Robert Lindsay Gives Detailed Description Of Sierra Kills Bigfoot Creatures

"Similar to the Sierra Kills Bigfoot, but the arms and legs on Mayes' Bigfoot are much thicker. The Sierra Kills subject has more ganglier arms, larger and longer feet with more prominent toes and the hands, while similar, and longer, with more gangly and apelike fingers." - Robert Lindsay

There is a Sierra Kills Bigfoot book that's going to be published. Soon, we will be able to read about this mystery and hopefully gain some insight into the mind of the person who shot the Bigfoots. One thing to look forward to in the book are the sketches of the creatures based on the description by Justin Smeja. According to several sources, these sketches have been shared among friends and people in Smeja's circle. Until now, no one has fully described what these drawings look like.

Robert Lindsay claims he has in possession an artist rendition of the adult Bigfoot and the juvenile. According to Lindsay, the adult Sasquatch reminded him of "Morgan Freeman".

Read below from Robert Lindsay's Bigfoot News April 21, 2012:

More drawings from the Sierra Kills available and examined. I have finally gotten ahold of two more drawings of the Bigfoots killed at the Sierra Kills. There are three drawings in total.

The first is a drawing of the head of the male. I described it previously, but I will describe it more now. I printed out the drawings and showed them to a couple of people I know. One looked and said, “Morgan Freeman!” As I mentioned previously, it does look something like an elderly Black man, albeit with a coned head. I looked at photos of Morgan Freeman, and it’s not quite right though.

The nose looks like a Black nose at first, but then when you look at an actual Black nose, the Bigfoot nose is different. The Bigfoot nose is not as wide, large and tall, and you can’t see the nostrils as well as on a Black nose. It has a sort of a “smashed-in” look that reminds more more of the Mississippi Iceman than anything else. It also looks quite a bit like Patty’s nose.

The lips at first look like a Black person’s lips, but then you look again, and they seem to be different. One of my friends who looked at it also said, “A Black person’s lips are different.”

The ears are also different. In a word, the ears are not exactly human. They are rather small compared to the size of the head, and they almost appear pointed like elves’ ears. If you look closely at the Harley Hoffman footage, you will also see small elf ears on that Bigfoot. One of my sources received a report from Canada of a man who also described “elf ears” on the Bigfoot he saw.

Small ears in comparison to the size of the head can be seen in much good Bigfoot footage such as the Pennsylvania White Bigfoot and the Larry Surface footage. Simply put, Bigfoot ears just do not appear human. Our ears look a lot different from theirs.

The eyes on the male are strange. They have an odd profound intelligence about them, and you would say that they are human eyes. Then again, the more you look at them, the intelligence you see in the eyes is more like “human but not us.” So it’s more of a humanoid look in the eyes than the look of Homo sapiens sapiens per se. You can see whites in the eyes. This drawing is not bad for the eyes.

This drawing on the web somewhat captures the general flavor of the Bigfoot’s face, as does this one of Patty, which seems to capture the flavor better than any other drawing I have seen, which is odd as she is so famous. Then again, she was also a California Bigfoot, and Bigfoots may well look different in different parts of the country. In particular, the nose in the Patty drawing is an excellent rendition of the nose in the Sierra Kills Bigfoot.

There is also a drawing of the male Bigfoot in full body view. The head looks the same, although the head is not so dramatically coned now. He seems to have no neck at all. The shoulders are huge and slope down precisely like the Hovey photo. He is very well built, but he is not fat at all. On the other hand, he’s not skinny either.

Instead, he looks lithe, athletic and very powerful. It’s been said that the males are built like swimmers. When my friend saw the photo, he said, “Mark Spitz!”

The Bigfoot’s arms are long but do not extend all the way to the knees. I agree with David Claerr that Bigfoots’ arms to not go all the way to the knees. Instead, they simply appear to due to the bent kneed method of running. The arms do extend longer down than in a human, about halfway between the waist and the knees. The arms have a long, gangly, simian look to them.

His legs narrow at the knees.

His hair is darker in the genital region, and you can’t see those parts of his body. The hair on the chest looks like the hair on the back of the Hovey photo. The hair in general is not long, but it’s not short either. It’s medium length.

The palms of the hand and soles of the feet are hairless. The feet are large and the toes are somewhat widely separated, more so than in a human.

I will look around on the web and see if I can find a drawing that resembles this one, but I can’t think of one offhand. The drawing below but William Mayes captures the flavor, but the arms and legs on the Sierra Kills subject are much thinner.

This Bigfoot looks a lot more slender, fit and lithe and not the massive hulk you see in most drawings. Nevertheless, you would not want to mess with him.

A friend who saw prints of both drawings said about each of them, “That looks like the recreation drawings they do of Homo Erectus,” and, “That looks like Homo Erectus!”

The oddest drawing of all is the drawing of the juvenile Bigfoot. It looks like a chimp, or a baby chimp! That’s the first thing you think when you look at it. I compared this drawing to a baby chimp, and it was similar in many ways.

However, the ears are completely wrong. The ears are similar to an adult Bigfoot, as they are already getting that pointy look to them. However, they are very large in comparison to the size of its head, much more than in the adult. At this stage in the development of a Bigfoot, its ears look quite human.

The hair on the head is sparse, as it is in the adult Bigfoot. I don’t understand why these Bigfoots have sparse hair on the tops of their heads.

The eyeridges look similar to a baby chimp’s. They arch upwards and give the Bigfoot the appearance of a human with eyebrows arched upwards in surprise. To some extent, the adult also has this perennial arched/surprised look in its eyeridges. The lips are very different from a chimp’s lips, as a chimp has no real lips to speak of. The lower lip is much more visible than the upper lip, but this is the same in the adult male.

The face from eyes to below the lips – the nose, upper lips, upper chin and cheeks- is hairless. There is sparse hair extending down from the head to the chin that ends in a beard at the lower chin. The effect is similar to the sideburns-beard continuous facial hair you see in some human males.

The eyes are also different. They are much larger than a chimp’s eyes, and have that same strange intelligence about them that you see in the male. The look in the eyes is hard to explain. You want to say it’s a “chimp with human eyes.” That explains it partly but not fully, as the young one’s eyes are part-animal and part-human, a very strange effect. You can see whites at the far ends of the eyes.

The head is slightly coned, but not nearly as much as the male, and in that effect it is certainly different from a baby chimp.

I do not have permission to publish any of these three photos at this time.

You can read the rest of the Bigfoot News here.