Uploaded by SUSANFARNS on Jul 6, 2011
We retrieved the SD cards from our cameras of the Bigfoot Research area closest to the Wallow Fire (east of Young Arizona). When we got back, the first picture was very promising. It looked as if we had a bigfoot! We were hoping our other cameras could confirm it.
That bear looks like a monkey with stubby legs check out the YouTube video Creature Examined there's been a couple experts now that discovered the Jacobs Sasquatch didn't have the proportions of a bear.
ReplyDeletePoor bears. I hope they can survive the fires.
ReplyDeleteThis video helps to show that the Jacobs Creature is a skinny Pennsylvania bear that happened to be captured on camera at an odd angle at night giving it the appearance of a primate in one picture. Look at the feet of the Jacobs Creature, especially in the one picture of its face sniffing the ground. The creature is called bigfoot, not bear foot. You can clearly see that the feet on the Jacobs Creature are not at all like the large human-like feet associated with bigfoot. This is so obvious. It's not a juvenile sasquatch; it's a bear. For crying out loud, there were bears in some of the photos caught minutes from the snapshots of the Jacobs Creature.
ReplyDeleteYou are looking at the feet at an angle. It only looks like the feet are short like a bears. Look at the length of the feet on the Jacobs photos. You can tell they would be much longer if you could see the creature from the side. Also, look at the length of the rear legs of the Jacobs creature. They are long like a man's legs. Even a sick, skinny bear wouldn't have long rear legs. Not any kind of primate either! I believe it to be closer to man than primate.
ReplyDeleteI have seen bigfoot before on my family property in Pennsylvania a couple of times. I haven't seen a juvanile before, but it sure looks like one to me. The fact that bears were there prior to the Jacobs creature means nothing. The (possable bigfoot), could have scared them off! Nobody knows for sure just by the photo offered here, but I'd say it's a 50/50 chance that it's a legit bigfoot!
Watch this one.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhCpKMs2_aM&feature=watch_response
November 2008 on page 17 of scientriffic magazine real scientists at the location worked out the size. The reenactment revealed 22 inch arms and an 18 3/4 torso. That's impossible for a bear because a bear's body's longer than their limbs.
The legs are much shorter than the Jacobs creature. I've also seen a replica model measured at that Jacobs site and filmed through the same game camera. Guess what? Anonymous is right the legs WERE longer than the body.
ReplyDeletehaha, Mitch, if you and I walked a 100 or so miles because of a fire, we would probably be a little thin too... :) IN fact Mitch, we should! ;)
ReplyDeleteWell Mitch was taking this video I was also driving through the Wallow a few of times~~~twice on my way to and from the 4 Corners to hook up with JC.
Mitch is the only person I work with more then JC. :)