BigfootWeekend September Expedition

Friday, May 4, 2012

Behold: Sketch of Sierra Kills Adult Bigfoot Released By Robert Lindsay


May only be reprinted with the watermark and with this text at the bottom of the photo.
“A drawing of the male Bigfoot killed at the Sierra Kills from an upcoming book by Justin Smeja about the incident which contains many more great photos and drawings like this." - Robert Lindsay

Here it is ladies and gentlemen, one of the sketches of the purported adult Bigfoot that was shot and killed by Justin Smeja near the Sierra Buttes in California. Robert Lindsay has it copyrighted with his name watermarked across the drawing. He claims that a "very prominent person in the Bigfoot world" sent him the sketches and he plans on publishing the full body sketch of the male Bigfoot very soon.

Here's what Lindsay wrote on his blog today:

Blockbuster breaking news for the Bigfoot world! As a world exclusive, I will be publishing the first drawing of the Bigfoots killed in the Sierra Kills in the California Sierra Nevada in October 2010. I will be publishing the rough draft of a drawing of the male Bigfoot, who was about 8 feet tall and weighed about 600 pounds.

The drawing I will be publishing is of the head of the male. As I mentioned in a previous post, I feel that the male looks like an elderly Black man. I have been attacked for this view by people who said I was comparing Black men to apes. But the SK Bigfoot does not look like an ape! He looks like a man! A very, very, very weird lookin’ man, but a man nonetheless.You are invited to look it over yourself and see what you think the SK male Bigfoot looks like.

Taking a note from the page of Melissa Hovey, I am going to copyright this drawing for the time being as a placeholder for the actual copyright owner of the drawing (I am not sure who that person is). I am doing this via watermark only to prevent people from stealing the photo and trying to copyright it themselves, which happens quite a bit in this sleazy Bigfoot world.

If, after publication, the true copyright owner wants to come talk to me about copyright issues, we can do that, and I will just turn copyright back over to him.

I received the drawing from a very prominent person in the Bigfoot world who had been given copies of the drawings. This person may be a major Bigfoot blogger or may host a big Bigfoot radio show, but who knows? Maybe they don’t do either of those things after all?

[via robertlindsay.wordpress.com]

279 comments:

  1. Of course, a sketch means absolutely nothing as far as evidence/proof is concerned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. It seems if the DNA were much differnt than Homo sapien the study would have been out some time ago. The involvment of the DNA Dr. makes this look really bad, like profit is the motive rather than turning himself in and laying out the samples for law enforcement. He never said he took or gave a sample to the DA did he? OP seems to be the group responsible for these profit choices.

      Delete
    2. They drew a picture of The Cat in the Hat too, and he isnt real. Look if Smeja really shot 2 bigfoot and they looked like this, he is a murdering sunofabitch, Second if he did that and didnt take pictures or a body or parts, he is the stupidest motherfukkr that ever lived.

      Based on the above evidence I call COMPLETE BULLSHIT on this whole affair, Ketchum, Smeja, Lindsay, all. Bullshit

      Delete
    3. And I see the usual troll crap attacking it.

      Delete
    4. If he indeed did shoot a creature unknown to humans or has yet t be proven to exist, and 1. he had a hunting license. 2. was hunting on land that was not private or was approved to hunt on. 3. If indeed was shot during hunting season- it's legal because there is no closed season on Sasquatch, meaning if he had a license- (not a tag for a specific species) he is within his rights to shoot a fur bearing animal....And no one has ever brought this up when talking about the shooting of a non existent creature.
      Same thing if he shot a mountain lion or a bobcat- there is no open season and they are fair legal game for anyone carrying a hunting license, hunting on rightful land and the species was not taken in an illegal means. Some of you non hunters need to get with the times.

      Delete
    5. You need to get with the program. You are only allowed to hunt *legal* species. You are not given license to go about willy nilly shooting any damn thing you wish.

      Delete
    6. Pssssst.....he didnt really do it he is selling a book....but thanks for all the hunting knowledge.

      Delete
    7. Says you. If just a book stunt, why don't we see more hunters and poachers doing it? Don't be silly it sadly does appear to be a real shooting event.

      Delete
    8. Lol, Robby strikes again! Thanks for giving your source this time though. John

      Delete
    9. Idiots you dont see more hunters killing them because they arent fucking real and Justin Smegma is a liar! anyone who thinks this even MiGHT be true should kill themselves immediately..there is nothing left to live for

      Delete
    10. Hunting for animals is managed by each state. In WA bobcats can be hunted with a small game license. Cougars require a big game license and a cougar tag. Coyotes can be hunted with any hunting license. Fur bearing animals are only allowed to be trapped. BUT, feral and unclassified animals are exempt from seasons etc. Since bigfoot is unclassified it would be fair game here. Except in Skamania County where they are protected. But their law would not hold up in court. There is no such thing as "legal game" in most states. There is either an open season on an animal or it is protected from hunting. To be protected it would be named and classified.

      Delete
  2. Doesn't look like Morgan Freeman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No he looks relared to Jimmy Walker
      "Dy-NA-MITE"

      Delete
    2. Looks like Louis Gossett Jr.

      Delete
  3. Ok so seriously. Smeja thought this was a "monster"?? And that's why he shot it??

    What an idiot. And, if you all think there isn't video of this supposed "kill" then you (we) are all idiots too. Screw some BS "drawing" given to us by Robert Lindsay!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It looks bad, his description of why he shot and killed both is bad.
      He is bad for trying to make himself Big with this.
      Bad, small, man-boy with a high powered rifle and low power heart.

      Delete
  4. this is the best news yet! thanks yolanda

    ReplyDelete
  5. really, Wait, I saw the Loch Ness Monster, I am going to draw it.........Now I am going to copyright it and sell t-shirts and caps.......see, I can do it also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You forgot the most important step: call in people with recognized names to gin up publicity, then make them sign non-disclosure agreements so they cant tell everyone else your full of shit...

      Delete
  6. Copyright: Robery Lindsay??? Ms. Hovey, much...?
    David from the PAC/NW

    ReplyDelete
  7. When you see lines like those indicating that the sketches were semt to him by a "very prominent person in the Bigfoot world," the bigfoot BS meter should go off because this type of wording is typical when bigfoot BS is present.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, this is merely pre-mainstream science take-over. Has to start somewhere.

      Delete
  8. This doesn't look like Patty. Either Patty is a hoax, this is a hoax, or both are. They can't look that different. They're both from California.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. if BF are really human beings, why shouldn`t there be big physical differences between individual faces? Or perhaps between different populations, even inside the same state or region?

      Delete
    2. Why do you think they have to look alike? If you read reports, there is always big differences in the way they look, and look at the sketch artist drawings, none of them look alike.

      Delete
    3. Now that is a really Stupid Statement !

      Delete
    4. Oh please. You people who think that bigfoot are humans are being ridiculous. What human is 8-10 feet tall, weighs 800+ pounds, and is covered with hair?

      Human cultures all have languages. They don't howl/scream like animals, and none of them are 8-10 feet tall, weigh 800+ pounds, and are covered with hair.

      How many gorillas look that different from each other?

      Delete
    5. never been to a Futbol match, eh?

      Delete
    6. They're evidently not apes but a different new unknown species of hairy more apelike built humans, and yes they have language and yes Smeja was dumb for killing them. I definitely see a Patty resemblance, remember this is a man and she was a woman.

      Delete
    7. Somewhat on topic here to anon question: Facial recognition is an interesting "elastic brain/development" trait and is subject to who/what you viewed at critical ages, early in life. So, seeing so many humans you are able to tell minute differences and catalogue those, seeing all the variability.
      But, it would be harder for you to distinguish and seperate any great apes, or sometimes even differnt "races," if you were not exposed to them as your brain developed. That old saying, "they all look alike to me," has truth in it, unfortunately used sarcastically.
      Also, when you "face recognize" another you typically are pulling your info from their right side...that's why, when you look at a photo of yourself it seems "not like" the way you think you look...b/c you always view yourself in a mirror..and that "right face side" is actually your left. But, when you view a picture you are registering the actual right side (how others see you) and it is startling thay often don't match up.
      I prefer my mirror view, I smile more and hold my chin up!

      Delete
    8. Did I get that bassakwards? lol...we register a person's identiy from their "right face side"...so however that works out, I may have inverted the "sides" above.

      Delete
    9. Looks pretty similar to Patty if you ask me. But then again, how can you really get enough detail from the PG film to tell?

      Delete
  9. why and how could this be from robert whatever. if this is what he shot at he will not rest in peace. she looks human. and i've read other stories about sasquatch showing their empty hands in submission, from treats of firearms. this all happenend when the whiteman came with his gunpowder. ! we are the animals. I hate this guy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wouldn't get too worked up about it man. There's no proof any of it is true anyways.

      Delete
    2. I'm totally with you on this,I couldn't agree more!! Well said !!!

      Delete
    3. I think, 'getting worked up' even more, if it is not true, is in order.

      Delete
  10. He's more clean cut and attractive than I imagined. Yup, not a bad looking guy.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Smeja shot Garey Coleman ???

    ReplyDelete
  12. Disconserting. Is this really a leaked piece of information? Or, the continuation of a desperate marketing campaign? This sucks big ones either way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marketing campaign sounds more accurate.

      Delete
  13. That book, if it ever is published, will be available on multiple file share sites. So much for copyrights. If ever published it is one book I would have no problem pirating and sharing. Sue me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No sue, I will commend you sir.

      Delete
  14. That looks nothing like what Smeja described.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, didn't he say that they had a snout that resembled a boxer dog? Maybe that was the juveniles he was talking about. Anyways, I don't think a nose can go from looking like a dog's, to looking human. Also, I'm pretty sure he said the head wasn't cone shaped.

      Delete
    2. I'm certain he said the juvey had a boxer face and they were much darker then adult that was shot. i think he's been pretty consistent from day one but people trust their poor memories and state things as facts (not saying yu jeremy) without going back and listening or reading

      Delete
  15. Looks a bit like Homer Simpson...

    I haven't followed this Sierra kills business that closely but given that this guy claims to have killed something that appeared to be an ape waving it's arms in a "don't shoot" manner, given that bigfoot isn't officially recognised shouldn't this claim warrant a police investigation? Is that going on? Assuming evey video on youtube is a hoax then there are A LOT of hoaxers running around the woods in bigfoot costumes, it's just a matter of time before someone shoots a hoaxer dead, so the police should be taking this matter seriously in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, why dont you call them and let them know your concerns. Let us know how that turns out.

      Delete
    2. Good question and one that has been asked by many online. He claims to have contacted the regional/local Fish and Game officials with the story, but not the samples or a photo. I don't know, the whole internet mess/claims are starting to run together like so much goo...
      It wouldn't bother me if this particular incident never made it to the public conscious. Right now I don't know what to think. Fortunately, I have no influence or say in the matter and am free to react as I feel. I feel bad for so many reasons! I can't help but give my attention to this story and yet really just want to shed it, along with the rest of my feelings about Bigfoots and Society!
      Except the good ones, the dark nights, the sounds of the forest, the anticipation and wonderment, the fear, the elation, the inquiry, the joy.
      On the bright side, Dr. Meldrum is still appaerntly plugging away, in attendance as promised. His Relict Homind Journal a new serious venue for those inclined. And his patience clearly his virtue, I can't imagine the frustrations over his career. And I am looking so forward to the time when these NDA's are done and the many come forward to inform us of what they each know. If I can live that long!

      Delete
    3. Any idiot running around the woods in a monkey suit that gets blown away deserves to be shot. It takes a world class moron to think it would be safe to do that. It would also take an idiot to shoot him as any true hunter makes 100% sure of his target before pulling the trigger.

      Delete
  16. I think he looks a lot like Danny Glover. If this is a true drawing there is no doubt bigfoot is human. If fake, someone was watching a Lethal Weapon marathon and had a bright idea to pull a fast one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, totally... Based in this drawing, the dna may show bigfoot is a cross between Danny Glover and a coconut. Lol.

      Delete
  17. Very, very interesting sketch as I wonder if this was the work of the LOTR artist previously rumored to be sketching the Sierras biggies? I believe this shooting event happened but every day am losing confidence in Dr. ketchum.
    Now she's no-showing the WA conference and like him or not, Lindsay is right, all the rumored deadlines have come and passed. Considering her unprofessional / unscientfic actions and associations Im about done. i mean blury stick pics?? mind speak nonsense? Arla W? Sally R? Of all people. Why???

    RL mentioned a few weeks ago that Bart C has Justin's boots and Ive heard from big name bfooters I won't name that cutino & smeja are highly suspicious of ketchum and want to get boots, flesh, other evidence tested independently of her but have been told to wait possbly by cutino's close friends DR & Wally H, who's thought to have ben funding all or part of Ketchum's study. Hope these guys get moving soon and appears to be a good move on their part keeping stuff seperate from her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Key word in all that you said, RUMOR. Anyone can make shit up, don't trust hear-say.

      Delete
    2. rumor is Erickson gave ALL their samples to her, so if she doesn't produce they are SOL

      Delete
    3. No, Erickson got some more samples and there is a parallel DNA study going on in Europe right now.

      Delete
    4. If they don't include the Sierra Kill samples they will get broad support.

      Delete
    5. I love how you think Lindsay has been right when every release date he has given has been incorrect. I bet you would eat a turd if someone served it in a glass dish and told you it was ice cream. John

      Delete
    6. lol haha that is too funny

      Delete
  18. why not release the photo?im tired of this bigfoot site feeding us a bunch of poop.

    all this sight doe's is release poop and make us people who believe in bigfoot look really bad.

    the whole world is laughing at us,look at us drooling over a bunch of nothing every day.

    they are playing us for fool's and im fucking finished with this site. photo please....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can return to sites that publish only old news, static sites with cleaned up copy. Or, you can come here and find out what is happening under the sheets. It's the Anon's man, not the articles, that drive this site. Trolls are not able to cover all of the truth, it's here. Read it all.

      Delete
    2. You seem to like the word "poop"

      Delete
  19. It's a bear. Anyone can see it's a bear. He had a licence to shoot a bear so it must be a bear. If your follow the king of disinformation then more fool you.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Is Justin trying to tell us he actually shot something that looked like that? If this turns out to be true, i have no words for how i feel about this douchebag.

    ReplyDelete
  21. That thing looks like it should be holding a sign that says FREE TAX SERVICE

    ReplyDelete
  22. Looks like Yoda, with hair. Give us a break.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Looks like Yoda with hair and small ears.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Looks like Tod Standings photo a bit.Compare them, pretty close to that picture he has.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought the same when i first saw it.

      Delete
    2. Why should people be so surprised about this, did they expect it to look like an elephant or what. The near-human facial appearance has been mentioned often enough by witnesses.

      Delete
  25. Regardless of what it looks like, I have to say this drawing is a cut above most of the bigfoot "art" that we see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lifeless, reminds me of Police art

      Delete
    2. But it's still just a fucking drawing! This is stupid.

      Delete
  26. I thought he shot a mother Bigfoot who had two babies or juveniles with her? Why is this guy Robert L. saying this is a drawing of a male? Maybe I'm wrong. Someone look it up!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's stoping YOU from looking it up?

      Delete
    2. lol yea you are on the cpu already, right?

      Delete
  27. Guy from previous post: I was wrong. I guess it just sounds more likely for the kids to be with mommy.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Looks like Robert Lindsay without his glasses

    ReplyDelete
  29. That thing is one ugly mother fucker. If the fur was removed it would look like one of the alien greys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the fur was removed ! It would look like a brother from another mother .

      Delete
  30. Armondo the Baker (of bread)Saturday, May 5, 2012 at 4:05:00 AM PDT

    Can't we all just leave the wood boogers alone, there clearly too old for this shit!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Technology has never been so accessible in the history of humans. Grandmothers that were afraid of computers are now facebooking on their smartphones. However, when it comes to Sasquatch, an alleged kill is documented like a Wanted poster in 1832.

    Come on, believers...you're being conned. As much as you want some of these fantastical notions of Bigfoot to be true, the hard, irrefutable evidence is just not there. The leaders in your "research community" spend more time undercutting each other or being exposed as common carny hoaxers than actually providing the world with scientific facts.

    To those that would write me off as a troll, please take a deep breath and think about what you're chasing. How long you've been chasing it. And how much time andto money you've spent along the way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From a witness: You are correct in your sritisims of the community, but not the reality. Bigfoots are alive and well, except for the one above and his son.

      Delete
    2. Exactly. Think the secrecy why this why that and the old ape debate ends here.

      Delete
  32. Seeing copyright on bf related stuff is really starting to get annoying. Its a good way to lose credibility and seem like an as*wipe that cares more about the money than helping to discover if BF is real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The copyright on this garbage will be blown away, by more than one source. It will be available free on several sites. Not many plan to actually buy the book, and many plan to spread it virally.

      Delete
    2. Good wouldn't give one cent for this crud!

      Delete
  33. That is a terrible drawing. The eyes don't even respond to the curvature of the face. Poorly done.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Robert freaking Hovey. Nice copyright dingus.

    ReplyDelete
  35. That sketch looks like Ernest Borgnine to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Irish will take offense, looks like many an Irishman. The artist tried HARD to make it look like a sagital crest, but it's just hair. No way anyone could mistake this for an ape, except one not much further up the evolutionary tree.

      Delete
  36. Hey Lindsey didnt yout tell us like 3 or 4 weeks ago that the Ketchum paper was coming out in like two weeks..I dont remember May was it? Who knows......you keep spreading all of your gossip and rumors...as if you WERE somebody who really knew. You have cried wolf so many times...you better hope this thing comes out for your sake...at least maybe then you might actually have a real reputation!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. he also wrote if not out by early May forget it...it's toast.

      Delete
    2. Some things he's wrong on some he's right on.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, the things he is right on are the same things already reported on other sites. He just makes up the rest, don't kid yourself.

      Delete
    4. The only things he is right about are already found on other sites. Everything else he just makes up. Don't kid yoursel anymore.

      Delete
    5. Thanks for taking the time to let us know that.

      Delete
  37. Irish! Explains all the red hair and the loud aggressive behavior that tuns out to be bluff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PLEASE STOP TALKING ABOUT AUTUMN FOREST LIKE THAT!

      Delete
  38. It just does not look morphologicaly right to me, if that is the right word, the eyes look to low with reference to the brow ridges, looking through some images of supraorbital ridges on wiki and the eyes are positioned just under this feature in all of the examples, so I would suggest this sketch has been made without reference to anything that may exist or existed and the artist has not paid enough attention to common primate head structure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol Did you mean draw it like it ought to look, or did look?

      Delete
    2. Both to address 2 possible scenarios, if the artist was sketching from a witnesses accurate account then I think we should be seeing the eyes where they should be central in the orbital socket below the brow ridge.
      Or if the artist was working from an unreliable account verbatim and had knowledge of primate physiology he still would not have put the eyes where they are.
      So to put it bluntly whichever way the penny drops the sketch will not be the real deal, at least not around the eye and brow ridge area.

      Delete
    3. "Were you there?"

      I did not have to be, no other primate has, ancient or modern, that eye/brow ridge relationship, it,s physically impossible, either the eye has been drawn to small so is sitting low in an oversize socket, unlikely, or the picture is wholly inaccurate.

      Delete
  39. This is a depressing Saturday "BF news" series of articles.
    Dr. Ketchum not showing predictable given the "study" not published, we had that warning on a FB page some time ago I think?
    But, no prior notice for those with $$ in travel a bit disconcerting, yes. I couldn't do that to so many eager attendees.
    But, as troubling is the timing of this "release" of a drawing by a man/group claiming to hold samples of the dead bodies still. And, supposedly willing participants in the study.
    What gives? Why today?
    The timing of this leak perhaps aimed at diluting the news from the conference, or deflecting attention?
    I agree with the many anons above about the BF "community."
    Geez, no wonder, no wonder, no wonder.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Robert=Sean, Sean=Robert

    enough said

    ReplyDelete
  41. At the end of the day it's just a drawing. A sketch from a sketch artist requires a lot of guesswork; this is especially the case with a non-human human that no one has really seen much. Anyway, some sketches are better than others. If you want to know what a Bigfoot face looks like, look at videos of the white Bigfoot from Carbondale, PA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If this guy was white, it would probably look similar to that sasquatch. I just watched it again, what bothers me about that video is the flashlight is shining right in its face and the head is well lit, yet you see no eye shine at all. That makes me think it could be a mask.

      Delete
    2. Do you mean the white bigfoot video in which "bigfoot" looks like a KKK member? That one?

      Delete
  42. I am a believer and I believer nothing about this "sketch" we as a community need to stop wasting time with people who are giving us drawings of what they swear they saw. Especially if it was killed. Everyone has cell phones with cameras on them and if they don't he should have found a way to get back to the creature with a camera to have his hardcore proof. Means nothing to me.

    Kristin (PA)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know eyewitness accounts don't really prove anything, but I don't think they should be disregarded because there is no photo or video to back up the story. This is especially true when the story is as fantastic as the Sierra Kills. IMO.

      Delete
    2. Not one bigfoot, but two... Killed. All we get is a fucking drawing?

      I'll just put the bait back...

      Delete
    3. I don't have a cell phone and wouldn't have one if you payed me, I want none of that new gadget crap.

      Delete
    4. The cell phone is a way for the government to track you in order to suppress the Bigfoot truth from everyone.

      Delete
    5. So, If Smeja shot the adult male first, and from quite a distance, and then it went crashing off into the woods never to be found how could he possibly know this much detail? John

      Delete
    6. Found him again later.

      Delete
    7. Not according to his version of events.

      Delete
  43. Yup..real blockbuster breaking news alright.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Replies
    1. Not that you'd believe differently then.

      Delete
  45. that's the sketch I did of the turd I dropped in the toilet the other day. I had ate to much wolf hair the night before which gave me a stomach ache, so I swollowed a Samuel l Jackson action figure to battle the gut ache. that sketch is what I shit out the next day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I build a statue that looks like Patty every day in my toilet.

      Delete
    2. Must be pretty smelly by now?

      Delete
  46. OK seriously, based on what Smeja has said, this beast was supposedly over 100 yards are so away when he shot it... and he can make out this kind of facial detail? Really? REALLY? ReallY? really? ReAlLy? rEaLlY? How many different kind of ways can we all say REALLY? Smeja's book will be used as toilet paper in my house. Sharon Lee

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This among many other's is a good observation. It has occurred to me, and I have no idea beyond speculation, if the killings took place the "100 yards" was the closest/furthest distance that sounded plausible regardless of truth.
      I do desire the truth one day, perhaps a future when I do not so feel so attached to Bigfoots and dissapointed with us.

      Delete
    2. Actually Sharon, they went back there later for the steak remember and I believe they probably had a closer look at the shooting time too.

      Delete
    3. Things appear a lot closer when looking through a scope. Duhhhhh.

      Delete
    4. Agree with you on this one Sharon, highly unlikely. But that's some expensive toilet paper, I have several Loren Coleman books I will just give you if you need to wipe that badly. John

      Delete
  47. maybe its just me but does this sketch kind of look like robert lindsay's avatar pic? I see a resemblance for some reason

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That innocent stare, yes.

      Delete
    2. Innocent? More like the stare of a creepy pedophile.

      Delete
    3. Innocent? More like the cold stare of a pedophile.

      Delete
  48. Looks nothing like the sasquatch I saw, not even close.

    This confirms to me that story is 100% bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL They're not all looking the same you know, they have different ages and shapes.

      Delete
    2. It's a wonder that some people seem to think that this story isn't 100% manure.

      Delete
    3. my sighting was in the same area as the kills, so I am now to believe there are 2 distinct species running around unknown? give me a fucking break.

      Delete
    4. Yeah, this is a bunch of BS. However, this guy knows that, no matter what idiotic bigfoot dung he puts out, some people will always fall for it.

      Delete
  49. This is not very "breaking." I'm an advocate but not a lindsay fan. Feels like he leads people on quite a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  50. What the hell? This doesn't look anything like Morgen freeman

    ReplyDelete
  51. COPYRIGHT EVERYTHING, quick before those scum steal it. This story is so much bullshit, and Lindsay is as full of crap as this drawing. Seriously, what made you think that following Hovey's lead was a good idea?

    ReplyDelete
  52. And all of the above is why sasquatch research will never be respected. the people who search for it are clowns.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. Although they don't have a red nose, they do already have the big feet. How many sasquatches can fit into one of those little cars?

      It does seem that everything involved with bigfoot turns into a three ring circus.

      Delete
  53. I'm shocked that he's allowed to profit from killing.

    Anyone who buys the book or supports Smeja is as guilty as he was pulling the trigger, again and again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. he shot nothing. its a story to make money, nothing more

      Delete
    2. Uh, I would think that the burden of proof of a story (with no evidence whatsoever) by some guy who claims to have shot and killed a bigfoot lies with the one who is making this claim, not those who doubt that this event actually occurred.

      Delete
  54. According to this photo, I'm pretty sure he shot a hairy Blackman and his child. Someone should compare this photo with the missing persons lists in that area...honestly, someone should alert the authorities.

    ReplyDelete
  55. RL has done it again! He's playing ''Pimp My Blog'' and all the bigfooter's played along. Congratulations. This is the only thing keeping it from sliding into obscurity. The sooner Bigfooter's quit letting themselves get USED the sooner people with some real evidence might step forward.

    ReplyDelete
  56. It's got Betty Davis eyes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big sexy bedroom eyes yes.

      Delete
    2. NO! the thing has Marty Feldman eyes.

      Delete
  57. get up from your computer, pack a back pack, walk out the door to your home, get in your vehicle, drive to the woods, hike 6 miles in, camp for a few days. Now come back here and tell us how you were able to identify the source of every sound you heard, oh and please capture crystal clear HD video of every animal you see to explain every noise you heard (thus proving Sasquatch DOES NOT exist) . Oh you say F that ? Well get in the game or go troll a tmz type site please.

    I have no problem with well thought out logical analytical arguments both for and against Sasquatch, but alot of commenters here are just "trash humans"

    -Monkey

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True spoken, guess some trashers have nothing better to do than hang around bigfoot sites and put down what they clearly have no conception of.

      Delete
    2. As if every story, claim, or photo/footage related to bigfoot should be taken at face value without questioning it?

      Delete
  58. Oh I'm not bashing Bigfoot, just RL milking it for his ridiculous blog. He must have figured out there wasn't much fame in UFO's, or that he'd be butting heads with astrophysicists if he did.

    Just taking a dim view of fellow squatchers being ''used''.

    ReplyDelete
  59. So far, Ernest Borgnine, Homer Simpson, Gary Coleman, Emmanuel Lewis, Danny Glover, Betty Davis, Marty Feldman, and Yoda have all been compared to the drawing. But no Morgan Freeman.

    To quote Mater: "That's funny right there."

    Ernest Borgnine cracked me up the most. LOL.

    Wouldn't you think that if someone was trying to create a drawing of a creature that was part of a story, that you'd at least go back and read the details given in the original story and then make sure that the drawing matches those details? Morgan Freeman? Does anyone see Morgan Freeman? I definitely see part of Yoda's faint mustache. The slightly raised left eyebrow (the eyebrow on the right side facing the picture)also reminds me a bit of Mr. Spock.

    ReplyDelete
  60. The entire Sierra Kills story is a bunch of bunkum.

    In the original story, the guy's truck was used to steady the first shot. So, their truck was right there when these supposed kills happened. There is no way, absolutely no way, that I'm going to believe that anyone who had just shot a baby bigfoot would not put the dead bigfoot in the back of the truck that was right there and take it out of there. The fact that this wasn't done tells me that this entire story is a bunch of BS from top to bottom.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unless he looked like a little dead boy and the driver said. "F u man, I am otta here." It is a bizarre story and one that Justin looks so bad in, it's hard to imagine it is made up.

      Delete
    2. It's hard to imagine that it is made up? Really? I have no trouble imagining that it's made up.

      Delete
  61. Smeja shot Trayvon Martin ! ???

    ReplyDelete
  62. You have to think that the lack of numbers of sasquatch, there's some serious inbreeding going on...that should turn out some weird looking beasts?

    ReplyDelete
  63. Paulides seems to think they kidnap humans to breed with.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So that's where Sharon Lee came from.

      Delete
  64. Another clown that copyrights something that doesn't belong to them.

    That Hovey Dingbat is not one to emulate.

    ReplyDelete
  65. So thats what happened to Dave Chappelle..... "I'm a Sasquatch Bitch!"

    ReplyDelete
  66. Hey, someone drew a sketch of a black guy with facial hair, therefore bigfoot must exist! Brilliant

    ReplyDelete
  67. I almost think that he shot a human man and child, now trying to make himself feel better, claims the father and son were bigfoot!and that he shot them out of fear for his life! Ok, has any one looked to see if there is a missing man and son that is missing local? Also what seems weird to me is , this bigfoot and child was so threating from 100 yards away that he,had no choice to shoot them, BOTH? Also that far away how in the hell did he know they were bigfoot? To me bigfoot looks like humans, really human if seen that far away. Plus if he made the first shot next to truck, that means he didnt need to kill them if felt threatened, he could have just drove away! Now, really people, break his story down barney stile, its bull crap! If he indeed killed the bigfoot and its child, his story is proof that he was for tge sole purpose in killing them for fun! In my state you cant hunt from your vehicle, so him shooting the adult from atop his truck is poatching! Remember this guy was bear hunting remember! So in my opinion, what happened was this guy wad driving down some hunting road, seen what looked like a bear and a cub, pulled over, leaned out the window, shot the bear, realised he would need help with the kill, left brought his dad back to harvest. On there return tracted down the kill. Astonished at what he killed, they took a sample for proof. Suddenly the child bigfoot rushes them, the guy caps the child bigfoot, falls in his arms and dies. Thats my opinion on what happened if it was a real bigfoot. My other opinion is the same story just add that it was a human father with his son hunting and got shot. The shooter kills the son to leave no witnesses. Maybe I have a active imagination but something is rotten in denmark!

    ReplyDelete
  68. I have had it! How this slimy, creepy, and repugnant, poor excuses for a human being is not under investigation, in prison yet, or at least hanging from a tall sturdy branch by his slimy neck, is beyond me. I have no respect for this person that claims to have killed these wonderfully magnificent creatures in cold blood. He might as well of walked into a private home of a mother and her two children and shot the unarmed woman in the back as she was fleeing and begging for her life. Then waited around and killed one of her kids, why? Just for shits and giggles. By the way, if this story is true, there is a young Bigfoot who watched his or her mother and sibling get slaughtered in cold blood. This creature will not always be a juvenile, it could grow to be a 9 or 10 foot, pissed off male with a healthy mistrust of the real animals in this world. You know the one's I am talking about, the one's who carry guns and took his defenseless mother and sibling away from him. How would you like to run into that beast on a cold foggy Octobober morning, after you find out you are in HIS forest? Are you going to be the ass that tries to reason with this creature "it was for the greater good", no thanks! I will never understand why us believers of Bigfoot are so juiced about proving that they are, right where we know they are anyway. I am not a stupid person, I understand the whole "lets prove they exist,for there protection" idea. Excuses me, if in fact this creature's ancestors walked over an ice bridge from Asia, however many thousands of years ago, and have found a way to survive this long. Somehow I think that Sasquatch's days on this planet are not numbered. Does anybody remember history? Every time the white man thought it was his duty to step in and go against nature, it didn't always work out so good for everyone evolved. There was that whole Indian thing, and of course lets not forget the mass exodus out west. Remember all of that plush grass on the great plains and how for years the land gave and gave. But that is not where that story ends is it, can you say "Dust Storms"? What about the Buffalo, or the very environment in which we live in? The Sasquatch's have seemed to have done alright so far without our help, somehow I think they will manage. That is of course, if we can keep the Justin Smejas of the the world from killing, just for the sake of killing. If this person actually killed two Sasquatch's that day, if he really stepped out of a truck, then leaned his riffle over the hood of said truck. Methodologically took aim, and squeezed that trigger, as the blood and adrenalin rushed through his veins and into his ears. So much so that the sound became deafening, that he didn't even notice that the gun had made its report. The bastard enjoyed himself, so much in fact that one dead Bigfoot wasn't enough to fulfill his blood lust. When the off-spring of this beautiful creature naturally hung around out of fear and confusion for its mother, he repeated the act of murder once again, but that kill was a little harder to swallow. I am guessing because the Juvenal probably didn't make it out of his sight, or ear range. He claims to have held the young one as it died. You all know, as well as I do, that is just a plain boldface lie. That kind of act of compassion is not in this person's character. How do I know you ask, because he proved it to me by murdering two of Mother Nature's best kept secrets. And don't kid yourself, this was murder. I will go on record and ask, if anyone that might read this posting, please, I am begging you, do not let this sleazy, disgusting, and nauseating person profit from his carnage. When he writes a book, don't purchase it. If he is paid to speak someplace, don't go hear him. Lets do the right thing here, lets pray that this person develops a conscious and is haunted by what he saw, what he heard, and more importantly, what he did that day.

    sbizkit 38

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am with you, let justin the hunter, become the hunted! And any one that profits from this slaying! If you come out justin watch your back!

      Delete
    2. Uh, this Sierra Kills story is fictitious. No bigfoot were killed in the making of this story. It's another bigfoot hoax.

      There's no sense in getting worked up about it because it didn't happen.

      Do you have one shred of evidence, anything at all, that gives support that this isn't just another in a long line of bigfoot hoax stories. Of course not.

      Delete
    3. There is no sense in getting all worked up over this Sierra Kills story because IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!!!!

      No bigfoot were harmed in the making of this story.

      This is another fictitious BS bigfoot story. There is NO REASON to believe this story. There is NO EVIDENCE to support its claims. In fact, as others have pointed out, there are holes in this story.

      This is why repeat bigfoot hoaxers do what they do. They know that there are always people who will fall for their BS, no matter how many times they dish it out. Not only do they get attention for their repeat BS, but they can also often make some money with it.

      If you buy into this Sierra Kills BS, you are being played.

      I believe that sasquatch exist, but this tall tale is a bunch of crap from top to bottom.

      Delete
    4. Theres no sens in getting all in a lather. No bigfoot were injurd in the making of this BS. LMAO.

      Delete
    5. How many times are you going to post the same thing...It wasn't funny the first time

      Delete
    6. Contrary to my post...I agree with you 100%..Don't get me wrong, I have no doubt he did what he said he did...I just can't figure out why ? After the "threat" of the mother Bigfoot was gone, why would he feel the need to turn his rifle on the younger one, whom by all accounts was in a panic and displayed human like emotions...Why wouldn't he at least try to capture one , if he had gone that far maybe the most humane thing to do would be to care for them....Now as far as we know there was one young one left out there to fend for itself, hopefully they stay in tight communities...If not the youngster likely froze or starved to death...Upright , bipedal ...wouldn't that make it Homocide? I know his friend urged him not to shoot...I can understand if he was going to bring a body back, but he didn't even do that....Still this guy has been closer to the creature than anyone else that has come forward, if he is pressed to much he is going to shut up and not speak about ever again...We need to know exactly what he knows...and for that reason I am willing to give him a pass...I DO NOT CONDONE THE KILLING OF THESE BEAUTIFUL CREATURES...But lets not let our modern day Roger Patterson, fade away....Tim

      Delete
    7. I wrote the first one. Some jack ass(es) rewrote some of my wording. It wasn't supposed to be funny. Why would you think that I'm trying to be funny.

      This Sierra Kills story is full of holes. It's more bull crap (and that's coming from someone who believes that bigfoot does exist). I'm just so sick of these types of crap stories that seem to fool people (apparently it's fooling you too).

      Delete
  69. Someone tell Lindsay to loose the 80s pervert frames. And sell your van!

    ReplyDelete
  70. That's a pretty detailed picture of a creature that was 80 + yards away and mistaken for a bear !

    ReplyDelete
  71. since hes so morgan freeman....has anybody blk been reported having contact with bigfoot? maybe they are just scared of white people.....with guns and things that look like guns...

    Indians figured this out quite quickly in the beginning too...

    not racist, but think about it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have never seen a black bigfoot witness on any TV show about the subject. Mybe cause they don't seem to be Hunters or live out in the country (as much).

      Delete
  72. I'm not sure if the person from Canada that offered to draw the encounter I had from my description or not...If so, this looks nothing like my encounters, however I believe that just like people and ape they all look different. But this creature seems to look more evolved than my 1980 sighting in Forest Co. WI....These drawings almost seem too much like the 3d animation of "Lucy"from the history channel.
    While I 100% believe Justin when he said he shot 2 of these, the drawings look too familiar. Anyone who has ever had an encounter (much different than a sighting) will tell you that there is this Primal Fear that overcomes you...Its a fear unlike anythink you will ever feel...For that reason alone I believe that as humans we have at one point in our history had problems with these creatures..Much like the fear some people have of snakes...
    Justins story is way to detailed for it to be a fake...Sorry if you are reading this Justin, but you don't strike me as a guy who can tell a good story...the way he recalls this stuff is matter of fact, not having to "remember or recall things...my encounter was 32 years ago and I remember it like it was an hour ago....This is to me the best evidence ever , even better than Patterson/Gimlin ..Justin actually heard them speak, seen their emotions, touched them....It don't get any better than that...Plus he is obviously distraught over killing them...Justin is by far the foremost expert at this point..MoneyMaker can say all he wants, be he has never touched one....Justin the more you can tell us the more better we can protect them from another shooting, or worse an extinction...For what its worth I believe this is true.....Tim

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why? Why would you "100% believe" this story? There is nothing here but another story. Zero evidence. Wouldn't it be far more likely that this story is just another bigfoot hoax stories, like many before it?

      Delete
  73. Oh brother, is this the new American Girl doll?

    ReplyDelete
  74. What if we got a big steroid taking bodybuilder type, Black or white, stripped him naked and glued hair it the correct places as discribed by most bigfoot witnesses. He may only be 6 foot tall but maybe a sasquatch will think he is a short or teen squatch and confront him. the decoy squath could have a hidden video spy came hang on top of his ear hidden by hair to capture and confrontations by a bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What about just doing a Naked field investigation. Pesonally I wouldn't want to see a naked Matt Moneymaker or Bobo walking though the woods doing Calls,maybe Renae... but I meen maybe if you ask primative like a caveman ,maybe a bigfoot would check you out.

      Delete
    2. lol OK, this thread has taken a turn for the surreal. "maybe if you act primitive like a caveman"....walk around the woods naked? I don't want to make Bigfoot run away, I want him to come closer. Lol, Thanks for the laugh, I was having a bad day until now.

      Sbizkit38

      Delete
  75. I think Naked field investigations are the way to go. maybe an all female team led by Renae Holland and some other naked hotties. They could do a show "Tempting Bigfoot" maybe if Bigfoot shows up and tries to mate whith them, we can get some cryptid porn with all the cameras around.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Sorr, I haven't read through all the comments, but can someone tell me who is supposed to have drawn this? When did they draw it? I thought Smeja was alone when he shot these creatures; did he have a sketch artist with him or is this based on his description? Thanks.

    ps - Smeja does come across as an idiot. If he did shoot one of these things, what could he be charged with? Doesn't murder only refer in law to the killing of Homo Sapiens Sapiens?

    ReplyDelete
  77. Well,anything that has Robert Lindsay's signature on it should be thrown out with the daily garbage because that is all that man spews....GARBAGE! He is a right wing,racist idiot who is the very type of person that people in the sasquatch community should avoid like the plague! Please quit giving this guy face time..he does not deserve it. I have no idea what this guy is after but it is not going to be positive for the sasquatch community. UGH.

    ReplyDelete