Robert Lindsay Gives Detailed Description Of Sierra Kills Bigfoot Creatures

"Similar to the Sierra Kills Bigfoot, but the arms and legs on Mayes' Bigfoot are much thicker. The Sierra Kills subject has more ganglier arms, larger and longer feet with more prominent toes and the hands, while similar, and longer, with more gangly and apelike fingers." - Robert Lindsay

There is a Sierra Kills Bigfoot book that's going to be published. Soon, we will be able to read about this mystery and hopefully gain some insight into the mind of the person who shot the Bigfoots. One thing to look forward to in the book are the sketches of the creatures based on the description by Justin Smeja. According to several sources, these sketches have been shared among friends and people in Smeja's circle. Until now, no one has fully described what these drawings look like.

Robert Lindsay claims he has in possession an artist rendition of the adult Bigfoot and the juvenile. According to Lindsay, the adult Sasquatch reminded him of "Morgan Freeman".

Read below from Robert Lindsay's Bigfoot News April 21, 2012:

More drawings from the Sierra Kills available and examined. I have finally gotten ahold of two more drawings of the Bigfoots killed at the Sierra Kills. There are three drawings in total.

The first is a drawing of the head of the male. I described it previously, but I will describe it more now. I printed out the drawings and showed them to a couple of people I know. One looked and said, “Morgan Freeman!” As I mentioned previously, it does look something like an elderly Black man, albeit with a coned head. I looked at photos of Morgan Freeman, and it’s not quite right though.

The nose looks like a Black nose at first, but then when you look at an actual Black nose, the Bigfoot nose is different. The Bigfoot nose is not as wide, large and tall, and you can’t see the nostrils as well as on a Black nose. It has a sort of a “smashed-in” look that reminds more more of the Mississippi Iceman than anything else. It also looks quite a bit like Patty’s nose.

The lips at first look like a Black person’s lips, but then you look again, and they seem to be different. One of my friends who looked at it also said, “A Black person’s lips are different.”

The ears are also different. In a word, the ears are not exactly human. They are rather small compared to the size of the head, and they almost appear pointed like elves’ ears. If you look closely at the Harley Hoffman footage, you will also see small elf ears on that Bigfoot. One of my sources received a report from Canada of a man who also described “elf ears” on the Bigfoot he saw.

Small ears in comparison to the size of the head can be seen in much good Bigfoot footage such as the Pennsylvania White Bigfoot and the Larry Surface footage. Simply put, Bigfoot ears just do not appear human. Our ears look a lot different from theirs.

The eyes on the male are strange. They have an odd profound intelligence about them, and you would say that they are human eyes. Then again, the more you look at them, the intelligence you see in the eyes is more like “human but not us.” So it’s more of a humanoid look in the eyes than the look of Homo sapiens sapiens per se. You can see whites in the eyes. This drawing is not bad for the eyes.

This drawing on the web somewhat captures the general flavor of the Bigfoot’s face, as does this one of Patty, which seems to capture the flavor better than any other drawing I have seen, which is odd as she is so famous. Then again, she was also a California Bigfoot, and Bigfoots may well look different in different parts of the country. In particular, the nose in the Patty drawing is an excellent rendition of the nose in the Sierra Kills Bigfoot.

There is also a drawing of the male Bigfoot in full body view. The head looks the same, although the head is not so dramatically coned now. He seems to have no neck at all. The shoulders are huge and slope down precisely like the Hovey photo. He is very well built, but he is not fat at all. On the other hand, he’s not skinny either.

Instead, he looks lithe, athletic and very powerful. It’s been said that the males are built like swimmers. When my friend saw the photo, he said, “Mark Spitz!”

The Bigfoot’s arms are long but do not extend all the way to the knees. I agree with David Claerr that Bigfoots’ arms to not go all the way to the knees. Instead, they simply appear to due to the bent kneed method of running. The arms do extend longer down than in a human, about halfway between the waist and the knees. The arms have a long, gangly, simian look to them.

His legs narrow at the knees.

His hair is darker in the genital region, and you can’t see those parts of his body. The hair on the chest looks like the hair on the back of the Hovey photo. The hair in general is not long, but it’s not short either. It’s medium length.

The palms of the hand and soles of the feet are hairless. The feet are large and the toes are somewhat widely separated, more so than in a human.

I will look around on the web and see if I can find a drawing that resembles this one, but I can’t think of one offhand. The drawing below but William Mayes captures the flavor, but the arms and legs on the Sierra Kills subject are much thinner.

This Bigfoot looks a lot more slender, fit and lithe and not the massive hulk you see in most drawings. Nevertheless, you would not want to mess with him.

A friend who saw prints of both drawings said about each of them, “That looks like the recreation drawings they do of Homo Erectus,” and, “That looks like Homo Erectus!”

The oddest drawing of all is the drawing of the juvenile Bigfoot. It looks like a chimp, or a baby chimp! That’s the first thing you think when you look at it. I compared this drawing to a baby chimp, and it was similar in many ways.

However, the ears are completely wrong. The ears are similar to an adult Bigfoot, as they are already getting that pointy look to them. However, they are very large in comparison to the size of its head, much more than in the adult. At this stage in the development of a Bigfoot, its ears look quite human.

The hair on the head is sparse, as it is in the adult Bigfoot. I don’t understand why these Bigfoots have sparse hair on the tops of their heads.

The eyeridges look similar to a baby chimp’s. They arch upwards and give the Bigfoot the appearance of a human with eyebrows arched upwards in surprise. To some extent, the adult also has this perennial arched/surprised look in its eyeridges. The lips are very different from a chimp’s lips, as a chimp has no real lips to speak of. The lower lip is much more visible than the upper lip, but this is the same in the adult male.

The face from eyes to below the lips – the nose, upper lips, upper chin and cheeks- is hairless. There is sparse hair extending down from the head to the chin that ends in a beard at the lower chin. The effect is similar to the sideburns-beard continuous facial hair you see in some human males.

The eyes are also different. They are much larger than a chimp’s eyes, and have that same strange intelligence about them that you see in the male. The look in the eyes is hard to explain. You want to say it’s a “chimp with human eyes.” That explains it partly but not fully, as the young one’s eyes are part-animal and part-human, a very strange effect. You can see whites at the far ends of the eyes.

The head is slightly coned, but not nearly as much as the male, and in that effect it is certainly different from a baby chimp.

I do not have permission to publish any of these three photos at this time.

You can read the rest of the Bigfoot News here.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. http://www.newswise.com/articles/channels?channel=106
      Science
      Channels:Genetics
      Keywords:Genetics

      EMBARGOED
      A reporter's PressPass is required to access this story until the embargo expires on 4/26/2012 12:00 PM EDT
      Embargo will expire:
      4/26/2012 12:00 PM EDT
      Released to reporters:
      4/23/2012 12:00 PM EDT

      Delete
  2. Thanks Robert/Shawn. Tim, U.K.

    ReplyDelete
  3. About the facial features overall apearance: The "yeti de bourganeuf" shows features similar to those described abowe. Why is the yeti de bourganeuf not discussed more, has it been confirmed a hoax? I´m asking because I do not know that much about it. It is very compelling I would say to think that it is/ was the real deal. It stood about 8 ft tall and would be very difficult to reproduce in all it´s detail.
    By the way: to speak of apes and people of colour in the same paragraph in this way is offensive.

    JN
    Sweden

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's true JN, but you'll hear from the ape theorists that we're all animals and apes. LOL Technically we are, sure.

      Delete
    2. Sure we are all animals but here the author only refers to people of a specific "race" in regard to apes, had he compared it to humans in general and not so precisely pointed out people of colour it would not have been the same. One has to think about the history of these comparisons.

      JN

      Delete
    3. Black people's nose and lips are different than white people's. That's a fact. I'm so sick of all this sensitivity to anyone mentioning race. You are part of the racial problem.

      Delete
    4. To the above commenter:
      Sensitivity of race is NOT part of the 'racial problem' (as you call it).
      Insensitivity is a problem. No one is calling anyone a racist. It's being brought up because these are sensitive areas of discussion and should be discussed thoughtfully. That is all.

      Delete
    5. Thank you anon 07:27, my thoughts exactly.

      JN

      Delete
  4. Um...isn't it the MINNESOTA Ice Man??? I don't think there is much ice in Mississippi.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The whole things a complete farce. He shot it at a distance, the male, and it ran off and they never found it. How then can he describe the entire body, including it's face, in such detail? He supposedly shot and killed the juvenile, which landed at his feet near the truck, but didn't take the body. This very bad story needs to end. It's all B.S., and none of it makes any logical sense. No-one would leave a small dead bigfoot, you would throw it in the truck and make history. Show the proof or shut up. Nuff said.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was quite a rant about something you claim not to believe in but clearly likes to spend elongated moments on.

      Delete
    2. If you've read up on it, it does make sense. You need to understand the person involved and the situation he was in. No one can truly say what someone would or would not do in such a circumstance, it is beyond what most of us will ever experience. And there are rumors that bodies were later recovered. Perhaps time will tell?

      Delete
    3. the bigfoot that got away that daySunday, April 22, 2012 at 8:26:00 AM PDT

      understand this anon- the person involved is a poacher/murderer plain and simple. the story that got around was they were out poaching and they saw it and that punk smeja shot and killed them without being attacked. then shot the little one! and his buddy's said no-more. as far as they're concerned they are no better(fellow-poachers) so go buy his lies(book) and help more animal's get poached(book/fundage)don't ever glorify a poacher. they steal from nature!!!!

      Delete
    4. this bigfoot was black right, so smeja probably thought it was going to carjack him!

      Delete
    5. Either carjack him or steal his Nike Air Jordans

      Delete
  6. anyone know what smeja says about the hovey photo? has he compared what he killed to how the hovey photo looks?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He told me in an email he felt like the color matched his sample perfectly but the hair on his sample is about 3 inches in length. He said it looked extremely like what he shot but he wondered if it was possible the picture was taken indoors because of the lighting or something

      Delete
  7. Hi Robert, with all of the comparisons to a black person about the only thing you left out was whether or not it was sporting a golden grill. I could see how this would be very offensive to a person of color. I mean if someone were to even vaguely equate a chimp or a gorilla to a black person you would be branded a racist. Are you sure you aren't letting your views as a "race realist" taint your description? Kind of reminds me of your family values post about the young female "hottie" which I thought sounded like a thinly vield pedophilic story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If it's the easiest way he can describe it, the way it makes the most sense to readers, why shouldn't he make the comparison? If anything, the statement suggests just how HUMAN these creatures are, not how supposedly ape-like any race of human is. It's all in your own perspective.

      Delete
    2. His blog is creepy - especially the post on women and his fascination with school girls underwear. This guy comes across strange and I wouldn't take anything he says seriously.

      Delete
    3. time and time again i told all of you that robert lindsgay is a true racist. look at the idiot's web-site. with others in this country that hold his views on the black race he would the first the N.B.P.(panthers) would go after. huh robert, tell the dear readers your true colors. there is no place for your words on a bigfoot blog! pig!

      Delete
    4. Not only is he racist, but he gives online mental health advice. (LOL) For instance, he bragged about helping a millionaire, who claimed to have feelings of wanting to hurt someone and Lindsay diagnosed him as OCD and suggested that the guy walk around town with a knife and if he didn't kill someone, then he was okay. I can't believe this guy is so deluded to think that he is an authority on race, bigfoot and mental health issues.

      Delete
    5. Spend about 5 minutes at his self-ingratiating blog and you'll know exactly who Lindsay is.

      Racist doesn't even begin to describe him.

      Delete
    6. Yes, I would go with racist, pedophilic, self-hating gay, and male chauvinistic sociopath. There are so many contradictions in his own character I can't begin to theorize on the childhood trauma it would take to produce someone like this. I get that Robert produces hits for Shawn, just look at the comments section here, but why feed his psychosis? Lindsay is a sad little man who is obviously not happy with himself and reacts by blaming the rest of the world for his own shortcomings. John

      Delete
    7. By the way- YOUR BANNED! LOL

      Delete
  8. Smeja sure has been quiet lately. Anybody heard anything from him recently? I think its been 4 months sense he said anything publicly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd be quiet too if I knew a report was pending on how the monster I shot might be a race of human after all. There's also a lot going on with a book deal and so forth, so he is probably not wanting to say much else yet.

      Delete
    2. Hominid maybe... Race of human not so much!

      Delete
    3. Maybe so maybe not, let's wait and see. Stands without question though that what speaks, and thus have language as we understand it cannot and will not ever be classified animal. Their features are even human too so do the math. Jungle or zoo ape species level no way, let's get real here and stop kidding ourselves.

      Delete
    4. This species does not have the taxonomic characteristics to be a "race" of human... It coul however be a totally independent species of hominid. We are Homo sapien sapien, an entirely different animal than Neanderthals, Homo erect us and the like, as would be with this animal if proven to exist (which I believe will happen), we're all on the same family tree so to speak but entirely different animals, therefore it can't be a race of human.

      Delete
    5. And we now know that they have language?!?!? How is this, we don't even have a body to prove that try exist, how can we assume they have language?! This isn't Harry and the Hendersons for goodness sake, one of my fav movies by the way. It is this kind of talk that make Bigfoot believers look ridiculous. I am a Bigfoot believer but damn people quit with the assumptions... What does the scientific data say? There is no undisputed Sasquatch language on record! Just because something vocalizes does not make language either! Dogs an cats vocalizes, chimps and apes vocalize but that can not be considered language

      Delete
    6. We are apes. We are animals. Shut up already.

      Delete
    7. Good one, idiot! Real intelligent! Have you seen one let alone heard one communicate with another? I doubt it. You my friend are the one who should shut up and try listening! And maybe you'll be able to distinguish between science fact and science fiction!

      Delete
    8. Enough with the ape and animal litter, they're only so technically as we are yet we're human same as them. Like that blow or not, but it's what the DNA is showing apparently. Unique other species obviously, but no doubt these aren't apes as most of us tend to think of them from zoology books as our less smart hairier cousin. We just don't have large undiscovered apes running loose in America, this is not the speechless ape species you find in zoos here or jungles of Africa nor is this Gigantopithecus either. Sorry to kill Grover's dream.

      Delete
    9. Humans are animals. Quit looking at yourself as something you aren't. While we may be the most prolific species, we are still animals. We weren't chosen for anything, we just organize better than the other species we have been in competition with. We aren't special, you aren't special.

      Delete
    10. No one's denying we're animals and no comments are implying that, you apers are going nuts here! Or should that be apeshit. LOL Nexy you'll deny we classify ourselves human, do you really want to do that? Sure we're animals and primates or apes if you will, still you don't walk around daily calling yourself an ape do you? Surely you use the term human, and the point here is we'll probably have to use that term about the Sasquatch species too.

      Delete
    11. DNA has not stated anything yet, if Dr Ketchum's report comes back as homosapien it will be dismissed, if it comes back as a new homo then we're looking at a new species of hominid not ape not human (homo sapien). There are a lot of extreme assumptions and opinions here... But nothing has been proven yet... You have to have an animal before you can prove it exists. To believe every little "factoid" that is brought out here and elsewhere is just foolish. To say for a fact that saquatch have language is speculation just as it would be to say they wipe their asses with oak leaves! Nobody really knows anything about the behavior of these creatures! We all know there is enough evidence to suggest their existence but tht is about it right now, anyone that says they know this or that about the creatures behavior is just blowing smoke up everybody's asses, if they could say these things with no doubt then they must have observed the creatures for hours in the wild to be able to state as a matter of fact that Sasquatch do this or that. Why then do they not have actual evidence, maybe clear photographs at the least... They just keep feeding everyone a pile of shit such as this unprovable dribble and people take it as gospel, don't be so quick to accept every these people say, wait for actual scientific confirmation.

      Delete
  9. Its amazing Lindsay can write at all with Mike Greene's head so far up his ass. God that must be uncomfortable.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Huh? I wonder how it would appear if I were to describe my family by my son's third grade school project drawing. "Mother appears to have wild hair, but not like a wild woman, more like a person with wild hair." That's basically the description we're getting here. I hope he's never a crime witness:
    “The hair in general is not long, but it’s not short either. It’s medium length.”
    “The lips at first look like a Black person’s lips, but then you look again, and they seem to be different. One of my friends who looked at it also said, “A Black person’s lips are different.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kind of vague, like cold reading, a similar sort of scam.

      Delete
    2. "Does anyone know a Sasquatch named Penelope? Or Pam or Patty? Anyone?"

      Delete
  11. What do you expect from a communist/socialist? His Bigfoot info is good, but dammit, he's a friggin kook!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The ideas on race and women on RL:s blog do not fit into neither socialist nor communist thought. Much can be said about communist ideology but it´s not racist or sexist, it´s opposite of that

      Delete
    2. Dude, he SAYS HIMSELF he's a socialist and that he likes communism! I wasn't just name calling

      Delete
    3. Yes, just read his other articles. I don't care that he's a socialist, we live in America and he has that right. He also has the right to say anything he wants, but his words do remind us that he is still an asshole. John

      Delete
    4. Well then he has gotten his ideologies fucked up, I didn´t intend to put it on you blobsquatch I´m just pissed at RL and his ignorance. He can call himself what ever he wants, doesn´t make it true.

      Delete
    5. All good, Anon. John, ur right, he has the right to be whatever he wants. Peace and love to all!

      Delete
  12. as far as the race issue with the dissription of the bigfoot come on really these people make me sick ther is no one tring to make this a big deal except the ones writing this trying to make it a big deal.I am a black male and it is a damn shame that people today are still making such a big deal of it you are the ones keeping that kind of stuff alive IT IS A DISCRIPTION OF THE BIGFOOTS FACE SO YOU CAN PICTURE IT IN YOUR MINDS EYE DAMN GET OVER IT .WELCOME TO 2012

    ReplyDelete
  13. We can anticipate a book, of an event that never took place, of animals that were never killed, ripe with racist terminology and descriptions. I've seen the images in question, and they look like Chimps. Artist renditions of animals plucked direct from a Jane Goodall movie. They look nothing like humans, and certainly do not look like Morgan freeman. Good grief. SWP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for proving the ape fixation again, SWP. Good grief indeed, so that really is your opinion then? LOL

      Delete
  14. Has anyone heard from "Jack" on the matter? If only I knew what Jack had to say about it. I don't guess anyone's talked to Jack on the phone lately.

    ReplyDelete
  15. His last line states: "I do not have permission to publish any of these three photos at this time."

    Uhhhh...thought these were DRAWINGS. Which is it???

    ReplyDelete
  16. There is nothing racist at all about making simple comparative discriptions. I have no idea wether any of you are racist or not, but the analogies you people use are false as hell.

    If a black man read the discription, he may or may not like it. But the fact is, it is only a discriptive comparison of looks, traits. It does not imply ANYTHING about "a black person."

    Making the comment about the "golden grill" is the most racist comment made here. What are you trying to say ANONA?

    STUPID lIBTARDS TRYING TO START TROUBLE WHERE THERE ISN'T ANY.

    I sure am looking forward to a day when a FALSE cry of racism is frowned upon as badly as Racism. The people who cry Racism the loudest, are usually the most racist.

    Anybody see the new photos of George Zimmermans head, YA CUTS AND BLEEDING. The new video of the officer looking at the cuts in the recieving area at the Jail.

    Why hasn't Obamha and his Attorney General dealt with all the Raciest Name calling and threats on the left.

    But they got time to visit the NUDGE!!!!!!

    "I eat what I kill" Motor City Madman For Pres!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nudge? Don't you mean Nuge? The guy's a right wing nut. Nuke the Nuge.

      Delete
    2. Wow, a leftist invoking the use of nuclear, or (NUCULAR IF YOU FIND THAT IRRITATING) weapons, interesting?

      Delete
    3. Amen, Leon W! Libtards suck

      Delete
    4. Of course Leon is going to side with Lindsay. Two lonely nuts rolling around the same bowl.

      Delete
  17. Oh, Is that how you spell that, I thought it might of had a silent D, thanks.

    Better a God fearing, guitar shreding, gun toating American hunter than a Commy flower child Libtard trying to TAKE MY FREEDOM, RIGHTS, AND MONEY!

    toating?
    toteing?
    toting? Maybe you can help me out on this one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Afraid of someone taking your freedom, rights and money; sounds like a liberal to me.

      Delete
    2. Don't forget draft dodger and guilty of illegally killing a bear.

      Delete
  18. Anyone that supports Olympic Project is supporting this kill. They proudly exhibit the kill on their site. So if you're not pro-kill, you should not be supporting or singing the accolades of Olympic Project, since this scum is part of their hand picked team.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The kill really upsets me as well. I'm not a hunter, but if u hunt to eat I have no issues with that. If u kill for sport, like Smeja did, I don't care for that. What he did was criminal

      Delete
    2. Agreed! If true, this guy cold-bloodedly murdered two innocent creatures, one of which was a baby or juvenile. Creatures that could be part human. He can try to explain it as "I felt threatened", but that holds no water. Bigfoot isn't exactly known for it's violence against humans. Sounds more like he's trying to convince himself because he realizes the atrocity he committed. To not even know what you are killing is the sickening part. This guy Smeja will get his in the end one way or the other. You reap what you sow and his judgement cometh--in this life or the next.

      Delete
    3. agreed.. I could handle it if they were simply an intermediary for Smeja, to get the sample somewhere. But, including him as a Researcher is sick. Sick indeed.

      Delete
  19. Toting. preach! Freedom of speech is under attack. I may hate every word that comes out of a persons mouth, but I will fight to the death for his right to say it. Once we start self-censoring our thoughts for fear of offending people, the thought police Libtards have one and freedom is dead! And before u start crying racism, I am a minority myself! God, guns and BIGFOOT!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm voting for you in November my friend : )

      Delete
    2. Yes, he has the right to say what he wants, but that doesn't change the fact he's an asshole.

      Delete
    3. Then why are you trying to paint out those asking questions as unpatriotic lefties or traitors? I see the right having this defensive attitude all the time, all that charming talk of freedom of speech is bull when you don't wanna hear it.

      Delete
    4. I disagree. I LOVE when those on the left express themselves, because they expose just how stupid their ideology is

      Delete
    5. Let them speak then. Come to think of it, when we finally do find Bigfoot I bet we'll find they're as liberal tree hugging as it gets. What do you right wing bigfooters think of that? LOL

      Delete
    6. Yes, what are BF right-wingers like Leon and Blob going to do if BF is discovered and they become the mascot of climate change and pro-environmentalism? Of course, they will automatically be labeled anti-american commies or socialists.

      Leon & Bob - where exactly does all this anger come from? You're on a freakin' BF blog, chill out already.

      Delete
    7. We NEVER start with the political crap HERE. We ALWAYS respond to it. Remember it is commies, facists and socialists who wrote the book on the utilization of propaganda. YOU GUYS STOP DROPPING IT IN, AND WE WON'T BRING IT UP.

      Were just not putting up with your lying shit anymore. Conservatives are done being poloite and politically correct with you mush heads.

      Hey, why don't you go clean up the shit your occupy BROTHERS are leaving all over this beautiful country you stupid fucking LIBTARD!

      WHY DON'T YOU TAKE A SIERRA CLUB MEMBER WITH YOU TO HOLD THE BAG WHILE YOU SHOVEL SCUMBAG!

      Delete
    8. Hey Leon, Jesus was a socialist. Wrap your tiny brain around that one.

      Delete
    9. No he absolutely was NOT. The difference between Jesus and socialists is that Jesus wanted man to have the FREEDOM to CHOOSE to help his fellow man, whereas socialists TAKE your freedom AWAY under the GUISE of helping your fellow man. Don't believe me? Read the story of the young rich man who asked Christ what more he could do. Christ says if u want to be perfect, give all ur possessions to the poor and follow me. He didn't say GIVE IT OR ELSE! He also let the guy walk away, he didn't FORCE him to do what he said.

      Delete
    10. Jesus was an animal activist anti-kill and anti-hunt, the total opposite of how most people have turned out to operate today, including that wannabe Nazi Nugent worshipped by leon. And still these hypoctrites pray to the Lord. LOL

      Delete
    11. Blobbie - You pay into social security? Unemployment Insuarance? On Medicare? You're part of a mandated socialistic system that you seem to despise so much. How do you live with yourself?

      Jesus implied if the rich young man didn't share his wealth with the people, he would not go to heaven (and I guess burn in hell.) Some choice. Thanks for proving my point for me!

      Delete
    12. I think Blobbie was the person holding the "Keep Your Government Hands Off My Medicare" at the Teabagger rally.

      Delete
    13. Jesus was a Sasquatch. Fact.

      Delete
  20. Sorry, "have WON"

    ReplyDelete
  21. Robert Lindsay is like the father most of us never had.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I stopped reading when it was comparisons were made to Patty's nose which can't be seen in the PGF.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This whole thread confirms three things for me. Lindsay is an absolute joke, Smeja is basically a murderer, and Leon continues to come on this blog just to misspell words and be a contrarian. Nothing new...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Smeja is not a murderer. He is a great story teller though, fooled many people

      Delete
    2. Undoubtedly, only not regarding the Sierra kills sadly.

      Delete
  24. Hello all:

    Just got off the phone with Jack Bindernagel, who was in good spirits. He backs up what Lindsey says and said "Lindsey continues to be the most accurate reporter of all things Bigfoot". He called Smeja a hero saying "he did what needed to be done and has shown bravery unlike most have ever seen".

    I said "jack are you being serious" and he said "yes I am, its time we take this whole Sasquatch thing to the next level and for all of us to cash in".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't see Bindernagel saying "cash in". Unless you I.d. Yourself I'm calling b.s.

      Delete
    2. Way to again expose yourself as a moron, Blob.

      Delete
    3. Dude, do you KNOW Bindernagel? If you did, you'd be singing a different tune. As for me being a moron, I forgive you. Too much angry rhetoric going around these days so I'll end it here, my liberal friend. God bless and keep you. The cool thing about BIGFOOT is it brings people from all ends of all spectrums TOGETHER. I don't know about u, but I'm PSYCHED for the Ketchum study to come out!

      Delete
  25. hey everyone, I time traveled 500 years into the future....got a book coming out to explain it all. Dont reall have any physical evidence, pics or anything, but it happened, I posted it on an internet blog and now my book is coming out. Thanks. There is no doubt this really bappened, even though no proof exists.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I found some meat in the woods today from a leprechaun I shot last week. Where can I send it off for DNA analysis? And also look out for the book next month, pre order now for 25% off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't know they were real. Who are you then, Elmer Fudd?

      Delete
    2. Leprechauns are conceived when a Unicorn farts into the Easter Bunnys mouth. Duh, everyone knows that.

      Delete
    3. Tragically, that's what happened to Lucky of Lucky Charms cereal fame. He was taken out by a leprechaun poacher.

      Poachers like you are heartless bastards!

      Delete
  27. It's funny how some of you people defend this story as if there is ANY evidence whatsoever to support it.

    This whole Sierra kills story is more likely a load of crap than a true story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Couldnt have said it better my self.

      Its like you say something bad about the story and all the bigfoot dreamers come out of the woodwork to defend the story to the death. Its incredible. Considering the hoaxes that have happened in the past, do bigfooters not learn?

      Delete
    2. Pitiful fool. What, you think a flesh and blood being can't be shot and killed? Hoaxes, who cares about hoaxes. The real encounters remain.

      Delete
  28. Well if there's no evidence to support the story as many keep saying then the whole DNA project with Melba must be a scam as well. Many must have forgotten she confirmed over and over to derek randles and Wally its the real deal something special. (His flesh sampe. Which is the largest DNA sample in a 3 year long study looking at proving the existance of a unknown primate living in north America ).

    I guess he could be lying about the whole thing and just so happen to find a bunch of Bigfoot flesh in the woods and decided to make up a terrible story to go along with it. That right there seems far fetched

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not as far fetched as the story itself. The ketchum report wont be out till 2014 anway.

      Delete
    2. As others have reported, Ketchum believes that sasquatches have come on to her property and braided the hair on her horses. Well, the objectivity of the study will certainly be questioned by non-bigfoot believers once they get a load of that.

      Delete
    3. I once fell asleep in the woods. I awoke to find my penis hairs neatly braided. I could see a young female sasquatch hiding in the bush while blushing back at me. She was a hotty by anyone's standards. Woo-hooo!!

      Delete
    4. Is it wrong that I'm turned on?

      Delete
    5. Anon 7:52pm- RL mentioned Bart Cutino having possession of Smeja's boots and possibly clothes in his recent article and wanting to eventually get this stuff tested. I know Bart & Lindsay is right though he didn't mention the reasons why he's kept this stuff away from Ketchum's hands on purpose. I know why and can tell you (BC told me several months ago) it's garbage like you mentioned with this horse braiding nonsense, monopolizing evidence, her belief in paranormal disappearing bigfoots that talk to her while she works and god knows what else. If this Sierra kills deal is real, all I can say is thank god a straight shooter is doing the right things behind the scenes and not drinking the kool aid.

      Delete
    6. What, you think a living being made of flesh and blood can't be killed? Of course the story is plausable, no matter how weird it sounds to some. Too many people are in deinal of this possible existence and refuse to admit a species could be there, hence the jokes.

      Delete
    7. Wow, now Ketchum is claiming the stick structures she snapped a pic of, that would take all of 14 seconds to assemble, are sasquatch related? Had a feeling she was a nut and glad to hear that not everyone jumped on her bandwagon, including and especially Justin S

      Delete
  29. This is related to the olympic project?

    The same project that does "expeditions" that allows people to come along (if they PAY of course) <- big eye opener.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it is. Justin is "da man" for them, and now with $300 or more a pop public expeditions you can hook up with Meldrum too, and be wowed by his knowledge. The same guy that bought into the BFRO BS...who did lower the bar for everyone regarding charing for public expeditions. Matt did deliver Wally Hersom to OP as well.
      How far can we fall. I am embarrassed anymore to admit I know any of these people, and actually referred others to them as top drawer.

      Delete
    2. Why are you embarrassed, you're an anon?

      Delete
  30. That is a pretty detailed representation from Justin being that it was at 80 yards and initially thought to be a bear !!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol YARF

      Yet Another Red Flag

      Delete
    2. We don't even know if justin really said any of this. In fact I doubt he did. He has been out of the country with no cell reception for over 2 weeks according to his Facebook messages. Consider the source people

      Delete
  31. If you are foolish enough to belive the Sierra story then you will buy this one also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 11:01
      Can you explain the tissue sample then ?

      Delete
    2. Of course trolls can't explain that, they'll keep denying it right until the bitter end. To them logic means nothing flesh and blood can't be killed, though we have murders happening daily somehow shooting this being is an impossibility since we're told they don't exist. They really don't want this to be true as it shakes their safe world, neither do bigfooters not this way anyway, but it still could be technically.

      Delete
  32. muscular Morgan freeman...good lord, i hope they dont put that in the book..that sounds so bad.

    ReplyDelete
  33. A lot of these comments remind me of a summit between North and South Korea years ago. They argued over the placement of chairs and seating arrangements and didnt accomplish much of anything else.

    ReplyDelete
  34. If the juvenile bigfoot is described as looking like a chimp, how can you say it grows up to be a near-human?

    For one humans don't tend to be 8 feet tall, extremely strong and covered in hair - some animals are though, including Kodiak bears and bigfoot.

    Despite various speculations about language and burying their dead, we do know that they wood knock/clap their hands to communicate, build ground nests and throw rocks or shake vegetation as displays to intimidate. They also have long arms, the ability to run on all fours at high speed, evidence of a sagital crest and a list of other ape traits.

    I have seen a video of a cat saying hello and a parrot that can make logical calculations - neither are near-human or becoming human.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I dont believe they are gigantopithecus. Maybe a common ancestor with that species millions of years ago. Ancient humanoids dont appear to get that large.
    Reminds me of an interesting story. I met a native from Tahiti years ago.Him and a friend were pig hunting and came across a cave with four or five human like skeletons with very large hands and skulls.They got the hell out of there fast.I asked him if he would go back there if I came and visited. He wouldnt answer and looked downward. His wife explained to me later that his friend was killed in a fall not long after this and he felt he had broken some kind of taboo by entering the cave and felt responsible. I lost contact with them years ago.
    Undiscovered species? Just a story? How could it be possible? Whom am I to say, but I have experienced and seen even stranger things. Some of it down right dangerous. I know If you dont go out and look though you wont find anything.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Funny thing, some people have been convicted of crimes on less evidence than what some researches have acquired on bigfoots existence.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bigfoot is a sub species of HUMAN ……keyword HUMAN!!!!
    Throw him in prison for Life….. killing a women and child he is a murderer not a hunter..
    If that’s the case I’m gonna start hunting grungy humans that don’t groom and that are hairy..

    ReplyDelete
  38. I drop a leave a response whenever I appreciate a post on a site
    or I have something to valuable to contribute to
    the discussion. It is a result of the sincerness displayed in the article I looked at.
    And on this article "Robert Lindsay Gives Detailed Description Of Sierra Kills Bigfoot Creatures".
    I was actually excited enough to drop a thought :) I actually do have some questions for you if it's okay. Is it only me or do a few of the responses look like they are written by brain dead people? :-P And, if you are posting at additional online sites, I'd like to keep up with everything
    fresh you have to post. Would you make a list all of your communal pages like
    your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?
    Review my blog post - irvingia gabonensis extract

    ReplyDelete
  39. With websites that allow you to download Pacman,
    now you can experience it for yourself. The game will quickly end if the mismatched pieces show up more and more.
    The computer demonstrate can be as used, Number of individuals while in
    the system you've selected inside moral quantity - Andadvantage. It's gained a lot of honours and also multiple nominations like "The Greatest Recreation of All Time throughout 2007 along with 2nd "100 Online video Online games ever.
    Additionally, most gaming sites add several features that encourage interaction
    between gamers including forums, chats, multiplayer games and tournaments, etc.


    my blog: Pacman Advanced

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story