when there's a discovery they'll feel embarrassed for having mssed it and not looking hard enough. So complacency sets in, that's where we're at presently thinking they have all the larger mammals mapped and needn't look further.

      Delete
    5. True scientists are even skeptical of their findings.

      Delete
  20. Greetings from Turkey. I want to share something with the wise visitors of this blog.

    http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/khwit-dna/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Wise"-I'm so sorry but the majority of comments are obviously made from trolls and jerks. The wise comments are here one just has to shift through the trash!

      However, manfromtatooine the article you referenced is very interesting. Thanks for the link.

      Delete
    2. Both the Khwit and Zana skulls yielded 100% Human mt DNA results with no Neanderthal mutations

      Delete
  21. I'm not sure about Khwit, but I know that they are not positive about whether the remains they have actually did belong to Zana. They were not certain where the grave actually was, so the one they excavated may not have been hers. Again, I am not sure about the grave of Khwit, whether they were certain beyond doubt that the grave they excavated was actually his.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story