NewsFeed Explains Why It's In Finding Bigfoot's Best Interest To Not Find Bigfoot, Ever


If these latest stats don't tell you anything, perhaps it can still give you a clue into the popularity of the Animal Planet show: Finding Bigfoot. According to NewsFeed, the show averages more than 1.4 million viewers a week, beating out other reality-TV favorites like TLC's Hoarding: Buried Alive and HGTV’s "Holmes Inspection."

The real question NewsFeed is pondering: does anyone really want to find Bigfoot? Proving Bigfoot’s existence puts an end to all of the fun, and in the case of Animal Planet, some serious ratings. The season-two premiere of Finding Bigfoot had 1.6 million viewers, making it the most watched episode of the program and the second-best season debut of any show on the network.

Four episodes into season two, Finding Bigfoot is still going strong. The show averages more than 1.4 million viewers a week, beating out other reality-TV favorites like TLC’s Hoarding: Buried Alive and HGTV’s “Holmes Inspection.” Not Kardashian numbers, but pretty respectable for basic cable.

Hunting Bigfoot poses potential ethical, legal and permitting issues, not to mention putting an end to profitable TV franchises. “Finding Bigfoot” has six more episodes before it’s season finale.

[via newsfeed.time.com]

Comments

  1. When is the 2nd season set to end? Maybe the DNA proof will beat them to it, and make any such TV shows obsolete in the future and relics themselves. Why, I hope so.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One thing is for sure: during that show they did in Minnesota, there was a lot of screwing around done by the team, and it seemed to me that Mr. Moneymaker was ignoring it.

    Maybe Matt said something about it later on off camera, and if so that's great.

    Example: Bobo calling out to Bigfoot, saying: "Come on you hairy sonof%*$#*." And later on he pretended to be Renae over the radio.

    If you take this research as a joke than that's how it is going to be treated by the public watching it.

    I'm all for a sense of humor, such as a light moment during the daytime while talking to a witness for example, but even that should be kept to a minimum.

    Anyways, it is a good show. I haven't missed an episode yet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent read. I just passed this onto a buddy who was doing some research on that. He actually bought me lunch since I found it for him! So let me rephrase: Thank you for lunch!

    ReplyDelete
  4. YOU JUST WANT TO SEE BF ONCE ? NOT ME BRING HIM BACK FOR THE NEXT 5 YEARS I'LL WATCH THEM FIND HIM OR HER.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Exactly to anonymous above me. If they find Bigfoot imagine the discovery shows or animal planet shows trying to observe them. I say find Bigfoot ASAP and let animal planet change the name to goin Bigfoot and they can travel around north America and determine which areas are " squatchy" and what not

    ReplyDelete
  6. Auto correct is evil. The above post was suppose to say change te name to found Bigfoot not goin Bigfoot. I'll have my son proof read all comments in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  7. They don't want to find Bigfoot anymore than Scotland wants to admit there really is no Nessie. Even if after all the sonar scans over the lock, They show nothing large living there, but to admit it doesn't exist will cost them tourist, so they will never admit it

    ReplyDelete
  8. LOL about auto correct. It can sure cause some funny semantics.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?