New Footage: Bigfoot Caught On Camera During Hunting Trip In Western Mass 2011


Thanks to Paul for sending this in.

This latest Bigfoot footage is from Western Massachusetts. The video starts off with little context, but the hunter in this video seems acutely aware that something's not right and he says, "The birds are just going crazy out here."

As he pans the camera to the right, you can catch a glimpse of the hairy figure doing the familiar tree peek that the Facebook Find Bigfoot guys love to point out in every footage.

Watch below:

Comments

  1. I didn't see anything probably a fake

    ReplyDelete
  2. At the 13-14 second mark, he starts to pan down the tree. Pause at the bottom of the tree.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sweet Jesus would go to a movie if Eastwood acted that bad, hummmmm?

      Delete
  3. That is one of those bigfoot yard statues. C'mon...
    http://www.designtoscano.com/product/garden+statues/extraordinary+statues/bigfoot%2C+the+garden+yeti+sculpture+-+db383049.do

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. man i didn't know they could move, cuz when ya pan back its not there, weird, i guess they have robotic ones now thats cool i want one

      Delete
  4. It's a Bigfoot garden statue... or it can be a real Bigfoot that's only 24" tall.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Signs of a hoax.

    -first post on youtube, brand new account.
    -the self-talk sounds more like bad acting.
    -the footage ends abruptly with no resolution. Meaning, what happened? Did he keep looking for whatever it was? Did he flee? Was it the old "I only had thirty seconds of film left." Give us some background, ya know?

    I'm not saying I believe it was a hoax, it just meets the criteria. And quacks like one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There's no way that's not a squatch

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is as wonderful as all the other bigfoot evidence. I'm sure a real discovery is just around the corner, over the hill, round the bend, in the next room, well, you know.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'll believe a new Bigfoot video when we see one as good as the Patterson film, everything else is just bull except for a few. The Marble Mountain video's real, but not exactly considered a close encounter. Fakers simply can't afford it (literally) to have their costumes out in the open and walking, they always obscure them behind trees and bushes, shaky cameras and quick cuts. Patterson's famous footage is the genuine deal, a new full body view like it is what we need.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. The Patterson-Gimlin film should be the yardstick by which all of these videos should be measured, and just about all the videos I've seen don't even come close to the quality of the Patterson-Gimlin film. Supposedly, the film taken by The Erickson Project in their habituation zones is just as good or better than Patterson-Gimlin but we shall see.

      Delete
    2. Dr. John Bindernagle has seen some of the old footage of the Erickson habituation zone from several years ago and said it is quite impressive and does not know why they have not brought it out yet. He seems to think that Erickson is afraid of criticism he might receive. This is what he said in the MNBRT internet broadcast this week. However I think Adrian is trying to put it all together at once in the most profitable way to gain back his considerable investment. (Only a guess on my part).

      Chuck

      Delete
  9. fake and poorly done if you alternate between pause and play really quickly 1 the bigfoot apears out of no where with no movement 2 the top part of the head is cut off?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3 If you go frame-by-frame, you'll see what could be a person's knee as the camera passes back by the base of the tree and after zooming out
      David from the PAC/NW

      Delete
  10. I think its time for BF community to stop giving any time to these pathetic attempts of late. Unless it's clear enough that someone without an over active imagination can see it in a photo, then it's not worth the time.
    All I've gotten from all these recent Blobs are headaches.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Tom Posted his breakdown.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbQSvu1BVq8

    Dont see any movement in the slow down.


    Paul

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes, he faked it, and he took us to a locatiom where he said he shot the video. We were able to show him, based on plainly visible things in the video that we were definitrly not in the same place where he shot video. He started making excuses at that point, saying he wasn't sue if it was the same place. He then admitted that it wasn't even the same creek .... It quickly became clear to all of us that he was lying and it was a hoax. I said so bluntly on camera but they will probably only show someone else's initial determination of it being "inconclusive".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How far west in Mass. I'm on the coast maybe I can find a blobsquatch too, if it is not too far.

      Delete
    2. How far west in Mass. I'm on the coast maybe I can find a blobsquatch too, if it is not too far.

      Delete
    3. How far west in Mass. I'm on the coast maybe I can find a blobsquatch too, if it is not too far.

      Delete
    4. How far west in Mass. I'm on the coast maybe I can find a blobsquatch too, if it is not too far.

      Delete
    5. Sorry, I don't know why that posted so many times.

      Delete
  13. More asinine bigfoot hoax crap.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Matt Moneymaker gazed upon it and said it was good. It's always a Squatch.

    ReplyDelete
  15. THIS LOOKS LIKE SOMETHING TIMBERGIANT OR TCSJRBIGFOOT WOULD DO THIS GUY LEARNED HOW TO HOAX FROM THOSE MASTERS !

    ReplyDelete
  16. ThinkerThunker,

    Why would a first post on youtube under a brand new account be signs of a hoax? What if he just didn't have a youtube account? I know a lot of people who don't, and of the ones that do they never post comments.If i ever filmed a bigfoot, that would probably be the first place i'd think of (except for here), just on account of how many people could potentially see it. But anyway, you're right on all your other points. This is fake, and a pretty poor one. is "acting" gives it away more than anything. He'd have better not speaking at all.
    Sam

    ReplyDelete
  17. The guy's manner is extremely suspect. Sounds poorly acted to me, plus he feels the need to state his intentions and reactions. I don't buy it for a second.

    ReplyDelete
  18. it's bigfoot petending to be a garden statue

    ReplyDelete
  19. I find the ones more realistic when they are running away and stuff because obviously they don't want to be seen, but this looks completely fake. Ugh.

    ReplyDelete
  20. definitely fake!! Case closed.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The birds sound normal in the early morning in the woods. The guys is filming looking into the woods from the edge of the tree line. He is looking into short young trees where the camera has a tough time ever focusing. When it does. . . there is something there. If he was hunting you would break that line and sit at the edge of the actual tree line. The guy is talking way too loud if he is a hunter.

    ReplyDelete
  22. does anybody know if i need a license to hunt and kill bigfoot? i want to kill this creature! I really think its all bullshit but if not I want him mounted by my fire place.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?