Expedition Bigfoot Review


From Bigfoot Evidence and Squatchable comes an in depth review of Expedition Bigfoot episode 2. Check it out.

Comments

  1. The advanced algorithm used to determine where a squatch is expected to be sounds like a bunch of horseshit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just remember folks - it's all for the cameras. Ratings are the most important thing going on here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousTuesday, December 10, 2019 at 12:37:00 PM PST
      You know have a concerted and well resourced expedition on TV right now searching in a Bigfoot "hotspot".

      AnonymousTuesday, December 10, 2019 at 12:58:00 PM PST
      Well one of them is a world renown Primatologist so I think that fits the credentials you are always asking for. They say they are there for 3 weeks in a Bigfoot "hotspot" so that should give them plenty of time to gather evidence.

      AnonymousTuesday, December 10, 2019 at 1:50:00 PM PST
      Here's the team. You can judge for yourself:
      https://www.travelchannel.com/profiles/talent/expedition-bigfoot





      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!

      Delete
    2. Can they use an advanced algorithm to cure Iktomi of his mental health issues?

      Delete
    3. Only one of us has psychologists writing articles on their behaviour boyo!

      Delete
    4. What are you talking about Rum? It's obvious that sasquatches can make their hair clear at will and thereby cloak themselves, right? You said so yourself. Doesn't that prove that you are a nutter?

      Delete
    5. Many thanks Joetomi for re-emphasizing my point so succinctly. You have always asked for all of the above for a serious inquiry into the existence of Bigfoot and now you have it. A concerted and well resourced expedition in a Bigfoot hotspot and a world renown Primatologist on board. THIS is what you have always demanded for a serious inquiry. Now when it fails to produce proof (and it will fail) what will be your excuse for them not finding it? Of course you will come up with an excuse - you always do. I'll have to start calling you "moving the goalpost" Joetomi.

      Delete
    6. You bigged it up, hoping for week’s worth of celebrating but you only to end up with another primatologist in the club!

      Nobody’s expected proof from a TV programme pal. Not for three weeks (if I’m to believe what you claim) in the bush. That’s your world. That’s your straw man. Maybe you should go take a look over the snow thread again. Maybe it’ll jog your memory as to how difficult primates are to track in the wild.

      Delete
    7. Oh the snow thread where I completely destroyed your arguments? Well here it is again for all to see for themselves.

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2019/12/check-out-these-bigfoot-prints.html#comment-form

      Delete
    8. HAAA!!!

      And what might people read in that link that would convince them how much of a thorough job of destroying me you did?

      Was it the photographs of genuine Bigfoot trackways in snow from enthusiast sites you used to somehow prove Bigfoot trackways are fake? Was it finding out that the agility and intelligence of recognised primates is in fact not “superhuman” at all, but the basics of a primate’s main attributes that a teenager doing their first science report would be aware of had they actually spent ten mins looking into the subject? Was it finding out that primates are smarter, stronger, faster, have acute senses, and basically more knowledgeable in wilderness environments? Or was it finding out that for the majority of the time chimps are caught on trail cameras in the wild, that they in fact have the confidence to not care rather than actually get caught out every time? Or could it in fact be the part where you had to be explained to that feet are attached to bodies, and therefore are body parts that have been documented for the past 80 years?

      Which one of these high points do you think sealed the sheer destroying of my credibility? Don’t worry... you could simply resort to your favourite and most current psychological safe space of making up comments from me where I have allegedly endorsed cloaking. That’s helped you a lot lately... it seems.

      Delete
    9. See, yet more BS excuses from Iktomi.

      Delete
    10. Take some responsibility for your stupidity, old boy.

      Delete
    11. I'm more than happy to let others read the comments and judge for themselves. You simply asked for examples where terrain wasn't a factor and I provided it. Didn't matter if it came from an enthusiast site or not. Well you got me - chimpanzees are smarter, stronger, faster, have acute senses, and basically more knowledgeable in wilderness environments....that's why we can never find them and they remain unclassified and unknown to this very day. I'm sure the cloaking helps those chimps. Feet are attached to bodies therefore all Bigfoot tracks are real. Brilliant! Why didn't I think of that?

      So you don't endorse cloaking? I could have sworn it was "lktomi" who made that statement. So you now do NOT think Bigfoot is in any way paranormal? Maybe there's a little hope for you after all.

      Delete
    12. Nope! I asked for reasons as to why, as you alleged, people do not follow tracks in flat showy terrain, because as you alleged... they don’t want to. And to argue that these tracks don’t lead to impossible terrain, you provided a mere photograph of a couple of tracks in snow. No context, and not one reason as to why anyone hasn’t followed the tracks. You couldn’t even put a decent case across if the tracks were faked. So... not only could you not substantiate your original argument, but you could have even been using genuine tracks for all you know. This is the extent of your little world where you’re “getting even” online. It’s pretty pathetic. chimpanzees are smarter, stronger, faster, have acute senses, and basically more knowledgeable in wilderness environments... but aren’t more human I’m appearance and are not clearly closer to us than any other primate known to man. I’m short, in their agility we are able to look at what we could achieve as “cavemen” in our evolutionary tree. And considering that these hominin have been at the root of indigenous peoples’ culture for thousands of years, there is three databases of modern reports, footage, and 80 years of track casts... they’ve been found alright. And the DNA is human, just to remind you for the 100th time of you needing to ignore it. And yes, why didn’t you think that feet were attached to bodies when demanding that a particular body part be documented scientifically? Morphology, forensic detail. Average height & weight ratios... Sums it up really, doesn’t it? I’m exchanging with an idiot who is on record lauding pareidolia.

      AnonymousWednesday, December 11, 2019 at 2:45:00 PM PST
      Again not me and are you saying the laurels picture isn't a sasquatch, mouth open and closed I might add. Don't preach and then throw away great evidence. There are very few good clear sasquatch photos and laurels is one of them, also see his black nosed bigfoot and a picture he took of a face in his own backyard. Come on, what the hell is it?

      AnonymousWednesday, December 11, 2019 at 2:52:00 PM PST
      Sasquatch, that's what it is. You know as much as it might p**s you off there are actually very few clear photos of sasquatch. Now I've pointed out some real gems, actual sasquatch. Even DS has produced actual Sasquatch. I know some of the researchers seem crazy but they're actually running around the woods photographing giant monsters. That's what's crazy.
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2019/12/bigfoot-turns-dream-home-into-nightmare.html?m=1

      Delete
    13. Well, I can confidently say that any newbie who wanders in here is almost immediately convinced that bigfoot is BS based upon iktomi’s clownish antics and idiotic arguments. I can only assume that he is a bigfoot denialist himself and he is trying to drive curious people away from the subject. He’s succeeding spectacularly in his efforts!

      Delete
    14. D’you know why people need to sockpuppet PS? Because they need to. They have no confidence in their arguments, and need to portray approval and support from others.

      Where’s your argument? You have confidence in them, right?

      Delete
    15. You know he’s right. If someone set out to create the perfect parody of a dumb, obsessed footer, he couldn’t do much better than Iktomi. I say good show to Iktomi! Although it is still puzzling as to how anyone could have so much free time and that he’d use it to act like a f*cktard?

      Delete
    16. Eh come on now PS! Surely you haven’t run out of those all-so-logical arguments against the existence of Bigfoot, that you are now resorted to mere insults?

      I believe you’ve still got some comments to respond to. Don’t make it so obvious that the penny has dropped with regards to your psychological safe space. Whipped out from under you like a haemorrhoid pillow.

      Delete
    17. Insults? He said, “Good show to Iktomi!” That came across to me as more of a compliment.

      Delete
    18. Come on now Rum... chop, chop. Let’s get back to looking at bones that should be EASY to differentiate, right?

      Delete
    19. He did refer to you as a “f*cktard” but he qualified it by emphasizing that acting like a “f*cktard” was all part of your spot-on parody of a deranged, ignorant bigfoot believer (and I agree that you’ve done a bang up job of that), so the “f*cktard” part was actually included in the compliment.

      Delete
    20. Grow a pair or I’m going to just assume in your change of tone that you realise well that your safe space argument is pretty much done.

      : )

      Delete
    21. No worries bud, I’ll let you carry on with your efforts to kill all belief in bigfoot. But you should keep in mind that bigfoot belief is now close to death and your mission has essentially been accomplished. You might want to shift your efforts to other fringe topics like ancient aliens or ghost hunting. Just a thought.

      Delete
    22. Ok, allow me to elaborate for your imaginary audience on a point that you know doubt are well aware of, since you haven’t the ***** to take it like a man.

      How can YOU expect Bigfoot bones to be found by others, when like every other average person on the planet, YOU can’t tell the difference between a human bone and a bear bone?

      Delete
    23. Hey, I’d love to help you out, but I have no idea what you’re on about or what your latest idiotic argument centers around. However, I fully endorse what you’ve achieved here! Kudos to you Iktomi for becoming one of the leading bigfoot debunkers! Keep up the great work, you have a friend in me!

      Delete
    24. Listen... it could be worse, eh? You could have just lost ten years’ of assertions on an experiment that made you look every bit as stupid as you would wish of the people you harass on the internet daily.

      Oh wait...

      Laters chump!

      : p

      Delete
    25. You have been talking to someone else Joetomi (who obviously thinks you nuts like me. But in your delusional world we are all the same person. Unfortunately I have no idea who wrote those quotes you reference as I'm no believer in Sasquatch but blame me if it makes you feel better. Unlike you I can't monitor this posts 24/7 but I'm doing my best. Now I answered your "human or bear" inquiry and we have now established you have proven Bigfoot exists (in your mind) so you can return the favor by answering my inquiry: You now do NOT think Bigfoot is in any way paranormal? A hundred percent flesh and blood creature?

      Come on - throw me a bone here. Ha ha ha

      Delete
    26. Here’s the deal dumbo. Since “Bigfoot” look like an archaic human, have even been shown to have a form of language in audio recordings (language of course being a form of culture)... then the likelihood of them burying their dead like we know even the most primitive hominids did, is the most plausible theory. We can safely theorise with this since their existence is no longer in doubt since the physical evidence is so solid. This means that you wouldn’t come across bones anyway since maintaining their dead could be sacred to them at a very primitive level.

      But for the first time you are correct. Even if the average hunter came across a bone, how would they know it’s from an archaic human if the average person does not know the difference. This being proven by the very quick experiment slapped on your dumb a*s.

      Now carry on sockpuppeting... since you’ve literally not had a break from this place for the last 72 hours and I know from the avatar you were once stupid enough to use, their is a high probability you’re in the ball park of around 60... a drunk... and since we have psychologists writing about your behaviour you are likely highly isolated with your only outlet for interaction being to draw people into negativity on the internet so you can have some sense of control over your negative emotions. Even though you believe in far crazier beliefs than those you harass without a shred of scientific verification.

      Now F off.

      Delete
    27. This may come as a revelation to you but words like "plausible", "theorize", "likelihood" "high probability" do not establish facts. You love to throw around words such as these however it gets you no closer to having actual proof.

      "We can safely theorise with this since their existence is no longer in doubt since the physical evidence is so solid."

      Really? So you have a Bigfoot body or some part of?

      My ONLY belief concerning Bigfoot is that it does not exist. I have never commented here stating otherwise and always under anonymous. Now you continue to evade my question: You now do NOT think Bigfoot is in any way paranormal? A hundred percent flesh and blood creature?

      Careful how you answer.

      Delete
    28. Just to let you know (cringe), but a scientific theory can be based on an already given scientific fact. For example, Darwin didn’t come up with the idea of evolution himself, and by the time he came up with the THEORY of natural selection it was considered that which was based on an already scientifically accepted fact.

      So... when you are referring to scientifically solid data such as 80 years of trackways and footprint casts consistent with accepted homo erectus trackways, we can assume that “Bigfoot” would be as intelligent and as successful as THE most successful (as for time it existed) hominin to have ever lived in this planet; homo erectus. There is no reason to doubt the existence of “Bigfoot” since you doubt its physical sign would be to doubt the physical sign homo erectus left behind in its tracks.

      Delete
  3. Nothing to see here. Move along.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay, now all they have to do is move in for 3 or more years and they might just get some real evidence. These things are not dumb, they aren’t gonna jump out and do walk byes after 3 weeks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They've got an advanced algorithm that will tell them where bigfoots will be.

      Joe

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story