Photos Of The Day: Bigfoot in Pawling NY, Barefoot Nepalese Porter, Cat-Boy
 |
| Bigfoot in Pawling NY |
The photo above is from Anglers Den Facebook page. It's labeled: Bigfoot sighting in Pawling NY 1/5/12. If you have any questions about this photo, you can post a reply here.
 |
| Barefoot Nepalese Porter |
Above is a photo Peter Byrne took of a Nepalese porter's foot, circa 1958. Thanks to Matthew Crowley for sending us this photo.
 |
| Cat-Boy |
Nicknamed "Cat-Boy," doctors in Dahua, southern China recently learned that this boy has the ability to see at night and can read in complete darkness as if it were day.
Here's a Google translation of the article from www.elonce.com:
A child of Chinese nationality can be seen from small in total darkness. According to specialists of the hospital in Dahua, south of that country, it is a genetic condition that leaves less protection for your eyes and make them more sensitive to light.
Nong Youhui rage with his superpowers. His parents are still concerned about the case.
It all started with a visit to the doctor when the child's father appeared to review your child's eyes.
The problem was that his father noticed the boy's eyes glowed in the dark like flashlights.
As reported by The Sun newspaper, to the surprise of the doctors at hospital in Dahua, southern China, found that the child has the ability to see in the dark.
According to medical examinations that made him able to determine that the boy easily readable in complete darkness and without the aid of any light. Moreover, you can see as clearly as if it were daylight.
Experts believe that the child was born with a rare condition that leaves less protection for your eyes and make them more sensitive to light.
On the other hand, the father of and boy they nicknamed "Cat-Boy" (boy cat) warned that some time ago the doctors said that the eyes of his son leave to shine, to become black like most Chinese.
But that never happened by This growing concern in your environment, however the condition does not reverse the specialists explain serious danger.
The Pawling NY photo is classic Photoshop. They forgot to shadow it correctly...amateurs usually do. :)
ReplyDeleteFake. Too bad about that limited human body, huh. lol
ReplyDeleteThat was a very small BF if they're trying to pass it off as one. That kid with the glowing eyes--reminds me of the BF stories of it having eyes that have eye shine at night. Would mean that perhaps they did evolve to handle nighttime. I wonder why, though? It seems it wouldn't be terribly necessary for their lifestyle to forage at night. More mysteries.
ReplyDeleteAmazing!!! Almost the exact same walk as Patty. They all must walk the exact same way. lol
ReplyDeleteAwful fake. Catboy looks cool! Maybe get him a cape and train him how to fight and he can free China in the near future
ReplyDeletethanks for this Shawn re: catboy no question in my mind they see quite well at night and also can detect light in the infrared range. the increase and decrease in intensity of eyeshine is puzzling, "powerup" is a term some use. are the eyes opening wider, dialting? is there something else going on? this looks like another rabbit trail to follow!
ReplyDeleteThe whole "it was Photoshopped" has become a really lame, tired, based-on-ignorance, first attack on photographic evidence. People who say this should really shut up and stay out of the game until they learn a little more about what they're talking about.
ReplyDeleteWe can clearly see the sun in the background and the long shadows coming towards us. The character in this photo clearly matches. It has the classic rim-lighting or a halo on it's back. While it's face and front are much darker due to the fact that they are in the shadow. Have somebody go out and stand with their back to the morning or late afternoon sun, you'll see the same effect.
The absolute truth is, no one on this planet has the skills or tools to say with confidence that this is a fake. Unfortunately, the same applies towards proving it's real. As it stands, it's just a photo. But a really interesting one.
That supposed BF photo is a tricky thing. I know BF exists, but people who "believe" in Bigfoot are quick to believe their eyes on photos. The problem with it is, not everything is an actual BF photo and the only ones that should be judged worthy of closer inspection are ones that come with an actual witness and context and not just some shot slapped down on the Internet with no "home" from which it came. You can't possibly consider this evidence without first considering the source and the context. So, it's not even a valid pic at this point.
ReplyDeleteStill another reason not to shoot
ReplyDeleteBigfoot. I can see the headline
now:
BIGFOOT SHOT. TEENAGER FOUND
INSIDE!
Totally agree with ThinkerThunker. If somebody did that in PS they did a good job. Seems to me it would be a whole lot easier having a person walk with a suit.
ReplyDeleteThe thing that struck me when I magnified it was that it was impossible top see if the BF was walking slightly downhill with right shoulder towards the camera or uphill with the back towards the camera.
Has this photo been posted anywhere else or just on that FB-page?
To me the shadows seem fine, as does the sunlight glisten off his side. The part I dont get is how the cameraman got the ahead of the creature. Seems as though the shot should have been taken from the house looking down, not ahead of the creature looking back at the house? Just an observation.
ReplyDeleteThe NY Bigfoot photo does not appear to be a photo shopped image. I Do not think it is a bigfoot for the following reasons.
ReplyDelete1. the arms appear to short,they appear to fall with in the 40 percent range found in humans, not the 60 persent range as would be more correct for bigfoot.
2. the Front leg is straight and appears to be more in line with a human walk.
but who knows for sure i guess.
Thanks
Ouch those poor feet of the porter!
ReplyDeleteWell, that Bigfoot picture sure got a lot of hits to their business Facebook page didn't it?
ReplyDeleteWhat makes me wonder is why there aren't any other photos. These woods are so clear that they could easily get more pics if they wanted. Also, there is a branch right on it's head. weird.
ReplyDeleteThe NY "bigfoot" photo looks like a person carrying a bucket.
ReplyDeleteLike I said, what better way to draw attention to your business? This one I'm very suspicious of and suspect it was a ploy to get people to their Facebook page. They take people on tours, make fishing lures, etc. Click on the business website for the Facebook page.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't matter if its 100% real or fake. I could step out in the woods right now see two Bigfeet (whatever the new term is) take a picture of them and post it on line and people would still say it was fake, photo shopped, or two guys in suits. The point being unless the viewers are there to witness the event there are still going to be people out there calling bullshit. It wouldn't matter if it was a Baptist minister that took the picture and swore before God on a stack of bibles that its true people would still say he was a liar. So my question is why does EVERYONE automatically go all Matt Moneymaker on these? Meaning if they didn't get the evidence then its gotta be staged.
ReplyDeleteI mean hell its been 40+ years since Patty was filmed and people are still calling bullshit yet nobody has been able to debunk it in all this time. So what if he had a shady past before that fateful day. No matter his intentions or real reasons for being there he still got one of the best pieces of evidence to date that has brought 98% of the people on this blog and into this area of research than anything else. So why do people still try and crap on it? Just take it as something really cool and interesting that got most of us started in this whole mixed up phenomena, that and Boggy Creek. Just sayin
ReplyDeleteThat's a good picture and everything looks good. I would go back and setup again and again.Just to see how close I could I get.Just to see it's face.
ReplyDelete