Without A Body Bigfoot Should Not Be Categorized As a Hominid


Editor’s Note: This is a post by Bigfoot Evidence contributor, Damian Bravo, a Sasquatch believer. You can join Damian's group Sasquatch Lives? on Facebook and the group's official page at www.sasquatchlives.com.

Evolution of a species and its adaptation to its environment has been the most plausible answer to the way many species look today. At one time in the early beginnings of evolution the creatures we see today came from what I call, a genetically caused big bang evolution, which altered the gamma of the species we have found and know today. Yet what many of us do not realize is that the traces of that event and the connections the hominoid species has to the moment mammals successfully propagated themselves on Earth is at our fingers. If Bigfoot is a species that successfully adapted through mutations in its evolutionary path, then this creature’s survival, if it exists, would give us answers to how another species has adapted with similar traits as possibly another hominid species.

In my article “Bigfoot and the Sloth Connection”, I wrote about a fantastical hypothesis that Bigfoot may be an evolutionary descendent of the extinct giant Sloth and possible not another Hominid. Let’s take a look why I think this could be possible and that this species may not be what some think it should be.

Simple traces within us and other species can be found to connect us to that moment when millions of years ago the earth had few choices of life forms in its gene pool. Let’s take a look at one particular morphological aspect that many mammalians have, good old fingers and toes. Even horses had toes instead of hoofs at one time. Horses and other equids are called odd-toed ungulates of the order Perissodactyla, a group of mammals that was dominant during the Tertiary period, which occurred 45 to 55 million years ago. This order of mammalians contained 14 families, but only three have survived, the horse, tapir and the rhinoceros. If Bigfoot is a species yet to be discovered and its origins was part of this evolutionary big bang, then it is possible that he might indeed have certain hominid traits but actually be something else, and not an alien like some may think. Within all this, without a specimen we just cannot assume the exact mammalian order Bigfoot will belong to.

The evolution of the horse hoof from bottom to top

We may ask ourselves why we have for example 5 toes, no less or no more. If we take a look at the morphology of the human foot, we have big broad stable feet compared to other animals to accommodate our locomotion and bipedalism. This type of feature helps us balance, as opposed to a cats foot which is designed for running or a rabbits for jumping (Long and narrow). It is because our ancestors have never had to jump or run to survive that we have the feet we have today. This is the same with toes, 5 toes on each foot provides us with optimal balance. Think about it.... when you walk, what last touches the ground? Your toes. They go at the angle they go in and from big to small, to keep us from tripping and falling. Interestingly, if we did not have toes and just had the ball of the foot, we could actually walk yet our balance would be affected, so running would cause us to fall off balance every time.

If the supposed species of Bigfoot has been part of this mammalian evolution of what some species are today, then we must be careful to categorize this supposed species as a hominid. I disagree that automatically with must assume if we see certain physical traits on a creature, it must be from the primate order. The countless mammals known today are connected in an origin that diversified each specific know order to adapt to its particular ever changing environment.

Many Paleontologists believe that the ancestor of all mammals and reptiles was a fish that had bony fins (an example of such a "living fossil" is the coelacanth, discovered several decades ago). Certain species of fish, hundreds of millions of years ago, had an arrangement of eight bones in their fins. Our fishy ancestor that one day had the capability to breath above water and crawled up onto land, by chance happened to have five bones in their fins. Those mammals and reptiles that have less than five digits lost digits as an adaptation to their environment. Humans could probably have done just as well with a fishy ancestor that had four fin bones, or six bones.

If one day we do get the chance to examine the physical body of Bigfoot, I think we will be surprised to find what exactly this creature truly is. As of yet not one DNA study has proven empirically that Bigfoot is a hominid, it surprises me how many people already believe what some are seen in the wilderness of North America and other parts of the world is another species of undiscovered hominoid. Like in any theory many variables must be considered before a species is categorized in a specific order. Even today certain species have been re-categorized to other subspecies or orders as science learns more about the structure DNA and what exactly makes living things what they are.

Once (if and when) we acquire a specimen of Bigfoot, we can place this supposed species in its proper order in the evolutionary tree if it truly does exist. As I look for the truth and evidence of this creature’s existence, I learn something new every day in my quest for answers in the enigma of Bigfoot. Yet if we already assume that what some are seeing is possibly a hominid closely related to us, I would think it would be careless of us to make assumptions of certain physical aspects of what exactly a Bigfoot is, without a proper in-depth biological study of its anatomy to prove such conclusions.

Damian Bravo

Contributing writer:

bigfootevidence.blogspot.com
www.sasquatchlives.com

Comments

  1. I would say not only would they be a type of hominin, but also a human (if they actually exist).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, and there's enough evidence already to suggest that they do exist only remains to see what exactly they are but given the possible capability to speak the species dealt with with is definitely a primate cousin and hominin of some kind. It's the sort of thing DNA can prove and undoubtedly already did via the Ketchum study, I think this work's primary delay is that fact alone and how such news should be presented to the public. If they have this knowledge there's really no other concern they could have presently.

      Delete
    2. As wild as Damian's theory may be, believing that Sasquatch are human seems even wilder. Whatever they are, they are different and separate from us.

      Delete
    3. Wilder how? Except human is what they most likely are unless you want to suggest they're something else, perhaps from outer space? Apes they're not that's for sure seems entirely unlikely anyway. If they speak they're human as that that's currently how we define human, still an unknown and new species of course but still human or people if you will. Hominins are human after all, they aren't ape beasts either, Neanderthals are/were our brothers. No other primate or great ape speaks or walks upright but we do and 'squatches do too. Sure a different and separate species we're not Neanderthals either.

      Delete
    4. I could maybe buy that its something in the homo genus, but homo sapiens to-be-determined is a reach.(If thats what you are saying). There would be evidence of tool use, fire or some altering of the environment. This might even be true of anything in the homo genus, I'll add.

      Delete
  2. Jesus, that things got teeth like Hovey :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That thing looks like Hovey and Fasano's love child.

      Delete
  3. It should not be characterized as a sloth either. With majority of accounts indicating human-like features and foot morphology, the BEST EDUCATED GUESS sans body would be a creature within the genus homo. I think DB is the weakest link in Team Tazer. Just sayin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I want to clarify something, I guess my I deas on what exactly BF's are at times can be wild, but what you are not getting from my articcle is in terms of scientific proof, we just cannot assume it is a hominid of sometype, for all we know it could be and entire new species of placental mammalain.

      Also where did i say it is a sloth, if you read my article it is a idea based on possible parallel evolution and how one mammalian species can become something different do to genetic mutations and enviormental adaptations, this type of evolution has been proven to exist by certain other species taking charateristics of another,even separated by continents. I understand you may not like my ideas, but explain to me how am I the weakest link of Team Tazer since you seem to be such and expert on evolution.

      Damian Bravo

      Delete
    2. Sounds like Damians been eating the bath salts again.Wow.

      Delete
    3. We CAN assume it is a hominid of some type because of it's foot-prints. All early Hominids shared the same shaped foot-print with little variation between species.(At least the prints we found so far) The only Odd-ball shaped foot-print in the Homo genus was us.

      look up Neanderthal prints and look up "Early Hominid Prints". You will see they look almost identical to Sasquatch prints. Who is to say we don't have a body? How do you know that Yeti, Sasquatch, Yowie, Southern-Saquatch etc.. Aren't our supposed ancestors?

      You have all these guys who post everytime there is a Ketchum topic saying "DNA won't prove anything without a body." Now suddenly you have Oxford studying this as well and bringing it to main-stream??? Why? unless it's DNA matched a body we do have.

      Delete
    4. Well, I don't know about the anon you asked, but there's a few reasons I'm a bit dubious on you.

      For starters, when you're describing 'parallel' evo, what you're actually describing is convergent evolution - close, but different.

      2nd, you're disregarding a few pretty important principles in phylogenetics - for one, what about homoplasy weightings that you'd use for features like... I don't know... the 5 toed foot you use in the article?

      Bleugh - enough for now.

      Delete
    5. So Damian your saying that you are smarter than the rest of the TTBF?I don't think they will like what you are implying.

      Delete
  4. A Bigfoot body will never be obtained because it is a paranormal entity. It is everywhere, yet nowhere. It cannot be trapped and therefore will never be categorized as a species or subspecies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not true. Justin Smeja shot two dead.

      Delete
    2. What I saw face to face at only 20' (twice), ran away through the woods; a paranormal entity would have just disappeared... It wouldn't' get scarred and run away making noise and knocking down trees as it went. Like happened during both my sightings-there was also other people at each sighting.

      Delete
    3. I know these thing exist, as I ate two once.

      Delete
    4. Paranormal? Then explain the blood trail left in the Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia after I grazed its shoulder with a 30.06 in early 2000?

      Delete
    5. Swamp gas or ectoplasm. Sorry for the bad news :(

      Delete
    6. 80% of them are flesh and blood. The other 205 are familiar spirits, Jin, skinwalkers, demons or what ever you prefer. Look up yosimite.

      There different critters out there i do thinkist!!!!

      Some friendly, some not!

      Delete
  5. It sounds like he's declaring war on speculation.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It should be characterized as pure speculation, myth, lies and bullshit. There isnt even enough evidence to support a theory, much less a true beliefe in a 10 foot tall ape-human living in my back yard. Even Meldrum's linked research paper referred to the friggin PGF film which has been questionable since before being captured.

    I mean seriously, even evolution has the weakest evidence, at least macro-evolution from one animal mutating into another separate species. Sure natural selection and micro-evolution are the norm and obvious, but mountain-dwelling humans have not developed any Bigfoot physical evolutions, and there is NO REAL EViDENCE Bigfoot even exists!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Only bullshit as usual is Timmy's trolling. To even suggest there's no evidence only proves a good deal about you, sure there may not be conclusive proof but there's a whole lotta evidence and indication.

      Those forest fellas are obviosuly intelligent and diligent and must be human of some kind, to conclude anything else means you're living in a bubble with your own rules disregarding what's realistically possible.

      Delete
    2. Show me the PROOF.....tick tock tick tock tick tock.

      Delete
    3. Those "forest fellas" are obviously supernatural and will never be captured. Oh, but they're there alright, they are definitely there.

      Delete
    4. To trolls they'll always be supernatural of course, to the rest of us they're just a race of giant primal people from a unique separate species.

      Delete
    5. To the rest of you a race of giant primal people in the forest....who dont actually exist! NO EVIDENCE! Put some real evidence in a link and show us the proof please....and that is not trolling.

      Im not a troll, I'm fascinated by Sasquatch-psychology much as I am fascinated by people in airports who have no connection to the military but see a soldier, run up to him and say "thanks for protecting my freedom", when they have absolutely no idea of what that soldiers function, nor grasp of the fact that freedom is gone and we are not protecting the US proper from anything.....simple, blind, brainwashed psychology, pure and simple.

      I bet you still think Ketchum will release a DNA study that will "prove" bigfoot too, right?

      Delete
    6. I think Timmy is a closest Bigfoot believer. Why else would you spend so much time at a Bigfoot blog?

      Delete
    7. 'Probably doesn't exist people' attack 'probably does exist people' to justify their position. And vice versa. It's a big problem on this forum. Argue the ideas/evidence not the people.

      "no real evidence" that depends how you define "real evidence". Obviously, some consider Aboriginal knowledge, tracks, PGF, witnesses,... as real evidence.

      Timmy your theory is that Bigfooters are brainwashed?

      Delete
    8. Timmy, the soldier comment was way off: people thank those who VOLUNTEER for doing just that, not for the specific role the military assigns them. And yes, they are protecting our freedom however indirectly it may be in some cases. And even if not at all, they ALL VOLUNTEERED with that intention.

      Delete
    9. Most are, yes. They have seen something they could not explain and they go for...tada, a ten foot primal ape man, of which there exists not a single, tangible piece of physical evidence, apart from hundreds of unverifiable photos and sttorys with strange twists (PGF, Freeman, Biscardi Hovey, etc). Now throw in the fringe "scientists" like Ketchum...also tied to multiple BF projects and researchers, many of which are known hoaxers. Now throw in the Smeja crap, Meldrums new DNA study followed by guess what...an attempt to sell his tracks and link to his research paper, which again references PGF, a highly questionable source. A gia-like self sustaining pool of myth, lies, bullshit, those who churn it and fan the flames (Ketchum) and those who are obvious hoaxters placed on a pedestal (moneymaker) and those who would sacrifice their own mother to protect their furry forest friends (this blog)

      Not a closet believer, I keep coming back because Bigfoot world is truly truly fascinating. Are all bigfoot followers also religious, believe in aliens, were molested? Im trying to piece this hairy giant together....

      Delete
    10. Anon at 543, if Canadian soldiers occupied your state by force and told you to submit to socialism and pot legalization or be dragged through the streets, humiliated and detained indefinitely with no trials, bombed your childrens friends or worse innocent relatives, would you be totally pissed? Pissed enough to do something about it?

      Now in that same scenario, pretend that Canada explained it all away because 20 american KKK members bombed a canadian city....and they said they had to "protect canadas freedom".

      If the military is fighting a war in california or texas they are protecting our freedom. If they volunteer to go into another country they are not protecting anything exept the interests of big business who holds the leash of govt and pentagon.

      But go thank them for VOLUNTEERiNG! The practice of welcome homes and handshakes started when people were DRAFTED and is perpetuated by the pentagon hype machine to bolster belief in the silent takeover of our freedoms by our own govt.


      By all means shake their hands though..

      Delete
    11. Its ok TIm, you will grow out of this phase. I'm guessing your 23-24, and itching to share with the world your recently obtained knowledge and profound insights(on a bigfoot blog, of all places) Rock on young bro!

      Delete
    12. Eat a dick Timmy. You're a typical slack-jawed indoctrinated idiot who's grasp on reality is on par with the dopeheaded hippies of the 60's. You've accomplished nothing in your pathetic life. That's obvious.

      Delete
    13. Yes ive accomplished nothing but time wasted serving as a mindless minion of the empty matrix that is the govt...but I went back home to the PacNW. And Im old, and wayyyy too educated, and I would love for their to be undisturbed aboriginal homo species in my beautiful forest...ive thrown a lot of pancakes out there, but seriously, some of you people are just , wow...I mean Ketchum? Patterson? Really? Smeja? Is this the best Bigfoot researchers can do?

      So where is the evidence? Biscardisfreezer? Ketchums Lab? Ericksons video? Bluff creek? Randals locker aka smejas boots? oh yeah ketchum has vids and pics too but just cant show them...come on people, I am not trolling, you people following this soap opera and still claiming anonymously and matter-of-factley to know their habits, birthing rituals, food sources, etc...yet Ive camped all over Bigfoot country and seen nothing.

      Delete
    14. My comment had nothing to do with Bigfoot. Just an observation on you that rings true.

      Delete
    15. boohoo, hit a nerve I guess? Trust me I wanted Ketchums story to be true. But i knew deep down it wasnt

      And indoctrinated hippie? LOL farthest things from either but definitely a realist. I base all beliefs on what is proven by evidence, military, bigfoot, taxes, whatever, thats anything but indoctrinated

      Delete
    16. Timmy you are a freakin moron. Your military theory basically suggests something similar to the fact that when the United States went and fought WWII across the Atlantic and the Pacific that they weren't protecting America's freedom? That soldiers, sailors, and airmen aren't protecting the freedom of the US abroad? Ha you really are stupid and apparently have no idea what really goes on in the military. Furthermore, you should be ashamed of yourself for using that as an example. I've got an idea, why don't you go to a VA hospital, military base, or anything place else has something to do with the military and plead the same case. You'd have no case. People would laugh at you just like I am laughing at you right now. The men and women that are volunteering for the military are PROTECTING freedom and will lay down their lives to do so. You, me, or a billion other people may not agree that the war we are fighting in afghanistan has anything to do with our freedom, but behind the scenes, in a way that you or I might not understand, it does. Not only that, the soldiers in afghanistan are protecting those people from terror. I'm sure if any other country had the balls to try and invade the US, the military that is here at home could more than aptly handle it, as could all of the men and women who exercise their right to bear arms. If you don't think this place is free you need to get out and see other parts of the world that have it way worse than us, as I have seen. If you are American, you should be ashamed. If you aren't, don't talk shit unless you have seen first hand that most of the rest of the world has it worse than we do here. And if you are in fact American and don't like what we've got goin on here-then get the hell out.

      Delete
    17. Timmy won't admit it but he is a closet bigfooter writing page up page down about this, to use his own phrasing, truly truly fascinating subject. That my friend makes you a bigfooter whether you like it or not, in fact I find often it's trolls like Timmy most fascinated about it so obviously it touches a nerve in him. He wants it to be true but can't quite grasp that it is, same old story of disbelief and so he feels a need to lash out at those one step ahead.

      Delete
    18. Like I said, Tommy's a slack-jawed dope headed indoctrinated moron. He continued to talk about Ketchums study even after i told him that my previous comment had nothing to do with Bigfoot. That shows you hes a hamster brained peon. He is a clueless clown who has watched Tranny porn on more than 1 occassion. His views are both pathetic and shameful, not worthy of the protection OTHERS die to provide him. I hope he dies in a fire.

      Delete
    19. Timmy, you unbelievable prick. It is because of the U.S soldier that you have the freedom to spew your rancid trollisms on this site, and to also speak freely in public. That goes double if you happen to be a Canadian, as the U.S. soldier has kept virtually the whole North American continent free. People like you make me physically ill. Okie said it quite well--if you don't like what our country is doing, LEAVE.

      Delete
    20. Timmy isn't going anywhere. His cowardice and hypocritical indoctrination has taught him to mock the United States while taking cover in the very freedom the U.S. provides. He's just another Obama freak.

      Delete
  7. I would think that a DNA sequence will be able to classify an un-known primate as hominid or ape or sloth or unicorn. If we have DNA from Neanderthal or other Homo species then DNA from Sasquatch will be enough to catagorize.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Precisely. DNA, you can't beat it.

      Delete
    2. But they wouldn't know that the DNA was Neanderthal DNA if they had not had a group of specimens, their bones, to compare to each other and identify as Neanderthal in the first place. You can't look at a random sequence and say, "there it is, Bigfoot DNA!" without a specimen to corroborate that this is where the sample came from. Think about it. John

      Delete
    3. Your point doesn't really hold water John, think it through. If the DNA shows something unique you can't currently compare (except to the other just as unique DNA samples) then you have a new species here. Simple as that.

      Delete
    4. @John You can if Bigfoot DNA happened to BE Neanderthal DNA or Homo-Erectus etc...

      Delete
    5. or if its 99%matching to homo sapiens.....no proof. bigfoot goes poof!

      Delete
  8. Not so many people rely on Native American accounts, that's why we see such stupid comments in here very often (including the comment of the poster).

    ReplyDelete
  9. So then, what happens when say, 2015 rolls around and there's still no proof that Bigfoot exists? Perhaps by then, numerous DNA studies will have been done and still nothing. What will happen then? Bigfoot has a shelf life and it's almost expired. Eww, what's that smell? Oh it's just Bigfoot, he when sour.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're not really expecting an answer are you?

      Delete
    2. Will the pancake video be re-released by then? That might buy us another 2 years.

      Delete
    3. Nope, we're all f*ck on 21/12/2012 so all this is academic.

      Drink, laugh have sex and enjoy it while you can.

      Delete
    4. Who says a deadline is 2015 or whatever, there's no deadline on a living species and this one we're chasing here is so closely related they won't let themselves get captured freely. This will be proven by happenstance only.

      Delete
  10. evolution is not real, jah created man, woman, child, universe, & everything else you can imagine! we would still be evolving if that theory were true. we adapt, but we do not evolve. there are several seperate beings, souls, spirits, organisms, etc. living on & inside this planet as well. there is life on other planets too! life exists in this dimension & other dimensions that we can &cant see. dont be fooled by what they feed you, SHEEP!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No,I'm a sheep focker.I put their hind legs in my boots so they can't runoff.

      Delete
  11. A Theory is just that, a theory, which we need in this field. Nobody should discount this man's theory because it doesn't match your own. Ask a hundred people their theory and you'll get a hundered diffrent theories and one may be proven to be correct.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Two good points DB. First, I agree with current level of evidence it is impossible to classify Sasquatch into any genus. Second, I agree it is possible that bipedalism evolved convergently from apes or even sloth (ie. the Gigantopithicus bigfoot theory).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is an amazing observation. Let me just throw this out there then. Do you think it's possible that Bigfoot is a descendant of Ghidorah?

      Delete
    2. Is Ghidorah related to Rodan or Godzilla?

      Delete
    3. Gigantopithicus was an ape and there is absolutely no reason to believe it was even bipedal. All we have of it are it's teeth which suggests it was a type of orangutan.

      Delete
    4. Ghidorah is from outer space 3:53, Rodan, Mothra and Godzilla team up against him to save their home planet, earth. So how could they be related? Duh.

      Delete
    5. ^^Sorry dude,it's been awhile since I've kept up with Godzilla and all his buds.But now I understand.Thanks for the explanation.

      Delete
  13. Damian has been in the woods once..And he had a first class sighting. This idiot should be ignored

    ReplyDelete
  14. without a body, bigfoot should not be categorized, it should not even be discussed, it simply does not exist

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^ Troll alert. The blog owner should do something about these trolls.

      Delete
    2. Im sorry. Do you have evidence? Please show me and I will happily accept that it exists. Thanks.

      Delete
    3. Why don't you happily accept that it doesn't exist and just go away troll?

      Delete
    4. Why should we even care if trolls believe it or not, and why does it matter to them anyway. If they don't believe it they can go away, yes.

      Delete
  15. I dont think a sloth could possibly be as smart as what the bigfoot are capible of according to people who have observed them. But who the hell really knows.

    ReplyDelete
  16. that bastards about to chew his face off. He got into the bath salts.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Definitely leaning toward a paranormal alien shapeshifting hollow earth BF now. Similar to whats at the Skinwalker Ranch in Utah.

    Hence, very difficult to see flesh in blood. Gotta go now, men in black suits at the back door.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Some do believe bigfoot is a skinwalker.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anything is possible although the probabilities diminish to the point of being meaningless. For intance I could suggest it evolved from a centipede that lost all of its legs except for 4 and became bipedal. Given a few billion years it could happen. But the chances of it happening are so small it is not worth talking about. So at least my stupid idea will make anyone else look like Einstien.

    ReplyDelete
  20. bigfoot is a feral human who refused society.Probably a group of many because bullys and war was to shallow for them. So they took to the woods and grew strong and big with there surroundings.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I remember when I was in like the 3rd or 4th grade a group of us boys was walking home from school speculating about what lies between girls legs. This is circa 1965. All kinds of theories were suggested. One kid went into great detail how the girls had little internal teeth to grasp men with. I think half of us really believed him.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I here ya first time i got drunk i thought my balls were going to explode. this is before i found out i had bladder.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bigfoot is NOT of this earth. The truth will come out soon.

    ReplyDelete
  24. even if hes not of this earth, it does not mean hes not flesh and blood. who the he hell knows we all might not from this earth.maybe its just habitable for us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, earth is habitable for us. Been here most of my life and so far so good.

      Delete
  25. Some believe they are demons from an entirely different dimension.

    Many possibilities w/ Quantum mechanics...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Their us from our future. Why the hell do you think they want nothing todo with man?

      Delete
    2. Gonna go back in time...

      Delete
  26. well i tell you what then i would vote for bigfoot to get that asshole obama out of office.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I believe that the Human race are the aliens. All other animals began here. We are the only ones to have 4000 genetic defects in our DNA. Apes don't even have that!

    ReplyDelete
  28. YOU FOLKS EVER HEARD OF BILDER BERG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I had the opportunity to do some catering at one of their events several years ago. Nice folks, not at all like what you've heard.

      Delete
  29. Without a body Bigfoot should not be categorized as even existing. Oh wait, its NOT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL. You trolls are so clueless.

      Delete
    2. So, you're saying you have the proof to prove OTHERWISE? Just shout the answer right out when you have it.......tick tock tick tock tick rock.

      Let me guess, this is the part where I wait.......indefinitely?

      Burden of Proof.

      Delete
    3. Lisa,

      How about a rebuttal then PROVE him wrong and more importantly show him you're not crazy. You do have the answer don't you? You're suggesting you do anyway......

      Delete
    4. Lisa,

      This is spectacular news. Please, let everyone in on it. Thanks.

      Delete
    5. Lisa please don't let us down.

      Delete
    6. Burden of proof. LOL Please, why it even matters to a troll is the real mystery.

      Delete
    7. Burden of proof, do you have it? Didnt think so. Please come back so i can smack you around like a little homo. You Bigfoot believers are the real trolls. Out there trolling the masses with t.v. shows, expeditions, souvenirs etc etc.

      I'm just glad I'm smarter than you.

      Delete
    8. Lisa,

      Where did you go? Hiding under a rock? You sounded so sure, why run like a dumb ass?

      Delete
  30. Sometimes I think the world has gone completely mad. And then I think, "Aw, who cares?" And then I think, "Hey, what's for supper?"

    ReplyDelete
  31. Wow! A lot of people sure sound like they are hoping Bigfoot is an alien. Maybe that is because they crave the obligatory body cavity PROBE.

    ReplyDelete
  32. shit man bigfoot has evolved thru illnesses that would kill humans. he and she is immune to our sickness. thats why they look a little deformed they dont need medicine.damn folks open your mind.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I wish Bigfoot would conquer the Earth and make people their pets, because I'd like to have one of those little beds with my name on it.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I think we are all including animals, aliens from the beginning source. sorry i forgot how cool insects are.we are who we are.

    ReplyDelete
  35. bigfoot is not a fucking alien you all wish you could be him. including me lmao.

    ReplyDelete
  36. vote for bigfoot or saquatch for the new world ORDER.

    ReplyDelete
  37. amen what a vote who says we cant this party started again.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story