Thursday, January 5, 2012

Canadian Bigfoot Researcher Todd Standing Ramping Up Production by Showing Clear Photographs of Sasquatch [Video]

"Todd's Experiences are the likes of an M. Night Shyamalan Hollywood Blockbuster"

Famous Sasquatch Researcher from Canada, Todd Standing, is currently handing out a mini-documentary featuring Bigfoot creature(s) he filmed during his 7 years of research. Not only is he providing video evidence, he also claims to have physical evidence for DNA testing (if anyone is interested).

Standing has been featured on countless television shows, and the media just loves him. An episode of Finding Bigfoot investigating Standing's claim is scheduled to air on January 15, and you do not want to miss that if you're a Todd Standing fan.

Check out these short visuals of the Bigfoot he caught on tape.


We hope you enjoyed this short visual collection of work from the past 7 years of research. To all those interested in a copy of the Sylvanic Bigfoot mini doc and more we are burning the below info (Audio clips, written chronicles and some of the best Photographs and video evidence of Sasquatch ever recorded) onto a computer disk.

If you are aware of any University's or Independent scientist that can do DNA testing on physical evidence we have been gathering please email us though our website.

We would like to wish all the groups of Bigfoot researchers the best of luck this year.
With some good fortune perhaps this year one of us will take this species out of the realm of the paranormal with definitive overwhelming proof that finally garners the acceptance of the scientific community.

- Todd Standing

Related:

73 comments:

  1. Well, you can tease me with BF documentaries and movies and I fall for it every time. Of course, I'm going to want this. I am a hopeless enthusiast. I did like the image at the end of the clip. For some reason, it resonated with me as something between a hint of ape but very primitive human too. Beautifully done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think TS is going to have the last laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Anonymous

    More hoaxes, huh? Probably.

    @Autumnforest

    Even though I've pretty much decided bigfoot isn't real, I still like silly stuff like this. I am going to read the Enoch book, which is probably the biggest pile of dung since the one featured in Jurassic Park. But I bet it's a fun read.

    Is Todd Standing (whose STANDING in the bigfoot world is not so tall) charging for this? If not, hell, I'll watch it. I really love monster movies. I just wish those who make them would admit it's fiction. :D

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think I'll pass on this.I live in Calgary and never here anything about Todd.
    I'm sure the University of Calgary could do DNA testing for him.It's a world class facility.
    I'm sure Todd already knows this.If he has a backer willing to pay 2 Million for a body,why not get the test done here?
    Every time I head out to my spot,I half expect to run in to him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thats what I like about Todd. He seems to always keep his distance from the Bigfoot community. Doesn't get involved in all the BS.

    Not saying his stuff is real, I just respect his approach a little more. Time will tell.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Biggest pile yet. The blink is ridiculous. It is obviously mechanical. Some argue that there are different types/styles of bigfoot and Standing's photos/video capture that; however, is it realistic to think that they have completely different eyeballs? Very stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  7. yea that blink jus doesnt look right.not much about all this looks right.nice try tho.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The blink looks fake to me.....

    ReplyDelete
  9. At this point, if there was interest in the mythical green spotted gremlins of old growth forests we would have "photo and film" evidence of them as the technology to create and try to fake almost anything is available.

    new anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  10. The blink doesn't look anything mechanical. You can clearly see muscle movement during the blink. Not saying its a real bf, never seen one. Although it does look how people describe it. Clever costume if its fake.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The blink is easily fake because the skin underneath the eyes does not move one bit. No nerves or nothing its so mechanical.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What creature blinks with the upper lid / eyebrow without any equal movement from the lower lid and eyebrow..try it.

    So, it that is fake, why consider anything else real? We don't have the context, so maybe it is presented as a model.

    new anonymous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. God your stupid. So all animals blink the same way? Top FX guys in the industry have already said that if they are fake they would hire the creator to head their FX division in a second. And as far as the blinking, I myself if I blink pretty slow I can move just my lid, but I'm a human, and who knows what they are... So if your telling me that you know the ocular physiology of an animal that hasn't been studied yet, your a fucken clairvoyant.

      Delete
  13. A quick Google search:

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rZKqPXQ07Eg/TXBt0YxdDiI/AAAAAAAAEZ4/FXzJ8M7RYhc/s1600/IMG_2351.JPG

    My green spotted gremlin.

    new anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anon what muscle movement are you talking about. Nothing blinks that slow and precise.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hey these gremlins are real!

    http://www.festivalcairns.com.au/uploads/GremlinTrio.jpg

    new anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  16. It never ceases to amaze me that known and multiple repeat bigfoot hoaxers like Standing and Biscardi and others can continue to get an audience. Anything from this guy can be dismissed as BS.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This guy is a known bigfoot fraud. He has done this type of crap again and again. Did you notice that his sasquatches don't consistently look the same at all. What a load of crap. Unfortunately, some people who don't know this guy's bigfoot past will fall for more of this fakery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What can you say when even Bobo doesn't believe you.

      Delete
  18. that blinking segment is comically FAKE. at least hire a better FX person if you are going to make such claims.

    ReplyDelete
  19. All his photos are the same. Head shot with some branches and brush thrown in. Not one upper body shot.
    I must say that last "model" is a masterpiece though, a lot of work went into that baby.
    Kudos to the artist on that one.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Total BS. Standing needs his ass kicked!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Will someone up there please beat him down?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous said...

    "Will someone up there please beat him down?"

    If I run in to him,I'd sure have a few questions.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I will check it out....maybe it isn't all head shots. Will see and report back later.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I will check it out....maybe it isn't all head shots. Will see and report back later.

    ReplyDelete
  25. He needs a hell of a lot more than questioning and so does Discardi. I am so over the top sick and tired of these assholes! They are counteracting every honest effort/amount of success that legitimate researchers achieve. People, as a whole, are very vulnerable and they are preying upon those people and making the rest of us waste a lot of time. It's time they're given a good reason to stop and get real jobs. I guarandamntee that if some dumbass within my reach was doing the things these guys are doing that I'd "convince" them to cease.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Anonymous-I would love to catch him in the act with my camcorder,but I have no idea where his alleged spot is.
    Giving him an ass kicking would just get my own ass tossed in jail.
    A good shaming on video would be sweeter.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Justin do you always have to cuss?

    There was that one video of several Sasses standing and walking away. Remember they just blended into the background. They were up on a hillside and he was filming from below.

    ReplyDelete
  28. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Todd Standings is a hoaxer. I think he might have had a real sighting once and then started faking things. TS is so horrible that he makes Tom Biscardi look not so bad.
    These guys will not stop hoaxing if they keep getting suckers to follow them and buying their fake videos.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I'm just curious, is it not possible to look at some of the high quality photos that Todd has and analyze them to see if they have been photo shopped? Not my area of expertise, so just wondering?

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Beer-Man
    If the photos are digital,then having the EXIF Data from the originals would be helpful.
    Beyond that,I have no other suggestions.
    The photos are cleverly cropped though.
    The subject is always looking in another direction,suggesting a staged picture.
    Maybe he actually had an encounter at some point,but these photos look off to me.
    Just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I've had the dvd for over a month now. It's pretty good. The eye-blink that's shown on the trailer above is in slo-mo.

    ReplyDelete
  33. One of TS released photos looked photoshopped or at least had an air brush effect. the others in his videos are either people in heavy make-up or some type of "dummy" type thing.
    As a side note he blocked me on youtube and i can't comment on his videos. I even told him he was getting better at making fake videos...lol

    ReplyDelete
  34. If I remember right I believe some of those photos were analyzed and proven to be taken in a studio because of things like shadows against the branches the reflection of the sun in the sasquatches eyes was the wrong color it was to bright and resembled a studio light, and I think the big one is you can clearly see the reflection of the sun in one of the Squatches eyes and yet it doesn't have any squint to it.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Thanks guys!

    Very creative photos though. I kinda hope that Bigfoot will look something like that. We shall see.

    @last annoymous

    If you have the video and have seen it, do u get to see any bodies with those faces, or any longer clips showing any more body movement?

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonomous with DVD: is the bigfoot shown on this trailor supposed to be real on the dvd, or a recreation?

    ReplyDelete
  37. Real life caught on film. All real according to him

    ReplyDelete
  38. Hoaxer. Period the end. There is really no maybe about him. He is a proven hoaxer.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Is he a hoaxer by the pictures? I been hearing lots of people calling him a hoaxer for the last year or so, but I've never heard or seen the logic behind the accusations.

    I'm a little weary of the photos myself, but I have a hard time passing judgement on someone based on not hearing or seeing any evidence.

    Does anyone out there have any proof of the hoax? Or is he just a hoaxer and thats that?

    ReplyDelete
  40. They are by far the best video faces of a Bigfoot, I have ever seen. I don't know if fake or not. If these are hoaxed then Todd is wasting his time in Canada and needs to haul his butt to Hollywood and set up a costume/special effects production company.

    Chuck in Ohio

    ReplyDelete
  41. Look closely at some of the bigfoot photos and then do a side to side comparison of Todd Standings most recent photos with beard/mustache. I believe some of these videos are of Todd Standing himself, wearing makeup and hair to make himself look like one of these creatures. Seriously. Look closely at the nose, cheek bone structure, lips, etc. Either it is Todd Standing himself, or his first cousin is a Sasquatch.

    Archer1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely is Todd Standing in the pose! No question. His sister made up his face, the rest is photocopy. easy to see his facial features.

      Delete
    2. You are 100% correct!!!

      Delete
  42. He owns a movie production company and his sister is a makeup effects artist. Yes it's been proven that some of his photos are hoaxes (and I think it's fairly obvious that the "blink" is obviously man made)

    The guy's story about Sylvanic describes a place that doesn't exist he claims to have crawled for a mile through an 18" crevice to find it.... He's a self aggrandizing huckster.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I'm with Alpha & Beer-Man. Baseless accusations have become "common knowledge". Can anyone here help me find the particulars of the "Standing Hoax"? I've looked and all I'm left with are my own suspicions and no documentation. Maybe he was dismissed so quickly (and maybe rightly so) that due dilligence wasn't taken to properly debunk him. I mean, wouldn't that have supported part of his original "Hoax/Misidentification Theory" in the opposite way he hoped? Rather than accepting the extraordinary footage, he was completely dismissed without question, because someone (or everyone, in this case) simply said so.
    Dave from the PAC/NW

    ReplyDelete
  44. Standing's photos are laughably bad without exception. The fact that anyone would consider them remotely believable is telling about hoaxers' ability to exist and perpetuate their "craft." The squatching community needs to learn to separate its desire for evidence from falling for pathetic examples such as these.

    Midwest Squatcher
    -

    ReplyDelete
  45. lol Ricter I love your comments...

    ReplyDelete
  46. I don't doubt this guys fake, but to all those people saying his Bigfoot all look differently; of course they do. How many humans (other than twins triplets etc) look the same. If Bigfoot is closely related to humans, it's silly to expect them all to look alike.

    ReplyDelete
  47. ShaunW73, I agree that we must assume BF don't all look alike - just like we don't all look alike; however, I can't think of any reason why the eyes in one photo are completely black and in another show separation between iris and the whites (sclera?). That type of fundamental difference is too much.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Hasnt anyone even notice that all the bigfoot resemble Standing, I really think he just glued hair to his own face and staged the photos, thats why there aren't any full body photo's. Look at the video again and you can clearly see it looks just like him.

    ReplyDelete
  49. You just have to look at the number of comments to see that Todd Standing - like him or hate him - is really "special". And folks: I do not know (and do not want to judge) if the two BF faces in the video are the real thing or fake. But if fake: especially the second one is a masterpiece of art, there is no denying it. I have never seen anything as well done as this: in no movie, in no TV docu, in no animation. Fantastic work, Todd!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  50. If the second face is a masterpiece of work if fake but if it has a body and movement I will give ole Todd a second look !

    ReplyDelete
  51. Very dramatic.... Yet no proof! Self promotional bullshit.

    If he has anything other than a decent special effects person (his sister)I will eat my shorts.

    ReplyDelete
  52. If this is about the quality of the fake, he's great!

    If it's about evidence, he sucks!

    ReplyDelete
  53. Nice sculpts and rigs. Utter hogwash.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I'd love for his pics and vids to be real. The pics I've seen look too good and a bit staged, but that could be me being cynical because of the usual blobsquatches I'm used to seeing. I hope he does prove me wrong though because if he does then his methods must be far better than any other researcher out there.
    However, one thing I will say about TS, it seems he wants to do a genuinely good thing in getting Bigfoot recognised as a protected species, that's got to be the most important thing here. Maybe having a few more researchers like him and getting rid of the money grabbing and fame hungry like Moneymaker and Biscardi would be better for all of us.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Just curious... apart from opinion has any of his footage been proven to be fake, where can I find these photos. Someone must know, majority of the ppl commenting have called him a hoaxer.

    Regards

    Stephen

    ReplyDelete
  56. I got a copy of his DVD when it first came out. His videos were boring to watch for the most part, but does show really good video and photos of their faces.

    Of course they all look different. If they are a hominid (a type of human) of course they will look just as different to each other as we are to each other. I say that because they look different, that means that they are real BF's. If all his videos and photos showed the same BF each time, then I would argue they are fake. A hoaxer would only bother to go to the effort of making a time consuming mask once.

    Another thing. They look just the whitnesses describe BF's, very human like. Also Where's the proof that it's fake. Just like where's the proof the Patterson-Gimly film is fake. Yeah, the eye blink is slow, but that's slow motion for you. Also my upper eye lid moves more than my lower one when I blink (for those that noticed), just as in the video.

    Another thing. People are complaining they can't see the upper body. Don't most people described seeing bigfoots looking around trees and bushes to conceal themselves from view? He simply concentrated on zooming in on the part of the body he could see.

    Also the complaint about him not wanting to tell people anything about how he go so close and where to find them it totally reasonable. In his DVD he was saying that after word got out of the location hunters went in there and started shooting at anything on two legs. That would keep me from telling the public how to find them. It would endanger peoples live and if BF's are hominids then the hunters would be committing murder. (I live up in his part of Canada and I know quite a few red necks up here and they would jump at the chance to "bag" themselves a BF), I know I was dating one and she saw finding bigfoot and was attament that someone has to go shoot one!

    I think that because he got actual real video and photos of some BF's, people are finding them to be looking too real and therefore must be fake. You are all used to the shaky, at a distance, grainy videos. For once someone found a way to sneak up undetected and film them with high quality equipment instead of cell phone cameras. Sheesh!

    Again, I keep hearing in here about how he's a proven fake. Where is the proof of this?????

    With the "Self promotional" claims. I would say he's no more self promotional then Matt Moneymaker on Finding Bigfoot. But Todd's not getting paid by the media where Matt is. hhmmm? Why is Todd any different then Matt? Since Matt is promoting himself in the media (and getting paid for it) that must mean he is a hoaxer too then? All those knocks in the woods must be hired people that hits trees with baseball bats and scream responces to Matt and them in the middle of the night? They Halloween special Renee had a large rock thrown at her. That must have been a camera crew person hiding in the woods? See where I am getting with this. Just because Todd's been on TV doesn't make him any more a hoaxer that Matt Moneymaker. (By the way I love his name, no pun intended. Come on a guy named Moneymaker being paid to host a show called Finding Bigfoot isn't faking all those noises in the woods?!?) Give Todd just as much credit as you give Matt Moneymaker.

    Did you guys know that Todd had run a signature petition campain to get BF's protected from hunting in Canada. Where's the selfish shame in that? That's what got his name on TV in the first place. He is an activist no different then the spotted owl activists who try to protect those creatures. Only difference is the spotted owl is a recognized species.

    I would say it seems everyone has a hate-on for him for some unknown reason. Some of you are jealous he got good video and you didn't.

    Chad (a believer in the unknown)

    ReplyDelete
  57. Chad - Channeling some Carl Popper there. Good for you.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Bigfooters are hard t please aren't we? Bad photos then it's a blobsqautch. Godd photos, it's fake.

    Maybe I'll give Todd a chance after all. Who knows, maybe we will all eat some humble pie one day?

    ReplyDelete
  59. What we need is another set of photos of (at least, close to) the same quality, not taken by Standing, to verify the subjects in these images... I'm lookin' at you, Matilda! ;)
    ...still waiting. [sigh]

    ReplyDelete
  60. If time permitted and I could afford to take time off work,I'd gladly go out on an expedition with him just so I could verify what he claims.
    I highly doubt he would take me to a place where I could witness,record and photograph Bigfoot though.
    Likely I'd be taken on a circular and long hike to nowhere,just like some guides do when taking hunters out.
    It might sound harsh,but TS and other BF researchers should be more transparent and forthcoming about such evidence/claims.

    ReplyDelete
  61. I agree 100% Sasquaination! It does no one any good to withhold evidence. TS should put it all out their for everyone to see. If he's not gonna do that, then quit coming out with these teaser videos, your wasting everyones time. Its very easy to lose respect for people when they do this.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Todd Standing is basically a criminal. If you defend him, you are allying yourself with a criminal and a hardcore con artist. Think about it.

    Speaking of beating him up, I love to see criminals get beat up. I know some people up in Canada who won't go to conferences if they know he's going to be there because they say they will punch him in the face if they ever see him. He's widely hated among Canadian researchers.

    It would be so cool to see someone walk up to Standing and punch him in the face!

    ReplyDelete
  63. http://squatchdetective.com/sylvanic.htm
    this should cover it for most of you wanting hoax details. I think the details of him shilling his videos with fabricated names is also covered. Just look at the guy, he screams bullshitter to me

    ReplyDelete
  64. I think its hilarious how they bash this dude without knowing what the fuck they are talking about. Even Robert Lindsay calling him a criminal lol if a picture is blurry its fake if its in HD its also fake ... haha since when did all these keyboard warriors start becoming experts in the field? At least the guy is clocking in hours in the woods doing research and when he get something interesting its automatically dismissed as a hoax because....well just because. Lol its almost like none of you want Bigfoot to be real. I'm not saying its real but at least analize the video correctly then make an intelligent opinion. I'm hearing people say its mechanical and even some saying its him dressed up lol are you serious? Robert Lindsay you're like an old lady man...you and your "sources " can shut the hell up. Have you met him? Or is that just the rumors you hear from snooping around for a living? Either prove that its a fake or keep an open mind you bunch of drama queen wannabe detectives.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Someday Todd (fraud) Standing (spamming) will admit it's him in makeup effects done by his sister. Mark my words.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Should read fraud Skamming.

    ReplyDelete