All this evidence combined with 1000s of years of unwritten, unverifiable Native American accounts, combined with the Patterson costume, along with fake footprints, make Bigfoot undeniably apocryphal.
Within the field of biology and anatomy, I am considered by most as an expert among experts. Many of these "bigfoot" sightings are simply misidentified creatures. Take for instance this most recent video above. Clearly, what the children filmed was not a Sasquai, but a large Afro-American lineman for some NFL team. He is hiding out in the bushes whilst the national anthem is being sang. Had the tiny tikes continued to film, they would have witnessed this great mountain of girth place his uniform back on.........
BRAVO!! At 5:22, At least that explanation is 1000x more plausible than some 1000lb 10ft hairy apeman running around undetected in the suburban area's of the USA!
This is a bear. You can see that it was upright on its hind legs when they first caught it on video, and then it goes down on all fours as it walks away.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
All evidence presented on NvTv is Fake or Hoaxed.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to say it's not because you see Bigfoot doesn't exist but giant cats of Britain, no, also doesn't exist
ReplyDeleteIktomi just Schooled all the Boyos that claim his IQ is low via the above comment, keep up the good work Joe.
DeleteAll this evidence combined with 1000s of years of unwritten, unverifiable Native American accounts, combined with the Patterson costume, along with fake footprints, make Bigfoot undeniably apocryphal.
DeleteWithin the field of biology and anatomy, I am considered by most as an expert among experts. Many of these "bigfoot" sightings are simply misidentified creatures. Take for instance this most recent video above. Clearly, what the children filmed was not a Sasquai, but a large Afro-American lineman for some NFL team. He is hiding out in the bushes whilst the national anthem is being sang. Had the tiny tikes continued to film, they would have witnessed this great mountain of girth place his uniform back on.........
DeleteBRAVO!! At 5:22, At least that explanation is 1000x more plausible than some 1000lb 10ft hairy apeman running around undetected in the suburban area's of the USA!
DeleteThis is a bear. You can see that it was upright on its hind legs when they first caught it on video, and then it goes down on all fours as it walks away.
ReplyDelete^ the only "bear" I am interested in is when it is combined with "back" - the bareback boys are ridden again...yeeeeaaaaayyyyy !
DeleteI LIKE it !!!
Joe