M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
There's no such thing as bigfoot! WAKE UP MORONS!!
ReplyDeleteWell said.
DeleteJust the fact that a dipshit like you believes strongly against, means that we should be strongly for.
DeleteSimple and to the point. I like it.
DeleteIf Bigfoot isnt real, than why is there a blog devoted to the evidence he leaves behind? Riddle me that!
DeleteUm, what evidence, dumbass?
DeleteGo back to youtube McClitoris and make another unfunny video about your small penis that you later found out was your clitoris
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C_wzhcG758
First
ReplyDeleteJ
Firsting!
ReplyDeleteWent deep sea fishing last week and captured a merman! He has rather extravagant taste and will only eat smoked salmon and caviar. He cant float around in my jetted tub all day using up all the hot water and wasting all the grocery money. Hes going to have to get a job. Do you think Dyer could set him up?
ReplyDeleteWas it Ethel Merman?
DeleteThere's no bigfoot, like our bigfoot...
DeleteYes, it was Ethel Merman! How did you know this? Has be been sponging at your house too?
Deleteis that a dog or baby bigfoot I hear in the background ?
ReplyDelete