Historical Reports Of Bigfoot Creatures


From the Bigfoot Case Files youtube channel comes a selection of stories of wild men and bigfoot type creatures from throughout history.

Comments

  1. The thing about these old stories is there's nothing at all to verify them except in some cases a newspaper article. Back in the day it was a common practice to make up sensational stories to sell papers. Often a story about such creatures would pop up only to have absolutely no follow-up. These stories offer little of value in proving the case for Bigfoot's existence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course, such articles aren’t proof. Yeah, some papers made stuff up... but what are the chances of ALL these newspaper reports being bunk, when there’s such a consistent stream of evidence spanning different cultures over hundreds of years? While offer no value as proof... It would be illogical to claim these articles have no value at all, given the hundreds of years of anthropological data preceding such articles, and the physical evidence, footage & audio since. In fact, if these reports in articles didn’t exist, people would point to a hole in the timeline.

      Delete
    2. *while THEY offer no value as proof

      Delete
    3. Flat 23, Mclay Court, St Fagans Road, CF5 3BP

      Delete
    4. A mountain of crap is still a mountain of crap no matter how much crap your ass spews out. It does prove that humans can produce huge amounts of crap. But you continue to demonstrate that phenomenon every day of your life!

      Ha ha ha ha!

      Delete
    5. Yet for so much alleged “crap”, you can’t do anything to prove that’s what it is. Not that the biggest Bigfoot fan boy in history is expected to debunk his biggest interest.

      Tell everyone who your latest Bigfoot crush is, Stuey. I bet your imaginary world audience can’t wait to read all about it.

      Delete
    6. I can't vouch for a world audience but there is at least one here who enjoys reading Stuey's posts. Of course I will just be accused of being a sockpuppet because as everyone knows EVERY post critical of Bigfoot HAS to be Stuey. Right lktomi?

      Delete
    7. I’ll go even further and accuse you of having your hand down your pants waiting to get off on the obvious being pointed out... sicko.

      Delete
    8. Flat 23, Mclay Court, St Fagans Road, CF5 3BP

      Delete
    9. From observation I would have to say Stuey's biggest interest here is making you look foolish (which he's quite successful at - not that it's that hard). He's probably just amused at how gullible you believers are as I am.

      Delete
    10. Stuey... You’ve only ever made the last speed-eating champ look foolish. If you wanna convince someone that you truly believe like-minded people are gullible, get better arguments. You don’t, purely because you’re too busy being a fan boy about a subject you couldn’t be without for even half a day.

      Do another crush list... go on. You’re dying to.

      Delete
    11. You’re right 12:05, although the entertainment value has become so much reduced lately that I rarely bother to comment here anymore.

      But it’s certainly amusing to watch the moron continue to think everyone is me. It seems that he’s so completely beat down from all of the previous thrashings that I’ve administered that he sees me everywhere and can’t get me out of his mind.

      Even when I’m not here, I continue to dominate every aspect of his life!

      Ha ha ha ha!

      Delete
    12. (Cringe)

      Stuey... These “thrashings” are more elusive than the Big Guy. I would ask you to post a link to at least one example, but it’s not what’s important to you... What’s clearly important to you is having someone respond so you can get off.

      Can I just remind you of the main reason you couldn’t apply a week’s worth of attention span to your own crypto blog? That’s right... you couldn’t leave me and the other posters here alone for a week. We all know you project, Stuey, but it gets to the point that you show your scars almost like a cry for help.

      And like a predicted a couple of days ago... your trolling would step up as soon as you sobered up and needed to take control of your guilt for another pedo comment. You really are the most predictable sack of t*rd around, aren’t you? Ha ha!!

      Delete
    13. This place has become pretty sad. I use to come here regularly but like you have reduced it down to about once or twice a week. Not much traffic anymore and I have to think that most of the believers who came here realized they were beating a dead horse so to speak. Unless something earthshaking appears on the horizon belief in Bigfoot will die a slow death...oh wait...Sykes is coming! LOL!!!

      Delete
    14. Pedo Stu... Now at this point I know you want me to reel off all the vile things you’ve published to drive people away, to get off on it... But I’ll leave you with this. Bigfoot sightings nationwide have increased 248 percent since the 2011, due to belief in the subject becoming less taboo, and people having the confidence & platforms to do so without ridicule. The physical evidence for Bigfoot is now peer reviewed and amateur researchers continue to gather more examples of such that would be good enough for any other biological research topic. The DNA comes back Human... And Sykes came, found credence in a whole community in Eastern Europe describing a yeti, and even theorised as to sub-species of Homo sapiens Leaving Africa 100,000 years ago.

      I’ve read you ask the admins here for this blog to be shut down... at the end of the day, that wouldn’t be the case if you weren’t emotionally scarred about being banned (at one point weekly), and flunking at your own blog.

      ; )

      Delete
    15. ^ complete rubbish and made up facts. Enough said.

      Delete
    16. And who would believe you?

      Here you’re claiming to not be Stuey whilst reeling off your favourite evidence;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2019/05/how-to-walk-like-bigfoot.html?m=0

      And then above you’re still claiming to not be Stuey but declaring you enjoy Stuey’s posts due to him allegedly making “believers look gullible”.

      You’re not consistent enough in your sockpuppeting to be remotely convincing. But I don’t think it matters anymore, since you likely believe even the most obvious sockpuppeting is aggravating people. Which is alarming context for how desperate you are to try and aggravate to take control over your own crap emotions.

      Delete
    17. Consistent in sock puppeting? Do you even know what sock puppeting is? You moron, the whole idea is to create inconsistent styles to try to make people think it’s two different people!

      No wonder your attempts at sock puppeting are so awful and transparent!

      Ha ha ha!

      Delete
    18. When your trying to sockpuppet... try and eat least stay in character. Pretending to be someone cheering on Stuey for calling out people as “gullible” and then reeling of evidence you believe in isn’t going to convince even the dullest folk you’re two different people. You’d think you’d have cracked it, having done it for YEARS.

      Ho ha hee ho ha!

      Delete
  2. You almost have it Iktomi. The "wild man of the woods" is pretty close to the truth except of course he's no man.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Think Woodwose and your halfway to the truth. Also forget all Nephillium nonsense, the creature we're discussing is infinitely smaller than "The Mighty men of Reknown".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?